EXPERIENCE OF EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON RADIATION ONCOLOGY AT R.E. KAVETSKY INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, ONCOLOGY AND RADIOBIOLOGY, NAS OF UKRAINE

Authors

  • E. Domina R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2023.03.275

Keywords:

ionizing radiation, therapeutic exposure, individual radiosensitivity, radiomitigators, cancer patients, carcinogenic effects

Abstract

This article briefly summarizes our long-term experience of research in the field of experimental and clinical radiation oncology unified by the key word "radiosensitivity". Consistently presented and interpreted here are the main results on biodosimetry of irradiation depending on doses and quality of ionizing radiation and determination of individual radiosensitivity of cancer patients. We justified the use of radiomitigators to reduce the frequency and severity of post-radiation complications in cancer patients, and for radiation protection of the general population. The radioprotective effect of the antioxidant inosine in the somatic cells of cancer patients in the range of low radiation doses was demonstrated. We established that in persons who are hypersensitive to irradiation, the reparative potential is reduced by about 60% compared to ones with normal indices of individual radiosensitivity. Cytogenetic predictors of radiosensitivity of healthy cells adjacent to the irradiated tumor have been determined. Unfortunately, they have not yet become a point of application for individual planning of irradiation courses and assessment of severity of post-radiation complications. The intensive development of selective radioprotectors that would selectively protect healthy tissues in the course of radiation therapy, reducing their radiosensitivity by activating reparation processes, is considered a priority direction of modern radiation oncology.

References

Krasnoselsky MV, Starenkyi VP, Averianova LO, Rublova TV. Problems and prospects of radiation oncology development in Ukraine. J Nat Acad Med Sci Ukraine 2021;27(4):256-262 (in Ukrainian). https:/doi.org/10.37621/ JNAMSU-2021-4-4

Domina EA, Dumansky YV. Medical and radiobiological aspects of radiation complications in patients with gynecologic oncology. Oncology. 2023;25(1):9-15 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/oncology.2023.01.009

Neklasova NY, Zharinov GM, Grebenyuk AN. Modification of radiosensitivity of normal and tumor tissues during radiation therapy of malignant neoplasms. Radiat Biol Radioecol. 2014;54(6):597-605.

Domina EA, Kopylenko OL. Minimizing the occurrence of stochastic effects during radiation incidents. Exp Oncol. 2022;44(3):186-189. https://doi.org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-44-no-3.18530

Chekhun VF, Domina EA. Modern view on the stochastic effects of ionizing radiation (to the 36th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster). Oncology. 2022;24(1):5-10 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32471/oncology.2663- 7928.t-24-1-2022-g.10339

Domina EA, Druzhyna MO, Ryabchenko NM. Individual Human Radiosensitivity. K.: Logos, 2006. 126 p (in Russian).

Chekhun VF, Domina EA. Method of primary prevention of radiogenic cancer. Patent of Ukraine No. 67007. Published 25.01.2012.

Bayens A, Van Den Broecke R, Makar A, et al. Chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients: influence of age of onset of the disease. Oncol Rep. 2005;13(2):347-353. PMID: 15643523

Domina EA, Ryabchenko NM. Increased individual chromosomal radiosensitivity of human lymphocytes as a parameter of cancer risk. Exp Oncol. 2007;29(3):217-220.

D’omina, EA, Ryabchenko, NM, Barylyak IR. A study of the contribution of repair processes to the formation of individual radiosensitivity in human beings at the chromosome level. Cytol Genet. 2008;42:107-110. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11956-008-2007-z

Basic Clinical Radiobiology. Michael C. Joiner, Albert J. van der Kogel, eds. CRC Press, 2019. 360 p.

Domina EA. Early and late radiation effects in healthy tissues of oncologic patients under therapeutic irradiations. Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol. 2017;22:23-37. https://doi.org/10.33145/2304-8336-2017-22-23-37

Kelly YK. Nanotechnology platforms and physiological challenges for cancer therapeutics. Nanomedicine 2007;3(2):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2006.12.002

Domina EA, Pilinskaya MA, Petunin YI, Klushin DA. Radiation Cytogenetics. K.: Zdorov'ya, 2009. 368 p. (in Russian).

Semov AB, Iofa EP, Akaeva EA, Shevchenko VA. Dose dependence of the induction of chromosomal aberrations in liquidators of the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Biol Radioecol. 1994;34(6):865-870 (in Russian).

Klyushin DA, Petunin YI. Proof Medicine. Dialektika, 2019. 316 p. (in Russian).

Chekhun VF, Domina EA, Druzhyna MO, et al., New approach to the approximation of "dose–effect" dependence during the human somatic cells irradiation. Nuclear Physics Energy. 2013;14(3):299-303 (in Ukrainian).

Grinevich YA, Domina EA. Immune and Cytogenetic Effects of Dense and Rare Ionizing Radiation. Second edition, Kyiv: Avicenna Publishing House, 2021. 383 p.

Chekhun VF, Domina EA, Demchenko OM. Method for reducing the frequency of spontaneous and radiationinduced genetic damage in human somatic non-malignant cells. Patent of Ukraine for utility model No. 616604. Published 25.07.2011.

Domina E. Expediency on using radiomitigators in radiation therapy of cancer patients, J Sci, Lyon. 2020;1(10):7-11.

Downloads

Published

28.12.2023

How to Cite

Domina, E. (2023). EXPERIENCE OF EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON RADIATION ONCOLOGY AT R.E. KAVETSKY INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, ONCOLOGY AND RADIOBIOLOGY, NAS OF UKRAINE. Experimental Oncology, 45(3), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2023.03.275