초록
This paper presents an analysis that middles are dispositionals containing a covert dynamic possibility modal with a [+Cause] feature. This analysis naturally explains the following middle properties: First, an internal argument of the middle verbs appears in the subject position because it is ascribed a dispositional property and the subject position is assigned the Cause Ɵ-role by the covert possibility modal operator. The responsibility reading is also accounted for by the Cause Ɵ-role assigned to the subject position. Genericity follows from the fact that middles are dispositionals. Modifiers which specify an event-property are needed to provide the nuclear scope for the generic operator which lexically binds the event and agent argument of the verb.
키워드
middles, dispositionality, dynamic modality, possibility modal, in-virtue-of generalization, responsibility reading
참고문헌(31)
-
[학술지] Arkema, P / 1995 / Middles and nonmovement / Linguistic Inquiry 26 : 173 ~ 197
-
[학위논문] Brennan, V. / 1993 / Root and Epistemic Modal Auxiliary Verbs
-
[학술지] Carlson, G / 1981 / Distribution of Free Choice Any / CLS 17 : 8 ~ 23
-
[보고서] Condoravdi, C. / 1989 / The middle: Where semantics and morphology meet : 16 ~ 30
-
[단행본] Dahl, O. / 1975 / On Generics, In Formal Semantics of Natural Language 17 : 99 ~ 112
-
[인터넷자료] Dowty, D. / The semantic asymmetry of "argument alternations"
-
[단행본] Fagan, S. / 1992 / The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions. A Study with Special Reference to German / Cambridge University Press
-
[학술대회] Greenberg, Y / 2002 / Two Types of Quantificational Modalized Genericity, and the Interpretation of Bare Plural and Indefinite Singular NPs / Proceedings of SALT 12. Ithaca: CLC Publications, Cornell University : 104 ~ 123
-
[단행본] Greenberg, Y. / 2003 / Manifestations of Genericity / Routledge
-
[학위논문] Heim, I. / 1982 / The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases
-
[학위논문] Kim, B. / 1995 / A Causative Analysis of Tough-constructions
-
[학술지] Keyser, S / 1984 / On the middle and ergative constructions in English / Linguistic Inquiry 15 : 381 ~ 416
-
[단행본] Kratzer, A. / 1981 / Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics / de Gruyter : 38 ~ 74
-
[단행본] Kratzer, A / 1986 / Conditionals, In Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory / CLS : 1 ~ 15
-
[단행본] Kratzer, A / 1991 / Modality, In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung / de Gruyter : 639 ~ 650
-
[단행본] Krifka, M. Pelletier / 1995 / Genericity: An Introduction, In The Generic Book / University of Chicago Press : 1 ~ 124
-
[단행본] Lekakou, M. / 2004 / Middles as Disposition Ascriptions, In Sinn und Bedeutung 8 / FB Linguistik : 181 ~ 196
-
[학위논문] Lekakou, M. / 2005 / In the Middle, Somewhat Elevated. The Semantics of Middles and its Cross-Linguistic Realization
-
[학술지] Massam, D / 1992 / Null objects and non-thematic subject / Linguistics 28 : 115 ~ 137
-
[단행본] McConnell-Ginet, S / 1994 / On the Non-Optionality of Certain Modifiers, In Proceedings of SALT 4 / Cornell University : 230 ~ 250
-
[학위논문] Menéndez-Benito, S. / 2005 / The Grammar of Choice
-
[단행본] Menéndez-Benito, S. / 2012 / On Dispositional Sentences, In Genericity / Oxford University Press
-
[학술지] van Oosten, J / 1977 / Subjects and agenthood in English / Chicago Linguistic Society 13 : 454 ~ 471
-
[학위논문] van Oosten, J. / 1984 / The Nature of Subjects, Topics and Agents; A Cognitive Explanation
-
[단행본] Palmer, F. R. / 2001 / Mood and Modality / Cambridge University
-
[단행본] Robert, I. / 1987 / The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects / Foris Publications
-
[학술지] Stroik, T / 1992 / Middles and Movement / Linguistic Inquiry 23 : 127 ~ 137
-
[학술지] Stroik, T / 1995 / On Middle Formation: A Reply to Zribi-Hertz / Linguistic Inquiry 26 : 165 ~ 171
-
[학술지] Strock, T / 1999 / Middles and Reflexivity / Linguistic Inquiry 30 : 119 ~ 131
-
[학위논문] Tao, Y. / 2011 / Chinese Middle Constructions: A Case of Disposition Ascription
-
[학술지] Zribi-Hertz, A / 1993 / On Stroik's analysis of English middle constructions / Linguistic Inquiry 24 : 583 ~ 589