Abstract
Carbon nanotube (CNT) composite materials are very attractive for use in neural tissue engineering and biosensor coatings. CNT scaffolds are excellent mimics of extracellular matrix due to their hydrophilicity, viscosity, and biocompatibility. CNTs can also impart conductivity to other insulating materials improve mechanical stability guide neuronal cell behavior and trigger axon regeneration. The performance of chitosan (CS)/polyethylene glycol (PEG) composite scaffolds could be optimized by introducing multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs). CS/PEG/CNT composite scaffolds with CNT content of 1%, 3%, and 5% (1%=0.01 g/mL) were prepared by freeze-drying. Their physical and chemical properties and biocompatibility were evaluated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the composite scaffolds had a highly connected porous structure. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) and Raman spectroscopy proved that the CNTs were well dispersed in the CS/PEG matrix and combined with the CS/PEG nanofiber bundles. MWCNTs enhanced the elastic modulus of the scaffold. The porosity of the scaffolds ranged from 83% to 96%. They reached a stable water swelling state within 24 h, and swelling decreased with increasing MWCNT concentration. The electrical conductivity and cell adhesion rate of the scaffolds increased with increasing MWCNT content. Immunofluorescence showed that rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells grown in the scaffolds had characteristics similar to nerve cells. We measured changes in the expression of nerve cell markers by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and found that PC12 cells cultured in the scaffolds expressed growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43), nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR), and class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) proteins. Preliminary research showed that the prepared CS/PEG/CNT scaffold has good biocompatibility and can be further applied to neural tissue engineering research.
概述
目的
对壳聚糖/聚乙二醇/多壁碳纳米管(CS/PEG/MWCNT)复合支架的理化性质及对神经细胞的生物相容性进行研究, 探究碳纳米管(CNT)的最佳浓度, 同时判断其是否可以进一步应用于神经组织工程研究。
创新点
通过引入MWCNT来优化CS/PEG复合支架的综合性能。
方法
通过冷冻干燥制备CNTs的质量体积分数(g/mL)分别为0%、1%、3%和5%的CS/PEG/CNT神经复合支架, 对其进行一系列的物理化学性质的表征, 包括扫描电镜(SEM)、透射电镜(TEM)、红外光谱、拉曼光谱、杨氏模量、孔隙率、水溶胀以及导电率等。进而将神经细胞接种到支架上进行体外培养, 通过对支架上的细胞增殖及粘附、活/死细胞染色来观察所制备神经支架的细胞毒性, 通过免疫荧光及实时定量聚合酶链式反应(qRT-PCR)检测了神经细胞标志物表达的变化, 进一步探究不同支架对神经细胞分化的影响。
结论
CS/PEG/CNTs支架表现出紧密而整洁的中空网络结构, 且CNTs很好地分散在CS/PEG基质中。CNTs的添加增加了支架孔壁的粗糙度、导电性和疏水性, 提高了支架的力学性能, 降低了溶胀率和生物降解率。PC12细胞体外生物学评价结果表明:CS/PEG/CNTs支架具有良好的生物相容性, 无细胞毒性, 增强了体外神经元细胞的增殖和分化能力。总体而言, CS/PEG/3% CNTs支架具有优异的综合性能, 有望用作周围神经再生的神经元生长基质。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abidian MR, Daneshvar ED, Egeland BM, et al., 2012. Hybrid conducting polymer—hydrogel conduits for axonal growth and neural tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 1(6):762–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200182
Ahn HS, Hwang JY, Kim SM, et al., 2015. Carbon-nanotube-interfaced glass fiber scaffold for regeneration of transected sciatic nerve. Acta Biomater, 13:324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.026
Bhaskar B, Owen R, Bahmaee H, et al., 2018. Composite porous scaffold of PEG/PLA support improved bone matrix deposition in vitro compared to PLA-only scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A, 106(5):1334–1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36336
Bosi S, Ballerini L, Prato M, 2014. Carbon nanotubes in tissue engineering. In: Marcaccio M, Paolucci F (Eds.), Making and Exploiting Fullerenes, Graphene, and Carbon Nanotubes. Springer, Berlin, p.181–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/128_2013_474
Duan B, Gao HM, He M, et al., 2014. Hydrophobic modification on surface of chitin sponges for highly effective separation of oil. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 6(22):19933–19942. https://doi.org/10.1021/am505414y
Eldesoqi K, Henrich D, El-Kady AM, et al., 2014. Safety evaluation of a bioglass—polylactic acid composite scaffold seeded with progenitor cells in a rat skull critical-size bone defect. PLoS ONE, 9(2):e87642. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087642
Fabbro A, Sucapane A, Toma FM, et al., 2013a. Adhesion to carbon nanotube conductive scaffolds forces action-potential appearance in immature rat spinal neurons. PLoS ONE, 8(8):e73621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073621
Fabbro A, Prato M, Ballerini L, 2013b. Carbon nanotubes in neuroregeneration and repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 65(15): 2034–2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.002
Gao JJ, Zhu J, Luo JJ, et al., 2016. Investigation of microporous composite scaffolds fabricated by embedding sacrificial polyethylene glycol microspheres in nanofibrous membrane. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 91:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.015
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, et al., 2011. Application of conductive polymers, scaffolds and electrical stimulation for nerve tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 5(4):e17–e35. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.383
Gu XS, Ding F, Williams DF, 2014. Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials, 35(24):6143–6156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.064
He M, Wang ZG, Cao Y, et al., 2014. Construction of chitin/PVA composite hydrogels with jellyfish gel-like structure and their biocompatibility. Biomacromolecules, 15(9): 3358–3365. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm500827q
Huang Y, Zhong ZB, Duan B, et al., 2014. Novel fibers fabricated directly from chitin solution and their application as wound dressing. J Mater Chem B, 2(22):3427–3432. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tb00098f
Ifuku S, Saimoto H, 2012. Chitin nanofibers: preparations, modifications, and applications. Nanoscale, 4(11): 3308–3318. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr30383c
Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Kumar PTS, et al., 2011. Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol Adv, 29(3):322–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.005
Ji CD, Annabi N, Hosseinkhani M, et al., 2012. Fabrication of poly-DL-lactide/polyethylene glycol scaffolds using the gas foaming technique. Acta Biomater, 8(2):570–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.09.028
Kotturi H, Abuabed A, Zafar H, et al., 2017. Evaluation of polyethylene glycol diacrylate-polycaprolactone scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Funct Biomater, 8(3):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb8030039
Lau C, Cooney MJ, Atanassov P, 2008. Conductive macroporous composite chitosan-carbon nanotube scaffolds. Langmuir, 24(13):7004–7010. https://doi.org/10.1021/la8005597
Liu XF, Miller AL II, Park S, et al., 2016. Covalent crosslinking of graphene oxide and carbon nanotube into hydrogels enhances nerve cell responses. J Mater Chem B, 4(43): 6930–6941. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tb01722c
Ma SQ, Chen Z, Qiao F, et al., 2014. Guided bone regeneration with tripolyphosphate cross-linked asymmetric chitosan membrane. J Dent, 42(12): 1603–1612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.015
Mattioli-Belmonte M, Vozzi G, Whulanza Y, et al., 2012. Tuning polycaprolactone—carbon nanotube composites for bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C, 32(2):152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.10.010
Mauro N, Manfredi A, Ranucci E, et al., 2013. Degradable poly (amidoamine) hydrogels as scaffolds for in vitro culturing of peripheral nervous system cells. Macromol Biosci, 13(3):332–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201200354
Mehdikhani M, Ghaziof S, 2018. Electrically conductive poly-ε-caprolactone/polyethylene glycol/multi-wall carbon nanotube nanocomposite scaffolds coated with fibrin glue for myocardial tissue engineering. Appl Phys A, 124:77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-017-1474-4
Nagarajan S, Belaid H, Pochat-Bohatier C, et al., 2017. Design of boron nitride/gelatin electrospun nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 9(39):33695–33706. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b13199
Naumenko E, Fakhrullin R, 2019. Halloysite nanoclay/biopolymers composite materials in tissue engineering. Biotechnol J, 14(12):1900055. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201900055
Nisbet DR, Crompton KE, Horne MK, et al., 2008. Neural tissue engineering of the CNS using hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater, 87B(1):251–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31000
Park SY, Choi DS, Jin HJ, et al., 2011. Polarization-controlled differentiation of human neural stem cells using synergistic cues from the patterns of carbon nanotube monolayer coating. ACS Nano, 5(6):4704–4711. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2006128
Posypanova GA, Gayduchenko IA, Moskaleva EY, et al., 2016. Neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells and mouse neural stem cells on carbon nanotube films. Cell Tissue Biol, 10(3):194–201. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990519X16030111
Rad SM, Khorasani MT, Joupari MD, 2016. Preparation of HMWCNT/PLLA nanocomposite scaffolds for application in nerve tissue engineering and evaluation of their physical, mechanical and cellular activity properties. Polym Adv Technol, 27(3):325–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3644
Runge MB, Dadsetan M, Baltrusaitis J, et al., 2010. Development of electrically conductive oligo(polyethylene glycol) fumarate-polypyrrole hydrogels for nerve regeneration. Biomacromolecules, 11(11):2845–2853. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100526a
Şen Ö, Culha M, 2016. Boron nitride nanotubes included thermally cross-linked gelatin—glucose scaffolds show improved properties. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 138:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.11.036
Shitole AA, Giram PS, Raut PW, et al., 2019. Clopidogrel eluting electrospun polyurethane/polyethylene glycol thromboresistant, hemocompatible nanofibrous scaffolds. J Biomater Appl, 33(10):1327–1347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328219832984
Shokrgozar MA, Mottaghitalab F, Mottaghitalab V, et al., 2011. Fabrication of porous chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) reinforced single-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites for neural tissue engineering. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 7(2):276–284. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2011.1284
Srinivasan A, Teo N, Poon KJ, et al., 2021. Comparative craniofacial bone regeneration capacities of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human neural crest stem cells and bone marrow. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 7(1):207–221. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00878
Stock K, Nolden L, Edenhofer F, et al., 2010. Transcription factor-based modulation of neural stem cell differentiation using direct protein transduction. Cell Mol Life Sci, 67(14):2439–2449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0347-1
Suner SS, Demirci S, Yetiskin B, et al., 2019. Cryogel composites based on hyaluronic acid and halloysite nanotubes as scaffold for tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol, 130:627–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.025
Teo AJT, Mishra A, Park I, et al., 2016. Polymeric biomaterials for medical implants and devices. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2(4):454–472. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00429
Türk S, Altınsoy I, Efe GÇ, et al., 2018. 3D porous collagen/functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube/chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C, 92:757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.07.020
Uto K, Mano SS, Aoyagi T, et al., 2016. Substrate fluidity regulates cell adhesion and morphology on poly (ε-caprolactone)-based materials. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2(3):446–453. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00058
van den Broeck L, Piluso S, Soultan AH, et al., 2019. Cytocompatible carbon nanotube reinforced polyethylene glycol composite hydrogels for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C, 98:1133–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.020
Venkatesan J, Ryu BM, Sudha PN, et al., 2012. Preparation and characterization of chitosan-carbon nanotube scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol, 50(2): 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.12.032
Wang JY, Sun PP, Bao YM, et al., 2011. Cytotoxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes on PC12 cells. Toxicol in Vitro, 25(1):242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2010.11.010
Wu J, Meredith JC, 2014. Assembly of chitin nanofibers into porous biomimetic structures via freeze drying. ACS Macro Lett, 3(2):185–190. https://doi.org/10.1021/mz400543f
Wu SQ, Duan B, Zeng XP, et al., 2017. Construction of blood compatible lysine-immobilized chitin/carbon nanotube microspheres and potential applications for blood purified therapy. J Mater Chem B, 5(16):2952–2963. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tb00101k
Xu DF, Fan L, Gao LF, et al., 2016. Micro-nanostructured polyaniline assembled in cellulose matrix via interfacial polymerization for applications in nerve regeneration. ACS Appl Mate Interfaces, 8(27):17090–17097. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b03555
Zhou ZF, Liu XF, Wu W, et al., 2018. Effective nerve cell modulation by electrical stimulation of carbon nanotube embedded conductive polymeric scaffolds. Biomater Sci, 6(9):2375–2385. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8bm00553b
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51975400 and 62031022) and the Shanxi Provincial Key Medical Scientific Research Project (No. 2020XM06), China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author contributions
Shengbo SANG and Rong CHENG designed the research, wrote the manuscript, and are primarily responsible for final content. Yanyan CAO and Yayun YAN conducted a characterization experiment of the scaffold and revised the manuscript. Zhizhong SHEN conducted cell culture. Yajing ZHAO and Yanqing HAN conducted cell experiments and explained them. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript, and therefore, have full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity and security of the data.
Compliance with ethics guidelines
Shengbo SANG, Rong CHENG, Yanyan CAO, Yayun YAN, Zhizhong SHEN, Yajing ZHAO, and Yanqing HAN declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sang, S., Cheng, R., Cao, Y. et al. Biocompatible chitosan/polyethylene glycol/multi-walled carbon nanotube composite scaffolds for neural tissue engineering. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 23, 58–73 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2100155
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2100155