Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Effects of Diets with Graded Levels of Canola Meal on the Growth Performance, Meat Qualities, Relative Organ Weights, and Blood Characteristics of Broiler Chickens

ABSTRACT

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the dietary supplementation of canola meal (CM) on the growth performance, carcass characteristics, antibody titers against Newcastle disease virus and Infectious bronchitis virus, and blood profiles of broiler chickens. In total 600 day-old feather-sexed Ross male broiler chicks were randomly assigned into five treatments with six replicates of 20 birds each for 35 days. Treatments consisted of five experimental diets containing 0 (control), 3, 5, 10, or 15% canola meal (CM). Final body weight (BW) was not affected by the dietary treatments. Daily BW gain (DWG) and feed intake linearly decreased as dietary CM inclusion increased during the starter phase (p<0.0001), but not during the grower and total rearing periods. Chicks fed the diet with 15% CM presented the lowest DWG during the starter phase. Breast meat yield of CM-fed chicks linearly decreased as CM inclusion level increased (p=0.0014). Dietary CM supplementation did not influence organ relative weights, except for the spleen, meat quality, or blood profile. The results suggest that the CM may replace soybean meal (SBM) with no detrimental effects on overall growth performance or physiological responses of broiler chickens. However, it is recommended that supplementing excess amount of CM into broilers' diet should be taken into account in practical diet formulation as it could impair growth performance at early age and lower breast meat yields.

Keywords:
Broiler chickens; canola meal; growth performance; meat quality

INTRODUCTION

The increase in soybean meal (SBM) prices in recent years had a strong impact in poultry feed costs. In order to reduce the burden of increased feed cost, several studies have focused on the exploration and efficient use of alternative feedstuffs. Rapeseed or canola meal is commonly used in animal feeds around the world and it ranks as the most widely traded plant protein sources after SBM (USDA, 2011). The term canola was coined to differentiate it from rapeseed; it is also called the 'double-zero rapeseed' (i.e., with low erucic acid and glucosinolate levels). Canola meal (CM), which is a by-product of canola oil extraction, has high protein levels with high methionine and cystine contents; however, it is poor in lysine like many plant-derived protein feedstuffs (Khajali & Slominski, 2012Khajali F, Slominski BA. Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry. Poultry Science 2012;91:2564-2575.). CM is available at relatively low price and thus, its inclusion level may be increased to reduce the poultry feed costs (Klein et al., 1981Klein KK, Salmon RE, Gardiner EE. Economic analysis of the use of canola meal in diets for broiler chickens. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 1981;29:327-338.).

Although CM is an economically viable alternative to SBM, there are several reports of reduced performance of broiler chickens when CM is replaced for a significant amount of SBM. Mushtaq et al. (2007Mushtaq T, Sarwar M, Ahmad G, Mirza MA, Nawaz H, Mushtaq MM, et al. Influence of canola meal-based diets supplemented with exogenous enzyme and digestible lysine on performance, digestibility, carcass, and immune responses of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 2007;86:2144-2151.) reported that the BW gain was significantly reduced when 30% CM was supplemented in the diets of 1- to 21-d-old broilers. The BW of broilers fed a diet supplemented with 7 and 10% CM decreased by 8.9 and 13.2%, respectively (Borcea et al., 1996Borcea F, Csuma A, Grossu D. The partial replacement of soybean meal with canola meal in broiler diet [abstract]. Archiva Zootechnica 1996;4:69.). In contrast, it has been reported that the replacement of 100% SBM by CM maintained broiler performance, provided diets are supplemented with lysine (Leeson et al., 1987Leeson S, Atteh JO, Summers JD. The replacement value of canola meal for soybean meal in poultry diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 1987;67:151-158.; Kocher et al., 2000Kocher A, Choct M, Porter MD, Broz J. The effects of enzyme addition to broiler diets containing high concentrations of canola and sunflower meal. Poultry Science 2000;79:1767-1774.). The observed discrepancy in CM feeding values prompted us to study the effects of the dietary inclusion of graded levels of CM on the growth performance of broilers. In addition, meat quality and various physiological responses to CM feeding were monitored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Diets, animals and management

The CM used in this study was produced and provided by CJ Cheil Jedang Corp., Korea. The CM samples were first analyzed for their chemical composition using the methods of AOAC (2000) in the officially accredited feed analysis laboratory (Korea Feed Ingredients Association, Seoul, South Korea) and are presented in Table 1. The experimental diets containing 0, 3, 5, 10, or 15% CM at the expense of SBM were formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of broilers according to the NRC (1994), as shown in Tables 2 and 3. All diets were formulated to contain identical levels of true metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen (TMEn), crude protein (CP), available lysine and total sulfur amino acids.

Table 1
Analyzed chemical composition of canola meal (as-is basis)

Table 2
Ingredients and compositions of experimental diets (starter)1,2
Table 3
Ingredients and compositions of experimental diets (finisher)1,2

Six hundred one-day-old feather-sexed Ross male broiler chicks were received from a local hatchery, individually weighed, and randomly divided into 30 pens (20 chicks per pen, six pens per treatment) on rice straw litter. A 23/1 light/dark cycle was used throughout the experimental period. At 21 days of age, all chicks were given an attenuated live mixed vaccine (Nobilis Ma5+Clone 30, MSD AH Korea Ltd., Korea) by eye drop.

The diets and water were provided for ad libitum for 35 days. The chicks were initially reared at 33ºC and the room temperature was gradually decreased to reach 23ºC and kept thereafter. Body weight (BW) and feed intake on a pen basis were recorded weekly and used to calculate feed conversion rate (FCR).

Sampling

At the end of the experimental period (14 days after vaccination), 12 birds per treatment (two birds per replicate) were randomly selected, individually weighed, and sacrificed, when blood samples were collected. Sera were obtained by gentle centrifugation and stored at 20ºC until use. Immediately after blood sampling, the liver, spleen, abdominal fat, breast and leg were removed and weighed, and their weight expressed as grams of organ per 100 g BW. All animal care procedures were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Konkuk University.

Measurement of humoral antibodies

In order to evaluate broilers' humoral immune response to vaccination, serum samples were analyzed for anti-NDV and anti-IBV antibody titers using an ELISA using commercial kits, following manufacturer's direction (IDDEX Laboratory, Inc., Korea).

Measurements of blood parameters

The activities of the enzymes glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) and glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT) in the serum samples were measured according to the colorimetric method, as previous described (An et al., 2007An BK, Im HJ, Kang CW. Nutritional values of red pepper seed oil meal and effects of its supplementation on performances and physiological responses of broiler chicks. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 2007;20:971-975.).

Determination of meat quality

The breast muscles were evaluated for cooking loss, pH, and color 24 h postmortem. To determine the cooking loss, 60 g of breast meat was boiled individually in polyethylene bags immersed in 80ºC water bath for 30 min and cooled at room temperature for 30 min. Cooking loss was calculated as the difference between uncooked and cooked weights. Breast meat pH values were estimated in triplicate with a pH meter (Model 340, Mettler-Toledo, Switzerland). Briefly, 1 g of breast meat was cut into small pieces and homogenized with 9 mL of distilled water for 1 min in an Ultra-Turrax (Model No. T25, Janken and Kunkel, Germany). The instrumental color of fresh meat, including lightness (L*), redness (a*) and yellowness (b*), was measured by a reflectance colorimeter (CR 210, Minolta, Japan) using illuminant source C. Color was measured in triplicate on the bone-side surface of each sample. The colorimeter was calibrated throughout the study using a standard white ceramic tile.

Statistical analysis

All the data obtained in this study were analyzed using the GLM procedure of SAS software (SAS Institute, 2002). Pen was considered an experimental unit. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were used to determine the linear and quadratic effects of dietary canola meal according to the following model: Y=µ+a+e, where Y was the observed response variables; µ was the overall mean; a was the effect of diet and e was the random error. Statistical significance was accepted at p<0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

According to the chemical analysis, CM, on an as-is basis, contained 6.80% of moisture, 39.9% of CP, 2.16% of ether extract, 10.8% of crude fiber, and 6.80% of crude ash, respectively, and these were comparable with NRC values (1994). In addition, CM amino acid profiles (Table 1) are considered favorable compared with those of SBM, although CP and lysine levels in CM vs. SBM are relatively low (Khajali and Slominski, 2012Khajali F, Slominski BA. Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry. Poultry Science 2012;91:2564-2575.). A value of 1,770 kcal of TMEn/kg was assigned to the CM for the formulation of the experimental diets in this study.

Growth performance of broiler chicks fed diets with varying CM levels is presented in Table 4. Final BW at 35 days of age was not affected by dietary treatments. However, DWG linearly (p<0.001) decreased as CM inclusion levels increased between 1-21 d of age. The chicks fed the diet with 15% CM showed the lowest daily weight gain. A linear trend for feed intake was determined with increasing dietary CM levels during 1-21 d of age (p=0.0204). However, DWG, feed intake, and FCR were not affected by CM dietary levels during the grower phase. When data were pooled for total rearing period (1-35 d), no significant effects of dietary CM levels on DWG, feed intake or FCR were observed.

Table 4
The dietary effect of canola meal on growth performance in broiler chickens1,2,3

In most studies on the supplementation of broiler diets with CM, the growth performance of broiler chickens was not affected when nutrient density, especially of lysine, was maintained in the experimental diets. For example, Leeson et al. (1987Leeson S, Atteh JO, Summers JD. The replacement value of canola meal for soybean meal in poultry diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 1987;67:151-158.) did not find any significant effects of replacing SBM with CM on feed intake, BWG and feed efficiency. In addition, it was shown that dehulled CM added in broiler diets at the level of 20% had no adverse effect on overall growth performance (Baloch et al., 2003Baloch GM, Solangi AA, Wagan MP, Tahira M. Efficiency of canola meal in broiler ration. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2003;2:138-142.). In the present study, the overall growth performance was not affected by CM dietary levels during grower phase and total rearing period, in agreement with those results.

However, in this study, with increasing levels of CM, DWG linearly decreased compared with the control during the starter phase (p<0.0001). In several studies, a reduction in growth performance of young chicks was reported when high CM levels were added to the diet. Mushtaq et al. (2007Mushtaq T, Sarwar M, Ahmad G, Mirza MA, Nawaz H, Mushtaq MM, et al. Influence of canola meal-based diets supplemented with exogenous enzyme and digestible lysine on performance, digestibility, carcass, and immune responses of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 2007;86:2144-2151.) reported that the supplementation of 30% CM into broiler diets reduced BWG from 1 to 21 d of age. The addition of 7 and 10% CM negatively affected broiler DWG and FCR, resulting in a significant BW depression (Borcea et al., 1996Borcea F, Csuma A, Grossu D. The partial replacement of soybean meal with canola meal in broiler diet [abstract]. Archiva Zootechnica 1996;4:69.). On the other hand, no clear negative effect of dietary CM addition on the growth of broiler chickens was reported. For example, Nassar & Arscott (1986Nassar AR, Arscott GH. Canola meal for broilers and the effect of a dietary supplement of iodinated casein on performance and thyroid status. Nutrition Reports International 1986;34:791-799.) reported that a diet with 50% replacement of SBM with CM did not negatively affect the early growth of broiler chickens. A similar result was reported by Min et al. (2009Min YN, Hancock A, Yan F, Lu C, Coto C, Karimi A, et al. Use of combinations of canola meal and distillers dried grains with solubles in broiler starter diets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2009;18:725-733.), who did not find any differences in the early growth of broilers fed a diet containing up to 10% CM.

The impaired growth performance caused by increasing CM levels at early ages of broiler chicks as shown in this study should not be attributed to the composition of the CM-added diets as all experimental diets were equally formulated on the basis of TMEn and available limiting AA. The plausible reason(s) would be that CM contains high fiber and some anti-nutritional factors, such as NSP, phytic acid, glucosinolates and sinapine (Clandinin, 1961Clandinin DR. Effect of sinapine, the bitter substance in rapeseed oil meal, on the growth of chickens. Poultry Science 1961;40:484-487.; Khajali & Slominski, 2012Khajali F, Slominski BA. Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry. Poultry Science 2012;91:2564-2575.), thus reducing feed intake which consequently led to early growth depression. Indeed, in the present study, there was a significant linear trend of dietary CM levels affecting feed intake during the starter phase (p=0.0204). However, observation that there was no significant effect on feed intake during the grower phase suggests that CM is palatable to old broilers.

Carcass characteristics and meat qualities of broiler chicks fed diets with varying levels of CM are presented in Table 5. There were no significant differences in relative weights of liver, abdominal fat and legs, except for spleen. The relative weight of breast meat in chicks fed diets with 10 and 15% CM was linearly decreased (p=0.0014). There were no significant linear and quadratic trends of dietary levels of CM affecting cooking loss, color and pH of breast meats (Table 5). The CM, as it contains low levels of lysine and arginine, may affect the carcass characteristics and breast yield. Jung et al. (2012Jung B, Mitchell RD, Batal AB. Evaluation of the use of feeding distillers dried grains with solubles in combination with canola meal on broiler performance and carcass characteristics. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2012;21:776-787.) found that addition of CM at the level of 7.5% in diet significantly (p<0.05) decreased the carcass yield and marginally (p>005) breast meat yield in broiler chickens. Mushtaq et al. (2007Mushtaq T, Sarwar M, Ahmad G, Mirza MA, Nawaz H, Mushtaq MM, et al. Influence of canola meal-based diets supplemented with exogenous enzyme and digestible lysine on performance, digestibility, carcass, and immune responses of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 2007;86:2144-2151.) also reported that the breast meat was reduced in broiler chickens fed a diet containing 30% CM diet with only 0.8% available lysine. The yield of breast meat is considered sensitive to the quantity and composition of dietary amino acids, and thus careful consideration should be taken when diet with high levels of CM are fed.

Table 5
The dietary effect of canola meal on carcass characteristics and meat qualities in broiler chickens1,2,3

The activities of GOT and GPT in serum and the antibody titers of against NDV and IBV were not affected by CM feeding (data not shown). The latter results agreed with those from Mushtaq et al. (2007Mushtaq T, Sarwar M, Ahmad G, Mirza MA, Nawaz H, Mushtaq MM, et al. Influence of canola meal-based diets supplemented with exogenous enzyme and digestible lysine on performance, digestibility, carcass, and immune responses of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 2007;86:2144-2151.) who found no significant difference in antibody titer against NDV of broilers fed diets containing 20 or 30% CM. The measurement of serum GOT and GPT activities, indicative of tissue damage in bird, is a valuable tool to determine a safe inclusion level for non-conventional feedstuff (Diaz et al., 2003Diaz GJ, Roldan LP, Cortez A. Intoxication of Crotalaria pallida seeds to growing broiler chicks. Veterinary and Human Toxicology 2003;45:187-189.). Earlier study revealed that a significant amount of crambe meal inclusion, a locally produced non-conventional source, resulted in elevation of serum GOT level (Kloss et al., 1996Kloss P, Jeffery E, Tumbleson M, Zhang Y, Parsons C, Wallig M. Studies on the toxic effects of crambe meal and two of its constituents, 1-cyano-2-hydroxy-3-butene and epi-progoitrin, in broiler chick diets. British Poultry Science 1996;37:971-986.). However, the CM used in this study did not adversely affect blood profiles and response of antibody production.

In conclusion, the canola meal can replace SBM without any detrimental effects on overall growth performance and physiological responses of broiler chickens. However, the using excessive amount of CM lowered growth performance, especially at early ages, and breast meat yield of broiler chickens, of which results needs to be considered in practical feed formulation.

ACKNOWLDEGMENTS

This paper was supported by the KU Research Professor Program of Konkuk University and the CJ CheilJedang Corp., Korea. We thank In-Sook An in the Laboratory of Poultry Science, Konkuk University for the technical assistance.

REFERENCES

  • An BK, Im HJ, Kang CW. Nutritional values of red pepper seed oil meal and effects of its supplementation on performances and physiological responses of broiler chicks. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 2007;20:971-975.
  • AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. Gaithersburg, Maryland; 2000.
  • Baloch GM, Solangi AA, Wagan MP, Tahira M. Efficiency of canola meal in broiler ration. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2003;2:138-142.
  • Borcea F, Csuma A, Grossu D. The partial replacement of soybean meal with canola meal in broiler diet [abstract]. Archiva Zootechnica 1996;4:69.
  • Clandinin DR. Effect of sinapine, the bitter substance in rapeseed oil meal, on the growth of chickens. Poultry Science 1961;40:484-487.
  • Diaz GJ, Roldan LP, Cortez A. Intoxication of Crotalaria pallida seeds to growing broiler chicks. Veterinary and Human Toxicology 2003;45:187-189.
  • Jung B, Mitchell RD, Batal AB. Evaluation of the use of feeding distillers dried grains with solubles in combination with canola meal on broiler performance and carcass characteristics. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2012;21:776-787.
  • Khajali F, Slominski BA. Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry. Poultry Science 2012;91:2564-2575.
  • Klein KK, Salmon RE, Gardiner EE. Economic analysis of the use of canola meal in diets for broiler chickens. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 1981;29:327-338.
  • Kloss P, Jeffery E, Tumbleson M, Zhang Y, Parsons C, Wallig M. Studies on the toxic effects of crambe meal and two of its constituents, 1-cyano-2-hydroxy-3-butene and epi-progoitrin, in broiler chick diets. British Poultry Science 1996;37:971-986.
  • Kocher A, Choct M, Porter MD, Broz J. The effects of enzyme addition to broiler diets containing high concentrations of canola and sunflower meal. Poultry Science 2000;79:1767-1774.
  • Leeson S, Atteh JO, Summers JD. The replacement value of canola meal for soybean meal in poultry diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 1987;67:151-158.
  • Min YN, Hancock A, Yan F, Lu C, Coto C, Karimi A, et al. Use of combinations of canola meal and distillers dried grains with solubles in broiler starter diets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2009;18:725-733.
  • Mushtaq T, Sarwar M, Ahmad G, Mirza MA, Nawaz H, Mushtaq MM, et al. Influence of canola meal-based diets supplemented with exogenous enzyme and digestible lysine on performance, digestibility, carcass, and immune responses of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 2007;86:2144-2151.
  • Nassar AR, Arscott GH. Canola meal for broilers and the effect of a dietary supplement of iodinated casein on performance and thyroid status. Nutrition Reports International 1986;34:791-799.
  • NRC- National Research Council. Nutrient requirement of poultry. 9th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1994.
  • SAS. SAS user's guide. Version 8. Cary: SAS Institute; 2002.
  • USDA. Oilseeds: World market and trade. Washington, DC; 2011. p.11-12.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Apr-Jun 2016

History

  • Received
    Apr 2015
  • Accepted
    June 2015
Fundação de Apoio à Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas Rua Barão de Paranapanema, 146 - Sala 72, Bloco A, Bosque, Campinas, SP - 13026-010. Tel.: 19 3255-8500 - Campinas - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@facta.org.br