Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 29, 2020

Human health risk assessment of heavy metals via consumption of fish from Kao Bay

  • Hasnawati Amqam ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Dahlan Thalib , Daud Anwar , Saifuddin Sirajuddin and Anwar Mallongi

Abstract

Water pollution by heavy metals due to discharge from gold mining activity has threatened the aquatic environment and human health of the community around Kao Bay. This report review explores the level of mercury and arsenic in the fish and the health risk of fish consumption within the community around Kao Bay. Fish from 10 spots in the bay were analyzed for mercury and arsenic using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. Community members around Kao Bay were interviewed for details of their fish consumption. Daily intake of metals and health risk level were also calculated. All of the fish caught contained mercury (mean of 0.2110 ug/g) and arsenic (mean of 0.422 ug/g). This heavy metal concentration exceeds the allowable level for food standard. The human health risk assessment showed that the fish caught from Kao Bay were not safe for human consumption (RQ>1). The hazard risk quotient based on cancer and non-cancer was more than one. As many as 49 of 52 people living around Kao Bay have a risk from mercury and arsenic exposure via fish consumption. The magnitude of HQ and ECR values for most fish indicates that it is not safe for consumption.


Corresponding author: Hasnawati Amqam, Environmental Health Department, Public Health, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia, E-mail:

Funding source: The Governor of North Maluku

Award Identifier / Grant number: 221/KPTS/MU/2015

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Central Halmahera District Health Office and Government of North Maluku Province for supporting the study.

  1. Researchfunding: Research reported in this article was supported partly by the Governor of North Maluku Province(No. 221/KPTS/MU/2015), the period of 2014–2019. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Governor.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from each participant included in the study.

  5. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Medical Faculty of Hasanuddin University.

References

1. David, IG, Matache, ML, Tudorache, A, Chisamera, G, Rozylowicz, L, Radu, GL. Food chain biomagnification of heavy metals in samples from the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park. Env Eng Manag J 2012;11:69–73. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2012.010.Search in Google Scholar

2. Hall, RJ, Kolbe, E. Bioconcentration of organophosphorus pesticides to hazardous levels by amphibians. J Toxicol Environ Heal Part A Curr Issues 1980;6:853–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287398009529903.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Batvari, B, Prabhu, D, Kamalakannan, S, Krishnamurthy, RR. Heavy metals accumulation in two fish species (Labeo rohita and Cirrhina mrigala) from Pulicat Lake, North of Chennai, Southeast Coast of India. J Chem Pharm Res 2015;7:951–6.Search in Google Scholar

4. Nauen, CE. Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products. FAO Fish Circ (FAO) no 764;1983.Search in Google Scholar

5. Commission regulation No. 466/2001. Official Journal of European Commission, 1.77/1. 2011.Search in Google Scholar

6. Administration F and D. Fish and fishery products hazards and controls guidance, 4th ed. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Rockville 2011.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ahmed, MK, Baki, MA, Islam, MS, Kundu, GK, Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M, Sarkar, SK, et al. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in tropical fish and shellfish collected from the river Buriganga, Bangladesh. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2015;22:15880–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4813-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Authman, MMN, Zaki, MS, Khallaf, EA, Abbas, HH. Use of fish as bio-indicator of the effects of heavy metals pollution. J Aquac Res Dev 2015;6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.1000328.Search in Google Scholar

9. Plessl, C, Otachi, EO, Körner, W, Avenant-Oldewage, A, Jirsa, F. Fish as bioindicators for trace element pollution from two contrasting lakes in the Eastern Rift Valley, Kenya: spatial and temporal aspects. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2017;24:19767–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9518-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Naigaga, I, Kaiser, H, Muller, WJ, Ojok, L, Mbabazi, D, Magezi, G, et al. Fish as bioindicators in aquatic environmental pollution assessment: a case study in Lake Victoria wetlands, Uganda. Phys Chem Earth, parts A/B/C 2011;36:918–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.066.Search in Google Scholar

11. Burger, J, Gochfeld, M, Jeitner, C, Pittfield, T, Donio, M. Heavy metals in fish from the Aleutians: interspecific and locational differences. Environ Res 2014;131:119–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Simange, MS, Simbolon, D, Jusadi, D. Analisis Kandungan Merkuri (Hg) dan Sianida (CN) Pada Beberapa Jenis Ikan Hasil Tangkapan Nelayan Di Teluk Kao, Halmahera Utara. Repos IPB Bogor 2010:335–353. https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/53762. (Accessed 19 July 2019).Search in Google Scholar

13. Baeyens, W, Leermakers, M, Papina, T, Saprykin, A, Brion, N, Noyen, J, et al. Bioconcentration and biomagnification of mercury and methylmercury in North Sea and Scheldt Estuary fish. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2003;45:498–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-003-2136-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. WHO. Environmental Health Criteria 101; Methylmercury. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1990;1–144.Search in Google Scholar

15. Bank, MS, Chesney, E, Shine, JP, Maage, A, Senn, DB. Mercury bioaccumulation and trophic transfer in sympatric snapper species from the Gulf of Mexico. Ecol Appl 2007;17:2100–10. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1422.1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Arifin, YI, Sakakibara, M, Sera, K. Impacts of artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) on environment and human health of Gorontalo Utara Regency, Gorontalo Province, Indonesia. Geosciences 2015;5:160–76. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences5020160.Search in Google Scholar

17. Evans, DW, Crumley, PH. Mercury in Florida Bay fish: spatial distribution of elevated concentrations and possible linkages to Everglades restoration. Bull Mar Sci 2005;77:321–46.Search in Google Scholar

18. Badan Standardisasi Nasional. Batas Maksimum Cemaran Logam Berat dalam Pangan [Internet]. SNI 7387:2009 2009. Available from: https://sertifikasibbia.com/upload/logam_berat.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

19. Rumampuk, NDC, Warouw, V. Bioakumulasi total merkuri, arsen, kromium, cadmium, timbal di Teluk Totok dan Teluk Buyat, Sulawesi Utara. J LPPM Bid Sains dan Teknol 2015;2:49–59.Search in Google Scholar

20. Kitong, MT, Abidjulu, J, Koleangan, HS. Analisis merkuri (Hg) dan arsen (As) di sedimen sungai Ranoyapo kecamatan Amurang Sulawesi Utara. J MIPA 2012;1:16–9. https://doi.org/10.35799/jm.1.1.2012.425.Search in Google Scholar

21. Samman, A, Batu, DTFL, Setyobudiandi, I. Konsentrasi merkuri dan hubungannya dengan indeks kepadatan keong popaco (Telescopium telescopium) di Kao Teluk, Halmahera Utara. DEPIK J Ilmu-Ilmu Perairan. Pesisir dan Perikan 2014;3. https://doi.org/10.13170/depik.3.2.1471.Search in Google Scholar

22. European Union. Maximum levels of inorganic arsenic in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union 2015;L 161/14.Search in Google Scholar

23. FAO. JointFAO/WHO food standards programme codex alimentarius commission on contaminants in Food. FAO/WHO, Italia. 2016.Search in Google Scholar

24. US EPA, 1997. Arsenic and fish consumption, EPA-822-R-.EPA Dallas, Texas.Search in Google Scholar

25. FAO/WHO. Joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives. World Health Organization; 2010, Vol 71.Search in Google Scholar

26. Marrugo-Negrete, J, Verbel, JO, Ceballos, EL, Benitez, LN. Total mercury and methylmercury concentrations in fish from the Mojana region of Colombia. Environ Geochem Health 2008;30:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-007-9104-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Sudarmaji, AHS, Suwarni, A, 2004. Contaminated fish consumption in long period. Konsumsi Ikan Laut, Kadar Mercury Dalam Rambut, Dan Kesehatan Nelayan Di Pantai Kenjeran Surabaya. J Manusia Dan Lingkungan 11(2004). https://doi.org/10.22146/jml.18627.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-02-18
Accepted: 2020-05-10
Published Online: 2020-06-29
Published in Print: 2020-09-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2020-0023/html
Scroll to top button