Abstract
This paper proposes the idea of “activity-semiotics,” which is characterized by three modes of semiosis, namely, representation, indication, and interpretation, based on dialogical interaction. This activity-semiotics or thought-activity as metasemiosis emphasizes the power of interpretation with a processual-functional approach through a discussion of sign and meaning. In this regard, the dialogical processes involve three interpretants in each semiosis, namely, emotional interpretant, energetic interpretant, and logical interpretant, which are to be examined as to how they are connected in relation to object. My argument for dialogical semiosis is intended to reveal the teleological nature of semiosis where goal, means, and action are cooperative in semiosis in which learning, knowing, and living are engaged. This activity-semiotic model is thus characterized as anthroposemiosis, and yet it adopts not an anthropocentric but an anthropomorphic stance. For this reason, logical interpretant is critical and generates an intellectual concept incorporated with emotional and energetic interpretant. I illustrate how activity-semiotics as dialogical semiosis is operative in traveling narratives or narratives of travel, leading to self-interpretation. Thus, the action of travel in the three modes of semiosis will be represented as metaphorical, transitional, and transformational concepts, respectively, of travel as object.
Funding statement: This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2017; this work was also supported by National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2010–361-A00013).
References
Bergman, Mats. 2005. C. S. Peirce’s dialogical conception of sign processes. Studies in Philosophy and Education 24. 213–233.10.1007/s11217-005-3845-0Search in Google Scholar
Colapietro, Vincent M. 1989. Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Colapietro, Vincent M. 2005. Introduction: Peirce and education: The conflicting processes of learning and discovery. Studies in Philosophy and Education 24. 167–177.10.1007/s11217-005-3842-3Search in Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2007. The quest of meaning: A guide to semiotic theory and practice. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ketner, Kenneth L. 1995. Pragmaticism is an existentialism? In S. J. Patrick H. Samway (ed.), A thief of Peirce: The letters of Kenneth Laine Ketner and Walker Percy, 288–295. Jackson, MI: University Press of Mississippi.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Yunhee. 2007. A theoretical model of activity semiotics: Symbolic mediation and dialogical interaction. Seoul: Korea University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Yunhee. 2008a. Application of Peircean symbol to symbol-mediated dialogic interpreting activity. Semiotica 169(1/4). 107–133.10.1515/SEM.2008.027Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Yunhee. 2008b. Symbols in dialogical structure of semiotics. Semiotica 171(1/4). 51–78.10.1515/SEMI.2008.067Search in Google Scholar
Liszka, James Jakób. 1996. A general introduction to the semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1958. Charles S. Peirce: Selected writings (Values in a universe of chance), Philip P Wiener (ed.). New York: Dover Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2005. Semiotics unbounded: Interpretive routes through the open network of signs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442657113Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A. 1986. I think I am a verb: More contributions to the doctrine of signs. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-3490-1Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A. 2003. Global semiotics. In Mark Gottdiener, K. Boklund-Lagopoulou & Alexandros P. H. Lagopoulos (eds.), Semiotics, 335–358. London: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
