Skip to main content
Log in

Out-of-plane behaviour of infill masonry panels strengthened with composite materials

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of various composite materials applied to strengthen hollow masonry panels under out-of-plane actions is compared here. The strengthening solutions belong to three reinforcement Externally Bonded (EB) wet lay-up systems: (i) bidirectional composite meshes applied with inorganic matrices, i.e., Textile Reinforced Mortars (TRM); unidirectional composite textiles applied with (ii) inorganic matrices, i.e., Steel Reinforced Grouts (SRG), or (iii) organic (epoxy) matrices, i.e., Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRP), Steel Reinforced Polymers (SRP) and Natural FRPs. Carbon FRP, flax and hemp NFRP, and basalt and glass-based TRM were examined. As inorganic matrix, a cement-based mortar was used for TRMs; in the case of SRGs, comparisons with a magnesia-based matrix were also carried out. Twenty-seven specimens were subjected to simplified four-point monotonic bending tests, aimed at reproducing in the laboratory the failure condition of infill masonry walls under out-of-plane actions. The results are compared in terms of failure mode and mechanical improvement, and provide an analytical evaluation of moment–curvature behaviour according to bilinear laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reluis (2009) Linee guida per riparazione e rafforzamento di elementi strutturali, tamponature e partizioni. In: Dolce M, Manfredi G (eds) Rete dei Laboratori Universitari di Ingegneria Sismica

  2. Braga F, Manfredi V, Masi A, Salvatori A, Vona M (2011) Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 9:307–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verlato N, Guidi G, da Porto F (2014) Experimental testing and numerical modelling of infill masonry walls subjected to in-plane damage. In: Proceedings of the 9th international masonry conference, Guimaraes, Portugal (CD-ROM)

  4. Hak S, Morandi P, Magenes G, Sullivan TJ (2012) Damage control for clay masonry infills in the design of RC frame structures. J Earthq Eng 16:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. da Porto F, Guidi G, Dalla Benetta M, Verlato N (2013) Combined in-plane/out-of-plane experimental behaviour of reinforced and strengthened infill masonry walls. In: Proceedings of 12th Canadian masonry symposium, Vancouver, BC (CD-ROM)

  6. Saatcioglu M, Serrato F, Foo S (2005) Seismic performance of masonry infill walls retrofitted with CFRP sheets. In: Proceedings of 7th international symposium on fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures. ACI, 230(1), pp 341–354

  7. Lunn DS, Rizkalla SH, Maeda S, Ueda T (2012) FRP anchorage systems for infill masonry structures. In: Proceedings of 3rd Asia-Pacific conference on FRP in structures (APFIS 2012), Hokkaido, Japan

  8. El-Dakhakhni W, Hamid A, Elgaaly M (2004) Seismic retrofit of masonry infill walls using advanced composites. In: Proceedings of 13th Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC

  9. Lunn DS, Rizkalla SH (2011) Strengthening of infill masonry walls with FRP materials. ASCE J Compos Const 15(2):206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8—design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings

  11. EN 1996-1-1 (2005) Eurocode 6—design of masonry structures. Part 1-1: general rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures

  12. Matana M, Nanni A, Dharani L, Silva P, Tunis G (2005) Bond performance of steel reinforced polymer and steel reinforced grout. In: Proceedings of international symposium on bond behaviour of FRP in structures (BBFS 2005), Hong Kong, pp 125–132

  13. Prota A, Marcari G, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G, Aldea C (2006) Experimental in-plane behaviour of tuff masonry strengthened with cementitious matrix-grid composites. ASCE J Compos Const 10(3):223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Papanicolaou CG, Triantafillou TC, Karlos K, Papathanasiou M (2007) Textile-Reinforced Mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: in-plane cyclic loading. Mater Struct 40:1081–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Borri A, Casadei P, Castori G, Hammond J (2009) Strengthening of brick masonry arches with externally bonded steel reinforced composites. ASCE J Compos Const 13(6):468–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Girardello P, Pappas A, da Porto F, Valluzzi MR (2013) Experimental testing and numerical modelling of masonry vaults. In: Proceedings of international conference on rehabilitation and restoration of structures, Chennai, India, pp 117–127

  17. CNR-DT 200 (2004) Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening existing structures. Italian Research Council, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  18. ACI 440M Guide Draft-1 (2004) Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP system for strengthening unreinforced masonry structures. ACI Committee 440. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

  19. Triantafillou TC (1998) Strengthening of masonry structures using epoxy-bonded FRP laminates. ASCE J Compos Const 2(2):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilstrap JM, Dolan CW (1998) Out-of-plane bending of FRP-reinforced masonry walls. Compos Sci Technol 58:1277–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamoush SA, McGinley MW, Mlakar P, Scott D, Murray K (2001) Out-of-plane strengthening of masonry walls with reinforced composites. ASCE J Compos Const 5(3):139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Galati N, Secondin S, Tumialan GJ, Nanni A (2003) Out-of-plane behaviour of URM walls strengthened with FRP bars. In: Proceedings of structural faults & repair 2003, UK (CD-ROM)

  23. Tan KH, Patoary MKH (2004) Strengthening of masonry walls against out-of-plane loads using fibre-reinforced polymer reinforcement. ASCE J Compos Const 8:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Turco V, Secondin S, Morbin A, Valluzzi MR, Modena C (2006) Flexural and shear strengthening of un-reinforced masonry with FRP bars. Compos Sci Technol 66(2):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Karantoni FV, Fardis MN (1992) Effectiveness of seismic strengthening techniques for masonry buildings. ASCE J Compos Const 118(7):1884–1902

    Google Scholar 

  26. ElGawady MA, Lestuzzi P, Badoux M (2006) Retrofitting of masonry walls using shotcrete. In: Proceedings of NZSEE 2006 conference, New Zealand

  27. Papanicolaou CG, Triantafillou TC, Papathanasiou M, Karlos K (2007) Textile Reinforced Mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: out-of-plane cyclic loading. RILEM Mater Struct 41(1):143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harajli M, ElKhatib H, San-Jose J (2010) Static and cyclic out-of-plane response of masonry walls strengthened using textile-mortar system. J Mater Civ Eng 22(11):1171–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Papanicolaou CG, Triantafillou TC, Lekka M (2011) Externally bonded grids as strengthening and seismic retrofitting materials of masonry panels. Constr Build Mater 25:504–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. EN 772-1 (2002) Methods of test for masonry units. Determination of compressive strength

  31. UNI 1015-11 (2007) Metodi di prova per malte per opere murarie. Determinazione della resistenza a flessione e a compressione della malta indurita

  32. UNI EN 998-2 (2010) Specifiche per malte per opere murarie. Malte da muratura

  33. UNI 6556 (1976) Prove sui calcestruzzi. Determinazione del modulo elastico secante a compressione

  34. UNI 1052-1 (2001) Metodi di prova per muratura. Determinazione della resistenza a compressione

  35. Larrinaga P, Chastre C, San-José JT, Garmendia L (2013) Non-linear analytical model of composites based on basalt textile reinforced mortar under uniaxial tension. Composites B 55:518–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. de Felice G, De Santis S, Garmendia L, Ghiassi B, Larrinaga P, Lourenço P, Oliveira D, Paolacci F, Papanicolau CG (2014) Mortar-based systems for externally-bonded strengthening of masonry. Mater Struct. doi:10.1617/s11527-014-0360-1

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the companies which provided the materials for this experimental research: Wienerberger for blocks, Tassullo for embedding mortar, Fidia Technical Global Service for fibres and epoxy saturants, and BASF and Orsan for inorganic matrices. Tests were performed at the Materials and Structures Testing Laboratory, University of Padova, Italy. Graduates L. Albieri, A. Marcolongo and S. Piccin are gratefully thanked for their work in all phases of the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Rosa Valluzzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valluzzi, M.R., da Porto, F., Garbin, E. et al. Out-of-plane behaviour of infill masonry panels strengthened with composite materials. Mater Struct 47, 2131–2145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0384-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0384-6

Keywords

Navigation