Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Comparative analysis of functional capacity among women with fibromyalgia and low back pain

Abstracts

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Musculoskeletal pain affects 3% to 5% of the world population, decreasing patients' functional capacity. This study aimed at comparing functional capacity among females with fibromyalgia or low back pain. METHOD: Comparative study with convenience sample of 69 females with diagnosis of low back pain (35) or fibromyalgia (34) registered in the Orthopedics Outpatient Setting of a Public Teaching Hospital in Fortaleza/CE. Musculoskeletal Pain Evaluation Questionnaire was used, and the association among type of pain, socio-demographic characteristics and activities practiced by patients was analyzed with Chi-square (χ²) and Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests. RESULTS: From 69 participants, mean age was 45 ±10.8 years, most were married (63.8%), most had low education level and were housewives (37.7%). The type of pain had no statistically significant association with marital status (p = 0.289), occupation (p = 0.349) and education level (p = 0.907). Major pain site for both groups was lumbar spine (56%) and was insidious (69%) and continuous (54.5%). Most did not practice physical exercises (p < 0.001), and complained of lack of energy, especially those with fibromyalgia (82.4%) (p = 0.019). From mentioned physical activities, walking was predominant in both groups (52.6%), followed by stretching, gymnastics and hydrogymnastics (47.4%) (p = 1.000). There has been impairment of occupational (21.7%), domestic (21.7%) and leisure (13.0%) activities. CONCLUSION: Females with fibromyalgia had poorer functional capacity as compared to females with low back pain, deserving attention of health professionals for thorough pain evaluation, and assessment of functional changes of these patients.

Chronic pain; Fibromyalgia; Functional capacity; Low back pain; Pain


JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Dores musculoesqueléticas acometem 3% a 5% da população mundial, reduzindo a capacidade funcional dos seus portadores. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a capacidade funcional entre mulheres com fibromialgia e lombalgia. MÉTODO: Estudo comparativo, com amostra de conveniência formada por 69 mulheres diagnosticadas com lombalgia (35) e fibromialgia (34) cadastradas em Ambulatório de Ortopedia de Hospital Público de Ensino em Fortaleza/CE. Utilizou-se o Questionário de Avaliação da Dor Musculoesquelética e analisou-se a associação entre tipo de dor, características sociodemográficas e atividades praticadas pelas pacientes com os testes de Qui-quadrado (χ²) e Fisher-Freeman-Halton. RESULTADOS: Do universo de 69 participantes, a média de idade foi de 45 ±10,8 anos, a maioria era casada (63,8%), a maior parte (42,0%) tinha baixo nível de escolaridade e era trabalhadora do lar (37,7%). O tipo de dor não mostrou associação estatisticamente significativa com estado civil (p = 0,289), ocupação (p = 0,349) e escolaridade (p = 0,907). A dor principal, em ambos os grupos, localizava-se na coluna lombar (56%) e tinha caráter insidioso (69%) e contínuo (54,5%). A maioria não praticava exercícios físicos (p < 0,001), queixando-se de falta de energia, predominante na fibromialgia (82,4%) (p = 0,019). Das atividades físicas citadas, sobressaiu a caminhada (52,6%) nos dois grupos, seguida de alongamento, ginástica e hidroginástica (47,4%) (p = 1,000). Também houve prejuízos nas atividades ocupacionais (21,7%), domésticas (21,7%) e de lazer (13,0%). CONCLUSÃO: Mulheres com fibromialgia apresentaram pior capacidade funcional que mulheres com lombalgia, merecendo atenção dos profissionais de saúde para avaliação completa da dor e das modificações funcionais destas pacientes.

Capacidade funcional; Dor; Dor crônica; Fibromialgia; Lombalgia


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparative analysis of functional capacity among women with fibromyalgia and low back pain*

Roberta Meneses OliveiraI; Ana Cláudia de Souza LeiteII; Lucilane Maria Sales da SilvaIII; Paulo César de AlmeidaIV; Sherida Karanini Paz de OliveiraV; Ana Clara Patriota ChavesVI

IMaster in Clinical Health Care. Doctorate Student of the Post-Graduation Clinical Nursing and Health Care Program (PPCCLIS), State University of Ceará (UECE). Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

IIDoctor in Nursing. Professor of the Nursing Graduation Course, State University of Ceará (UECE). Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

IIIDoctor in Nursing. Coordinator and Professor of the Post-Graduation Clinical Nursing and Health Care Program (PPCCLIS), State University of Ceará (UECE). Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

IVDoctor in Public Health. Post-Graduation Clinical Care in Nursing and Health Program. State University of Ceará. Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

VDoctorate Student of the Nursing Post-Graduation Program, Federal University of Ceará. Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

VIMaster Student of the Post-Graduation Clinical Care in Nursing and Health Program. State University of Ceará. Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

Correspondence to

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Musculoskeletal pain affects 3% to 5% of the world population, decreasing patients' functional capacity. This study aimed at comparing functional capacity among females with fibromyalgia or low back pain.

METHOD: Comparative study with convenience sample of 69 females with diagnosis of low back pain (35) or fibromyalgia (34) registered in the Orthopedics Outpatient Setting of a Public Teaching Hospital in Fortaleza/CE. Musculoskeletal Pain Evaluation Questionnaire was used, and the association among type of pain, socio-demographic characteristics and activities practiced by patients was analyzed with Chi-square (χ2) and Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests.

RESULTS: From 69 participants, mean age was 45 ±10.8 years, most were married (63.8%), most had low education level and were housewives (37.7%). The type of pain had no statistically significant association with marital status (p = 0.289), occupation (p = 0.349) and education level (p = 0.907). Major pain site for both groups was lumbar spine (56%) and was insidious (69%) and continuous (54.5%). Most did not practice physical exercises (p < 0.001), and complained of lack of energy, especially those with fibromyalgia (82.4%) (p = 0.019). From mentioned physical activities, walking was predominant in both groups (52.6%), followed by stretching, gymnastics and hydrogymnastics (47.4%) (p = 1.000). There has been impairment of occupational (21.7%), domestic (21.7%) and leisure (13.0%) activities.

CONCLUSION: Females with fibromyalgia had poorer functional capacity as compared to females with low back pain, deserving attention of health professionals for thorough pain evaluation, and assessment of functional changes of these patients.

Keywords: Chronic pain, Fibromyalgia, Functional capacity, Low back pain, Pain.

INTRODUCTION

Subject of increasing interest on part of health care researchers, chronic musculoskeletal pain is a public health problem because the overcrowding of services in different specialties and levels of attention to control it is frequent. In this context, chronic pain is partially legitimated as a disease and in the lack of known physiological mechanisms attention has turned to pain psychological and social determining factors1.

In parallel, it is estimated that 50% to 60% of chronic pain patients become partially or totally disabled to perform daily life activities (DLA), in a transient or permanent manner, significantly impairing quality of life (QL)2. This functional incapacity is primarily caused by pain associated to chronic clinical conditions, such as cancer, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), fibromyalgia (FM) and low back pain.

FM, painful syndrome of still unknown etiopathogenesis, is characterized by musculoskeletal pain in different body regions, sleep disorders, fatigue, short-lasting morning rigidity, sensation of edema and paresthesias3. On the other hand, low back pain is considered a major cause of morbidity, physical and psychosocial incapacity, being originated by mechanical-degenerative factors, including structural disorders, biomechanical deviations, or the interaction of both4. In addition, a recent study has shown a positive correlation of this type of pain with workload, and minor negative correlation with regular physical activity5.

Due to their chronicity, limitations caused by musculoskeletal pain go beyond functional capacity because they have a major impact on QL, especially evidenced by impairment of DLA and physical exercises of patients, who in general are females in professionally active age groups. Several of these females end up quitting their jobs and suffering psychological problems with social repercussion, such as depression and anxiety6. Such repercussions were observed by studies developed with patients seen in pain outpatient settings7.

The high prevalence (30% to 40%) of chronic pain in Brazil calls the attention to the need for studies trying to characterize chronic pain-related incapacity8. Understanding the impact of pain on activities and exercises may orient the type of health professionals interventions for a better assistance to chronic musculoskeletal pain patients, so that this pain is treated in all its dimensions, preventing the appearance of other diseases and chronic conditions such as obesity, diabetes mellitus and hypertension, among others.

So, this study aimed at comparing functional capacity between females with FM and low back pain, evaluating musculoskeletal pain repercussions in the practice of daily activities and physical exercises.

METHOD

This is a piece of the projects called "Tactile Technology to Evaluate Pain in Fibromyalgia People" and "Tactile Technology to Evaluate Pain in Low Back Pain People", carried out by the Tactile Technology Research Group for Pain Evaluation and Palliative Care (TECDOR/UECE). This is a descriptive and quantitative study about functional capacity to perform daily activities and physical exercises of individuals with musculoskeletal pain.

In the period from May 2005 to July 2006, 83 patients were selected from a Public Teaching Hospital of Fortaleza/CE, who have looked for the Orthopedics and Traumatology Ambulatory to treat chronic musculoskeletal pain. Inclusion criteria were: aged between 25 and 65 years; diagnosis of low back pain or fibromyalgia for at least one year; consent and signature of the Free and Informed Consent Term (FICT) about research protocols.

In this study, 14 females (16.9%) were excluded for having evidence of cognitive or attention deficit which precluded the understanding of questions of the data collection tool. So, final sample was made up of 69 patients.

Data regarding DLA, practice of physical exercises and their capacity to practice them were obtained from open questions of the Musculoskeletal Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (MDPEQ). This questionnaire, adapted from the "Tool to evaluate people with chronic pain"9, has open and closed questions divided in 11 parts about, respectively: identification, anthropometric data, major pain, other pains, coping with pain, eating, activities and exercises, sleep and rest, perceptions, sexuality, values and beliefs.

The questionnaire was applied during nursing visits to evaluate chronic pain carried out by nurse researchers and nursing students, members of the TECDOR/UECE.

The association of type of pain, sociodemographic characteristics and activities performed by patients was analyzed with Chi-square (χ2) and Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests. Mean age, number of children and family income were compared among females with low back pain and FM by Student's t and Mann-Whitney tests. Data were processed by the EPI-INFO program considering significant p < 0.05.

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, UECE (04545014-5) and (04497421-3).

RESULTS

Table 1 shows sociodemographic characteristics of the sample according to the type of musculoskeletal pain.

Both groups were homogeneous as to variables: marital status, occupation and education level. It has called the attention the fact that from 44 married females, most had FM (56.8%). However, it was observed that the type of pain had no statistically significant association with the variables: marital status (p = 0.289), occupation (p = 0.349) and education level (p = 0.907).

Table 2 shows means of variables: age, number of children and family income according to the type of musculoskeletal pain.

It is observed that mean age and family income were equal for both groups. On the other hand, females with low back pain had fewer children as compared to females with FM, being this difference considered statistically significant (p < 0.001).

From 69 evaluated patients, 50.7% had low back pain and the others FM (49.3%). According to questionnaire information, major patients complaint included lumbar spine pain (56.0%), insidious (69.0%) and continuous (54.5%), lasting from one to three years (30.0%).

Functional capacity-related variables

Table 3 shows data of the comparative analysis of functional capacity for both groups.

It has been observed that a large part of low back pain patients (45.7%) assured having energy to practice physical exercises and daily activities, while just 17.6% of FM patients have reported this (p = 0.019).

On the other hand, the practice of daily activities was independent of the type of pain (p = 0.731) because in both groups most patients have reported not practicing physical exercises (p < 0.001). From those practicing physical activities, the most frequently mentioned were walking and gymnastics/stretching.

Both groups had impairment of occupational, domestic and leisure activities, however in a lower proportion (21.7%, 21.7% and 13.0%, respectively).

DISCUSSION

The sample profile (Table 1) confirms observations from other authors with regard to chronic pain estimates among Brazilians, with predominance of females who are married, unemployed and with low socioeconomic and education levels7.

As to the fact that most married females had FM, a research has also observed such result. In evaluating 40 females (20 with FM and 20 without FM) in a Medical Clinic Ambulatory, authors have observed statistically significant differences in marital status between groups, being most FM patients married and control patients had partners, but were not married10.

Mean age was similar for both groups (Table 2), confirming results of other studies with similar samples11,12.

On the other hand, researchers have evaluated a sample similar to ours and have found significantly older mean age in FM patients as compared to control group, being this difference statistically significant (p = 0.03)10.

As to the difference in number of children in both groups, we were unable to find studies addressing such variable which could confirm the results of our study.

As to pain location, the prevalence of lumbar spine in both groups was equally evidenced by a recent study developed in an emergency service of a municipal hospital of Rio Grande do Sul. Authors confirmed lumbar pain as one of the major reasons to look for the service, being the major complaint of 52 patients (18.5%), and second only to upper and lower limbs pain related to fractures and/or contusion in 64 patients (22.77%)13.

As to functional capacity data (Table 3) it was observed that females with low back pain have a more satisfactory level of energy than FM females to practice physical exercises, labor, domestic and leisure activities. This lack of energy is in general caused by chronic fatigue and rigidity, more common in FM6.

Using a specific tool to evaluate functional capacity (Roland-Morris Brazil Incapacity Questionnaire), a study with 17 chronic low back pain patients has shown functional incapacity prevalence of just 23.5%, in line with the thesis that this capacity is more reduced in FM patients. Lumbar pain was not observed as a factor pegged to incapacity, but just as limiting the performance of some daily activities14.

A comparative study with 16 females with FM and 15 females without the diagnosis has shown that females with FM had negative impact on QL with decreased functional capacity, increased pain and worsening of general health status15. FM patients have higher levels of pain, which leads to functional and physical limitations, less flexibility, muscle fatigue, lack of aerobic conditioning and less capacity to perform daily activities6,11.

In a different study with 38 females diagnosed with FM, results have shown moderate difficulty to severe incapacity when their functional capacity was evaluated. That is, there has been significant correlation between pain and the level of functional incapacity for daily activities12.

In this context, there is a cyclic relationship between different FM conditioning factors and functional incapacity. Muscle fatigue, rigidity and continuous and diffuse musculoskeletal pain are often reported by patients, being each one of these disorders the causes and, at the same time, the consequences of symptoms and worse labor capacity of FM females.

The fact that most patients did not practice physical exercises was also concerning, and was the most implied variable in functional capacity evaluation (p < 0.001), because the percentage (72.5%) is significantly high, similarly to a study with 30 chronic low back pain patients with prevalence of physical inactivity of 64.7%14.

As to primarily practiced physical exercises (walking and stretching/gymnastics), it has already been shown that physical activity, be it cardiovascular, strengthening or stretching, is associated to physical and mental well being and to social inclusion of individuals. Although clinical benefits of exercises are stressed for decreasing chronic pain intensity, physiological effects involved are still not clear; sometimes the analgesic effect is contradictory15.

It is worth stressing that just the fact of practicing daily physical activities does not imply a spinal protective factor and type of exercise, level of activity, workload and body posture in childhood/adolescence deserve attention. But it is certain that physical activities contribute for the prevention of spinal painful syndromes for providing, through strength and flexibility programs, more posture awareness16.

Another evidence of this is that the practice of physical activities has already been considered a positive factor for the QL of FM patients. In a randomized clinical trial with 42 FM patients, results have confirmed that the long term combination of aerobic, strengthening and flexibility exercises improves psychological health status and QL of these patients17.

It has also been proven that treatment with hydrokinesiotherapy of FM patients aged between 35 and 55 years has relieved pain and improved QL. It was observed improvement, in all patients, of painful symptoms characteristic of the disease and significant improvement in fatigue and sleep disorders. There has been improvement in performing daily life and professional activities, since the FM Impact Questionnaire applied before and after treatment has shown that water treatment allowed patients to perform activities otherwise made difficult by pain, rigidity and fatigue6.

So, it is up to health professionals assisting these patients to know their pain and functional changes, by a thorough evaluation which contributes to the diagnostic and treatment of changes causing discomfort, aiming at improving QL of these patients18.

For such, it is necessary to apply scientifically validated scales and use them as a complement of pain and functional capacity evaluation of people suffering with this type of pain, in addition to refer them to treatments already known as effective, such as physical exercise, stretching, walking and hydrotherapy programs; in addition to educational, cognitive-behavioral and rehabilitation programs.

So, treatment should include an interdisciplinary team systematically developing self-regulation skills needed for the maintenance of an active and independent lifestyle, adding specific activities to daily or weekly plan and regular follow up18.

Finally, the follow up of these patients should not exclude the psychological component. This, although not inducing pain, is part of the symptoms and modulates their expression. So, psychological support will contribute for reprogramming the subject and the idea of physical and psychical reprogramming should be central to the treatment. Professionals have to assure to ill subjects their voice, instituting in their practice the value of "listening, understanding and negotiating" as clinical practice resources to make the clinical meeting feasible1.

CONCLUSION

Females with FM have worse functional capacity as compared to low back pain patients and deserve attention of health professionals for continuous and thorough evaluation of the quality of pain, of physical fitness and capacity to practice exercises, aiming at a more effective treatment assuring QL.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lima MAG, Trad LAB. A dor crônica sob o olhar médico: modelo biomédico e prática clínica. Cad Saúde Pública. 2007;23(11):2672-80.
  • 2. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287-333.
  • 3. Martinez JE, Panossian C, Gavioli F. Estudo comparativo das características clínicas e abordagem de pacientes com fibromialgia atendidos em serviço público de Reumatologia e em consultório particular. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2006;46(1):32-6.
  • 4. Cecin HA. Proposição de uma reserva anátomofuncional, no canal raquidiano, como fator interferente na fisiopatologia das lombalgias e lombociatalgias mecânico-degenerativas. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 1997;43(4):295-310.
  • 5. Malateaux JM, Ricci FR, Fragoso YD. Investigação da lombalgia em população não hospitalar no litoral paulista. Rev Dor. 2011;12(1):19-22.
  • 6. Salvador JP, Silva QF, Zirbes MC. Hidrocinesioterapia no tratamento de mulheres com fibromialgia: estudo de caso. Fisioter Pesq. 2005;11(1):27-36.
  • 7. Ruviaro LF, Filippin LI. Prevalência de dor crônica em uma Unidade Básica de Saúde de cidade de médio porte. Rev Dor. 2012;13(2):128-31.
  • 8. Kreling MCGD, Cruz DALM, Pimenta CAM. Prevalência de dor crônica em adultos. Rev Bras Enferm. 2006;59(4):509-13.
  • 9. Cruz DALM, Pimenta CAM. Avaliação do doente com dor crônica em consulta de enfermagem: proposta de instrumento segundo diagnósticos de enfermagem. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 1999;7(3):49-62.
  • 10. Costa EDGMM, Kneubil MC, Leão WC, et al. Avaliação da satisfação sexual em pacientes portadoras de fibromialgia. Einstein. 2004;2(3):177-81.
  • 11. Martins MRI, Polvero LO, Rocha CE, et al. Uso de questionários para avaliar a multidimensionalidade e a qualidade de vida do fibromiálgico. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2011;52(1):16-26.
  • 12. Homann D, Goes SM, Timossi LS, et al. Avaliação da capacidade funcional de mulheres com fibromialgia: métodos diretos e autorrelatados. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2011;13(4):292-8.
  • 13. Dal Ponte ST, Machado A, Dutra APG, et al. Dor como queixa principal no serviço de Pronto-Atendimento do Hospital Municipal de São Pedro do Sul - RS. Rev Dor. 2008;9(4):1345-9.
  • 14. Mascarenhas CHM, Santos LS. Avaliação da dor e da capacidade funcional em indivíduos com lombalgia Crônica. J Health Sci Inst. 2011;29(3):205-8.
  • 15. Cardoso FS, Curtolo M, Natour J, et al. Avaliação da qualidade de vida, força muscular e capacidade funcional em mulheres com fibromialgia. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2011;51(4):338-50.
  • 16. Toscano JJO, Egypto EP. A influência do sedentarismo na prevalência de lombalgia. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2001;7(4):132-7.
  • 17. Sañudo B, Galiano D, Carrasco L, et al. Effects of a prolonged exercise program on key health outcomes in women with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(6):521-6.
  • 18. Martins MRI, Foss MHD, Santos Junior R, et al. A eficácia da conduta do grupo de postura em pacientes com lombalgia crônica. Rev Dor. 2010;11(2):116-21.
  • Endereço para correspondência:
    Dra. Roberta Meneses Oliveira
    Rua Lídia Brígido, 837 - Bairro Cidade dos Funcionários
    60821-800 Fortaleza, CE
    E-mail:
  • *
    Recebido do Grupo de Pesquisa em Tecnologia Tátil para Avaliação da Dor e Cuidados Paliativos (TECDOR) do Curso de Graduação em Enfermagem da Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE). Fortaleza, CE.
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      17 Apr 2013
    • Date of issue
      Mar 2013

    History

    • Received
      04 Oct 2012
    • Accepted
      01 Feb 2013
    Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor Av. Conselheiro Rodrigues Alves, 937 cj 2, 04014-012 São Paulo SP Brasil, Tel.: (55 11) 5904 3959, Fax: (55 11) 5904 2881 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: dor@dor.org.br