본고는 대학생들의 글을 구성 및 논리적인 면(논거 제시, 주제와의 관련성 등), 어법적인 면(어휘 선택, 호응 관계, 수식 관계, 성분 생략 등)에 초점을 맞춰 살펴보았다. 여기에 인용한 자료는 대학 1학년 학생들이 수업 시간에 직접 작성한 글이다. ‘생리공결제’와 ‘사형제도’ 도입 여부를 주제로 자신의 찬, 반 주장을 논술한 4편의 글이 분석의 자료로 쓰였다. 어법적 오류가 적은 글, 논리적 결함이 적은 글이 ‘좋은 글’의 본질이라고 할 때 본고의 첨삭 지도의 사례는 글쓰기 교육 과정의 한 본보기가 될 수 있을 것이다.
This study aims to examine college students' writings, with a focus on their construction, logic (presentation of rationale, relationship with the theme, etc) and grammar (use of word, correspondence, modification, omission, etc.) The materials cited here are the writings the students personally composed during their school classes in a year. An analysis is made of four writings which present the students' opinions approving or disapproving, for example, ‘a system for officially recognizing absence due to menstruation’ and ‘introduction of the system of capital punishment.' The correction cases listed here may set an example of the composition education since 'good writings' necessarily have good grammar and few logical discrepancies.
This study aims to examine college students' writings, with a focus on their construction, logic (presentation of rationale, relationship with the theme, etc) and grammar (use of word, correspondence, modification, omission, etc.) The materials cited here are the writings the students personally composed during their school classes in a year. An analysis is made of four writings which present the students' opinions approving or disapproving, for example, ‘a system for officially recognizing absence due to menstruation’ and ‘introduction of the system of capital punishment.' The correction cases listed here may set an example of the composition education since 'good writings' necessarily have good grammar and few logical discrepancies.
