Smoothing derivational asymmetries in English

References

Allen, Cynthia L. 2009. Case syncretism and word order change. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 201–223. Malden: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1980. On the development of morphology from syntax. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 51–69. New York: Mouton Publishers.10.1515/9783110823127.51Search in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald. 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Gert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991, 109–149. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_8Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald. 1994. Derivational productivity and text typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1. 16–34.10.1080/09296179408589996Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald. 1996. The effects of lexical specialization on the growth curve of the vocabulary. Computational Linguistics 22. 455–480.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald. 2009. Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 899–919. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213881.2.899Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald & Anneke Neijt. 1997. Productivity in context: A case study of a Dutch suffix. Linguistics 35. 565–587.10.1515/ling.1997.35.3.565Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald & Antoinette Renouf. 1996. Chronicling the times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72(1). 69–96.10.2307/416794Search in Google Scholar

Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486234Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3). 373–415.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165846Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1990. Be-heading the word. Journal of Linguistics 26. 1–31.10.1017/S0022226700014407Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1998. When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English. English Language and Linguistics 2(1). 65–86.10.1017/S1360674300000691Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486210Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2009. Competition in English word formation. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 177–198. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470757048.ch8Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2010. The typology of exocentric compounding. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 147–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.14bauSearch in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie & Antoinette Renouf. 2001. A corpus-based study of compounding in English. Journal of English Linguistics 29(2). 101–123.10.1177/00754240122005251Search in Google Scholar

Bean, Marian C. 1983. The development of word order patterns in Old English. Totowa: Barnes & Noble Books.Search in Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 1989. Intersegmental cohesiveness. Folia Linguistica 23. 245–280.10.1515/flin.1989.23.3-4.245Search in Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 1998. The (in)compatibility of morpheme orders and lexical categories and its historical implications. English Language and Linguistics 2(2). 245–262.10.1017/S1360674300000873Search in Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 2009. Structure in language: A dynamic perspective. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1993. Representativeness in corpus design. Linguistic and Literary Computing 8(4). 243–257.10.1007/978-0-585-35958-8_20Search in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert E. 1992. Morphology, semantics, and argument structure. In Iggy Roca (ed.), Thematic structure, its role in grammar, 27–50. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110872613.47Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Gert E. 2004. Inflection and derivation. In Gert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, 360–369. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110172782.2Search in Google Scholar

Burrow, John A. & Chorlac Turville-Petre. 2001. A book of Middle English. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.9Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca & Revere D. Perkins. 1990. On the assymetries in the affixation of grammatical material. In William Croft, Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony: Papers presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th birthday, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.20.04bybSearch in Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. 2001. What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23(2/3). 113–161.10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00019-XSearch in Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle & Richard D. Janda. 2001. Introduction: Conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences 23(2/3). 93–112.10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00018-8Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam A. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham: Ginn.Search in Google Scholar

Ciszek, Ewa. 2008. Word derivation in Early Middle English. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Clackson, James. 2002. Composition in Indo-European languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 100(2). 163–167.10.1111/1467-968X.00094Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernhard. 1980. Morphology and word order reconstruction: Problems and prospects. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 83–96. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110823127.83Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne, John A. Hawkins & Gary Gilligan. 1985. The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics 23. 723–758.10.1515/ling.1985.23.5.723Search in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1996. The French influence on Middle English morphology: A corpus-based study of derivation. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110822113Search in Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Laura E. Lettner. 2010. First language acquisition of compounds. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 323–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.24dreSearch in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1). 81–138.10.1353/lan.1992.0028Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2011. The world atlas of language structures Online. München: Max Planck Digital Library.Search in Google Scholar

Fabb, Nigel. 1984. Syntactic affixation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Faiß, Klaus. 1992. English historical morphology and word-formation: Loss versus enrichment. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gaeta, Livio. 2008. Constituent order in compounds and syntax: Typology and diachrony. Morphology 18. 117–141.10.1007/s11525-009-9125-xSearch in Google Scholar

Gardner, Anne. 2013. Derivation in Middle English: Regional and text type variation. PhD dissertation, University of Zurich.Search in Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz J. 2004. Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion. English Language and Linguistics 8(1). 1–24.10.1017/S1360674304001224Search in Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz J. 2009. The English compound stress myth. Word Structure 2. 1–17.10.3366/E1750124509000270Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1971. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip. Chicago Linguistic Society 7. 394–415.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.syn2Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haeberli, Eric. 1999. Features, categories and the syntax of A-positions: Synchronic and diachronic variation in the Germanic languages. PhD Thesis: Université de Genève.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Christopher J. 1988. Integrating diachronic and processing principles in explaining the suffixing preference. In John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 321–349. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553Search in Google Scholar

Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Typological changes in the lexicon: Analytic tendencies in English noun formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter10.1515/9783110238211Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1996. Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory. In Gert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 43–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_3Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33.10.1515/COG.2008.001Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heidermanns, Frank. 2004. Zur Typologie der Suffixentstehung. Indogermanische Forschungen 109. 1–20.10.1515/16130405.1Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1994. Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 253–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.109.08heiSearch in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske.Search in Google Scholar

Hiltunen, Risto. 1983. The decline of the prefixes and the beginnings of the English phrasal verb: The evidence from some Old and Early Middle English texts. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 1990. Where do words come from? In William Croft, Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony, 151–160. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.20.10hopSearch in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Horobin, Simon & Jeremy Smith. 2002. An introduction to Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1515/9780748673124Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard A. 1987. Zwicky on heads. Journal of Linguistics 23. 109–132.10.1017/S0022226700011051Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Kastovsky, Dieter. 2009a. Typological changes in derivational morphology. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 151–176. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470757048.ch7Search in Google Scholar

Kastovsky, Dieter. 2009b. Diachronic perspectives. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 321–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Katamba, Francis & John Stonham. 2006. Morphology. New York: Palgrave McMillan.10.1007/978-1-137-11131-9Search in Google Scholar

Koopman, Willen. 1990. Word order in Old English; with special reference to the verb phrase. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs. 2004. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania: CD-ROM, first edition. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/.Search in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Ariel Diertani. 2010. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Modern British English (PPCMBE). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania: CD-ROM, first edition. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/.Search in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania: CD-ROM, first edition. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred P. 1969. Proto-Indo-European compounds in relation to other Proto-Indo-European syntactic patterns. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 12. 1–20.10.1080/03740463.1969.10415422Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred P. 1973. A structural principle of language and its implications. Language 49(1). 47–66.10.2307/412102Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred P. 1974. Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred P. 1978. English: A characteristic SVO language. In Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, 169–222. Sussex: The Havester Press.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1974. An explanation of word order change SVO --> SOV. Foundations of Language 12(2). 201–214.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1978. An exploration of Mandarin Chinese. In Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, 223–266. Sussex: The Havester Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1983. Argument linking and compounding in English. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 251–286.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lipka, Leonhard. 1994. Lexicalization and idiomatization. In Ron E. Asher (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2164–2167. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach. München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, William D. & Paul Warren. 1994. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access. Psychological Review 101(4). 653–675.10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.653Search in Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, William D. & Alan Welsh. 1978. Processing interaction and lexical access during recognition of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 10. 29–63.10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-XSearch in Google Scholar

Matthews, Peter H. 1974. Morphology: An introduction to the theory of word-structure. London: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mayerthaler, Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion.Search in Google Scholar

Munske, Horst Haider. 2002. Wortbildungswandel. In Mechthild Habermann, Peter Müller & Horst Haider Munske (eds.), Historische Wortbildung des Deutschen, 23–40. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110940756.23Search in Google Scholar

Nagano, Akiko. 2011. The right-headedness of morphology and the status and development of category-determining prefixes in English. English Linguistics and Linguistics 15(1). 61–83.10.1017/S1360674310000286Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 1992. Early Modern lexis and semantics. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. 1476–1776. Volume III, 332–458. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264761.006Search in Google Scholar

Nübling, Damaris, Antje Dammel, Janet Duke & Renata Szczepaniak. 2010. Historische Sprachwissenschaft des Deutschen: Eine Einführung in die Prinzipien des Sprachwandels. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary (OED) (2015): Online version. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com. (accessed 30 September 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Olsen, Anette. 2002. Thoughts on Indo-European compounds – inspired by a look at Armenian. Transactions of the Philological Society 100(2). 233–257.10.1111/1467-968X.00098Search in Google Scholar

Peukert, Hagen. 2012. From semi-automatic to automatic affix extraction in Middle English corpora: Building a sustainable database for analyzing derivational morphology over time. In Jeremy Jancsary (ed.), Empirical methods in natural language processing: 11th conference on natural language processing (KONVENS) 5, 413–423. Wien: Scientific series of the ÖGAI.Search in Google Scholar

Pintzuk, Susan. 1998. From OV to VO in the history of English. Ms. University of York.Search in Google Scholar

Pintzuk, Susanne & Ann Taylor. 2009. The loss of OV order in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 249–278. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470757048.ch11Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological productivity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841323Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo, Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Harald Baayen. 1999. Morphological productivity across speech and writing. English Language and Linguistics 3(2). 209–228.10.1017/S1360674399000222Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph & Sidney Greenbaum. 1973. A university grammar of English. München: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Risch, Ernst. 1949. Griechische Determinativ-Komposita. Indogermanische Forschungen 59. 245–294.Search in Google Scholar

Roeper, Thomas. 1987. Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 267–310.Search in Google Scholar

Roeper, Thomas. 1988. Compound syntax and head movement. Yearbook of Morphology 1. 187–228.10.1515/9783112329528-011Search in Google Scholar

Roeper, Thomas & Muffy E. A. Siegel. 1978. A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. Linguistic Inquiry 9(2). 199–260.Search in Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Hacourt, Brace & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Schendera, Christian F. G. 2010. Clusteranalyse mit SPSS. München: Oldenbourg.10.1524/9783486710526Search in Google Scholar

Schindler, Jochen. 1997. Zur internen Syntax der indogermanischen Nominalkomposita. In José Luis García Ramón & Emilio Crespo (eds.), Berthold Delbrück y la sintaxis indoeuropea hoy. Actas del Coloquio de la Indogermanische Gesellschaft Madrid, 21–24 de septiembre de 1994, 537–540. Madrid: Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, Muffy E. A. 1974. Topics in English morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter. 2004. Analytische und synthetische Tendenzen in der Entwicklung des Englischen. In Uwe Hinrichs (ed.), Die europäischen Sprachen auf dem Wege zum analytischen Sprachtyp, 169–196. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung. 2001. Linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological theory: An introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sproat, Richard. 1985. On deriving the lexicon. PhD dissertation, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Strang, Barbara M. 1970. A history of English. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2012. Analyticity and syntheticity in the history of English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 654–665. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0056Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. 2001. From OV to VO in Early Middle English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.60Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. 2009. Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology: The development of -hood, -dom and -ship in the history of English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.10.1515/9783484971318Search in Google Scholar

van Marle, Jaap. 1996. The unity of morphology: On the intervowenness of the derivational and inflecitonal dimension of the word. In Gert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 67–82. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_4Search in Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 1973. Explanation in syntax. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, 1–50. New York: Seminar Press.10.1163/9789004368804_002Search in Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 1974. Theoretical word order studies: Results and problems. Papiere zur Linguistik 7. 5–25.Search in Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 1983. Causality in language change: Theories of linguistic preferences as a basis for linguistic explanations. Folia Linguistica Historica 6(1). 5–26.10.1515/flih.1983.4.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2). 245–274.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Dieter. 1975. Grundzüge der diachronischen Morphologie des Englischen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Zipf, George Kingsley. 1929. Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 40. 1–95.10.2307/310585Search in Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Heads. Journal of Linguistics 21. 1–29.10.1017/S0022226700010008Search in Google Scholar