Skip to main content
Log in

Rheological characterization and performance-related evaluation of paint sludge modified binders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Application of paints by spraying, extensively used in the automotive industry, generates a solid waste, known as paint sludge, which, if improperly managed, may lead to significant environmental and economic burdens. In the research work described in this paper, use of paint sludge for the production of modified bituminous binders for paving applications was investigated. In particular, expected field performance of paint sludge modified binders (PSMBs) was assessed and compared to that of neat bitumen and polymer-modified binders. PSMBs considered in the study were prepared in the laboratory by employing variable dosages of sludge coming from different painting plants and derived either from basecoat or clearcoat application. PSMB characteristics were evaluated by means of rheological tests which led to construction of master curves, determination of performance grade (PG) according to the SUPERPAVE scheme, detailed evaluation of resistance to permanent deformation by means of multiple stress creep recovery tests, and analysis of resistance to fatigue damage by making use of time sweep and linear amplitude sweep tests. Obtained results showed that use of automotive paint sludge for the production of PSMBs is a feasible, cost-effective and environmentally compatible alternative to currently adopted management solutions which consist either in incineration or in energy production in cement kilns. Although fluxing and stiffening effects were observed in the case of basecoat and clearcoat sludge, respectively, only minor variations were recorded in terms of PG, elastic response, stress sensitivity, fatigue resistance and fatigue ductility of neat bitumen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Streitberger HJ, Dössel KF (2008) Automotive paints and coatings. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KgaA, Weinheim

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Toda K, Salazar A, Saito K (2013) Automotive painting technology. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. FCA S.p.A. (2014a) FCA Annual Report at 31 December 2014. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Turin

  4. FCA S.p.A. (2014b) Sustainability Report 2014. Economic, environmental and social responsibility. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Turin

  5. Chen CP (1995) Automotive painting: achieving a technological, economic and environmental balance. Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  6. Papasavva S, Kia S, Claya J, Gunther R (2002) Life cycle environmental assessment of paint processes. J Coat Technol 74:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerace MJ, Gerace JM (1992) Method of making a filler from automotive paint sludge, filler and sealant containing a filler. US Patent 5,160,628

  8. Gerace MJ, Gamboa SC, Landaburu YS (1993) Method of making sludge powder and sealant from paint sludge and sludge powder and sealant composition produced thereby. US Patent 5,254,263

  9. Gerace MJ, Landaburu YS, Gamboa SC (1999) Compounded polymeric compositions utilizing processed paint sludge as a replacement for polymeric components. US Patent 5,880,218

  10. Mathenson RR, Dixon DM, Moore JR, Fisher DA (2006) Process for producing building materials from raw paint sludge. US Patent 7,128,780

  11. Soroushian P, Okwuegbu AC (1996) Shrinkage compensating concrete with expansive additive. US Patent 5,489,333

  12. St. Louis DM (1996) Process for producing building materials from paint sludge. US Patent 5,573,587

  13. Bhatia RK, Bhatia VK, Vishnoi AS (2007) Composition and process for conversion of paint sludge into reusable paint. Patent WO/2007/072502

  14. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. (2005) Process for producing building materials from raw paint sludge. Patent EP 1 432 663 B1

  15. Haden Inc. (1998) Method for processing paint sludge. Patent EP 0 882 678

  16. Haden Schweitzer Corporation (1993) Method and apparatus for treating waste paint sludge. Patent EP 0 344 946 B1

  17. Maharani Paints Private (2004) Composition for conversion of paint sludge into bitumen blendable mixture, process for preparation thereof. Patent IN 264 332 B

  18. Martínez-González GM, Castro-Agũero A, Quintana-Hernández PA, González-Alatorre G, Castro-Montoya AJ (1998) Use of automotive paint sludge as filler in asphaltic mixtures. J Solid Waste Technol Manag 25:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruffino B, Dalmazzo D, Riviera PP, Santagata E, Zanetti MC (2012) Preliminary performance assessment of asphalt concrete with paint sludge from automotive industries. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on industrial and hazardous waste management, Crete, 12–14 Sept 2012

  20. Ruffino B, Dalmazzo D, Santagata E, Zanetti MC (2011) Preliminary evaluation of the potential use of paint sludge in bituminous binders. In: Proceedings, Sardinia 2011, 13th international waste management and landfill symposium, 3–7 Oct 2011

  21. Vercelli A, Ruffino B, Dalmazzo D, Zanetti MC, Santagata E (2016) Reuse of paint sludge for the production of modified bituminous binders for road pavements. Resour Conserv Recycl (Submitted)

  22. Chailleux E, Ramond G, Such C, De La Roche C (2006) A mathematical-based master curve construction method applied to complex modulus of bituminous materials. Road Mater Pavement Des 7(Special issue EATA 2006), 75-92

  23. Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Christensen DC, Anderson DA (1992) Interpretation of dynamic mechanical test data for paving grade asphalt cements. J Assoc Asph Paving Technol 61:67–116

    Google Scholar 

  25. AASHTO M 332-14 (2014) Performance-graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test

  26. AASHTO T 240-13 (2013) Effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt binder (Rolling Thin Film Oven test)

  27. AASHTO R 28-12 (2012) Accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV)

  28. AASHTO T 350-14 (2014) Multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR)

  29. FHWA (2011) The multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) procedure. Techbrief, Office of Pavement Technology FHWA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bahia H, Hanson DI, Zeng M, Zhai H, Khatri MA, Anderson RM (2001) Characterization of modified asphalt binders in superpave mix design. NCHRP Report 459, project 9-10, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC

  31. Pronk AC, Hopman PC (1990) Energy dissipation: the leading factor to fatigue. In: Proceedings of the Strategic Highway Research Program: sharing the benefits, London

  32. Santagata E, Baglieri O, Dalmazzo D (2008) Experimental investigation on the fatigue behaviour of modified bituminous binders and mastics. J Assoc Asph Paving Technol 77:851–884

    Google Scholar 

  33. Botella R, Perez-Jimenez FE, Mirò R (2012) Application of a strain sweep test to assess fatigue behavior of asphalt binders. Constr Build Mater 36:906–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hintz C, Bahia H (2013) Simplification of the linear amplitude sweep (LAS) test and specification parameter. J Transp Res Board 2370:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hintz C, Velasquez R, Johnson C, Bahia H (2011) Modification and validation of the linear amplitude sweep test for binder fatigue specification. J Transp Res Board 2207:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim Y, Lee HJ, Little DN, Kim YR (2006) A simple testing method to evaluate fatigue fracture and damage performance of asphalt mixtures. J Assoc Asph Paving Technol 75:755–788

    Google Scholar 

  37. Peebles GR, Mehta Y (2013) Characterization of fatigue properties of binders and mastics at intermediate temperatures using dynamic shear rheometer. University Transportation Research Center—Region 2. Final Report, New York

  38. Santagata E, Baglieri O, Tsantilis L, Dalmazzo D (2013) Evaluation of self-healing properties of bituminous binders taking into account steric hardening effects. Constr Build Mater 41:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee HJ, Daniel JS, Kim YR (2000) Continuum damage mechanics-based fatigue model of asphalt concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 12:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee HJ, Kim YR (1998) Viscoelastic continuum damage model of asphalt concrete with healing. J Eng Mech 124:1224–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Park SW, Kim YR, Schapery RA (1996) A viscoelastic continuum damage model and its application to uniaxial behavior of asphalt concrete. Mech Mater 24:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wen H, Bahia H (2009) Characterizing fatigue of asphalt binders using viscoelastic continuum damage mechanics. J Transp Res Board 2126:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. AASHTO TP 101-14 (2014) Estimating damage tolerance of asphalt binders using the linear amplitude sweep

  44. Anderson DA, Christensen DW, Bahia HU, Dongre R, Sharma MG, Antle CE, Button J (1994) Binder characterization and evaluation. Physical characterization, vol 3. SHRP-A-369. Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington DC

  45. AASHTO M 320-10 (2010) Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder

  46. Domingos MDI, Faxina AL (2015) Rheological behavior of bitumens modified with PE and PPA at different MSCR creep-recovery times. Int J Pavement Eng 16:771–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Anderson RM (2013) Northeast Asphalt User-Producer Group Second Interlaboratory Study to determine the precision of AASHTO TP70—the Multiple-Stress Creep-Recovery (MSCR) test, prepared for the Northeast Asphalt User-Producer Group (NEAUPG), Asphalt Institute and FHWA, DTFH61-11-H-00033

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study reported in this paper is part of the research project entitled “Reuse of Paint Sludge in Road Pavements (RP2)” funded by FCA Italy S.p.A. The constant support of Simone Cencetti and Germano Gaido is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezio Santagata.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalmazzo, D., Vercelli, A., Santagata, E. et al. Rheological characterization and performance-related evaluation of paint sludge modified binders. Mater Struct 50, 74 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0945-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0945-y

Keywords

Navigation