Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016)
Economics of Higher Education

Thematic Articles

Historical and Theoretical Framework of the Relation between Higher Education Institutions and the Process of Regional Economic Development

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040103

Published 2016-03-24

  • Alexandru Cristian Fotea
    • ,
  • Corneliu Gutu

Alexandru Cristian Fotea
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi

Corneliu Gutu
Academy of Economic Sciences of Moldova

Abstract

Objective: The objective is to show how the relation between the higher education institutions and their surrounding environment has evolved over the centuries and how it can increase the economic competitiveness of regional and national economies.

Research Design & Methods: For the literature review that illustrates the evolution of the relation between higher education institutions and its surroundings we used a qualitative analysis using various sources of information (books, articles, journals etc.) In order to capture the contribution of higher education to sustainable development of national economies in Eastern Europe we used an empirical analysis based on the data and statistics provided by the The Global Competitiveness Report.

Findings: In the context of a contemporary global knowledge economy, higher education institutions contribute to the economic competitiveness of regions and nations by performing quality higher education and innovation activities.

Implications & Recommendations: Both theoretical literature and practical evidence show that the relation between higher education institutions and the surrounding economies have helped eachother become more competitive. More than ever, nowadays regions and nations must foster and invest in the most important institutions that provide higher education and innovation which increase the competitiveness level.

Contribution & Value Added: The originality of this work lies in displaying the historical evolution of higher education in relation to its surrounding environment and  the comparative analysis of the two competitivity pillars higher education and innovation  in Eastern Europe.

Article type:

research paper

Keywords:

higher education institutions; regional economic development; socio-economic impact;

JEL codes:

O1, F63

Keywords

higher education institutions, regional economic development, socio-economic impact

PDF

Author Biography

Alexandru Cristian Fotea

Bachelor of Economics and Business Administration (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania); Master in International Trade (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania); PhD  in Economics (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania).

Corneliu Gutu

Professor at the Academy of Economic Sciences of Moldova, Republic of Moldova; Bachleor in Economics at the National Economic Institute in Moscow, PhD in Economics obtained at the National Economic Institute in Moscow.

References

  1. Andrews, R.B. (1953). Mechanics of the urban economic base: historical development of the base concept. Land Economics, 161-167.
  2. Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the Regional Contribution of Higher Education Institutions: A Literature Review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 9, OECD Publishing.
  3. Bender, T. (1988). Introduction. In Bender, T. (ed.), The University and the City. From Medieval Origins to Present (pp. 3-10). New York/Oxford: Oxford Uniersity Press.
  4. Broadberry, S., & Gupta, B. (2006). The early modern great divergence: wages, prices and eco-nomic development in Europe and Asia, 1500-1800. The Economic History Review, 59(1), 2-31.
  5. Brewer, P.D., & Brewer, K. L. (2010). Knowledge management, human resource management, and higher education: a theoretical model. Journal of Education for Business, 85(6), 330-335.
  6. Carpentier, V. (2006). Funding in Higher Education and Economic Growth in France and the United Kingdom, 1921-2003. Higher Education Management and Policy, 18(3), 1-22.
  7. Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (4), 945-974;
  8. Cooke, P., & Schienstock, G. (2000). Structural competitiveness and learning regions. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(3), 265-280.
  9. Crafts, N. (1996). Post-neoclassical endogenous growth theory: what are its policy implications?. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30-47.
  10. De Meulemeester, J.L., & Rochat, D. (1995). A causality analysis of the link between higher educa-tion and economic development. Economics of Education Review, 14(4), 351-361.
  11. Drucker, P.F. (1995). The new productivity challenge. Quality in Higher Education, 37.
  12. Elliott, D.S., Levin, P.S.L., & Meisel, J.B. (1988). Measuring the economic impact of institutions of higher education. Research in Higher Education, 28(1), 17-33.
  13. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 66-83.
  14. Fotea, A.C. (2014), A Historical perspective on the regional dimension of higher education institu-tions, Studia Humanitatis, 4, 1-16.
  15. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.
  16. Gascoigne, J. (2002). Cambridge in the Age of the Enlightenment: Science, Religion and Politics from the Restoration to the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
  18. Glomm, G., & Ravikumar, B. (1992). Public versus private investment in human capital: endoge-nous growth and income inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 818-834.
  19. Goldstein, H., & Renault, C. (2004). Contributions of universities to regional economic develop-ment: a quasi-experimental approach. Regional Studies, 38(7), 733-746.
  20. Green, K.C., & Gilbert, S. W. (1995). Great expectations: Content, communications, productivity, and the role of information technology in higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(2), 8-18.
  21. Hughes, T.P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems. In W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, T.J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 51-82). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  22. Ikenberry, G.J. (1986). The irony of state strength: comparative responses to the oil shocks in the 1970s. International Organization, 40(01), 105-137.
  23. Jorgenson, D.W., & Griliches, Z. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. The Review of Economic Studies, 249-283.
  24. Kerr, C. (ed.) (1980). Three Thousand Futures: The Next Twenty Years for Higher Education (Carne-gie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education, 9). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  25. Kerr, C. (1982). The Uses of the University. Fourth Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  26. King, R.G., Plosser, C.I., & Rebelo, S. T. (1988). Production, growth and business cycles: I. The basic neoclassical model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 21(2), 195-232.
  27. Krugman, P. (1992). Does the new trade theory require a new trade policy?. The World Economy, 15(4), 423-442.
  28. Kwiek, M. (2006). The university and the state. A study into global transformations. Frankfurt and New York: Peter Lang.
  29. Layton, E. (1971). Mirror-image twins: The communities of science and technology in 19th-century America. Technology and Culture, 562-580.
  30. Lucas, R.E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
  31. Lundvall, B. Å. (ed.) (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
  32. Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States (Vol. 278). Princeton University Press.
  33. Newman, J.H. (1917).The Idea of a University Defined and Illustrated: In Nine Discourses Delivered to the Catholics of Dublin, Longmans, Green and Co., London, avalaible at: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/24526/24526-pdf.pdf, Release Date: February 5, 2008 [Ebook 24526], 5.
  34. Nelson, R.R. (1959). Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research, The Journal of Political Econ-omy, 67(3), 297-306.
  35. North, D.C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 359-368.
  36. Parr, J.B. (1973). Growth poles, regional development, and central place theory. Papers in Regional Science, 31(1), 173-212.
  37. Paul, H., & Jonathan, Z. (1991). Flexible specialization versus post-Fordism: theory, evidence and policy implications. Economy and Society, 20(1), 5-9.
  38. Pedersen, O. (1997). The first universities: Studium generale and the origins of university education in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Porter, M. (2001).Clusters of Innovation: Regional Foundations of US Competitiveness. Washington D.C.: The Council on Competitiveness.
  40. Prebisch, R. (1949). O desenvolvimento econômico da América Latina e seus principais problemas. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 3(3), 47-111.
  41. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage Publishing, London.
  42. Roobeeck, A.J.M. (1990), Beyond the Technology Race. An Analysis of Technology Policy in Seven Industrialized Countries, Amsterdam: Elsevier.;
  43. Romer, P. (1994).The origins of endogenous growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3-22.
  44. Sauerland, K. (2007). The Way to the Humboldtian Idea of University. Przeglad Filozoficzno-Literacki, 1, 57-70.
  45. Science The Endless Frontier Report (1945). A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, available at: http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm;
  46. Schlesinger, A.M. (2003). The Coming of the New Deal: 1933-1935. The Age of Roosevelt. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  47. Schwab, K. (Ed.) (2011), The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012, Full Data Edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  48. Schwab, K. (Ed.) (2012), The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013, Full Data Edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  49. Schwab, K. (Ed.) (2013), The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014, Full Data Edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  50. Schwab, K. (Ed.) (2014), The Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015, Full Data Edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  51. Shaw, J.K., & Allison, J. (1999). The intersection of the learning region and local and regional eco-nomic development: Analysing the role of higher education. Regional Studies, 33(9), 896-902.
  52. Solow, R.M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Eco-nomics and Statistics, 312-320.
  53. Solow, R.M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65-94.
  54. Varvoglis, H. (2014). Organization of Teaching and Research. In Varvoglis, H., History and Evolution of Concepts in Physics, Springer International Publishing, 125-136.
  55. Wach, K. (2015). Modern Policy for the Entrepreneurial Economy: Theoretical Considerations (chapter 1). In A.S. Gubik & K. Wach (Eds.). Institutional Aspects of Entrepreneurship (pp. 9-18). Miskolc: University of Miskolc.
  56. Williamson, J. G. (2008). Globalization and the Great Divergence: terms of trade booms, volatility and the poor periphery, 1782-1913. European Review of Economic History, 12(3), 355-391.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.