Applications of Hubble Volume in Atomic Physics, Nuclear Physics, Particle Physics, Quantum Physics and Cosmic Physics

U. V. S.  Seshavatharam; S.  Lakshminarayana

doi:10.15415/jnp.2013.11005

Authors

U. V. S. Seshavatharam Honorary faculty, I-SERVE, Alakapuri, Hyderabad-35, AP, India.
S. Lakshminarayana Department of Nuclear Physics, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam-03, AP, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15415/jnp.2013.11005

Keywords:

Hubble length, Hubble volume, Hubble mass, Cosmic redshift, CMBR energy density, Reduced Planck‘s constant, rms radius of proton

Abstract

In this paper an attempt is made to emphasize the major shortcomings of standard cosmology. It can be suggested that, the current cosmological changes can be understood by studying the atom and the atomic nucleus through ground based experiments. If light is coming from the atoms of the gigantic galaxy, then redshift can be interpreted as an index of the galactic atomic ‘light emission mechanism’. In no way it seems to be connected with ‘galaxy receding’. With ‘cosmological increasing (emitted) photon energy’, observed cosmic redshift can be considered as a measure of the age difference between our galaxy and any observed galaxy. If it is possible to show that, (from the observer) older galaxy’s distance increases with its ‘age’, then ‘galaxy receding’ and ‘accelerating universe’ concepts can be put for a revision at fundamental level. At any given cosmic time, the product of ‘critical density’ and ‘Hubble volume’ gives a characteristic cosmic mass and it can be called as the ‘Hubble mass’. Interesting thing is that, Schwarzschild radius of the ‘Hubble mass’ again matches with the ‘Hubble length’. Most of the cosmologists believe that this is merely a coincidence. At any given cosmic time,’Hubble length’ can be considered as the gravitational or electromagnetic interaction range. If one is willing to think in this direction, by increasing the number of applications of Hubble mass and Hubble volume in other areas of fundamental physics like quantum physics, nuclear physics, atomic physics and particle physics - slowly and gradually - in a progressive way, concepts of ‘Black hole Cosmology’ can be strengthened and can also be confirmed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Seshavatharam U.V. S. and Lakshminarayana S. Peculiar Relations in Cosmology. Volume 2 Progress in Physics, April, (2013).

U. V. S. Seshavatharam. Physics of rotating and expanding black hole universe. Progress in Physics. April, p 7-14, (2010).

U.V.S. Seshavatharam. The Primordial Cosmic Black Hole and the Cosmic Axis of Evil. International Journal of Astronomy, 1(2): 20-37, (2012).

U. V. S. Seshavatharam. Light speed rotating black holes: The special holes. International Journal of Advanced Astronomy. 1 (1), 13-20 (2013).

U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Hubble volume and the fundamental interactions. International Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences (IJANS), Vol.1, Issue 2 Nov, p 45-58 (2012).

U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Atom, universe and the fundamental interactions. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (A) Vol. 12 Issue 5, p. 1, (2012).

U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana, B.V.S.T. Sai. Is red shift an index of galactic‘atomic light emission’ mechanism? International Journal of Physics, Vol. 1, No. 3, 49-64, (2013). [8] U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana, B.V.S.T. Sai. . Nucleus, Atom and the Universe a combined study. International Journal of Advanced Astronomy, 1 (1) , 1-12 (2013).

U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Is Planck’s constant a cosmological variable? International Journal of Astron-omy, 2(1): 11-15 DOI: 10.5923/j.astronomy. http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.astronomy 20130201.02 (2013).

Pathria, R. K. The Universe as a Black Hole. Nature 240 (5379):298299. doi:10.1038/240298a0 (1972). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/240298a0

Good, I. J. Chinese universes. Physics Today 25 (7): 15. July. doi:10.1063/1.3070923 (1972). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3070923

Poplawski, N. J. Radial motion into an Einstein-Rosen bridge. Physics Letters B 687 (23): 110113. (2010).

Zhang, Tianxi. A New Cosmological Model: Black Hole Universe. Progress in Physics, 3: 3-11, (2009).

Zhang, Tianxi. Cosmic microwave background radiation of black hole universe. Astrophysics and Space Science, Volume 330, Issue 1, pp 157-165. (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10509-010-0372-4

Joel Smoller and Blake Temple. Shock-wave cosmology inside a black hole. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. September 30; 100(20): 1121611218. (2003).

Chul-Moon Yoo et al. Black Hole Universe. Time evolution. arXiv:1306.1389v1 [gr-qc] 6 Jun (2013).

Hawking S.W. A Brief History of Time. Bantam Dell Publishing Group. (1988).

P. A. M. Dirac. The cosmological constants. Nature, 139, 323, (1937). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/139323a0

P. A. M. Dirac. A new basis for cosmology. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 165, 199, (1938). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1938.0053

J. Huchara. Estimates of the Hubble Constant, 2010. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. http://hubble.plot.dat.

W. L. Freedman et al. Final Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant. The Astrophysical Journal 553 (1): 47-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/320638

Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Armitage-Caplan, C.; et al. (Planck Collaboration).Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scienti c results” Astronomy & Astrophysics (submitted). arXiv:1303.5062 (http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5062) (21 March 2013).

C. L. Bennett et al, Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results. Submitted to Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5225v1.

David Gross, Einstein and the search for Uni cation, Current Science, Vol. 89, No. 12, 25 Dec (2005).

P. J. Mohr and B.N. Taylor, CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants. http://physics.nist.gov/constants. (2007).

Geiger H and Marsden E. On a di use reaction of the particles. Proc. Roy. Soc., Ser. A 82: 495-500, (1909). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1909.0054

H. Yukawa. On the Interaction of Elementary Particles. Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jap. 17 (48). (1935).

Michael O. Distler et al. The RMS Charge Radius of the Proton and Zemach Moments. Phys. Lett.B. 696: 343-347, (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.067

Hubble E. P. A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae”, PNAS, 1929, vol. 15, pp.168-173, (1929).

Hubble, E.P. The 200-inch telescope and some problems it may solve. PASP, 59, pp153167, (1947). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/125931

Louis Marmet. On the Interpretation of Red-Shifts: A Quantitative Comparison of RedShift Mechanisms. www.marmet.org/louis/index.html.

Marmet. A New Non-Doppler Redshift. Physics Essays, 1(1):2432, Online (1988).

Christopher S. Reynolds. Astrophysics: Black holes in a spin. Nature. 494, 432433 doi:10.1038/494432a (28 February 2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/494432a

Michael J. Longo, Detection of a Dipole in the Handedness of Spiral Galaxies with Redshifts z 0.04, Phys. Lett. B 699, 224-229 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.008

S.W. Hawking (1969). On the rotation of the universe. Mon. Not. Royal. Astr. Soc. 142, 129-141.

C Sivaram and Kenath Arun, Primordial Rotation of the Universe, Hydrodynamics, Vortices and Angular Momenta of Celestial Objects. The Open Astronomy Journal, 2012, 5, 7-11 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874381101205010007

S.-C. Su and M.-C. Chu. Is the universe rotating? Astrophysical Journal, 703 354. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/354

Sidharth,B.G.. Is the Universe Rotating? Prespacetime Journal. October 2010, Vol. 1, Issue 7, pp. 1168-1173.

E. Kajari et al. Rotation in relativity and the propagation of light. Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course CLXVIII, pp. 45-148 (2009)

Istvan Nemeti et al. Visualizing ideas about Godel-type rotating universes. Godel-type Spacetimes: History and New Developments.www.math-inst.hu/pub/algebraic-logic/ godunivisu-revised.pdf (2009)

Marcelo Samuel Berman. A General Relativistic Rotating Evolutionary Universe. Astrophys. Space Sci.314:319-321,2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10509-008-9772-0

G. Chapline et al. Tommy Gold Revisited: Why Does Not The Universe Rotate? AIP Conf.Proc.822:160-165, 2006. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0509230.

Robert V Gentry. New Cosmic Center Universe Model Matches Eight of Big Bang’s Major Predictions Without The F-L Paradigm. CERN preprint, EXT-2003-022, 14 Apr 2003.

Kurt Godel. Rotating Universes in General Relativity Theory. Proceedings of the international Congress of Mathematicians in Cambridge, 1: 175-81, 1950.

Dmitri Rabounski. On the Speed of Rotation of Isotropic Space: Insight into the Redshift Problem. The Abraham Zelmanov Journal, Vol. 2, 2009, 208-223.

Mauro Dorato. On becoming cosmic time and rotating universes. Time, Reality and Experience (provisional title), Royal Institute of Philosophy Series, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Yuri N. Obukhov. On physical foundations and observational eects of cosmic Rotation. Published in Colloquium on Cosmic Rotation, Eds M. Scherfner, T. Chrobok and M. Shefaat (Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag: Berlin, 2000) pp. 23-96. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0008106v1, 7August 2000.

Barrow JD, Juszkiewicz R, Sonoda DH. Universal rotation - How large can it be? Mon Not R Astron Soc 1985; 213: 917.