Skip to main content
Log in

On Modeling Trivalent Dangling Bonds with Bivalent Levels

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

We examine the treatment of the hydrogenated Amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) dangling-bond defect used in the Analysis of microelectronic and Photonic Structures (AMPS) computer model and in other models of a-Si:H semiconductor devices. The dangling bond defect (D) is trivalent, with two correlated electronic levels in the gap. However, Modelers typically employ two uncorrelated bivalent levels to represent D; this introduces fictitious neutral dangling bond (D°) levels whenever D is charged. We find that the bivalent (AMPS) representation captures the important aspects of D physics and introduces only small errors into simulations. To reach this conclusion, we examine charge density and recombination and compare the trivalent D defect and its bivalent representation in both thermal equilibrium and non-equilibrium (illuminated) cases. The charge density is identical, implying that band bending computed by the simulation is accurate. We find errors in the recombination rate for the bivalent representation are normally less than or equal to σ0ch, where σ° is the capture cross section of D0 and σch is the capture cross section of a charged state of D. Typically Modelers use σ0ch of 1:10 to 1:100 yielding insignificant errors in the recombination rate with the uncorrelated bivalent representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Hack and M. Shur, J. Appl. Phys. 58, 997 (1985)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. F.A. Rubinelli, S.J. Fonash, J.K. Arch, 6th International PVSEC Proc., 851 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.L. Gray, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 36, 906 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Block, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Amorphous Semiconductors, edited by S. R. Elliot, E. A. Davis, and J. Robertson Cambridge, UK, 1993), in press.

  5. J. Hubin, A. V. Shah, and E. Sauvain, Phil. Mag. Lett. 66, 115 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Okamoto and Y. Hamakawa, Solid St. Comm. 24, 23 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. G. Simmons and G. W. Taylor, Phys. Rev. B 4, 502 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Bar-Yam and J.D. Joannopoulos, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 97&98, 467 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M.J. Powell and S.C. Deane, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10815 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suntharalingam, V., Branz, H.M. On Modeling Trivalent Dangling Bonds with Bivalent Levels. MRS Online Proceedings Library 336, 153–158 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-336-153

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-336-153

Navigation