Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the two point bending and four point bending test methods for aged asphalt concrete field samples

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complex modulus and fatigue behavior are important characteristics for all materials. Some European countries have developed performance oriented requirements for bituminous mixtures. Using such requirements it is expected that the life of pavements can be improved. According to the European standards, these properties are characterized by various methods including two point bending (2PB) on trapezoidal specimen and four point bending (4PB) on prismatic specimen. It is known that the fatigue results obtained are highly dependent, in addition to the mixture variables and environmental variables, on specimen fabrication procedure and test equipment and procedure. Therefore the question remains how comparable are the results obtained from these tests? Up to date, a significant amount of data on comparison of the results of such tests is absent. This paper presents results of a Swiss inter-laboratory study on 2PB and 4PB tests for complex modulus and fatigue conducted on a wide pallet of specimen produced from aged field sections. The results show that a good linear regression for complex modulus values were obtained, however, the fatigue performance ranking obtained from the two tests were dissimilar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Partl MN et al (eds) (2013). Advances in inter-laboratory testing and evaluation of bituminous materials. State of the Art Report of the Rilem Technical Committee 206-ATB

  2. EN 12697-26 (2012) Bituminous mixtures—test methods for hot mix asphalt—part 26: stiffness

  3. EN 12697-24 (2007) 2004+A1, bituminous mixtures—test methods for hot mix asphalt—part 24: resistance to fatigue

  4. Wu H, Huang B, Shu X (2014) Document characterizing fatigue behavior of asphalt mixtures utilizing loaded wheel testers. J Mater Civ Eng 26(1):152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Benedetto H, de La Roche C, Baaj H, Pronk A, Lundström R (2004) Fatigue of bituminous mixtures. Mater Struct 37:202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pittet M (2000) Essais d’exactitude pour essai de module complexe et essai de fatigue pour normes EN 12697-24 et EN 12697-26. Détermination de la répétabilité et de la reproductibilité

  7. Pittet M (2006) A2 Erstfeld-Amsteg. Module et résistance à la fatigue d’un enrobé AC EME 22 C1

  8. Gubler R, Partl MN, Canestrari F, Grilli A (2005) Influence of water and temperature on mechanical properties of selected asphalt pavements. Mater Struct 38:523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pais J (ed) (2009) Four point bending proceedings of the second workshop. University of Minho, Guimaraes. 24–25th Sept 2009

  10. AkhtarhuseinTayebali A, Deacon JA, Monismith CL (1996) Development and evaluation of dynamic flexural beam fatigue test system. Transp Res Rec 1545:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Puchard Z, Gorgenyi A (2012) Hungarian experience with different bending devices. In: Pais JC (ed) Four-point bending. Taylor and Francis Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. SN 640 431-1b-NA, Bituminous mixtures- material specifications- part 1: aspahlt concrete National Annex. Asphaltmischgut- Mischgutanforderungen-teil 1: Asphaltbeton; nationaler Anhang available in German and French

  13. Pais C, Harvey JT (2012) Four point bending. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matthews JM, Monismith CL, Craus J (1993) Investigation of laboratory fatigue testing procedures for asphalt aggregate mixtures. J Transp Eng 119(4):634–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Picado-Santos L, Almeida A, Pais J, Antunes ML, Batista F (2009) Assessment of stiffness and fatigue tests in Portugal. In: Pais J (ed) Four point bending proceedings of the second workshop. University of Minho, Guimaraes. 24–25th Sept 2009

  16. Francken L (ed) 1998 Bituminous binders and mixes. Rilem Report 17. E & FN Spon, London

  17. Dondi G, Pettinari M, Sangiorgi C, Zoorob S (2013) Traditional and dissipated energy approaches to compare the 2PB and 4PB flexural methodologies on warm mix asphalt. Constr Build Mater 47(2013):833–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research project was supported by the Swiss Roads Office (FEDRO) grant number VSS 2006/503. The authors would like to acknowledge the help of Simon Kuentzel, Andreas Treuholz and Martin Hugener in performing the experiments in this project at Empa. The specimen were cut and prepared by Christian Meierhofer and Roland Takacs. At LAVOC, data analysis and specimen preparation were done by Jean-Claude Reymond and Jean-Wilfried Fils-Aimé.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lily D. Poulikakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poulikakos, L.D., Pittet, M., Dumont, AG. et al. Comparison of the two point bending and four point bending test methods for aged asphalt concrete field samples. Mater Struct 48, 2901–2913 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0366-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0366-8

Keywords

Navigation