Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison Study of a-SiGe Solar Cells and Materials Deposited Using Different Hydrogen Dilution

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

A-SiGe n-i-p solar cells with i-layer deposited via plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) with a germane to disilane ratio of 0.72 and hydrogen dilution R=(H2 flow)/(GeH4+Si2H6 flow) values of 1.7, 10, 30, 50, 120, 180 and 240 were deposited on stainless steel substrates. This germane to disilane ratio is what we typically use for the i-layer in the bottom cell of our standard triple-junction solar cells. Solar cell current-voltage curves (J-V) and quantum efficiency (QE) were measured for these devices. Light soaking tests were performed for these devices under 1 sun light intensity at 50° C. While device with R=30 showed the highest initial efficiency, the device with R=120 exhibit higher stabilized efficiency after 1000 hours of light soaking.

Single-layer a-SiGe films (∼500 nm thick) were deposited under the same conditions as the i-layer of these devices on a variety of substrates including 7059 glass, crystalline silicon, and stainless steel for visible-IR transmission spectroscopy, FTIR, and hydrogen effusion studies. It is interesting to note 1) the H content in the film decreased with increasing R based on both the IR and H effusion measurements, and 2) while the H content changes significantly with different R, the change in Eg is relatively small. This is most likely due to a change in Ge content in the film for different R.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Yang, L. Chen, and A. Catalano, MRS Proc. 219, 259 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Yang, X. Xu and, MRS Proc. 336, 687 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Shima, M. Isomura, E. Maruyama, S. Okamoto, H. Haku, K. Wakisaka, S. Kiyama, and S. Tsuda, MRS Proc. 507, 145 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Guha, K.L. Narasimhan, and S.M. Pietruszko, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 859 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Tanaka and A. Matsuda, MRS Proc. 70, 245 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Yang and, MRS Proc. 557, 239 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Swanepoel, J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 16, pp. 1214–1222 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. D. Compaan and X. Deng, University of Toledo 1999 2nd Quarterly Report submitted to NREL under the Thin Film Partnership Program (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Yang, R. Ross, T. Glatfelter, R. Mohr, and S. Guha, MRS Proc. 149, 435 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. X. Deng, X. B. Liao, S. Han, H. Povolny, P. Agarwal, Solar Energy Mat. & Solar Cells, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Povolny, H., Agarwal, P., Han, S. et al. Comparison Study of a-SiGe Solar Cells and Materials Deposited Using Different Hydrogen Dilution. MRS Online Proceedings Library 609, 303 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-609-A30.3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-609-A30.3

Navigation