Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

A formação de constelações: o caso da indústria global de transporte aéreo

On the formation of constellations: the case of the global airline industry

Resumos

Constelações são alianças constituídas por empresas autônomas que competem entre si por clientes e membros no mesmo setor ou em setores similares. Empresas de transporte aéreo não somente vêm formando agrupamentos formais multilaterais, que aqui foram denominados de constelações explícitas, como também têm se engajado em uma rede de laços bilaterais que constituem grupos alternativos de empresas com maiores laços umas com as outras do que com empresas de fora do grupo, o que denominamos de "constelações implícitas". Este estudo mostra que constelações explícitas tendem a crescer atraindo empresas que possuem recursos diversos e que estejam associadas a membros-chave por meio de um grupo implícito. Ao mesmo tempo, membros de um grupo explícito tendem a criar associações implícitas com parceiros que possuam recursos similares aos seus, criando assim um grupo de empresas adjacente à constelação explícita. Outra descoberta deste estudo é a de que as associações explícitas tendem a apresentar uma inércia maior ao longo do tempo do que as associações implícitas, possivelmente devido aos grandes investimentos e aos compromissos contratuais necessários para a formação de grupos explícitos.

Constelações; alianças estratégicas; redes; estratégia cooperativa; setor de transporte aéreo


Constellations are alliances among multiple autonomous firms, such that these groups compete against each other in the same or similar industries for both clients and members. Airline carriers, in particular, have not only formed formal groupings in a multilateral fashion- which we call "explicit constellations" - but have also engaged in a web of bilateral ties configuring alternative groups of firms that have more bilateral ties to one another than to firms outside their group - which we call "implicit constellations". We find that explicit constellations tend to grow by luring firms holding diverse resources and that are associated with key members through an implicit group. At the same time, members of an explicit group tend to create implicit associations with partners holding resources that are similar to their own resources, thereby creating a cluster of firms adjacent to the explicit constellation. Explicit associations also tend to exhibit more inertia over time than implicit ones, possibly due to the larger non-redeployable investments and contractual commitments required for the formation of explicit groups.

Constellations; strategic alliances; networks; cooperative strategy; airline industry


FÓRUM

A formação de constelações: o caso da indústria global de transporte aéreo

On the formation of constellations: the case of the global airline industry

Sérgio G. Lazzarini; Thiago A. Z. Joaquim

Faculdades Ibmec

RESUMO

Constelações são alianças constituídas por empresas autônomas que competem entre si por clientes e membros no mesmo setor ou em setores similares. Empresas de transporte aéreo não somente vêm formando agrupamentos formais multilaterais, que aqui foram denominados de constelações explícitas, como também têm se engajado em uma rede de laços bilaterais que constituem grupos alternativos de empresas com maiores laços umas com as outras do que com empresas de fora do grupo, o que denominamos de "constelações implícitas". Este estudo mostra que constelações explícitas tendem a crescer atraindo empresas que possuem recursos diversos e que estejam associadas a membros-chave por meio de um grupo implícito. Ao mesmo tempo, membros de um grupo explícito tendem a criar associações implícitas com parceiros que possuam recursos similares aos seus, criando assim um grupo de empresas adjacente à constelação explícita. Outra descoberta deste estudo é a de que as associações explícitas tendem a apresentar uma inércia maior ao longo do tempo do que as associações implícitas, possivelmente devido aos grandes investimentos e aos compromissos contratuais necessários para a formação de grupos explícitos.

Palavras-chave: Constelações, alianças estratégicas, redes, estratégia cooperativa, setor de transporte aéreo.

ABSTRACT

Constellations are alliances among multiple autonomous firms, such that these groups compete against each other in the same or similar industries for both clients and members. Airline carriers, in particular, have not only formed formal groupings in a multilateral fashion– which we call "explicit constellations" – but have also engaged in a web of bilateral ties configuring alternative groups of firms that have more bilateral ties to one another than to firms outside their group – which we call "implicit constellations". We find that explicit constellations tend to grow by luring firms holding diverse resources and that are associated with key members through an implicit group. At the same time, members of an explicit group tend to create implicit associations with partners holding resources that are similar to their own resources, thereby creating a cluster of firms adjacent to the explicit constellation. Explicit associations also tend to exhibit more inertia over time than implicit ones, possibly due to the larger non-redeployable investments and contractual commitments required for the formation of explicit groups.

Key words: Constellations, strategic alliances, networks, cooperative strategy, airline industry.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

Artigo recebido em 09.06.2003.

Aprovado em 06.01.2004.

Sérgio G. Lazzarini

Professor das Faculdades Ibmec-SP. Doutor em Administração pela John M. Olin School of Business, Washington University. Interesses de pesquisa em alianças e redes de empresas, co-opetição, e dinâmicas competitivas. E-mail: sergiogl1@ibmec.br Endereço: Rua Maestro Cardim, 1170 – São Paulo – SP, 01323-001.

Thiago A. Z. Joaquim

Graduado em Administração de Empresas pelas Faculdades Ibmec-SP. Interesses de pesquisa em dinâmicas competitivas e estratégia empresarial. E-mail: thiagoazj@ibmec.br Endereço: Rua dos Franceses, 174, 61-B – São Paulo – SP, 01329-010.

Texto traduzido por Rebeca Alves Chu.

  • AXELROD, R.; MITCHELL, W.; THOMAS, R. E.; BENNETT, D. S.; BRUDERER, E. Coalition formation in standard-setting alliances. Management Science, v. 41, n. 9, p. 1493-1508, 1995.
  • BAKER, C. The global groupings. Airline Business, p. 40-45, 2001.
  • BLAU, P. Exchange and power in social life New York: Wiley, 1964.
  • BOCK, R. D.; HUSAIN, S. Z. An adaptation of Holzinger's B-Coefficients for the analysis of sociometric data. Sociometry, v. 13, n. 2, p. 146-153, 1950.
  • BORGATTI, S. P.; EVERETT, M.; FREEMAN, L. C. Ucinet 5.0 Natick: Analytic Technologies, 1999.
  • BURGERS, W. P.; HILL, C. W. L.; KIM, W. C. A theory of global strategic alliances: the case of the global auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, v. 14, n. 6, p. 419-432, 1993.
  • CAVES, R. E.; PORTER, M. E. From entry barriers to mobility barriers: conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 91, n. 2, p. 241-261, 1977.
  • CHUNG, S.; SINGH, H. Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2000.
  • CLOUGHERTY, J. A. US domestic airline mergers: the neglected international determinants. International Journal of Industrial Organization, v. 20, n. 4, p. 557-576, 2002.
  • DARR, E. D.; KURTZBERG, T. R. An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 82, n. 1, p. 28-44, 2000.
  • DAS, T. K.; TENG, B. S. Alliance constellations: a social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review, v. 27, n. 3, p. 445-456, 2002.
  • DOMOWITZ, I. Electronic derivatives exchanges: implicit mergers, network externalities, and standardization. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, v. 35, n. 2, p. 163-175, 1995.
  • FARRELL, J.; SALONER, G. Coordination through committees and markets. Rand Journal of Economics, v. 19, n. 2, p. 235-252, 1988.
  • GARCIA-PONT, C.; NOHRIA, N. Local versus global mimetism: the dynamics of alliance formation in the automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 4, p. 307-321, 2002.
  • GLOVER, F. Tabu search part I. Orsa Journal on Computing, v. 1, n. 3, p. 190-206, 1989.
  • GNYAWALI, D. R.; MADHAVAN, R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 3, p. 431-445, 2001.
  • GOMES-CASSERES, B. Group versus group: how alliance networks compete. Harvard Business Review, v. 72, n. 4, p. 62-74, 1994.
  • GOMES-CASSERES, B. The alliance revolution: the new shape of business rivalry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
  • GRANDORI, A.; SODA, G. Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, v. 16, n. 2, p. 183-214, 1995.
  • GREENE, W. H. Econometric analysis Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
  • GULATI, R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, v. 38, n. 1, p. 85-112, 1995a.
  • GULATI, R. Social structure and alliance formation pattern: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 40, n. 4, p. 619-652, 1995b.
  • GULATI, R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, v. 19, n. 4, p. 293-317, 1998.
  • GULATI, R.; GARGIULO, M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, v. 104, n. 5, p. 1.439-1493, 1999.
  • HANLON, P. Global airlines: competition in a transnational industry. 2. ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1999.
  • HANNAN, M. T.; FREEMAN, J. Organizational ecology Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
  • HUMAN, S. E.; PROVAN, K. G. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: a comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 45, n. 2, p. 327-365, 2000.
  • HWANG, P.; BURGERS, W. P. The many faces of multi-firm alliances: lessons for managers. California Management Review, v. 39, n. 3, p. 101117, 1997.
  • JONES, C.; HESTERLY, W. S.; FLADMOE-LINDQUIST, K.; BORGATTI, S. P. Professional service constellations: how strategies and capabilities influence collaborative stability and change. Organization Science, v. 9, n. 1, p. 396-410, 1998.
  • JOSHI, M. P.; KASHLAK, R. J.; SHERMAN, H. D. How alliances are reshaping telecommunications. Long Range Planning, v. 31, n. 4, p. 542548, 1998.
  • KATZ, M. L.; SHAPIRO, C. Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 8, n. 2, p. 93-115, 1994.
  • KRAATZ, M. S. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, v. 41, n. 6, p. 621-643, 1998.
  • LAWLESS, M. W.; ANDERSON, P. C. Generational technological change: effects of innovation and local rivalry on performance. Academy of Management Journal, v. 39, n. 5, p. 1185-1217, 1996.
  • LAZZARINI, S. G. The performance implications of membership in competing firm constellations: evidence from the global airline industry. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 2003.
  • LEVINTHAL, D. A.; FICHMAN, M. Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: auditor-client relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 33, n. 3, p. 345-369, 1988.
  • LEVINTHAL, D. A.; MARCH, J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, v. 14, n. 8, p. 95-112, 1993.
  • LI, S. X.; ROWLEY, T. J. Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: syndicate formation among U.S. investment banks. Academy of Management Journal, v. 45, n. 6, p. 11041119, 2002.
  • MACNEIL, I. R. Values in contract: internal and external. Northwestern University Law Review, v. 78, n. 2, p. 340-418, 1980.
  • MADDALA, G. S. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • MARTIN, X.; PARK, N. K. Why firms enter into successive international alliances: bounded momentum and alliance formation. New York: Stern School of Business, 2002. (Working paper).
  • MCPHERSON, J. M. Hypernetwork sampling: duality and differentiation among voluntary organizations. Social Networks, v. 3, n. 4, p. 225-249, 1982.
  • NOHRIA, N.; GARCIA-PONT, C. Global strategic alliances and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, v. 12, n. 4, p. 105-124, 1991.
  • OUM, T. H.; YU, C. Winning airlines: productivity and cost competitiveness of the world's major airlines. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
  • PARK, J. H.; ZHANG, A. An empirical analysis of global airline alliances: cases in North Atlantic markets. Review of Industrial Organization, v. 16, n. 4, p. 367-383, 2000.
  • PARK, N. K.; MARTIN, X. When do resources enhance firm value? Testing alliance and resource effects on firm value New York: Stern School of Business, 2001. (Working paper).
  • RICHARDSON, G. B. The organization of industry. The Economic Journal, v. 82, n. 327, p. 883-896, 1972.
  • RING, P. S.; VAN DE VEN, A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, v. 19, n. 1, p. 90-118, 1994.
  • SCHILLING, M. A.; STEENSMA, H. K. The use of modular organizational forms: an industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal, v. 44, n. 6, p. 1149-1168, 2001.
  • STUART, T. E. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 43, p. 668-698, 1998.
  • TEECE, D. J. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1-25, 1992.
  • TER KUILE, A. Hub fever. Airline Business, v. 11, n. 12, p. 66-71, 1997.
  • THOMPSON, J. D. Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
  • VANHAVERBEKE, W.; NOORDERHAVEN, N. G. Competition between alliance blocks: the case of the Risc microprocessor technology. Organization Studies, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1-30, 2001.
  • WALKER, G. Network analysis for cooperative interfirm relationships. In: CONTRACTOR, F. J.; LORANGE, P. (Eds.). Cooperative strategies in international business: joint ventures and technology partnerships between firms. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1988. p. 227-240.

Datas de Publicação

  • Publicação nesta coleção
    10 Fev 2011
  • Data do Fascículo
    Jun 2004

Histórico

  • Aceito
    06 Jan 2004
  • Recebido
    09 Jun 2003
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de S.Paulo Av 9 de Julho, 2029, 01313-902 S. Paulo - SP Brasil, Tel.: (55 11) 3799-7999, Fax: (55 11) 3799-7871 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rae@fgv.br