Brexit and female leadership in Spanish digital media from a linguistic perspective. The case of Theresa May’s decline
Main Article Content
Abstract
The United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union (broadly known as Brexit) is one of the most outstanding historical events of the 21st Century to date. Two major figures have led this process politically: Theresa May and Boris Johnson, the two Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom since 2016. This paper, however, focuses on the former, as she is a female politician in a controversial situation, and thus the way she is presented can serve an example of how women in power are represented by the media. This research was designed with the aim of discovering the roles attributed to Theresa May by Spanish digital media throughout this process. The fact that people in Spain are becoming deeply concerned with women’s advances in society was motivated the desire to test how Spanish media represent female leaders, such as May. To complete this study, fifty-four publications from three different Spanish digital media leaders of audience (El Mundo, El País and El Español) were taken as a reference. The methodological procedure used was Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), based on semantic relationships, and although some comparisons between relative and absolute frequencies were made, the general approach is basically qualitative. Through this analysis, it has been discovered that Theresa May is presented in a different way depending on the remaining characters, usually masculine, who participate in the action. These differences are mainly observable between those articles in which May relates to her European counterparts and those in which she deals with her British colleagues.
Keywords
References
Araya, S. (2002). Las representaciones sociales: Ejes teóricos para su discusión. Cuaderno de ciencias sociales, 127. Retrieved from http:/unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/ICAP/UPAN027076.pdf
Banchs, M. (1986). Concepto de representaciones sociales: análisis comparativo. Revista costarricense de psicología, 5(8-9), 27-40.
Basurto, A. (2019, August, 13). El Reino Unido ya ha cambiado. El Mundo. Retrieved from https://www.elmundo.es/opinion/2019/08/13/5d51647dfc6c8316078b460e.html
Berger, L. P. & Luckman, T. (2003 [1968]). La constructión social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Borchardt, A., Simon, F. & Bironzo, D. (2018). Interested but not Engaged: How Europe’s Media Cover Brexit, Reuters Institute. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-06/How%20Europe%27s%20Media%20Cover%20Brexit.pdf
Calhoun, C. (2017) Populism, nationalism and Brexit. In W. Outhwaite (Ed.), Brexit: Sociological responses (pp. 57-76). London/New York: Anthem Press.
Camps, V. (1998). El siglo de las mujeres. Madrid: Cátedra.
Davtyan-Gevorgyan, A. (April 8, 2016). Women and Mass Media. Retrieved from http://feminism-boell.org/en/2016/04/08/women-and-mass-media
De Miguel, R. (2019, April, 11). ¿Cuándo dijo May que dimitía? El País. Retrieved from https://elpais.com/internacional/2019/04/10/actualidad/1554922095_914992.html
De Miguel, R. (2019, May, 24). Theresa May y el Brexit: la primera ministra que se aisló del mundo. El País. Retrieved from https://elpais.com/internacional/2019/05/23/actualidad/1558608890_684941.html
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Farr, R. (1986). Las representaciones sociales. In S. Moscovici (Comp.), Psicología Social II (pp. 495-506). Barcelona: Paidós.
Fresneda, C. (2019, October, 17). De Cameron a May, lo que la tempestad del Brexit se llevó. El Mundo. Retrieved from https://www.elmundo.es/internacional/2019/10/17/5da615ff21efa0c3748b462b.html
García Beaudoux, V. (2014). Influencia de la televisión en la creación de estereotipos de género y en la percepción social del liderazgo femenino. La importancia de la táctica de reencuadre para el cambio social. Ciencia Política, 9(18), 47-66. Retrieved from https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cienciapol/article/view/52305/52048
García Jiménez, A, Gómez-Escalonilla, G., Torregrosa, J. F., Rodríguez, R. & Santín, M. (2008). Medios de comunicación, representaciones y percepciones: el caso de la mujer política. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 14, 175-196. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ESMP/article/view/ESMP0808110175A
Gómez, V. (2019, July, 24). Elogio de Theresa May con vistas a La Moncloa. El Español. Retrieved from https://www.elespanol.com/opinion/tribunas/20190724/elogio-theresa-may-vistas-moncloa/416078390_12.html
Güney, S., Gohar, R., Akinci, S. K. & Akinci, M. M. (2006). Attitudes toward women managers in Turkey and Pakistan. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 8(1), 194-211.
Jaworska, S. & Larrivée, P. (2011). Women, power and the media: assessing the bias. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 2477-2479.
Jodelet, D. (1986). La representación social: fenómenos, concepto y teoría. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psicología Social II. Pensamiento y vida social. Psicología social y problemas sociales (pp. 469-494). Barcelona: Paidós.
Kiamba, J. M. (2008) Women and Leadership Positions: Social and Cultural Barriers to Success. Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women’s & Gender Studies, 6.
Kress G. R. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Psychology press.
Laclau, E. (1996). Política y los límites de la modernidad. In R. N. Buenfil (Ed.), Debates políticos Contemporáneos (pp. 55-74). México: Plaza y Valdés.
Maccaferri, M. (2019). Splendid isolation again? Brexit and the role of the press and online media in re-narrating the European Discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(16), 389-402. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592766
Moscovici, S. (1979). El Psicoanálisis, su imagen y su público. Buenos Aires: Huemul.
Moscovici, S. (2001). Why a theory of Social Representation? In G. Deaux & K. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social. Brigging theoretical traditions (pp. 8-35). Massachussetts: Blackwell.
Pardo, M. L. (2011). Teoría y metodología de la investigación lingüística. Método sincrónico-diacrónico de análisis lingüístico de textos, Buenos Aires: Tersites.
Pellicer, Ll. (2019, May, 24). Los pasos en falso de Theresa May en Bruselas. El País. Retrieved from https://elpais.com/internacional/2019/05/23/actualidad/1558638933_079343.html
Quevedo, R. & Suárez, M. (2017): Del retrato de la Dama de Hierro a la fotografía de Mutti Angela: la representación icónica de la canciller alemana Angela Merkel. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 23(1), 535-551.
Rei, J. (2019, May, 25). Cinco actos de soberbia que han acabado con la dimisión de May. El Español. Retrieved from https://www.elespanol.com/mundo/europa/20190524/actos-soberbia-acabado-dimision-may/400960903_0.html
Sánchez Rodríguez, G. (2008). Violencia machista y medios de comunicación. El tratamiento informativo de los delitos relacionados con el maltrato a mujeres. Comunicación y hombre: revista interdisciplinar de ciencias de la comunicación y humanidades, 4, 155-167.
Suanzes, P. (2019, November, 18). Los seis meses perdidos por la cerrazón de Irlanda y la falta de arrojo de Theresa May. El Mundo. Retrieved from https://www.elmundo.es/internacional/2019/10/17/5da8b54b21efa07a6e8b45da.html
Trimble, L. (2007). Gender, Political Leadership and Media Visibility: Globe and Mail Coverage of Conservative Party of Canada Leadership Contests. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 969-993. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0008423907071120
Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Context and cognition. Journal of pragmatics, 1, 211-232.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Estructuras y funciones del discurso. Una introducción interdisciplinaria a la lingüística del texto y a los estudios del discurso. México: Siglo XXI.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Texto y contexto. Madrid: Cátedra.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discurso y manipulación: Discusión teórica y algunas aplicaciones. Rev. signos, 39(60), 49-74.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Discurso y Poder. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2012). Discurso y Contexto. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The Representation of Social Actors. In R. Caldas-Coulthard C. & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 32-71). London: Routledge.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walsh, C. (2015). Media capital or media deficit? Representations of women in leadership roles in old and new media. Feminist Media Studies, 15(6), 1025-1034. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1087415
Wodak, R. (Ed.) (1989). Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (Eds.) (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. [Kindle DX version]. Retrieved from Amazon.
Zappetini, F. & Krzyźanowski, M. (2019). The critical juncture of Brexit in media & political discourses: from national-populist imaginary to cross-national social and political crisis. Critical Discourse Studies 4(16), 381-388. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.