Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological Changes of Isolated Osteoclasts in Cell Culture Due to Different Biomaterials

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

Osteoclasts have been isolated in primary cell culture using femoral bone of laying hens being fed on an eight day calcium free diet. Placing these cells on the surface of fixed cortico-femoral chicken bone provoked the feature of resorption pits proving that they are able to resorb bone.

After placing osteoclasts on different biomaterials (Aluminumoxide ceramics, teflon, carbon fibre reinforced polysulphone, polymethylmethacrylate, polydioxanone) scanning electron microscopy was performed. Different materials provoke different morphological features of these cells, probably due to functional variations as a response to the changing surfaces. Adhesion was feasible on all the surfaces, uptake of small surface particles was possible and cell fusion took place on most materials suggesting acceptance of the tested biomaterials by the cells.

The results show that morphological changes of isolated osteoclasts in cell culture can be detected due to different functional challenges of the surfaces of different biomaterials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.E. Holtrop Clin. Orthop. 123, 177 (1977).

  2. A. Zambonin Zallone, A. Teti and M.V. Primavera Cell. Tiss. Res. 235, 561 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. I. Glowacki, D. Altobelli and J.B. Millikens Calcif. Tiss. Int. 33, 71 (1981)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J.Th. Lambrecht, R. Ewers and C. Wollesen in Normal and Abnormal Bone Growth, edited by A.D. Dixon and B.G. Sarnat (A.R. Liss, New York, 1985) p. 45.

  5. G.H. Nentwig and I. Glanville in Biomaterialien und Nahtmaterial, edited by H.M. Rettig (Springer, Berlin, 1984) p. 28.

  6. M. Krukowski and A.I. Kahn Calcif. Tiss. Int. 34, 474 (1982).

  7. I.M. Shapiro, S.I. Jones, N.M. Hogg, M. Slusarenko and A. Boyde Scan. Elect. Microsc. II, 539 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.D. Allen, N.G. Testa, T. Suda, S.L. Schor, D. Onions, O. Jarrett and A. Boyde Scan. Elect. Microsc. III, 347 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N.G. Testa, T.D. Allen and L.G. Lajthe J. Cell. Sci. 47, 127 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Boyde, N.N. Ali and S.I. Jones Scan. Elect. Microsc. III, 1259 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Osdoby, M.L. Martini and A.I. Caplan J. Exp. Zoology 224, 331 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M.I. Oursler, L.V. Bell, B. Clevinger and P. Osdoby J. Cell. Biol. 100, 1592 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. T.I. Chambers J. Path. 145, 297 (1985).

  14. J.Th. Lambrecht, R. Ewers, R. Jentzsch and A. Vietze presented at the World Dental Conference, Jerusalem, Israel (1986) (unpublished).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambrecht, J.T., Ewers, R., Kerscher, A. et al. Morphological Changes of Isolated Osteoclasts in Cell Culture Due to Different Biomaterials. MRS Online Proceedings Library 110, 317–323 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-110-317

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-110-317

Navigation