Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter March 25, 2020

Synthesis, structure, fluorescence, and electrochemical properties of a binuclear Ag(I) complex with 1,4-bis(benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)butane as a ligand

  • Lixian Xia , Geng Zhang , Xinzhao Xia , Yagang Li , Jiao Wang , Jianhua Xu and Huilu Wu EMAIL logo

Abstract

Reaction of 1,4-bis(benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)butane (BBO) with [Ag(CH3CN)4(ClO4)] afforded a new binuclear silver(I) complex, with composition [Ag2(BBO)2(ClO4)2], characterized by elemental analysis, UV/Vis and IR spectroscopy, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The results show that the Ag(I) complex consists of a centrosymmetric dimetallacyclic structure assembled from two Ag(I) atoms and two bridging BBO ligands. The coordination environment of silver(I) complex can be described as distorted trigonal planar, with one oxygen atom from a perchlorate anion and two nitrogen atoms from two BBO ligands. The luminescence properties of the ligand and the Ag(I) complex were studied in the solid state. The emission peaks of the Ag(I) complex are attributed to ligand-centered transitions. There is no effect of the complexation except for a partial quenching. The cyclic voltammograms of the Ag(I) complex indicated an irreversible Ag+/Ag couple.

1 Introduction

In recent decades, the chemistry of silver(I) complexes is a very active field that has attracted a great deal of interest [1], [2], [3], [4]. Many silver(I) complexes reported have been used in the fields of luminescence, catalysis, conduction, and anticancer agents [5], [6], [7], [8]. As a representative d10 metal, silver(I) has a very flexible coordination sphere, which enables it to adopt coordination numbers ranging from 2 to 6, even 7 and 8, resulting in coordination geometries varying from linear to T-shaped, tetragonal, square pyramidal, and octahedral [9]. Moreover, the Ag(I) ion is apt to form short Ag–Ag contacts either supported or unsupported by ligands which have been proven to be an important factor contributing to the formation of such complexes and their special properties [10], [11].

Nitrogen-containing heterocycles are typically used as ligands because of their diversity of coordination patterns [12], [13]. Azaheterocyclic benzoxazole complexes have also been hot topics over the past decades [14]. With the rapid development of heterocyclic chemistry, benzoxazole and its derivatives have received extensive attention in drug synthesis, coordination chemistry and bioinorganic chemistry, directed to applications in molecular catalysis, solar energy conversion, anti-tumor drugs, and nucleic acid probes [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Therefore, the investigation of silver(I) complexes with benzoxazole ligands is becoming a very popular and interesting field.

Our recent studies have focused on the use of benzoxazole/benzimidazole ligands to coordinate to metal ions to improve their photoluminescent and biological properties [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]. In this work, we report the synthesis, structure, fluorescence studies, and electrochemical properties of an Ag(I) complex containing 1,4-bis(benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)butane (BBO) as a ligand.

2 Experimental

Caution: Although no problems were encountered in this work, transition metal perchlorate salts are potentially explosive and should thus be prepared in small quantities and handled with special care.

2.1 Materials and physical measurements

All chemicals and solvents (Kaitong Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) were reagent grade and used without further purification. Electronic spectra were taken using a Lab-Tech UV Bluestar spectrophotometer (Beijing Labtech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Absorbance was measured using the Spectrumlab722sp spectrophotometer (Shanghai Lengguang Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at room temperature. The C, H, and N elemental analyses were performed using a Carlo Erba 1106 elemental analyzer (Carlo Erba, Rome, Italy). 1H spectra were obtained using a Mercury plus 400 MHz NMR spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with trimethylsilane as the internal standard. The IR spectra were recorded in the 4000–400 cm−1 region using a Nicolet FT-VERTEX 70 spectrometer (Bruker, Madison, WI, USA) using KBr pellets. Electrochemical measurements were performed using a LK2005A electrochemical analyzer (Tianjin Lanlike Chemical Electronics High Technology Co., Ltd., Tanjin, China) under nitrogen at T=283 K. A glassy carbon working electrode, a platinum wire auxiliary electrode, and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (c(Cl)=1.0 mol L−1) were used in the three-electrode measurements. The electroactive component was at 1.0×10−3 mol L−1 concentration with tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (0.1 mol L−1) used as the supporting electrolyte in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at room temperature. The fluorescence spectra were obtained using an F97 Pro fluorescence spectra fluorophotometer (Shanghai Lengguang Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.2 Synthesis of BBO

The BBO ligand was synthesized according to the literature method [34]. Yield: 52%. m.p. 118–120°C. – 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ=7.65–7.67 (m, 2H, Ph-H), 7.44–7.47 (m, 2H, Ph-H), 7.65–7.67 (m, 4H, Ph-H), 2.99–3.03 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.04–2.07 (m, 4H, CH2). – Elemental analysis for C18H16N2O2: calcd. C 73.95, H 5.52, N 9.58; found C 73.87, H 5.46, N 9.49%. – IR (KBr): ѵ (cm−1)=3051 (w), 1572 (s), 1246 (s), 831 (w), 746 (s). – UV/Vis (in DMF): λ (nm)=271, 278.

2.3 Synthesis of [Ag2(BBO)2 (ClO4)2]

A solution of BBO (29.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) in 3 mL of methanol and a solution of [Ag(CH3CN)4(ClO4)] (37.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) in 3 mL of acetonitrile were combined and stirred at room temperature for 8 h to give a light yellow solution. The solution was evaporated to dryness to obtain a brown yellow solid. Bright brown single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by direct diffusion of Et2O into the DMF solution of the resulting complex. Yield 47%. – Elemental analysis for C36H32Ag2Cl2N4O12: calcd. C, 43.27; H, 3.23; N, 5.61; found C, 43.25; H, 3.27; N, 5.55%. – 1H [dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6, 400 MHz]: δ=7.89–7.91 (m, 2H, Ph-H), 7.65–7.60 (m, 2H, Ph-H), 7.33–7.40 (m, 4H, Ph-H), 3.05–3.09 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.25–2.31 (m, 4H, CH2). – IR (KBr): ѵ(cm−1)=3053(w), 1564(s), 1454(s), 1248(m), 1092(s), 760(s), 621(s). – UV/Vis (in DMF): λ (nm)=273, 279.

2.4 X-ray crystallography

A suitable single crystal of the complex was mounted on a glass fiber, and the intensity data were collected using a Bruker APEX-II CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromatized Mo radiation (λ=0.71073 Å) at T=296(2) K. Data reduction and cell refinement were performed using the Saint suite of programs [35]. The absorption corrections were made using empirical methods. The structure was solved by Direct Methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares against F2 using the Olex 2 software [36], [37]. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined by using anisotropic displacement parameters [38]. All hydrogen atoms were included in calculated positions and refined with isotropic displacement parameters taken as riding on the parent atoms. Crystal data and details of the data collection and refinement are shown in Table 1. Selected bond lengths and bond angles are listed in Table 2. Due to disorder of the atoms O5, O6 of the ClO4 anions, they were treated as split-atom model between two positions. In the refinement, several constrains were applied: ISOR for the disordered O5 and O5′ atoms; DFIX for O3, O4, O5, O5′, O6, O6′, Cl1 and Ag1 atoms; DELU for Cl1 and O3 atoms; SIMU for Cl1, O3, O4, O5, O5′, O6 and O6 atoms.

Table 1:

Crystal data and numbers pertinent to data collection and structure refinement for the Ag(I) complex.

Complex
Empirical formulaC36H32Ag2Cl2N4O12
Molecular weight999.29
Crystal systemTriclinic
Space groupP1̅;
a, Å8.432(4)
b, Å11.026(4)
c, Å11.235(4)
α, deg63.612(5)
β, deg74.929(6)
γ, deg83.854(6)
V, Å3903.5(6)
Z1
Dcalcd, g cm−31.84
Absorption coefficient, mm−11.3
F(000), e500
Crystal size, mm30.41×0.37×0.33
2θ range data collection, deg4.168–50.996
Index ranges–7≤h≤10, –11≤k≤13, –11≤l≤13
Reflections collected4737
Independent reflections/Rint3306/0.0146
Refinement methodFull-matrix least-squares on F2
Data/restraints/parameters3306/51/272
Goodness-of-fit on F21.004
Final R1/wR2 [I>2 σ(I)]0.0614/0.1761
Final R1/wR2 (all data)0.0654/0.1819
Largest diff. peak/hole, e Å−31.34/–1.95
Table 2:

Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) of Ag(I) complex.

Bond lengthsBond angles
Ag(1)–N(1)2.165(4)N(2)–Ag(1)–N(1)155.04(17)
Ag(1)–O(5′)2.278(7)N(1)–Ag(1)–O(5′)99.9(4)
Ag(1)–N(2)2.163(5)N(2)–Ag(1)–O(5′)96.9(4)

CCDC 1848100 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data request/cif.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Characterization of the Ag(I) complex

The Ag(I) complex was prepared by the reaction of [Ag(CH3CN)4(ClO4)] with BBO in acetonitrile and methanol (v/v, 1: 1). The crystals were obtained by diffusion of diethyl ether into a DMF solution of the product in the dark to avoid photodecomposition. The Ag(I) complex is soluble in polar aprotic solvents such as DMF and DMSO, partially soluble in ethanol and methanol, but insoluble in Et2O and petroleum ether. The results of the elemental analyses show that the composition of the complex is [Ag2(BBO)2(ClO4)2], which was confirmed by the crystal structure analysis.

The free BBO shows strong IR bands at 1246 and 1572 cm−1 attributed to the ѵ(C–O) and ѵ(C=N) vibrations of the benzoxazole group, respectively [11]. In comparison with the IR spectra of the ligand BBO, the ѵ(C–O) and ѵ(C=N) frequencies (1248 and 1564 cm−1) for the Ag(I) complex exhibit shifts of 2–8 cm−1 indicating the participation of benzoxazole nitrogen in coordination with Ag(I) ions [39]. An absorption peak of the perchlorate anion appeared at 1092 cm−1 [40], [41]. The electronic spectra of the ligand BBO and its silver complex were recorded in DMF solution at room temperature. The UV bands of BBO (271, 278 nm) are marginally shifted in the Ag(I) complex. These bands are assigned to π-π* (benzoxazole) and π-π* (imidazole) transitions, providing clear evidence of (C=N) coordination to the metal ion [42], [43].

3.2 Crystal and molecular structure of the Ag(I) complex

Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that the Ag(I) complex crystallizes in the triclinic crystal system with the space group P1̅;. As shown in Fig. 1a, the asymmetric unit of the Ag(I) complex is half of a centrosymmetric array containing two silver(I) atoms, two BBO ligands, and two perchlorate anions. The two Ag atoms are both three coordinated by one oxygen atom from a perchlorate anion and two nitrogen atoms from two BBO ligands. The sum of the angles around the Ag(I) ion amounts to 354.8° (Fig. 1b), indicating a deviation from planarity. Two BBO ligands are bridging two Ag(I) cations in a head-to-tail mode through Ag–N coordination to generate a binuclear unit. The perchlorate anions fill the 18-atom bimetallic macrocyclic cavity and participate in coordination with the distance Ag–O(5′) of 2.278(7) Å (Fig. 1c). The Ag–N bond lengths are 2.163 Å and 2.165 Å.

Fig. 1: (a) Molecular structure and atom numberings of the Ag(I) complex showing displacement ellipsoids at the 30% probability level (hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity; only one set of atoms of the disordered ClO4− anions is shown). (b) Coordination of the silver ion in the complex. (c) Metal ring diagram of the Ag(I) complex.
Fig. 1:

(a) Molecular structure and atom numberings of the Ag(I) complex showing displacement ellipsoids at the 30% probability level (hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity; only one set of atoms of the disordered ClO4 anions is shown). (b) Coordination of the silver ion in the complex. (c) Metal ring diagram of the Ag(I) complex.

As shown in Fig. 2, the distance of intermolecular π-π stacking between benzoxazole rings, measured by centroid-to-centroid distance, is estimated to be 3.716 Å. These intermolecular π-π interactions assemble the dimeric units to form a supramolecular structure.

Fig. 2: A view of the packing of the Ag(I) complex in the crystal highlighting the π···π stacking between neighboring units.
Fig. 2:

A view of the packing of the Ag(I) complex in the crystal highlighting the π···π stacking between neighboring units.

3.3 Fluorescence properties

Coordination compounds of d10 metals have attractive fluorescence properties, which make them eligible as candidates for chemical sensors or optical devices [44], [45]. Hence, the emission spectra of BBO and the Ag(I) complex in the solid state at room temperature were investigated (Fig. 3). The free ligand BBO displays photoluminescence with emission maxima at 382 and 401 nm (λex=350 nm), tentatively assigned to π-π* and n-π* transitions [46]. The Ag(I) complex exhibits emission maxima at 379 and 400 nm upon excitation at 352 nm, which are also due to π-π* and n-π* transitions, showing a blue shift of only 3 and 1 nm, respectively. The observed partial quenching of the fluorescence of the Ag(I) complex may be due to the heavy atom effect of silver [47], [48]. The fluorescence spectra of the uncoordinated BBO and the Ag(I) complex are very similar, indicating that the coordination of BBO to silver has little effect on the electronic structure of the ligand.

Fig. 3: The solid-state fluorescence spectra of uncoordinated 1,4-bis(benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)butane and its Ag(I) complex.
Fig. 3:

The solid-state fluorescence spectra of uncoordinated 1,4-bis(benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)butane and its Ag(I) complex.

3.4 Electrochemical studies

The electrochemical properties of the BBO ligand and the Ag(I) complex were studied by cyclic voltammetry in DMF [49], [50]. The data are collected in Table 3 and a voltammogram is shown in Fig. 4. The neutral free BBO ligand is not electroactive over the range –1.5 to +1.5 V. The separation between the cathodic and anodic peak potentials ΔEp (EpaEpc) of the Ag complex is greater than 60 mV, and the current ipa/ipc>1, indicating an irreversible redox process assignable to the Ag+/Ag couple [51], [52].

Table 3:

Electochemical data the Ag(I) complex.

Epa (V)Epc (V)ΔEp (V)E1/2 (V)ipa (μA)ipc (μA)I
Ag(I) complex0.1790.4830.3040.311–5.7775.3551.079
  1. Ep=EpaEpc; E1/2=(Epa+Epc)/2; I=ipa/ipc. Data with relative error=±0.5% ~1%.

Fig. 4: Cyclic voltammogram of the Ag(I) complex recorded with a platinum electrode in dimethyl formamide solution containing (nBu)4N(ClO4) (0.1 m) (scan rate=0.10 V s−1).
Fig. 4:

Cyclic voltammogram of the Ag(I) complex recorded with a platinum electrode in dimethyl formamide solution containing (nBu)4N(ClO4) (0.1 m) (scan rate=0.10 V s−1).

4 Conclusion

In summary, the ligand BBO and its silver complex have been synthesized and characterized. The complex has a dinuclear metallacyclic structure [(BBO)2Ag2]2+ with tri-coordinated silver atoms coordinated by the perchlorate anions. The solid state fluorescence has been studied, but no significant effect of the coordination to the ligand has been found. Cyclovoltammetric investigations in DMF solution were also carried out showing only one redox wave.

Acknowledgments

The present research was supported by Foundation of A Hundred Youth Talents Training Program of Lanzhou Jiaotong University (Grant No. 152022), Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (Grant No. 17JR5RA090).

References

[1] J. J. Perry, J. A. Perman, M. J. Zaworotko, Chem. Soc. Rev.2009, 38, 1400.10.1039/b807086pSearch in Google Scholar

[2] N. C. Kasuga, A. Sugie, K. Nomiya, Dalton Trans.2004, 3732.10.1039/B411859FSearch in Google Scholar

[3] B. Moulton, J. J. Lu, R. Hajndl, S. Hariharan, M. J. Zaworotko, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2002, 41, 2821.10.1002/1521-3773(20020802)41:15<2821::AID-ANIE2821>3.0.CO;2-YSearch in Google Scholar

[4] D. Sun, N. Zhang, Q. J. Xu, Z. H. Wei, R. B. Huang, L. S. Zheng, Inorg. Chim. Acta2011, 368, 67.10.1016/j.ica.2010.12.048Search in Google Scholar

[5] L. Hou, D. Li, Inorg. Chem. Commun.2005, 8, 128.10.1016/j.inoche.2004.11.019Search in Google Scholar

[6] Y. Cui, C. He, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2003, 125, 16202.10.1021/ja038668bSearch in Google Scholar

[7] D. Sun, C. F. Yang, H. R. Xu, H. X. Zhao, Z. H. Wei, N. Zhang, L. J. Yu, R. B. Huang, L. S. Zheng, Chem. Commun.2010, 46, 8168.10.1039/c0cc02112aSearch in Google Scholar

[8] M. A. Fik, A. Gorczynski, M. Kubicki, Z. Hnatejko, A. Fedoruk-Wyszomirska, E. Wyszko, M. Giel-Pietraszuk, V. Patroniak, Eur. J. Med. Chem.2014, 86, 456.10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.09.004Search in Google Scholar

[9] X. F. Zheng, L. G. Zhu, Inorg. Chim. Acta2011, 365, 419.10.1016/j.ica.2010.09.043Search in Google Scholar

[10] H. Y. Shi, Y. B. Dong, Y. Y. Liu, J. F. Ma, Cryst. Eng. Commun.2014, 16, 5110.10.1039/c4ce00236aSearch in Google Scholar

[11] S. S. Mao, K. S. Shen, X. K. Shi, Y. L. Xu, H. L. Wu, Appl. Organomet. Chem.2017, 31, e3747.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Z. X. Li, T. L. Hu, H. Ma, Y. F. Zeng, C. J. Li, M. L. Tong, Cryst. Growth Des.2013, 10, 1138.10.1021/cg900980ySearch in Google Scholar

[13] X. L. Wang, J. X. Zhang, G. C. Liu, H. Y. Lin, Y. Q. Chen, Z. H. Kang. Inorg. Chim. Acta2011, 368, 207.10.1016/j.ica.2011.01.005Search in Google Scholar

[14] I. A. Gural’skiy, D. Escudero, A. Frontera, P. V. Solntsev, E. B. Rusanov, A. N. Chernega, H. Krautscheidd, K. V. Domasevitch, Dalton Trans.2009, 2856.10.1039/b818125jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] M. Yoshizawa, M. Tamura, M. Fujita, Science2016, 312, 251.10.1126/science.1124985Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] C. T. Zeyrek, H. Ünver, Ö. T. Arpacı, K. Polat, O. N. Iskeleli, M. Yildiz, J. Mol. Struct.2015, 1081, 22.10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[17] H. L. Wu, J. W. Zhang, C. Y. Chen, H. Zhang, H. P. Peng, F. Wang, Z. H. Yang, New J. Chem.2015, 39, 7172.10.1039/C5NJ01684CSearch in Google Scholar

[18] H. L. Wu, H. Wang, X. L. Wang, G. L. Pan, F. R. Shi, Y. H. Zhang, Y. C. Bai, J. Kong, New J. Chem.2014, 38, 1052.10.1039/c3nj01145cSearch in Google Scholar

[19] T. R. Chen, J. Organomet. Chem.2008, 693, 3117.10.1016/j.jorganchem.2008.06.034Search in Google Scholar

[20] S. S. Mao, K. S. Shen, X. K. Shi, H. L. Wu, X. T. Han, C. Li, G. Z. Huang, Inorg. Chim. Acta2018, 471, 82.10.1016/j.ica.2017.10.038Search in Google Scholar

[21] H. L. Wu, J. K. Yuan, G. L. Pan, Y. H. Zhang, X. L. Wang, F. R. Shi, X. Y. Fan, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B2013, 122, 37.10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.03.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] S. S. Mao, H. Zhang, K. S. Shen, Y. L. Xu, X. K. Shi, H. L. Wu, Polyhedron2017, 134, 336.10.1016/j.poly.2017.06.042Search in Google Scholar

[23] H. L. Wu, J. K. Yuan, Y. Bai, G. L. Pan, H. Wang, J. Kong, X. Y. Fan, H. M. Liu, Dalton Trans.2012, 41, 8829.10.1039/c2dt30512gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] H. L. Wu, F. Wang, F. R. Shi, Z. H. Yang, H. Zhang, H. P. Peng, Transition Met. Chem.2015, 40, 555.10.1007/s11243-015-9948-8Search in Google Scholar

[25] H. L. Wu, Z. H. Yang, C.Y. Chen, J. W. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. P. Peng, F. Wang, J. Coord. Chem.2016, 69, 1076.10.1080/00958972.2016.1145212Search in Google Scholar

[26] Y. L. Xu, K. S. Shen, S. S. Mao, X. K. Shi, H. L. Wu, X. Y. Fan, Appl. Organomet. Chem.2018, 32, e4041.10.1002/aoc.4570Search in Google Scholar

[27] X. T. Han, K. S. Shen, G. Z. Huang, C. Li, S. S. Mao, X. K. Shi, H. L. Wu, J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1169, 18.10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.05.058Search in Google Scholar

[28] S. S. Mao, X. T. Han, C. Li, Y. L. Xu, K. S. Shen, X. K. Shi, H. L. Wu, Spectrochim. Acta A2018, 203, 408.10.1016/j.saa.2018.06.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] X. T. Han, G. Z. Huang, C. Li, Y. C. Wu, C. Wang, K. S. Shen, Y. Qu, K. Zhao, H. L. Wu, J. Lumin. 2019, 208, 453.10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.01.018Search in Google Scholar

[30] Y. Qu, C. Wang, Y. C. Wu, X. T. Han, K. Zhao, G, Z. Huang, K. S. Shen, C. Li, H. L. Wu, Polyhedron2019, 161, 189.10.1016/j.poly.2019.01.013Search in Google Scholar

[31] Y. C. Wu, X. T. Han, Y. Qu, K. Zhao, C. Wang, G. Z. Huang, H. L. Wu, J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1191, 95.10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.04.108Search in Google Scholar

[32] Y. Qu, C. Wang, K. Zhao, Y. C. Wu, G. Z. Huang, X. T. Han, H. L. Wu, J. Coord. Chem.2019, 72, 3046.10.1080/00958972.2019.1675049Search in Google Scholar

[33] C. Wang, Y. Qu, Y. C. Wu, K. S. Shen, K. Zhao, C. Li, G. Z. Huang, X. T. Han, H. L. Wu, J. Coord. Chem.2019, 72, 1579.10.1080/00958972.2019.1613648Search in Google Scholar

[34] Y. L. Xu, S. S. Mao, K. S. Shen, X. K. Shi, H. L. Wu, X. Tang, Inorg. Chim. Acta2018, 471, 17.10.1016/j.ica.2017.10.023Search in Google Scholar

[35] Apex2, Saint, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin (USA) 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[36] O. V. Dolomanov, L. J. Bourhis, R. J, Gildea, J. A. K. Howard, H. Puschmann, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2009, 42, 339.10.1107/S0021889808042726Search in Google Scholar

[37] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, C71, 3.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Y. L. Xu, H. L. Wu, H. Zhang, S. O. Aderinto, Z. H. Yang, J. Coord. Chem.2016, 69, 2988.10.1080/00958972.2016.1218484Search in Google Scholar

[40] L. Pejov, M. Ristova, B. Soptrajanov, Spectrochim. Acta A2011, 79, 27.10.1016/j.saa.2011.01.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] M. Kowczyk-Sadowy, R. Świsłocka, H. Lewandowska, J. Piekut, W. Lewandowski, Molecules2015, 20, 3146.10.3390/molecules20023146Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] L. K. Thompson, B. S. Ramaswamy, E. A. Seymour, Can. J. Chem.1977, 55, 878.10.1139/v77-122Search in Google Scholar

[43] L. M. Pu, H. T. Long, Y. Zhang, Y. Bai, W. K. Dong, Polyhedron2017, 128, 57.10.1016/j.poly.2017.02.033Search in Google Scholar

[44] Y. Song, R. Q. Fan, S. Gao, X. M. Wang, P. Wang, Y. L. Yang, Y. L. Wang, Inorg. Chem. Commun.2015, 53, 34.10.1016/j.inoche.2015.01.004Search in Google Scholar

[45] A. N. Jadhav, S. B. Pawal, S. S. Chavan, Inorg. Chim. Acta2016, 440, 77.10.1016/j.ica.2015.10.026Search in Google Scholar

[46] L. N. Cui, K. Y. Hu, Q. H. Jin, Z. F. Li, J. Q. Wu, C. L. Zhang, Polyhedron2011, 30, 2253.10.1016/j.poly.2011.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[47] Z. P. Deng, L. H. Huo, M. S. Li, L.W. Zhang, Z. B. Zhu, H. Zhao, S. Gao, Cryst. Growth Des.2011, 11, 3090.10.1021/cg200360eSearch in Google Scholar

[48] Z. P. Deng, Z. B. Zhu, S. Gao, L. H. Huo, H. Zhao, Dalton Trans.2009, 1290.10.1039/b819705aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] H. L. Wu, H. P. Peng, Y. H. Zhang, F. Wang, H. Zhang, C. P. Wang, Z. H. Yang, Appl. Organomet. Chem.2015, 29, 443.10.1002/aoc.3313Search in Google Scholar

[50] L. Q. Chai, H. S. Zhang, J. J. Huang, Y. L. Zhang, Spectrochim. Acta A2015, 137, 661.10.1016/j.saa.2014.08.084Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] X. T. Han, S. S. Mao, C. Li, K. S. Shen, X. K.Shi, G. Z Huang, H. L. Wu, Z. Naturforsch.2018, 73b, 733.10.1515/znb-2018-0113Search in Google Scholar

[52] K. Zhao, Y. Qu, Y. C. Wu, C. Wang, K. S. Shen, C. Li, H. L. Wu, Transition Met. Chem.2019, 44, 713.10.1007/s11243-019-00340-4Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-01
Accepted: 2020-01-31
Published Online: 2020-03-25
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2019-0198/html
Scroll to top button