1 Introduction

Ganoderma lucidum (Leyss. ex Fr.) Karst (“Lingzhi” in Chinese, “Youngzhi” in Korean, and “Reishi” in Japanese), a fungus belonging to the family of Polyporaceae, is a valuable traditional Chinese medicinal mushroom with a history of use spanning 2000 years. All its parts, including fruiting bodies, mycelia, and spores, can be used for medicinal purposes, and have been involved in the clinical prevention and treatment of a wide range of diseases (Shiao, 2003), such as tumors (Tang and Zhong, 2004; Thyagarajan et al., 2010), insomnia, hepatitis (Paterson, 2006), cardiovascular diseases, hypertension (Fang et al., 2002; Liu and Zhang, 2005), hyperglycaemia, diabetes, inflammation, immune diseases, and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (Min et al., 1998; Wasser, 2010). The pharmaceutically active compounds of G. lucidum include polysaccharides, triterpenoids, lactones, nucleotides, steroids, alkaloids, peptides, and fatty acids, among which the polysaccharides and triterpenoids are the major sources of biological activity and are responsible for some of these medicinal properties (Qiao et al., 2007; Keypour et al., 2010).

Traditionally, G. lucidum is cultivated in the field, which takes a long time and cannot guarantee standardized products and high yield (Fang and Zhong, 2002b). Bioactivity is much higher in mycelia than in fruiting bodies and spores. Therefore, submerged fermentation has been a promising method for efficient and large-scale production of mycelia biomass and bioactive metabolites with a shortened time of incubation and reduced risk of contamination (Kim et al., 2004; Lin and Yang, 2006). Bioactive metabolites are influenced by different culture conditions (Xu et al., 2010) and the aim of condition optimization is to accelerate mycelia growth and enhance productions of triterpenoids and polysaccharides (Wagner et al., 2003; Tang et al., 2009; Zhang and Zhong, 2010). Most research to date has focused on increasing mycelia yield and the production of polysaccharides (Wagner et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2006; Liu and Zhong, 2011). The production of triterpenoids by fermentation using wort as a cheap carbon source instead of glucose has not been optimized, even though triterpenoids are the most important contributor to the bioactivity and quality of G. lucidum (Tang et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2012).

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been widely used for isolation and purification of triterpenoids from crude extracts of G. lucidum (Tang et al., 2006; Keypour et al., 2010), while LC-mass spectrometry is the most efficient method for characterizing triterpenoid compounds (Yang et al., 2007; Ding et al., 2010; Guo et al., 2013). Ganoderic acids are the main constituents of triterpenoids and to date, more than 200 ganoderic acid derivatives and other triterpenic acids have been identified from the fruiting bodies, spores, and mycelia (Ma et al., 2014); the structural identification of ganoderic acid derivatives is needed for research into their pharmacological effects.

In this study, the nutritional requirements and culture conditions for submerged fermentation of G. lucidum were optimized for mycelia yield and production of intracellular triterpenoids using response surface methodology. The major compounds of triterpenoids were then characterized by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization multi-stage tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MSn).

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Microorganism and culture conditions

In a preliminary experiment, we screened G. lucidum for the production of mycelia biomass and bioactive metabolites.

G. lucidum was grown in a 250-ml flask containing 100 ml seed culture medium at 28 °C for 8 d with shaking at 180 r/min, and was then inoculated at 10% (v/v) into the fermentation culture at 28 °C for 7 d with shaking at 180 r/min. The seed culture medium contained (g/L): potato extract 10, glucose 20, peptone 18, KH2PO4 3, MgSO4 1.5, and vitamin B1 (VB1) 0.05, pH 5.5. The fermentation culture contained (g/L): glucose 20, peptone 18, KH2PO4 3, MgSO4 1.5, and VB1 0.05, pH 5.5.

2.2 Preparation of the wort

The wort was made from barley using the European Brewery Convention (EBC) official analysis method (Munck et al., 1989).

2.3 Determination of mycelia biomass and intracellular triterpenoids (ITs)

To determine mycelia biomass, mycelia were collected by centrifuging G. lucidum at 3000 r/min for 30 min, washing three times in distilled water, and drying at 60 °C to a constant weight.

For the determination of ITs, mycelia were collected as above, mixed with 50× (1 g/50 ml) of 95% ethanol and kept overnight, and then extracted twice by 400 W ultrasound at 75 °C for 1 h. The supernatant was merged and measured (Fang and Zhong, 2002b; Tang and Zhong, 2002; Xiao et al., 2006): 0.1 ml of the sample diluent was heated in a test tube to dry solvent at 60 °C and then 0.2 ml 0.05 g/ml of vanillin-glacial acetic acid solution and 0.5 ml of perchloric acid were added and kept at 60 °C for 20 min; finally, 5 ml of glacial acetic acid was added after cooling for 15 min. The IT content was measured under 550 nm and IT production was expressed as follows: IT production (mg/100 ml)=IT content (mg/g)×mycelia biomass (g/100 ml).

2.4 Sample preparation of ganoderic acids

The dried mycelia were pulverized, extracted three times with 40× (1 g/40 ml) of CHCl3 in an ultrasonic water bath for 20 min (Zhang et al., 2006; Keypour et al., 2010), filtered, evaporated, and concentrated to about 1/5 of its original volume at 50 °C. The concentrated solution was then extracted with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, which was then acidified to pH 3–4 with 6 mol/L HCl at 0 °C. Finally, the insoluble precipitate obtained was dissolved in methanol and filtrated through a 0.45-µm membrane filter unit prior to HPLC analysis (Guo et al., 2012).

2.5 HPLC instrumentation and chromatographic conditions

HPLC analysis was performed on an Agilent series 1100 HPLC instrument (Agilent, Waldbroon, Germany) equipped with diode array detector (DAD) and an autosampler. The sample was separated on a ZORBAX SB-C18 column (5 µm, 4.6 mm×250 mm; Agilent). The mobile phase consisted of methanol (A), 2% (0.2 g/ml) aqueous acetic acid (B), and acetonitrile (C). The column was eluted by a linear gradient which consisted of 30% A and 10%–30% C in 0–15 min, 30%–37% A and 30%–35% C in 15–30 min, 37%–38% A and 35%–39% C in 30–60 min, 38%–50% A and 39%–45% C in 60–80 min, and 50% A and 45%–50% C in 80–100 min. The flow rate was 0.2 ml/min at a column temperature of 35 °C. The DAD was set up at 254 nm and 3D-plots were recorded between 200 and 400 nm.

2.6 LC-MS chromatographic conditions

The mass spectra were acquired using the LCD Deca xp max with an ESI source (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA, USA), and were connected to the Agilent 1200 HPLC. The LC effluent was introduced into the ESI source at a post-column splitting ratio of 2:1. Ultrahigh-purity helium was used as the collision gas; high-purity nitrogen was used as the sheath and auxiliary gas. The ESI-MS spectra were acquired in the negative ion mode and the optimized parameters were as follows: ion spray voltage, 3 kV; sheath gas, 40 arbitrary units; auxiliary gas, 5 units; capillary temperature, 320 °C; capillary voltage, −4 V; tube lens offset voltage, −60 V. For full scan MS analysis, the spectra were recorded in the range of m/z 125–1500. The collision energy was adjusted to 40% in LC-MS analysis.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Optimization of submerged fermentation conditions

3.1.1 Effects of the carbon source and its concentration

Carbohydrates are the major nutrient for the growth and development of G. lucidum. Different carbon sources can have different effects on the catabolism of the cellular secondary metabolism. To select a suitable carbon source for mycelia growth and IT production, five different carbon sources (glucose, C1; corn powder extract, C2; wort, C3; sucrose, C4; and soluble starch, C5) were added into the basal submerged culture individually at a level of 2% (w/w). Mycelia biomass and IT production were used as screening indicators.

As shown in Fig. 1a, maximum mycelia biomass was obtained in glucose with a value of 1.38 g/100 ml and maximum IT production was in wort with a value of 49.62 mg/100 ml, while the mycelia biomass was 1.21 g/100 ml.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of initial carbon source (a) and the concentration of the suitable carbon source (b) on mycelia growth and intracellular triterpenoid (IT) production in shake flask culture of G. lucidum

C1: glucose; C2: corn powder extract; C3: wort; C4: sucrose; C5: soluble starch. The results were expressed as the average of triple determination with ±standard deviation (SD)

As the main raw material for brewing beer, dry barely has the following average chemical composition: total carbohydrate (70%–85%), protein (10.5%–11.5%), inorganic material (2%–4%), fat (1.5%–2.0%), and other substances (1.0%–2.0%). The carbohydrate contains starch (50%–63%), sugar (1.8%–2.0%), cellulose (5%–6%), and hemicellulose (β-glucan 80%–90%, pentosan 10%–20%). After saccharification treatment, about 75%–80% of the grist weight was converted into soluble products. Much more sugar (maltose, dextrins, glucose, etc.), soluble nitrogen, amino nitrogen, gums, and inorganic substances could be obtained, indicating that wort is more than a simple carbon source. As wort is low-cost, abundantly available, and conducive to the cultivation of microorganisms and industrial production, it is suitable for further study regarding mycelia growth and IT production. This is the first time that wort has been used as the sole carbon source for the growth of G. lucidum to increase IT production.

To find the most suitable concentration of wort for mycelia biomass and IT production, five different concentrations (1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5% (i.e. 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, and 0.05 g/ml)) were separately added into the culture. From Fig. 1b, it can be seen that mycelia biomass and IT production increased with increasing concentration and reached maximum of 1.45 g/100 ml and 61.52 mg/100 ml, respectively, when wort concentration was 4%. Mycelia biomass and IT production decreased to 1.38 g/100 ml and 55.80 mg/100 ml when the concentration was 5%, which would cause higher osmotic pressure. It was clear that 4% of wort was the optimum concentration.

3.1.2 Effects of nitrogen source and its concentration

Compared with inorganic nitrogen sources, organic nitrogen is more favorable for mycelia growth and the production of bioactive substances (Xiao et al., 2006). In this study, five different organic nitrogen sources including soybean meal (N1), bran (N2), peptone (N3), beef extract (N4), and yeast extract (N5) were added into the basal culture at a concentration of 1.8% (18 g/L). As shown in Fig. 2a, the maximum mycelia dry weight was 1.71 g/100 ml in soybean meal, while maximum IT production was 60.34 mg/100 ml in yeast extract. Taking both biomass yield and IT production into consideration, yeast extract was chosen for fermentation of G. lucidum. In addition, mycelia biomass and IT production under 1.8% yeast extract were higher than those in previous reports (Fang and Zhong, 2002b; Xiao et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2012), mainly because of the large amounts of nitrogenous substances and other nutrients contained in yeast extract. To determine the most suitable concentration of yeast extract, five different levels (0.8%, 1.3%, 1.8%, 2.3%, and 2.8% (i.e. 8, 13, 18, 23, and 28 g/L)) were tested, as shown in Fig. 2b. IT production was maximal at 1.8%, and biomass at 1.41 g/100 ml was maximal at 2.3%. IT production at 2.3% was 55.70 mg/100 ml, a 7.7% decrease on production at 1.8%. The results indicated that an excessive initial concentration was unfavourable to mycelia growth and IT biosynthesis because of the higher osmotic pressure caused by the higher nitrogen concentration (Mao et al., 2005). The yeast extract at 1.8% was chosen for the following research.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of initial nitrogen source (a) and the concentration of the suitable nitrogen source (b) on mycelia growth and intracellular triterpenoid (IT) production in shake flask culture of G. lucidum

N1: soybean meal; N2: bran; N3: peptone; N4: beef extract; N5: yeast extract. The results were expressed as the average of triple determination with ±standard deviation (SD)

3.1.3 Effect of the initial pH

It was reported that G. lucidum prefers to grow in acidic conditions (Fang and Zhong, 2002a; Kim et al., 2006): the pH of the fermentation culture could affect fungal cell membrane function, cell morphology, and the availability of various nutrients. To determine the optimal pH, G. lucidum was cultivated in basal culture at pH ranging from 3.5 to 7.5 (Fig. 3). The results showed that mycelia biomass and IT production reached a maximum at pH 5.5, and declined rapidly outside the pH range of 4.5–6.5. Our results were consistent with submerged fermentation of G. lucidum in an acidic pH environment (Fang and Zhong, 2002a).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of initial pH on mycelia growth and intracellular triterpenoid (IT) production in shake flask culture of G. lucidum

The results were expressed as the average of triple determination with ±standard deviation (SD)

3.1.4 Response surface methodology (RSM) design and statistical analysis

RSM is an efficient statistical technique for optimization of multiple variables. A central composite design (CCD) was used for optimization of mycelia biomass and IT production by wort (A), yeast extract (B), and initial pH (C). The lowest and the highest levels of variables were: 3.5% and 4.5% of wort, 1.5% and 2.3% of yeast extract, pH at 5 and 6, respectively. The CCD and the corresponding experimental results were shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Central composite design matrix and the responses of mycelia biomass and IT production

Regression analysis was performed to fit the response function (R1, R2) for mycelia biomass. The F-test with a very low probability value (P<0.01) indicated that the total model was statistically highly significant, while the lack of fit (0.076) was not significant. The pH had a positive linear effect on the response R1 (P<0.05), while wort and yeast extract had no significant effect (P>0.05). For IT production, the value of “Prob>F” (<0.001) showed that the model was highly significant, while the lack of fit (0.0619) was not significant. All three variables had significantly positive linear effects on the response R2 (P<0.01). The polynomial models for mycelia biomass yield (Y1) and IT production (Y2) were regressed by mainly considering the significant terms and were expressed by Eqs. (1) and (2):

$$\matrix{{{Y_1} = 1.85 - 0.011A + 0.0093B - 0.017C + 0.012AB - } \hfill \cr {\quad 0.041AC + 0.017BC - 0.059{A^2} - 0.045{B^2} - 0.067{C^2},} \hfill \cr }$$
(1)
$$\matrix{{{Y_2} = 92.46 + 3.5A + 5.92B - 3.96C + 1.64AB + 0.2AC - } \hfill \cr {\quad 1.49BC - 4.69{A^2} - 8.67{B^2} - 8.79{C^2}.} \hfill \cr }$$
(2)

The effect on mycelia biomass and IT production of the interaction between any two variables while one variable was kept constant at its middle value was also analyzed. The contour and surface plots of the combined effect of wort and yeast extract on mycelia biomass showed that there was no significant interaction between the set of variables (P>0.05) (Fig. 4). The biomass yield was significantly increased at increasing levels of wort and yeast extract, but decreased when the variables’ concentrations were excessive. Similarly, there was no significant interaction between yeast extract and pH (P>0.05), while the interaction between wort and pH was just the opposite and significant (P=0.0419). As shown in Fig. 4, IT production increased with increasing levels of wort and yeast extract, and dropped at excessive concentrations of variables. There was no significant interaction effect between wort and yeast extract on IT production (P>0.05), as well as the interaction effects between any other two of three variables (P>0.05). The model predicted that maximum mycelia biomass and IT production of 1.85 g/100 ml and 94.55 mg/100 ml, respectively, would appear at wort 4.10%, yeast extract 1.89%, and pH 5.40.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Contour (a, b) and surface (c, d) plots of the combined effects of wort and yeast extract on the mycelia biomass (a, c) and IT production (b, d) (hold values: pH 5.5)

Verification of the predicted optimum model and the existence of an optimum point for mycelia biomass and IT production was performed. The results of the triplicate experiments showed that the biomass and IT production could reach 1.87 g/100 ml and 93.21 mg/100 ml, respectively, which were in agreement with the predicted values, suggesting the model was valid for mycelia biomass and IT production.

3.2 Identification of major compounds of triterpenoids by HPLC-MS analysis

G. lucidum was cultured using the optimal culture established above, and the triterpenoids were extracted for HPLC-MS analysis at negative mode which gave [M-H] and [2M-H] ions. The dominant fragmentation pathways of the triterpenoids are losses of H2O and CO2, as well as fragment ions of a, b, c and d resulting from the cleavages of C-ring and D-ring as shown in Fig. 5 (Yang et al., 2007). Molecular weight, HPLC retention time (tR), and mass spectra were referred to literature data and an MS library. We tentatively identified and deduced the possible structure of 10 main constituents (Fig. 6 and Table 2) (Guo et al., 2012), most of them being ganoderic and lucidenic acids.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Characteristic fragmentation of ganoderic acids

Fig. 6
figure 6

Chemical structures of the triterpenoids identified from G. lucidum

Table 2 Identification of possible ganoderic acids from G. lucidum by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS n at 252 nm

3.2.1 Identification of ganoderic acids of C30

HPLC-ESI-MS spectra of Compound 1 showed [M-H] ion at m/z 515 (tR=33.90 min; Fig. 7); it produced a prominent ion at m/z 497.23 by losing a molecule of H2O (∆m=18), and at m/z 479.34, 453.34, 435.39 by further losing H2O and CO2 (∆m=44). m/z 435.39 underwent successive loss of CH3 (∆m=15) to generate an ion at m/z 405.45 and some minor signals at m/z 301.27 (b), 300.3 (b−1), 299.32 (b−2), and 285.36 (b−16); these ions were identified as the major fragments of ganoderic acid A. Similarly, Compound 8 was tentatively characterized as ganoderic acid F.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Fragmentation ions of MS 2 spectra for Compound 1

[M-H-H2O] ion (m/z 497.23), [M-H-H2O−H2O] ion (m/z 479.34), [M-H-H2O−CO2] ion (m/z 453.34), [M-H−2H2O−CO2]−ion (m/z 435.39), b (m/z 301.27), b−1 (m/z 300.3), b−2 (m/z 299.32), b−16 (m/z 285.36)

The [M-H] ion of Compound 2 was at m/z 499 (tR=33.98 min); the base peaks in its MS spectrum were ions (m/z 437.39), which appeared to be a dehydroxylated derivative of ganoderic acid C2. The characteristic fragment ions at m/z 287.70 and 285.12 were presumed to be b+2 and b, respectively, which indicated that D-ring was its major fragmentation pathway. Thus, Compound 2 was identified as probably ganolucidic acid A with a molecular structure of C30H44O6.

The [M-H] ion of Compound 3 was at m/z 513 (tR=34.69 min). It gave [M-H-H2O] ion (m/z 495.23), which suggested that this character could be applied to all other ganoderenic acids, [M-H-H2O−CH3] ion (m/z 480.86), and [M-H-H2O−CO2] ion (m/z 451.37). On account of the different side chains on C-17, it possessed characteristic ions at m/z 329.17 (e−2H) and m/z 287.62 (b−H−CH3). Compound 3 was identified as probably ganoderenic acid B (Yang et al., 2007).

The peak at 40.60 min (Compound 4) showed the characteristics of [M-H] ion (m/z 527.00) and [M−2H−H2O] ion (m/z 507.50, 506.80), which indicated that one carbonyl was hydrogenized. The ion m/z 507.50, 506.80 continuously eliminated CH2 (∆m=14), CH3 (∆m=15), and CO2 to become m/z 480.74, 478.22, and 465.20, and Compound 4 was temporarily identified as elfvingic acid A with a molecular structure of C30H40O8.

3.2.2 Identification of ganoderic acids of C27

Lucidenic acid is a type of compound which has a skeleton of lanostane containing 27 carbon atoms and is different from ganoderic acid in its side chain. Compound 5 (tR=45.31 min) gave the [M-H] ion at m/z 459.00 and it produced the prominent ions of m/z 440.95, 422.86, and 415.04 by consecutively losing H2O and CO2. Its MS2 spectra gave a list of ions at m/z 301.17 (b), 300.23 (b−1), 287.13 (b−CH2), and 286.50 (b−CH3), which indicated that there are hydroxyls attached at C17 and C15 and that Compound 5 possesses 27 carbon atoms and belongs to the lucidenic acids. In summary, Compound 5 was tentatively identified as 7,15-dihydroxy-4,4,14-trimethyl-3,11-dioxochol-8-en-24-oic acid, which was first reported by Yang et al. (2007).

The fragmentation behavior of Compound 6 in HPLC-MSn spectra gave the [M-H] ion at m/z 461.00 (tR=50.74 min) (Fig. 8), and the base peaks included [M-H-H2O] ion (m/z 443.11) and [M-H-H2O− H2O] ion (m/z 424.82), which are prominent ions in the fragmentation of lucidenic acids. It also gave [M-H−CO2] (m/z 417.12) and [M−2H−CH3COOH] (m/z 398.57), which showed that a molecule of acetic acid (∆m=60) was lost through the β-cleavage of the carboxy group. Minor signals at m/z 304.03 (b−1), m/z 291.35 (b−CH2) and m/z 287.14 (b−CH2−CH2) were also present and Compound 6 was provisionally identified as 3,7,15-trihydroxy-4,4,14-trimethyl-11-oxo-chol-8-en-24-oic acid (Guo et al., 2012).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Fragmentation ions of MS 2 spectra for Compound 6

[M-H-H2O] ion (m/z 443.11), [M-H-H2O−H2O] ion (m/z 424.82), [M-H−CO2] ion (m/z 417.12), [M−2H−CH3COOH] ion (m/z 398.57), b−1 (m/z 304.03), b−CH2 (m/z 291.35), b−CH2−CH2 (m/z 287.14)

The [M-H] ion of Compound 7 was at m/z 457.00 (tR=58.22 min) (Fig. 9) with the following base peaks: [M-H-H2O] (m/z 439.16), which eliminated H2O, CO2, and CH3COOH consecutively to m/z 420.87, 413.20, 396.28, 395.24, and 285.37 (b−1−CH3), which was identified as probably 3β-hydroxy-4,4,14-trimethyl-7,11,15-trioxochol-8-en-24-oic acid. Using a similar analysis method, Compound 9 was temporarily identified as lucidenic acid C (Nishitoba et al., 1984).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Fragmentation ions of MS 2 spectra for Compound 7

[M-H-H2O] ion (m/z 439.16), [M-H-H2O−H2O] ion (m/z 420.87), [M-H−CO2] ion (m/z 413.20), [M−3H−CH3COOH] ion (m/z 395.24), b−1−CH3 (m/z 285.37)

3.2.3 Identification of ganoderic acid H (C32)

The [M-H] ion of Compound 10 was at m/z 571.00 (tR=82.40 min) (Fig. 10), which showed the [M-H-H2O] at m/z 553.21, [M-H-H2O−CO2] at m/z 508.68, and [M-H−2H2O−CO2−CO] at m/z 462.19. The resulting m/z 467.00 ion then gave ions at m/z 315.00 (b−2) and 291.20 (b+2−CO). Thus, it was temporarily identified as ganoderic acid H, which showed that the C12 was acetylated.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Fragmentation ions of MS 2 spectra for Compound 10

[M-H-H2O] ion (m/z 553.21), [M-H-H2O−CO2] ion (m/z 508.68), [M-H−2H2O−CO2−CO] ion (m/z 462.19), b−2 (m/z 315.00), b+2−CO (m/z 291.20)

To sum up, the structures of ganoderic acids preliminarily identified by HPLC-ESI-MS2 were shown in Fig. 11.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Structures of 10 ganoderic acids preliminarily identified by HPLC-ESI-MS 2

4 Conclusions

G. lucidum has received considerable attention for its wide application as a medicinal ingredient. Submerged fermentation of G. lucidum was optimized by RSM, with a mycelia biomass and IT production of 1.87 g/100 ml and 93.21 mg/100 ml, respectively, using wort 4.10%, yeast extract 1.89%, and pH 5.40. Previous studies have established glucose as an important carbohydrate source (Xu et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010). For the first time, we determined wort as the best carbon source to increase IT production. Wort is low-cost, abundant, and conducive to microorganism cultivation.

The HPLC-ESI-MS approach was demonstrated successfully in the screening of complex triterpenoid mixtures and the specific identification of ganoderic acids. This is a worthwhile tool to help rapid semi-preparative purification of targeted ganoderic acids (Cheng et al., 2011). In this study, 10 possible ganoderic acids were identified from the triterpenoid extract using HPLC-MSn with the elimination of H2O and CO2. Further study is needed to purify individual compounds from the extract using column chromatography and to understand their possible biological functions against various types of disease.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Mei-lin CUI, Huan-yi YANG, and Guo-qing HE declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.