Abstract
Introduction: The mass rapid transit (MRT) is the largest transport infrastructure project under the national key economic area (NKEA) in Malaysia. As urban rail is anticipated to be the future spine of public transport network in the Greater Kuala Lumpur city, it is important to mainstream climate change mitigation and public health benefits in the local transport development. This study quantifies the health co-benefits in terms of mortality among the urbanites when the first line of the 150 km MRT system in Kuala Lumpur commences by 2017.
Method: Using comparative health risk assessment, we estimated the potential health co-benefits from the establishment of the MRT system. We estimated the reduced CO2 emissions and air pollution (PM2.5) exposure reduction among the general population from the reduced use of motorized vehicles. Mortality avoided from traffic incidents involving motorcycles and passenger cars, and from increased physical activity from walking while using the MRT system was also estimated.
Results: A total of 363,130 tonnes of CO2 emissions could be reduced annually from the modal shift from cars and motorcycles to the MRT system. Atmospheric PM2.5 concentration could be reduced 0.61 μg/m3 annually (2%). This could avoid a total of 12 deaths, mostly from cardio-respiratory diseases among the city residents. For traffic injuries, 37 deaths could be avoided annually from motorcycle and passenger cars accidents especially among the younger age categories (aged 15–30). One additional death was attributed to pedestrian walking. The additional daily physical activity to access the MRT system could avoid 21 deaths among its riders. Most of the mortality avoided comes from cardiovascular diseases. Overall, a total of 70 deaths could be avoided annually among both the general population and the MRT users in the city.
Conclusion: The implementation of the MRT system in Greater Kuala Lumpur could bring substantial health co-benefits to both the general population and the MRT users mainly from the avoidance of mortality from traffic injuries.
References
1. Allwood JM, Bosetti V, Dubash NK, Gómez-Echeverri L, von Stechow C. Glossary. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, et al., editors. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
2. Castillo CK, Sanqui DC, Ajero M, Huizenga C. The co-benefits of responding to climate change: status in Asia. Manila: Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
3. De Oliveira JAP, Doll CNH, Suwa A. UNU-IAS Policy Report: Urban development with climate co-benefits: aligning climate, environment and other development goals in cities. Yokohama: UNU-IAS, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
4. Litman T. Evaluating public transportation health benefits. Victoria: Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2010. Available at: http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/APTA_Health_Benefits_Litman.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
5. Woodcock J, Givoni M, Morgan AS. Health impact modelling of active travel visions for England and Wales Using an Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modelling Tool (ITHIM). PLoS ONE 2013;8(1):e51462.10.1371/journal.pone.0051462Search in Google Scholar
6. Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Teixido O, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Replacing car trips by increasing bike and public transport in the greater Barcelona metropolitan area: a health impact assessment study. Environ Int 2012;49:100–9.10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.009Search in Google Scholar
7. Salahudin SN, Abdullah MM, Newaz NA. Emissions: sources, policies and development in Malaysia. Int J Educ Res 2013;1:7.Search in Google Scholar
8. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Malaysia (NRE). Second national communication to the UNFCCC 2011. Available at: http://www.nre.gov.my/ms-my/PustakaMedia/Penerbitan/SECOND%20NATIONAL%20COMMUNICATION%20TO%20THE%20UNFCCC%20%28NC2%29.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
9. Sims R, Schaeffer R, Creutzig F, Cruz-Núñez X, D’Agosto M, et al. Transport. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, et al., editors. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
10. Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD). Greater Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley Public Transport Master Plan 2013. Available at: http://www.spad.gov.my/projects/national-master-plan/draft-greater-klklang-valley.Search in Google Scholar
11. Jaafar J. Emerging trends of urbanization in Malaysia. Journal of the Department of Statistics, Malaysia 2004;1:43–54.Search in Google Scholar
12. Tan CC, Ahmad A. No benefits living on fringes. New Sunday Times 2013, August 4:10–3.Search in Google Scholar
13. Mohamad J, Kiggundu AT. The rise of the private cars in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. IATSS Res 2007;31(1):69–77.10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60185-0Search in Google Scholar
14. Almselati ASI, Rahmat RAOK, Jaafar O. An overview of urban transport in Malaysia. Social Sci 2011;6(1):24–33.10.3923/sscience.2011.24.33Search in Google Scholar
15. Performance Management Delivery Unit (PEMANDU). Improving urban public transport. In: Government Transformation Programme Annual Report. Kuala Lumpur: Prime Minister Office, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
16. Kaur S. MRT Corp seeks speedy Line 2 decision. New Straits Times Online 2014, July 1. Available at: http://www.nst.com.my/node/8089.Search in Google Scholar
17. GEF, circa. Manual for Calculating Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Global Environment Facility Transportation Projects. Prepared by the. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy For the Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel of the Global Environment Facility, 2010. Available at: http://www.thegef.org/gef/sites/thegef.org/files/publication/GEF_CalculatingGHGbenefits_webCD.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
18. Niltrit S, Sampanpanish P. Emission factor of carbon dioxide from in-use vehicles in Thailand. Modern Applied Science 2012;6:8.Search in Google Scholar
19. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). Air Quality Management Study for Klang Valley Region 1993; Volume 2, Main Report.Search in Google Scholar
20. Walker H. Road transport emission factors. London, UK: National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
21. Apte JS, Bombrun E, Marshall JD, Nazaroff WW. Global intraurban intake fractions for primary air pollutants from vehicles and other distributed sources. Environ Sci Technol 2012;46: 3415–23.10.1021/es204021hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
22. Humbert S, Marshall JD, Shaked S, Spadaro JV, Nishioka Y, et al. Intake fraction for particulate matter: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 2011;45:4808–16.10.1021/es103563zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Ostro B. Outdoor air pollution: assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
24. Zhou Y, Levy JI. Factors influencing the spatial extent of mobile source air pollution impacts: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2007;7:89.10.1186/1471-2458-7-89Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
25. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett Jr DR, et al. The Compendium of Physical Activities Tracking Guide. Healthy Lifestyles Research Center, College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 2011. Available at https://sites.google.com/site/compendiumofphysicalactivities/.Search in Google Scholar
26. Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). Malaysia Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010) Results 1990–2010. Seattle, United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), 2013.Search in Google Scholar
27. Rumar K. Transport safety visions, targets and strategies: beyond 2000. European Transport Safety Council, 1999. Available at: http://archive.etsc.eu/documents/etsl1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
28. HEI Panel on the Health Effects of Traffic-Related Air Pollution. Traffic-Related Air Pollution: A Critical Review of the Literature on Emissions, Exposure, and Health Effects. HEI Special Report 17. Boston: Health Effects Institute, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
29. Rahman SA, Hamzah MS, Wood AK, Elias MD, Salim NAA, et al. Sources apportionment of fine and coarse aerosol in Klang Valley, Kuala Lumpur using positive matrix factorization. Atmos Pollut Res 2011;2:197–206.10.5094/APR.2011.025Search in Google Scholar
30. Xia T, Nitschke M, Zhang Y, Shah P, Crabb S, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and health co-benefits of alternative transport in Adelaide, South Australia. Environ Int 2015;74:281–90.10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Boniface S, Scantlebury R, Watkins SJ, Mindell JS. Health implications of transport: evidence of effect of transport on social interactions. J Transp Health 2015;2:441–46.10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.005Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
