Populism in the Communication Strategy of Lula and Bolsonaro: An Analysis of the Television Debates in Brazil’s 2022 General Election
Article Sidebar
308)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
472
The 2022 presidential election in Brazil involved two radically different candidates but with broad similarities in their populist discourse and communication strategies. The electoral campaign and the results polarized the country between the supporters of the outgoing president, Jair Bolsonaro, and the incoming one, Lula da Silva. This article analyzes the two television debates that took place in the second round of the presidential election in October. The interventions of the candidates have been studied using the methodology of critical discourse analysis applied by Hawkins (2010). The goal is to discover the degree of populism present in the candidates’ discourse in the two debates studied. The results show evidence of the highly populist nature of the discourse of the two leaders in both television events. This characteristic, as well as other important aspects of the campaigns and the narrow margin of Lula’s eventual victory, may explain the level of polarization evident in the country. It may also be the reason behind the rejection of the election results by the followers of Bolsonaro and their protest against the change in president.
Keywords
References
Barbosa Jr. R. & Casarões, G. (2022). Statecraft under God: Radical Right Populism meets Christian Nationalism in Bolsonaro’s Brazil. Millennium, 50(3), 669-699 . https://www.doi.org/10.1177/03058298221110922
Bennett, W. L. & Entman, R. M. (2001). Mediated politics: communication in the future of democracy. Cambridge, UK/ New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berardi, F. (2017). Futurability : the age of impotence and the horizon of possibility. London: Verso Books.
Bondebjerg, I. (2015). The mediatization of politics in contemporary Scandinavian film and television. Palgrave Communications, 1(1), 15003. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2015.3
Canel, M. J. (2018). La comunicación de la administración pública para gobernar con la sociedad. México: FCE.
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2-16. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
Casero-Ripollés, A. & Feenstra, R. A. (2012). Nuevas formas de producción de noticias en el entorno digital y cambios en el periodismo: el caso 15-M. Comunicación y Hombre, 8, 128-140. https://www.doi.org/10.32466/eufv-cyh.2012.8.150.129-140
Cesarino, L. (2019). Identidade e representação no bolsonarismo. Corpo digital do rei, bivalência conservadorismo-neoliberalismo e pessoa fractal. Revista de Antropologia, 62(3), 530-557. https://www.doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2019.165232
Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Castro Gomes, A. (2022). O populismo no Brasil. Estudos Ibero-Americanos, 48(1), e42806-e42806. https://www.doi.org/10.15448/1980-864X.2022.1.42806
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F. & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109-1126. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
Enli, G. S. & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757-774. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.
Gagliardi, J. (2018). “Um projeto de poder por vias não democráticas”: O Globo e a narrativa do Lulopetismo. [Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal Fluminense] Repositório Institucional da UFF. Retrieved from https://app.uff.br/riuff/handle/1/16689
Gómez-Iniesta, P. (2016). Consciously populist: Deconstructing the discourse of Podemos’ Pablo Iglesias. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 12(2), 257-263. https://www.doi.org/10.1386/macp.12.2.257_7
Gonçalves, L. P. & Neto, O. C. (2020). O Fascismo em Camisas Verdes: do integralismo ao neointegralismo. Río de Janeiro: FGV.
Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411-426. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
Hawkins, K. A. (2010). Venezuela’s Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jagers, J. & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319-345. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
Krause, S. & Hoffmann, K. D. (2010). Populismo e neopopulismo: teorias, contextos e práxis. Sociedade e Cultura, 13(2), 167-171. https://www.doi.org/10.5216/sec.v13i2.13419
Laclau, E. (2008). La razón populista (1ª Ed.). México: FCE.
Livingstone, S. & Lunt, P. (2014). Mediatization: an emerging paradigm for media and communication studies. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication. Handbooks of Communication Science (pp. 703-724). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Luengo, Ó. G. (2013). Debates electorales en televisión: una aproximación preliminar a sus efectos inmediatos. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 0(25), 81-96.
López García, G., Llorca Abad, G., Valera Ordaz, L. & Peris Blanes, A. (2018). Los debates electorales, ¿el último reducto frente la mediatización? Un estudio de caso de las elecciones generales españolas de 2015. Palabra Clave, 21(3), 772-797. https://www.doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.3.6
Machin, D. & Mayr, A. (2014). How to do Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
Manfredi-Sánchez, J. L., Amado, A. & Gómez-Iniesta, P. (2022). State disinformation: emotions at the service of the cause. Communication & Society, 35(2), 205-221. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.205-221
Marín Lladó, C. & Pérez Tornero, J. M. (2020). Un modelo conceptual para analizar los debates electorales en TV. Mediatización y ceremonias televisivas. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 76, 229-245. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1445
Mazzoleni, G. & Schulz, W. (1999). “Mediatization” of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247-261. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political thinking action: Abingdon: Routledge.
Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135
Mudde, C. (2021). La ultraderecha hoy. Barcelona: Paidós.
Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147-174. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11
Padilla-Castillo, G. (2014). La espectacularización del debate electoral: estudio del caso en Estados Unidos. Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación, 132, 162–180. https://www.doi.org/10.15178/va.2015.132.162-180
Postill, J. (2018). Populism and social media: a global perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 754-765. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772186
Pérez-Curiel, C., Jiménez-Marín, G. & García-Medina, I. (2020). Influencia de agencias y estudio del framing en el marco electoral del Procés de Catalunya. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 75, 27-51. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1415
Rebouças, H. d. S., Costa, D. S., Silva, L. S., Gonçalves, J. d. C. & Nascimento, A. F. (2022). Lula e Bolsonaro populistas?: A visão de populismo dos jornais Folha de S. Paulo e O Estado de S. Paulo em alusão aos dois presidentes brasileiros. Media & Jornalismo, 22(40), 121-140. https://www.doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_40_6
Ricci, P., Izumi, M. & Moreira, D. (2021). O populismo no Brasil (1985-2019) Um velho conceito a partir de uma nova abordagem. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 36, 34-49. https://www.doi.org/10.1590/3610707/2021
Saes, D. (1994). A reemergência do populismo no Brasil e na América Latina. In E. Dagnino (Ed.), Os anos 90: Política e sociedade no Brasil (pp. 41-48). São Paulo: Brasiliense.
Santander, P., Elórtegui, C. & Buzzo, C. (2020). Twitter, Presidential Debates and Attention Economy: A Symbiosis between Television Audience and Social Media Users during Campaign Season. Communication & Society, 33(3), 51-65. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.33.3.51-65
Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228-246. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097
Taggart, P. A. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Thompson, M. J. (2016). Enough said: what’s gone wrong with the language of politics? (1st Ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A. & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual Screening the Political: Media Events, Social Media and Citizen Engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041-1061. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12187
Van-Dijk, T. A. (2017). Análisis Crítico del Discurso. Revista Austral De Ciencias Sociales, 30, 203-222. https://www.doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2016.n30-10
Vergeer, M. & Franses, P. H. (2016). Live audience responses to live televised election debates: time series analysis of issue salience and party salience on audience behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1390-1410. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093526
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
