Discrete simulation of granular and particle-fluid flows: from fundamental study to engineering application

References

Abbasi A, Islam MA, Ege PE, Lasa HI. CPFD flow pattern simulation in downer reactors. AIChE J 2013; 59: 1635–1647.10.1002/aic.13956Search in Google Scholar

Agrawal K, Loezos PN, Syamlal M, Sundaresan S. The role of meso-scale structures in rapid gas-solid flows. J Fluid Mech 2001; 445: 151–185.10.1017/S0022112001005663Search in Google Scholar

Aharonov E, Rothman DH. Non-Newtonian flow (through porous media): a lattice Boltzmann method. Geophys Res Lett 1993; 20: 679–682.10.1029/93GL00473Search in Google Scholar

Aidun CK, Clausen JR. Lattice-Boltzmann method for complex flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2010; 42: 439–472.10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145519Search in Google Scholar

Aidun CK, Lu Y. Lattice-Boltzmann simulation of solid particles suspended in fluid. J Stat Phys 1995; 81: 49–61.10.1007/BF02179967Search in Google Scholar

Aidun CK, Lu Y, Ding E. Direct analysis of particulate suspensions with inertia using the discrete Boltzmann equation. J Fluid Mech 1998; 373: 287–311.10.1017/S0022112098002493Search in Google Scholar

Ai J, Chen JF, Rotter JM, Ooi JY. Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations. Powder Technol 2011; 206: 269–282.10.1016/j.powtec.2010.09.030Search in Google Scholar

Akiki G, Balachandar S. Immersed boundary method with non-uniform distribution of Lagrangian markers for a non-uniform Eulerian mesh. J Comput Phys 2016; 307: 34–59.10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.019Search in Google Scholar

Alexander FJ, Chen S, Sterling JD. Lattice Boltzmann thermohydrodynamics. Phys Rev E 1993; 47: R2249–R2252.10.1103/PhysRevE.47.R2249Search in Google Scholar

Alder BJ, Alley WE. Generalized hydrodynamics. Phys Today 1984; 37: 56–63.10.1063/1.2916048Search in Google Scholar

Alder BJ, Wainwright TE. Molecular dynamics by electronic computers. New York: Wiley, 1956.Search in Google Scholar

Alder BJ, Wainwright TE. Phase transition for a hard sphere system. J Chem Phys 1957; 27: 1208–1209.10.1063/1.1743957Search in Google Scholar

Alian M, Ein-Mozaffari F, Upreti SR, Wu J. Using discrete element method to analyze the mixing of the solid particles in a slant cone mixer. Chem Eng Res Des 2015; 93: 318–329.10.1016/j.cherd.2014.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Alizadeh E, Bertrand F, Chaouki J. Comparison of DEM results and Lagrangian experimental data for the flow and mixing of granules in a rotating drum. AIChE J 2014a; 60: 60–75.10.1002/aic.14259Search in Google Scholar

Alizadeh E, Bertrand F, Chaouki J. Discrete element simulation of particle mixing and segregation in a tetrapodal blender. Comput Chem Eng 2014b; 64: 1–12.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.12.009Search in Google Scholar

Allen MP, Tildesley DJ. Computer simulation of liquids. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Allsopp N, Ruocco G, Fratalocchi A. Molecular dynamics beyond the limits: massive scaling on 72 racks of a BlueGene/P and supercooled glass dynamics of a 1 billion particles system. J Comput Phys 2012; 231: 3432–3445.10.1016/j.jcp.2012.01.019Search in Google Scholar

Amati G, Succi S, Benzi R. Turbulent channel flow simulations using a coarse-grained extension of the lattice Boltzmann method. Fluid Dyn Res 1997; 19: 289–302.10.1016/S0169-5983(96)00026-3Search in Google Scholar

Anand A, Curtis JS, Wassgren CR, Hancock BC, Ketterhagen WR. Predicting discharge dynamics from a rectangular hopper using the discrete element method (DEM). Chem Eng Sci 2008; 63: 5821–5830.10.1016/j.ces.2008.08.015Search in Google Scholar

Anderson JD. Computational fluid dynamics: the basic with application. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson JA, Lorenz CD, Travesset A. General purpose molecular dynamics simulations fully implemented on graphics processing units. J Comput Phys 2008; 227: 5342–5359.10.1016/j.jcp.2008.01.047Search in Google Scholar

Andrade JE, Lim KW, Avila CF, Vlahinić I. Granular element method for computational particle mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2012; 241: 262–274.10.1016/j.cma.2012.06.012Search in Google Scholar

Andrews AT. Filtered models for gas-particle flow hydrodynamics. Princeton: Princeton University, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Andrews MJ, O’Rourke PJ. The multiphase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC) method for dense particulate flows. Int J Multiphase Flow 1996; 22: 379–402.10.1016/0301-9322(95)00072-0Search in Google Scholar

Antoci C, Gallati M, Sibilla S. Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by SPH. Comput Struct 2007; 85: 879–890.10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Ansumali S, Karlin IV, Öttinger HC. Minimal entropic kinetic models for hydrodynamics. Europhys Lett 2003; 63: 798–804.10.1209/epl/i2003-00496-6Search in Google Scholar

Apte SV, Finn JR. A variable-density fictitious domain method for particulate flows with broad range of particle-fluid density ratios. J Comput Phys 2013; 243: 109–129.10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.021Search in Google Scholar

Apte SV, Martin M, Patankar NA. A numerical method for fully resolved simulation (FRS) of rigid particle-flow interactions in complex flows. J Comput Phys 2009; 228: 2712–2738.10.1016/j.jcp.2008.11.034Search in Google Scholar

Ardekani MN, Costa P, Breugem WP, Picano F, Brandt L. Drag reduction in turbulent channel flow laden with finite-size oblate spheroids. arXiv preprint 2016; arXiv:1607.00679.10.1017/jfm.2017.68Search in Google Scholar

Arntz MMHD, Beeftink HH, Otter WK, Briels WJ, Boom RM. Segregation of granular particles by mass, radius, and density in a horizontal rotating drum. AIChE J 2014; 60: 50–59.10.1002/aic.14241Search in Google Scholar

Ashby S, Beckman P, Chen J. The opportunities and challenges of exascale computing. USA: The ASCAC Subcommittee on Exascale Computing, US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Washington D. C., USA, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Azizi N, Kuon I, Egier A, Darabiha A, Chow P. Reconfigurable molecular dynamics simulator. Proceedings of the 12th Annual IEEE Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines. Napa, CA, 2004: 197–206.Search in Google Scholar

Bagnold RA. Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear. Proc R Soc Lond A 1954; 225: 49–63.10.1098/rspa.1954.0186Search in Google Scholar

Barnea E, Mizrahi J. A generalized approach to the fluid dynamics of particulate systems. Part I. general correlation for fluidization and sedimentation in solid multiparticle systems. Chem Eng J 1973; 5: 171–189.10.1016/0300-9467(73)80008-5Search in Google Scholar

Barr AH. Superquadrics and angle-preserving transformations. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1981; 1: 11–23.10.1109/MCG.1981.1673799Search in Google Scholar

Barrasso D, Ramachandran R. Multi-scale modeling of granulation processes: bi-directional coupling of PBM with DEM via collision frequencies. Chem Eng Res Des 2015; 93: 304–317.10.1016/j.cherd.2014.04.016Search in Google Scholar

Beeman D. Some multistep methods for use in molecular dynamics calculations. J Comput Phys 1976; 20: 130–139.10.1016/0021-9991(76)90059-0Search in Google Scholar

Beetstra R, Van der Hoef MA, Kuipers JAM. A lattice-Boltzmann simulation study of the drag coefficient of clusters of spheres. Comput Fluids 2006; 35: 966–970.10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.03.009Search in Google Scholar

Beetstra R, Van der Hoef MA, Kuipers JAM. Drag force of intermediate Reynolds number flow past mono- and bidisperse arrays of spheres. AIChE J 2007a; 53: 489–501.10.1002/aic.11065Search in Google Scholar

Beetstra R, Van der Hoef MA, Kuipers JAM. Numerical study of segregation using a new drag force correlation for polydisperse systems derived from lattice-Boltzmann simulations. Chem Eng Sci 2007b; 62: 246–255.10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.054Search in Google Scholar

Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Dijkstra EJ, Achterop S, Vondrumen R, Vanderspoel D. GROMACS: a parallel computer for molecular dynamics simulations. Proceedings of the 4th Intl. Conference Physics Computing 92. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Belytschko T, Gilbertsen ND. Implementation of mixed time integration techniques on a vectorized computer with shared memory. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1992; 35: 1803–1828.10.1002/nme.1620350906Search in Google Scholar

Belytschko T, Lu YY, Gu L. Element-free Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1994; 37: 229–256.10.1002/nme.1620370205Search in Google Scholar

Bentley JL. Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Commun ACM 1975; 18: 509–517.10.1145/361002.361007Search in Google Scholar

Benyahia S, Galvin JE. Estimation of numerical errors related to some basic assumptions in discrete particle methods. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010; 49: 10588–10605.10.1021/ie100662zSearch in Google Scholar

Benyahia S, Syamlal M, O’Brien TJ. Extension of Hill-Koch-Ladd drag correlation over all ranges of Reynolds number and solids volume fraction. Powder Technol 2006; 162: 166–174.10.1016/j.powtec.2005.12.014Search in Google Scholar

Benzi R, Succi S, Vergassola M. The lattice-Boltzmann equation: theory and applications. Phys Rep 1992; 222: 145–197.10.1016/0370-1573(92)90090-MSearch in Google Scholar

Berendsen HJC. Biological molecules and membranes. In: Ciccotti G, Hoover WG, editors. Molecular dynamics simulation of statistical mechanical systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, Van Gunsteren WF, Hermans J. Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. Intermol Forces 1981; 16: 331–342.10.1007/978-94-015-7658-1_21Search in Google Scholar

Berger R, Kloss C, Kohlmeyer A, Pirker S. Hybrid parallelization of the LIGGGHTS open-source DEM code. Powder Technol 2015; 278: 234–247.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.03.019Search in Google Scholar

Berthiaux H, Mizonov V. Applications of Markov chains in particulate process engineering: a review. Can J Chem Eng 2004; 82: 1143–1168.10.1002/cjce.5450820602Search in Google Scholar

Berthiaux H, Mizonov V, Zhukov V. Application of the theory of Markov chains to model different processes in particle technology. Powder Technol 2005; 157: 128–137.10.1016/j.powtec.2005.05.019Search in Google Scholar

Bertrand F, Leclaire LA, Levecque G. DEM-based models for the mixing of granular materials. Chem Eng Sci 2005; 60: 2517–2531.10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.048Search in Google Scholar

Bird GA. Approach to translational equilibrium in a rigid sphere gas. Phys Fluids 1963; 6: 1518–1519.10.1063/1.1710976Search in Google Scholar

Bluhm-Drenhaus T, Simsek E, Wirtz S, Scherer V. A coupled fluid dynamic-discrete element simulation of heat and mass transfer in a lime shaft kiln. Chem Eng Sci 2010; 65: 2821–2834.10.1016/j.ces.2010.01.015Search in Google Scholar

Bonet J, Peraire J. An alternating digital tree (ADT) algorithm for 3D geometric searching and intersection problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1991; 31: 1–17.10.1002/nme.1620310102Search in Google Scholar

Bowers KJ, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Overview of neutral territory methods for the parallel evaluation of pairwise particle interactions. J Phys Conf Ser 2005; 16: 300–304.10.1088/1742-6596/16/1/041Search in Google Scholar

Bowers KJ, Dror RO, Shaw DE. The midpoint method for parallelization of particle simulations. J Chem Phys 2006; 124: 184109.10.1063/1.2191489Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bowman ET, Soga K, Drummond W. Particle shape characterization using Fourier descriptor analysis. Géotechnique 2001; 51: 545–554.10.1680/geot.2001.51.6.545Search in Google Scholar

Breault RW, Shadle LJ, Spenik JL, Huckaby ED. CO2 adsorption: experimental investigation and CFD reactor model validation. J Comput Environ Sci 2014; 503194: 1–14.10.1155/2014/503194Search in Google Scholar

Breugem WP. A second-order accurate immersed boundary method for fully resolved simulations of particle-laden flows. J Comput Phys 2012; 231: 4469–4498.10.1016/j.jcp.2012.02.026Search in Google Scholar

Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983; 4: 187–217.10.1002/jcc.540040211Search in Google Scholar

Brooks CL, Young WS, Tobias DJ. Molecular simulations on supercomputers. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 1991; 5: 98–112.10.1177/109434209100500409Search in Google Scholar

Brooks BR, Brooks CL, Mackerell AD, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, Caflisch A, Caves L, Cui Q, Dinner AR, Feig M, Fischer S, Gao J, Hodoscek M, Im W, Kuczera K, Lazaridis T, Ma J, Ovchinnikov V, Paci E, Pastor RW, Post CB, Pu JZ, Schaefer M, Tidor B, Venable RM, Woodcock HL, Wu X, Yang W, York DM, Karplus M. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009; 30: 1545–1614.10.1002/jcc.21287Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Brosh T, Kalman H, Levy A. Accelerating CFD-DEM simulation of processes with wide particle size distributions. Particuology 2014; 12: 113–121.10.1016/j.partic.2013.04.008Search in Google Scholar

Brown WM, Wang P, Plimpton SJ, Tharrington AN. Implementing molecular dynamics on hybrid high performance computers – short range forces. Comput Phys Commun 2011; 182: 898–911.10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.021Search in Google Scholar

Brown WM, Kohlmeyer A, Plimpton SJ, Tharrington AN. Implementing molecular dynamics on hybrid high performance computers-Particle-particle particle-mesh. Comput Phys Commun 2012; 183: 449–459.10.1016/j.cpc.2011.10.012Search in Google Scholar

Camones LAM, Vargas Jr EdA, de Figueiredo RP, Velloso RQ. Application of the discrete element method for modeling of rock crack propagation and coalescence in the step-path failure mechanism. Eng Geol 2013; 153: 80–94.10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.11.013Search in Google Scholar

Cao NZ, Shen SY, Jin S, Martinez D. Physical symmetry and lattice symmetry in the lattice Boltzmann method. Phys Rev E 1997; 55: R21–R24.10.1103/PhysRevE.55.R21Search in Google Scholar

Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1668–1688.10.1002/jcc.20290Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Cates ME, Wittmer JP, Bouchaud JP, Claudin P. Jamming, force chains, and fragile matter. Phys Rev Lett 1998; 81: 1841–1844.10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1841Search in Google Scholar

Caulkin R, Ahmad A, Fairweather M, Jia X, Williams RA. Digital predictions of complex cylinder packed columns. Comput Chem Eng 2009; 33: 10–21.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Chambon G, Bouvarel R, Laigle D, Naaim M. Numerical simulations of granular free-surface flows using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Non Newton Fluid Mech 2011; 166: 698–712.10.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Charpentier JC. Among the trends for a modern chemical engineering, the third paradigm: the time and length multiscale approach as an efficient tool for process intensification and product design and engineering. Chem Eng Res Des 2010; 88: 248–254.10.1016/j.cherd.2009.03.008Search in Google Scholar

Chen HD. Volumetric formulation of the lattice Boltzmann method for fluid dynamics: basic concept. Phys Rev E 1998; 58: 3955–3963.10.1103/PhysRevE.58.3955Search in Google Scholar

Chen S, Doolen GD. Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1998; 30: 329–364.10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.329Search in Google Scholar

Chen H, Chen S, Matthaeus WH. Recovery of the Navier-Stokes equations using a lattice-gas Boltzmann method. Phys Rev A 1992; 45: R5339–R5342.10.1103/PhysRevA.45.R5339Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Chen H, Kandasamy S, Orszag S, Shock R, Succi S, Yakhot V. Extended Boltzmann kinetic equation for turbulent flows. Science 2003; 301: 633–636.10.1126/science.1085048Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Chen F, Ge W, Wang L, Li J. Numerical study on gas-liquid nano-flows with pseudo-particle modeling and soft-particle molecular dynamics simulation. Microfluid Nanofluid 2008; 5: 639–653.10.1007/s10404-008-0280-xSearch in Google Scholar

Chen F, Ge W, Guo L, He X, Li B, Li J, Li X, Wang X, Yuan X. Multi-scale HPC system for multi-scale discrete simulation – development and application of a supercomputer with 1 Petaflops peak performance in single precision. Particuology 2009; 7: 332–335.10.1016/j.partic.2009.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Chen F, Lu L, Ge W, Li J. Coupling of a coarse-grained discrete particle method with particle-in-cell method for gas-solid flow simulation. Presented at 22nd SCEJ Symposium on Fluidization and Particle Processing as a plenary talk. 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng Y, Wang C. Numerical study on coal gasification in the downer reactor of a triple-bed combined circulating fluidized bed. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014; 53: 6624–6635.10.1021/ie500013ySearch in Google Scholar

Cheng C. Multi-scale modeling of the axial heterogeneous structure in circulating fluidized beds. Doctorial Dissertation. The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng C, Li J, Zhang Z, Yuan J. Fluid dynamic model of concurrent-up gas-solid two-phase flow. J Chem Ind Eng 2001; 52: 684–689.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng C, Li J, Zhang Z. Energy-minimization multi-scale core-annulus (EMMS/CA) model for gas-solid circulating fluidized beds. J Chem Indust Eng (China) 2002; 53: 804–809.Search in Google Scholar

Chiesa M, Melheim JA, Pedersen A, Ingebrigtsen S, Berg G. Forces acting on water droplets falling in oil under the influence of an electric field: numerical predictions versus experimental observations. Eur J Mech – B/Fluids 2005; 24: 717–732.10.1016/j.euromechflu.2005.03.005Search in Google Scholar

Chong Z, Jin Y. Numerical investigation of progressive development of granular pile with spherical and non-spherical particles. Mech Mater 2009; 41: 707–714.10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.017Search in Google Scholar

Chu K, Yu A. Numerical simulation of complex particle-fluid flows. Powder Technol 2008a; 179: 104–114.10.1016/j.powtec.2007.06.017Search in Google Scholar

Chu K, Yu A. Numerical simulation of the gas-solid flow in three-dimensional pneumatic conveying bends. Ind Eng Chem Res 2008b; 47: 7058–7071.10.1021/ie800108cSearch in Google Scholar

Chu K, Wang B, Yu A, Vince A, Barnett GD, Barnett PJ. CFD-DEM study of the effect of particle density distribution on the multiphase flow and performance of dense medium cyclone. Minerals Eng 2009a; 22: 893–909.10.1016/j.mineng.2009.04.008Search in Google Scholar

Chu K, Wang B, Yu A, Vince A. CFD-DEM modelling of multiphase flow in dense medium cyclones. Powder Technol 2009b; 193: 235–247.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.015Search in Google Scholar

Chu K, Wang B, Xu D, Chen Y, Yu A. CFD-DEM simulation of the gas-solid flow in a cyclone separator. Chem Eng Sci 2011; 66: 834–847.10.1016/j.ces.2010.11.026Search in Google Scholar

Clark TW, McCammon JA, Scott LR. Parallel molecular dynamics. Proc. 5th SIAM Conference on Parallel Processing for Scientific Computing. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1992: 338–344.Search in Google Scholar

Cleary PW. Ball motion, axial segregation and power consumption in a full scale two chamber cement mill. Miner Eng 2009; 22: 809–820.10.1016/j.mineng.2009.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Cleary PW. DEM prediction of industrial and geophysical particle flows. Particuology 2010; 8: 106–118.10.1016/j.partic.2009.05.006Search in Google Scholar

Cleary PW, Sinnott MD. Assessing mixing characteristics of particle-mixing and granulation devices. Particuology 2008; 6: 419–444.10.1016/j.partic.2008.07.014Search in Google Scholar

Cleary PW, Stokes N, Hurley J. Efficient collision detection for three dimensional super-ellipsoidal particles. CTAC97, Adelaide, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Cleary PW, Metcalfe G, Liffman K. How well do discrete element granular flow models capture the essentials of mixing processes? Appl Math Model 1998; 22: 995–1008.10.1016/S0307-904X(98)10032-XSearch in Google Scholar

Cohen JD, Lin MC, Manocha D, Mirtich B, Ponamgi MK, Canny JF. I-COLLIDE, 1995. Retrieved from http://gamma.cs.unc.edu/I-COLLIDE/, Accessed on August 18, 2015.10.1145/199404.199437Search in Google Scholar

Cohen JD, Gottschalk S, Hudson T, Pattekar A, Lin MC, Manocha D. V-COLLIDE, 1998. Retrieved from http://gamma.cs.unc.edu/V-COLLIDE/, Accessed on August 18, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Cook BK, Noble DR, Williams JR. A direct simulation method for particle-fluid systems. Eng Comput 2004; 21: 151–168.10.1108/02644400410519721Search in Google Scholar

Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL. Introduction to algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press and McGraw-Hill, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C. Introduction to algorithms, 3rd ed., Cambridge: MIT Press and McGraw-Hill, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz IKM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995; 117: 5179–5197.10.1021/ja00124a002Search in Google Scholar

Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H. Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik. Math Ann 1928; 100: 32–74.10.1007/978-1-4612-5385-3_7Search in Google Scholar

Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H. On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM J Res Dev 1967; 11: 215–234.10.1147/rd.112.0215Search in Google Scholar

Cundall PA. A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movement in blocky rock systems. In: Muller Led, editor. Proceedings of the symposium international society of rock mechanics. Rotterdam: Balkama A.A., 1971; 1: 8–12.Search in Google Scholar

Cundall PA. Numerical experiments on localization in frictional materials. Ingenieur-Archiv 1989; 59: 148–159.10.1007/BF00538368Search in Google Scholar

Cundall PA, Strack ODL. A discrete numerical -model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 1979; 29: 47–65.10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47Search in Google Scholar

Darabi P, Pougatch K, Salcudean M, Grecov D. DEM investigations of fluidized beds in the presence of liquid coating. Powder Technol 2011; 214: 365–374.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.08.032Search in Google Scholar

Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N [center-dot] log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 1993; 98: 10089–10092.10.1063/1.464397Search in Google Scholar

Daw MS, Baskes MI. Semiempirical, quantum mechanical calculation of hydrogen embrittlement in metals. Phys Rev Lett 1983; 50: 1285–1288.10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1285Search in Google Scholar

Deen NG, Kuipers JAM. Direct numerical simulation of fluid flow and mass transfer in dense fluid-particle systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013; 52: 11266–11274.10.1021/ie303411kSearch in Google Scholar

Deen NG, Kuipers JAM. Direct numerical simulation of fluid flow accompanied by coupled mass and heat transfer in dense fluid-particle systems. Chem Eng Sci 2014; 116: 645–656.10.1016/j.ces.2014.05.036Search in Google Scholar

Deen NG, Van Sint Annaland M, Van der Holf MA, Kuipers JAM. Review of discrete particle modeling of fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 2007; 62: 28–44.10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.014Search in Google Scholar

Delaney GW, Morrison RD, Sinnott MD, Cummins S, Cleary PW. DEM modelling of non-spherical particle breakage and flow in an industrial scale cone crusher. Miner Eng 2015; 74: 112–122.10.1016/j.mineng.2015.01.013Search in Google Scholar

Dellar PJ. Lattice Boltzmann formulation for linear viscoelastic fluids using an abstract second stress. SIAM J Sci Comput 2014; 36: A2507–A2532.10.1137/130940372Search in Google Scholar

Deng L, Liu Y, Wang W, Ge W, Li J. A two-fluid smoothed particle hydrodynamics (TF-SPH) method for gas-solid fluidization. Chem Eng Sci 2013, 99: 89–101.10.1016/j.ces.2013.05.047Search in Google Scholar

Derjaguin BV, Muller VM, Toporov YP. Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 1975; 53: 314–326.10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1Search in Google Scholar

Derksen JJ. Numerical simulation of solids suspension in a stirred tank. AIChE J 2003; 49: 2700–2714.10.1002/aic.690491104Search in Google Scholar

Derksen JJ. Highly resolved simulations of solids suspension in a small mixing tank. AIChE J 2012; 58: 3266–3278.10.1002/aic.13889Search in Google Scholar

d’Humières D, Ginzburg I, Krafczyk M, Lallemand P, Luo LS. Multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann models in three dimensions. Philos Trans R Soc London A 2002; 360: 437–451.10.1098/rsta.2001.0955Search in Google Scholar

Di S. Multi-scale modeling and numerical simulation of complex flows based on immersed boundary method. Beijing: Institute of Process Engineering, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Di S, Ge W. Simulation of dynamic fluid-solid interactions with an improved direct-forcing immersed boundary method. Particuology 2015; 18: 22–34.10.1016/j.partic.2014.05.004Search in Google Scholar

Di Felice R. The void function for fluid-particle interaction systems. Int J Multiphase Flow 1994; 20: 153–159.10.1016/0301-9322(94)90011-6Search in Google Scholar

Di Maio FP, Di Renzo A, Trevisan D. Comparison of heat transfer models in DEM-CFD simulations of fluidized beds with an immersed probe. Powder Technol 2009; 193: 257–265.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Di Renzo A, Di Maio FP. Comparison of contact-force models for the simulation of collisions in DEM-based granular flow codes. Chem Eng Sci 2004; 59: 525–541.10.1016/j.ces.2003.09.037Search in Google Scholar

Dilts GA. Moving-least-squares-particle hydrodynamics: consistency and stability. Int J Numer Anal Methods 1999; 44: 1115–1155.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990320)44:8<1115::AID-NME547>3.0.CO;2-LSearch in Google Scholar

Ding J, Gidaspow D. A bubbling fluidization model using kinetic theory of granular flow. AIChE J 1990; 36: 523–538.10.1002/aic.690360404Search in Google Scholar

Dobrohotoff PB, Azeezullah SI, Maggi F, Alonso-Marroquin F. Optimal description of two-dimensional complex-shaped objects using spheropolygons. Granular Matter 2012; 14: 651–658.10.1007/s10035-012-0357-9Search in Google Scholar

Dobson M, Fox I, Saracino A. Cell list algorithms for nonequilibrium molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 2016; 315: 211–220.10.1016/j.jcp.2016.03.056Search in Google Scholar

Dong K, Wang B, Yu A. Modeling of particle flow and sieving behavior on a vibrating screen: from discrete particle simulation to process performance prediction. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013; 52: 11333–11343.10.1021/ie3034637Search in Google Scholar

Dong K, Wang C, Yu A. A novel method based on orientation discretization for discrete element modeling of non-spherical particles. Chem Eng Sci 2015; 126: 500–516.10.1016/j.ces.2014.12.059Search in Google Scholar

Doucet J, Nicolas H, Bertr F, Chaouki J. Modeling of the mixing of monodisperse particles using a stationary DEM-based Markov process. Comput Chem Eng 2008; 32: 1334–1341.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.06.017Search in Google Scholar

Duan C, Zhou F, Jiang K, Yu T. Molecular dynamics simulation of planar Poiseuille flow for polymer melts in atomically flat nanoscale channel. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2015; 91: 1088–1100.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.08.035Search in Google Scholar

Dudukovic MP. Frontiers in reactor engineering. Science 2009; 325: 698–701.10.1126/science.1174274Search in Google Scholar

Dyka CT, Randles PW, Ingel RP. Stress points for tension instability in SPH. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1997; 40: 2325–2341.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19970715)40:13<2325::AID-NME161>3.0.CO;2-8Search in Google Scholar

Džiugys A, Peters B. An approach to simulate the motion of spherical and non-spherical fuel particles in combustion chambers. Granul Matter 2001; 3: 231–266.10.1007/PL00010918Search in Google Scholar

Eaton JK, Fessler JR. Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Int J Multiphase Flow 1994; 20: 169–209.10.1016/0301-9322(94)90072-8Search in Google Scholar

Ergun S. Fluid flow through packed columns. Chem Eng Prog 1952; 48: 89–94.Search in Google Scholar

Espanol P. Hydrodynamics from dissipative particle dynamics. Phys Rev E 1995; 52: 1734.10.1103/PhysRevE.52.1734Search in Google Scholar

Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz M, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 1995; 103: 8577–8593.10.1063/1.470117Search in Google Scholar

Eu BC. Generalized hydrodynamics and transport processes. In: Eu, Byung Chan, editor. Kinetic theory of nonequilibrium ensembles, irreversible thermodynamics, and generalized hydrodynamics. Berlin: Springer, 2016: 463–529.10.1007/978-3-319-41147-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Evans DJ, Hoover WG. Flows far from equilibrium via molecular dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1986; 18: 243–264.10.1146/annurev.fl.18.010186.001331Search in Google Scholar

Evans DJ, Morriss GP. Non-Newtonian molecular dynamics. Comput Phys Rep 1984; 1: 297–343.10.1016/0167-7977(84)90001-7Search in Google Scholar

Evans MW, Harlow FH, Bromberg E. The particle-in-cell method for hydrodynamic calculations. DTIC Document, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 1957.Search in Google Scholar

Fadlun E, Verzicco R, Orlandi P, Mohd-Yusof J. Combined immersed-boundary finite-difference methods for three-dimensional complex flow simulations. J Comput Phys 2000; 161: 35–60.10.1006/jcph.2000.6484Search in Google Scholar

Fan Y, Schlick CP, Umbanhowar PB, Ottino JM, Lueptow RM. Modelling size segregation of granular materials: the roles of segregation, advection and diffusion. J Fluid Mech 2014; 741: 252–279.10.1017/jfm.2013.680Search in Google Scholar

Fang H, Chen S. Lattice Boltzmann method for three-dimensional moving particles in a Newtonian fluid. Chin Phys 2004; 13: 47–53.10.1088/1009-1963/13/1/010Search in Google Scholar

Fede P, Simonin O. Numerical study of the subgrid fluid turbulence effects on the statistics of heavy colliding particles. Phys Fluids 2006; 18: 045103.10.1063/1.2189288Search in Google Scholar

Feinauer J, Spettl A, Manke I, Strege S, Kwade A, Pott A, Schmidt V. Structural characterization of particle systems using spherical harmonics. Mater Charact 2015; 106: 123–133.10.1016/j.matchar.2015.05.023Search in Google Scholar

Feng YT. Discrete element methods – theory & practice, short course on discrete element methods. Beijing, China, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Feng ZG, Michaelides EE. The immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for solving fluid-particles interaction problems. J Comput Phys 2004; 195: 602–628.10.1016/j.jcp.2003.10.013Search in Google Scholar

Feng ZG, Michaelides EE. Proteus: a direct forcing method in the simulations of particulate flows. J Comput Phys 2005; 202: 20–51.10.1016/j.jcp.2004.06.020Search in Google Scholar

Feng ZG, Musong SG. Direct numerical simulation of heat and mass transfer of spheres in a fluidized bed. Powder Technol 2014; 262: 62–70.10.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.019Search in Google Scholar

Feng YT, Owen DRJ. An augmented spatial digital tree algorithm for contact detection in computational mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2002; 55: 159–176.10.1002/nme.502Search in Google Scholar

Feng YQ, Yu A. Assessment of model formulations in the discrete particle simulation of gas-solid flow. Ind Eng Chem Res 2004; 43: 8378–8390.10.1021/ie049387vSearch in Google Scholar

Feng J, Hu HH, Joseph DD. Direct simulation of initial value problems for the motion of solid bodies in a Newtonian fluid. Part 1. Sedimentation. J Fluid Mech 1994a; 261: 95–134.10.1017/S0022112094000285Search in Google Scholar

Feng J, Hu HH, Joseph DD. Direct simulation of initial value problems for the motion of solid bodies in a Newtonian fluid. Part 2. Couette and Poiseuille flows. J Fluid Mech 1994b; 277: 271–301.10.1017/S0022112094002764Search in Google Scholar

Feng YT, Han K, Owen DRJ. Coupled lattice Boltzmann method and discrete element modeling of particle transport in turbulent fluid flows: computational issues. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2007; 72: 1111–1134.10.1002/nme.2114Search in Google Scholar

Feng YT, Han K, Owen DRJ, Loughran J. On upscaling of discrete element models: similarity principles. Eng Comput 2009; 26: 599–609.10.1108/02644400910975405Search in Google Scholar

Ferellec JF, McDowell GR. A simple method to create complex particle shapes for DEM. Geomech Eng 2008; 3: 211–216.10.1080/17486020802253992Search in Google Scholar

Ferziger JH, Perić M. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Berlin: Springer, 2002.10.1007/978-3-642-56026-2Search in Google Scholar

Filippova O, Hanel D. Lattice-Boltzmann simulation of gas-particle flow in filters. Comput Fluids 1997; 26: 697–712.10.1016/S0045-7930(97)00009-1Search in Google Scholar

Fincham D. Parallel computers and molecular simulation. Mol Simul 1987; 1: 1–45.10.1080/08927028708080929Search in Google Scholar

Finn J, Apte SV. Relative performance of body fitted and fictitious domain simulations of flow through fixed packed beds of spheres. Int J Multiphase Flow 2013; 56: 54–71.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Fornari W, Picano F, Brandt L. Sedimentation of finite-size spheres in quiescent and turbulent environments. J Fluid Mech 2016; 788: 640–669.10.1017/jfm.2015.698Search in Google Scholar

Forterre Y, Pouliquen O. Flows of dense granular media. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2008; 40: 1–24.10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102142Search in Google Scholar

Fox RO. Large-eddy-simulation tools for multiphase flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2012; 44: 47–76.10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101118Search in Google Scholar

Freddolino PL, Arkhipov AS, Larson SB, McPherson A, Schulten K. Molecular dynamics simulations of the complete satellite tobacco mosaic virus. Struct 2006; 14: 437–449.10.1016/j.str.2005.11.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fries L, Antonyuk S, Heinrich S, Palzer S. DEM-CFD modeling of a fluidized bed spray granulator. Chem Eng Sci 2011; 66: 2340–2355.10.1016/j.ces.2011.02.038Search in Google Scholar

Fries L, Antonyuk S, Heinrich S, Dopfer D, Palzer S. Collision dynamics in fluidised bed granulators: a DEM-CFD study. Chem Eng Sci 2013; 86: 108–123.10.1016/j.ces.2012.06.026Search in Google Scholar

Frisch U, Hasslacher B, Pomeau Y. Lattice-gas automata for the Navier-Stokes equation. Phys Rev Lett 1986; 56: 1505–1508.10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1505Search in Google Scholar

Fu HH, Liao JF, Yang JZ, Wang LN, Song ZY, Huang XM, Yang C, Xue W, Liu FF, Qiao FL, Zhao W, Yin XQ, Hou CF, Zhang CL, Ge W, Zhang J, Wang YG, Zhou CB, Yang GW. The Sunway TaihuLight supercomputer: system and applications. Science China: Information Sciences. 2016; 59: 072001.10.1007/s11432-016-5588-7Search in Google Scholar

Galindo-Torres SA, Muñoz JD, Alonso-Marroquín F. Minkowski-Voronoi diagrams as a method to generate random packings of spheropolygons for the simulation of soils. Phys Rev E 2010; 82: 056713.10.1103/PhysRevE.82.056713Search in Google Scholar

Gao T, Hu HH. Deformation of elastic particles in viscous shear flow. J Comput Phys 2009; 228: 2132–2151.10.1016/j.jcp.2008.11.029Search in Google Scholar

Garg R, Galvin J, Li T, Pannala S. Open-source MFIX-DEM software for gas-solids flows: part I – verification studies. Powder Technol 2012; 220: 122–137.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.09.019Search in Google Scholar

Gear CW. Numerical initial value problems in ordinary differential equations. New Jersey: Longman Higher Education, 1971.Search in Google Scholar

Geier M, Greiner A, Korvink JG. Cascaded digital lattice Boltzmann automata for high Reynolds number flow. Phys Rev E 2006; 73: 066705.10.1103/PhysRevE.73.066705Search in Google Scholar

Geier M, Schönherr M, Pasquali A, Krafczyk M. The cumulant lattice Boltzmann equation in three dimensions: theory and validation. Comput Math Appl 2015; 70: 507–547.10.1016/j.camwa.2015.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Ge W. Multi-scale simulation of fluidization. Doctor Dissertation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Li J. Pseudo-particle approach to hydrodynamics of gas/solid two-phase flow. Li J and Mooson K. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Circulating Fluidized Bed. Beijing: Science Press, 1996: 260–265.Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Li J. Simulation of discrete systems with local interactions: a conceptual model for massive parallel processing. Comput Appl Chem 2000; 17: 385–388.Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Li J. Macro-scale pseudo-particle modeling for particle-fluid systems. Chin Sci Bull 2001; 46: 1503–1507.10.1007/BF02900568Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Li J. Physical mapping of fluidization regimes – the EMMS approach. Chem Eng Sci 2002a; 57: 3993–4004.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00234-8Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Li J. General approach for discrete simulation of complex systems. Sci China Ser B Chem 2002b; 47: 1172–1175.10.1007/BF02907603Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Li J. Macro-scale phenomena reproduced in microscopic systems pseudo-particle modeling of fluidization. Chem Eng Sci 2003; 58: 1565–1585.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00673-5Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Karsten L, Hartge EU. Application of the EMMS model to hydrodynamics of large CFB combustors. Selected papers of engineering chemistry and metallurgy china, 1998; 1998: 108–116.Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Zhang J, Li T, Li J. Pseudo-particle simulation of multi-scale heterogeneity in fluidization. Chin Sci Bull 2003; 48: 634–636.10.1360/03tb9135Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Ma J, Zhang J, Tang D, Chen F, Wang X, Guo L, Li J. Particle methods for multiscale simulation of complex flows. Chin Sci Bull 2005; 50: 1057–1069.10.1360/04wb0108Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Chen F, Gao J, Gao S, Huang J, Liu X, Ren Y, Sun Q, Wang L, Wang W, Yang N, Zhang J, Zhao H, Zhou G, Li J. Analytical multi-scale method for multi-phase complex systems in process engineering – bridging reductionism and holism. Chem Eng Sci 2007; 62: 3346–3377.10.1016/j.ces.2007.02.049Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Wang W, Ren Y, Li J. More opportunities than challenges – perspectives on chemical engineering. Curr Sci 2008; 95: 1310–1316.Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Wang W, Yang N, Li J, Kwauk M, Chen F, Chen J, Fang X, Guo L, He X, Liu X, Liu Y, Lu B, Wang J, Wang J, Wang L, Wang X, Xiong Q, Xu M, Deng L, Han Y, Hou C, Hua L, Huang W, Li B, Li C, Li F, Ren Y, Xu J, Zhang N, Zhang Y, Zhou G, Zhou G. Meso-scale oriented simulation towards virtual process engineering (VPE) – The EMMS Paradigm. Chem Eng Sci 2011; 66: 4426–4458.10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.029Search in Google Scholar

Ge W, Lu L, Liu S, Xu J, Chen F, Li J. Multiscale discrete supercomputing – a game changer for process simulation? Chem Eng Technol 2015; 38: 575–584.10.1002/ceat.201400746Search in Google Scholar

Germann TC, Kadau K. Trillion-atom molecular dynamics becomes a reality. Int J Mod Phys C 2008; 19: 1315–1319.10.1142/S0129183108012911Search in Google Scholar

Gibilaro LG, Di Felice R, Waldram SP, Foscolo PU. Generalized friction factor and drag coefficient correlations for fluid-particle interactions. Chem Eng Sci 1985; 40: 1817–1823.10.1016/0009-2509(85)80116-0Search in Google Scholar

Gidaspow D. Multiphase flow and fluidization: continuum and kinetic theory description. Boston: Academic Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Gidaspow D, Bezburuah R, Ding J. Hydrodynamics of circulating fluidized beds: kinetic theory approach. 7th International Conference on Fluidization, New York, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Gilmanov A, Sotiropoulos F, Balaras E. A general reconstruction algorithm for simulating flows with complex 3D immersed boundaries on cartesian grids. J Comput Phys 2003; 191: 660–669.10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00321-8Search in Google Scholar

Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc 1977; 181: 375–389.10.1093/mnras/181.3.375Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg I. Equilibrium-type and link-type lattice Boltzmann models for generic advection and anisotropic-dispersion equation. Adv Water Resour 2005; 28: 1171–1195.10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Glaser J, Nguyen TD, Anderson JA, Lui P, Spiga F, Millan JA, Morse DC, Glotzer SC. Strong scaling of general-purpose molecular dynamics simulations on GPUs. Comput Phys Commun 2015; 192: 97–107.10.1016/j.cpc.2015.02.028Search in Google Scholar

Glowinski R, Pan TW, Periaux J. A fictitious domain method for Dirichlet problems and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1994a; 111: 283–303.10.1016/0045-7825(94)90135-XSearch in Google Scholar

Glowinski R, Pan TW, Periaux J. A fictitious domain method for external incompressible viscous flow modeled by Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1994b; 112: 133–148.10.1016/0045-7825(94)90022-1Search in Google Scholar

Glowinski R, Pan TW, Periaux J. Distributed Lagrange multiplier methods for incompressible viscous flow around moving rigid bodies. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1998; 151: 181–194.10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00116-3Search in Google Scholar

Glowinski R, Pan TW, Hesla TI, Joseph DD. A distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. Int J Multiphase Flow 1999; 25: 755–794.10.1016/S0301-9322(98)00048-2Search in Google Scholar

Glowinski R, Pan TW, Hesla TI, Joseph DD, Periaux J. A distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for the simulation of flow around moving rigid bodies: application to particulate flow. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2000; 184: 241–267.10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00230-3Search in Google Scholar

Goldhirsch I. Stress, stress asymmetry and couple stress: from discrete particles to continuous fields. Granul Matter 2010; 12: 239–252.10.1007/s10035-010-0181-zSearch in Google Scholar

Goniva C, Kloss C, Deen NG, Kuipers JAM, Pirker S. Influence of rolling friction on single spout fluidized bed simulation. Particuology 2012; 10: 582–591.10.1016/j.partic.2012.05.002Search in Google Scholar

González S, Windows-Yule CRK, Luding S, Parker DJ, Thornton AR. Forced axial segregation in axially inhomogeneous rotating systems. Phys Rev E 2015; 92: 022202.10.1103/PhysRevE.92.022202Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Gopalakrishnan P, Tafti D. Development of parallel DEM for the open source code MFIX. Powder Technol 2013; 35: 33–41.10.1016/j.powtec.2012.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Gottschalk S, Lin MC, Manocha D. OBBTree: a hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 1996; ACM: 171–180.10.1145/237170.237244Search in Google Scholar

Govender N, Rajamani RK, Kok S, Wilke DN. Discrete element simulation of mill charge in 3D using the BLAZE-DEM GPU framework. Miner Eng 2015a; 79: 152–168.10.1016/j.mineng.2015.05.010Search in Google Scholar

Govender N, Wilke DN, Kok S. Collision detection of convex polyhedra on the NVIDIA GPU architecture for the discrete element method. Appl Math Comput 2015b; 267: 810–829.10.1016/j.amc.2014.10.013Search in Google Scholar

Govender N, Wilke DN, Kok S, Els R. Development of a convex polyhedral discrete element simulation framework for NVIDIA Kepler based GPUs. J Comput Appl Math 2014; 270: 386–400.10.1016/j.cam.2013.12.032Search in Google Scholar

Gray JP, Monaghan JJ, Swift RP. SPH elastic dynamics. Comput Methods Appl M 2001; 190: 6641–6662.10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00254-7Search in Google Scholar

Greengard L, Rokhlin V. A fast algorithm for particle simulations. J Comput Phys 1987; 73: 325–348.10.1016/0021-9991(87)90140-9Search in Google Scholar

Grest GS, Dünweg B, Kremer K. Vectorized link cell Fortran code for molecular dynamics simulations for a large number of particles. Comput Phys Commun 1989; 55: 269–285.10.1016/0010-4655(89)90125-2Search in Google Scholar

Groot RD, Warren PB. Dissipative particle dynamics: bridging the gap between atomistic and mesoscopic simulation. J Chem Phys 1997; 107: 4423.10.1063/1.474784Search in Google Scholar

Gueyffier D, Li J, Nadim A. Volume-of-fluid interface tracking with smoothed surface stress methods for three-dimensional flows. J Comput Phys 1999; 152: 423–456.10.1006/jcph.1998.6168Search in Google Scholar

Gunstensen AK, Rothman DH, Zaleski S, Zanetti G. Lattice Boltzmann model of immiscible fluids. Phys Rev A 1991; 43: 4320–4327.10.1103/PhysRevA.43.4320Search in Google Scholar

Guo Y, Curtis JS. Discrete element method simulations for complex granular flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2015; 47: 21–46.10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-014644Search in Google Scholar

Guo Z, Zhao TS. Lattice Boltzmann model for incompressible flows through porous media. Phys Rev E 2002; 66: 036304.10.1103/PhysRevE.66.036304Search in Google Scholar

Guo Y, Wassgren C, Ketterhagen W, Hancock B, Curtis J. Some computational considerations associated with discrete element modeling of cylindrical particles. Powder Technol 2012; 228: 193–198.10.1016/j.powtec.2012.05.015Search in Google Scholar

Haeri S, Shrimpton JS. On the application of immersed boundary, fictitious domain and body-conformal mesh methods to many particle multiphase flows. Inter J Multiphase Flow 2012; 40: 38–55.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Han H, Tseng CW. A comparison of locality transformations for irregular codes. Fifth Workshop on Languages, Compilers, and Run-Time Systems for Scalable Computers (LCR’ 2000). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2000: 253–275.10.1007/3-540-40889-4_6Search in Google Scholar

Hancock BC, Mojica N, John-Green KS, Elliott JA, Bharadwaj R. An investigation into the kinetic (sliding) friction of some tablets and capsules. Int J Pharm 2010; 384: 39–45.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.09.038Search in Google Scholar

Happel J. Viscous flow in multi-particle systems: slow motion of fluids relative to beds of spherical particles. AIChE J 1958; 4: 197–202.10.1002/aic.690040214Search in Google Scholar

Harald K, Frederik E. Modeling of screening processes with the discrete element method involving non-spherical particles. Chem Eng Technol 2014; 37: 847–856.10.1002/ceat.201300649Search in Google Scholar

Harlow FH. The particle-in-cell computing method for fluid dynamics. Methods Comput Phys 1964; 3: 319–343.Search in Google Scholar

Harrisa T, Thorpeb RB, Davidsona JF. Stochastic modelling of the particle residence time distribution in circulating fluidised bed risers. Chem Eng Sci 2002; 57: 4779–4796.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00278-6Search in Google Scholar

Harting JDR, Frijters S, Ramaioli M, Robinson M, Wolf DE, Luding S. Recent advances in the simulation of particle-laden flows. Eur Phys J 2014; 223: 2253–2267.10.1140/epjst/e2014-02262-3Search in Google Scholar

Harvey MJ, Giupponi G, Fabritiis GD. ACEMD: accelerating biomolecular dynamics in the microsecond time scale. J Chem Theory Comput 2009; 5: 1632–1639.10.1021/ct9000685Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Hassanpour A, Pasha M, Susana L, Rahmanian N, Santomaso AC, Ghadiri M. Analysis of seeded granulation in high shear granulators by discrete element method. Powder Technol 2013; 238: 50–55.10.1016/j.powtec.2012.06.028Search in Google Scholar

Hazeghian M, Soroush A. DEM simulation of reverse faulting through sands with the aid of GPU computing. Comput Geotech 2015; 66: 253–263.10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.01.019Search in Google Scholar

Hendrickson B, Plimpton S. Parallel many-body simulations without all-to-all communication. J Parallel Distrib Comput 1995; 27: 15–25.10.1006/jpdc.1995.1068Search in Google Scholar

Hendrickson B, Womble DE. The torus-wrap mapping for dense matrix calculations on massively parallel computers. SIAM J Sci Comput 1994; 15: 1201–1226.10.1137/0915074Search in Google Scholar

Henry C, Minier JP, Mohaupt M, Profeta C, Pozorski J, Tanière A. A stochastic approach for the simulation of collisions between colloidal particles at large time steps. Int J Multiphase Flow 2014; 61: 94–107.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Hertz H. Miscellaneous papers. London, UK: Macmillan and Co., 1896.Search in Google Scholar

Hess B, Kutzner C, Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2008; 4: 435–447.10.1021/ct700301qSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

He X, Luo L. A priori derivation of the lattice Boltzmann equation. Phys Rev E 1997a; 55: R6333.10.1103/PhysRevE.55.R6333Search in Google Scholar

He X, Luo L. Lattice Boltzmann model for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation. J Stat Phys 1997b; 88: 927–944.10.1023/B:JOSS.0000015179.12689.e4Search in Google Scholar

He X, Chen S, Doolen GD. A novel thermal model for the lattice Boltzmann method in incompressible limit. J Comput Phys 1998; 146: 282–300.10.1006/jcph.1998.6057Search in Google Scholar

Helfand E, Frisch HL, Lebowitz JL. Theory of the two- and one-dimensional rigid sphere fluids. J Chem Phys 1961; 34: 1037–1042.10.1063/1.1731629Search in Google Scholar

Heyes DM, Baxter J, Tuzun U, Qin RS. Discrete-element method simulations: from micro to macro scales. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A 2004; 362: 1853–1865.10.1098/rsta.2004.1420Search in Google Scholar

Hill KM, Tan DS. Segregation in dense sheared flows: gravity, temperature gradients, and stress partitioning. J Fluid Mech 2014; 756: 54–88.10.1017/jfm.2014.271Search in Google Scholar

Hill RJ, Koch DL, Ladd AJC. The first effects of fluid inertia on flows in ordered and random arrays of spheres. J Fluid Mech 2001a; 448: 213–241.10.1017/S0022112001005948Search in Google Scholar

Hill RJ, Koch DL, Ladd AJC. Moderate-Reynolds-number flows in ordered and random arrays of spheres. J Fluid Mech 2001b; 448: 243–278.10.1017/S0022112001005936Search in Google Scholar

Hilton JE, Cleary PW. Comparison of non-cohesive resolved and coarse grain DEM models for gas flow through particle beds. Appl Math Modell 2014; 38: 4197–4214.10.1016/j.apm.2014.02.013Search in Google Scholar

Hirt CW, Nichols BD. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 1981; 39: 201–225.10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5Search in Google Scholar

Hockney RW, Goel SP, Eastwood JW. Quiet high-resolution computer models of a plasma. J Comput Phys 1974; 14: 148–158.10.1016/0021-9991(74)90010-2Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann DWM, Kuleshova L, D’Aguanno B. A new reactive potential for the molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water. Chem Phys Lett 2007; 448: 138–143.10.1016/j.cplett.2007.09.063Search in Google Scholar

Hogue C, Newland D. Efficient computer simulation of moving granular particles. Powder Technol 1994; 78: 51–66.10.1016/0032-5910(93)02748-YSearch in Google Scholar

Hohenberg P, Kohn W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev 1964; 136: B864–B871.10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864Search in Google Scholar

Holloway W, Yin X, Sundaresan S. Fluid-particle drag in inertial polydisperse gas-solid suspensions. AIChE J 2010; 56: 1995–2004.10.1002/aic.12127Search in Google Scholar

Holzer A, Sommerfeld M. New simple correlation formula for the drag coefficient of non-spherical particles. Powder Technol 2008; 184: 361–365.10.1016/j.powtec.2007.08.021Search in Google Scholar

Holzer A, Sommerfeld M. Lattice Boltzmann simulations to determine drag, lift and torque acting on non-spherical particles. Comput Fluids 2009; 38: 572–589.10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Hoogerbrugge PJ, Koelman J. Simulating microscopic hydrodynamic phenomena with dissipative particle dynamics. Europhys Lett 1992; 19: 155–160.10.1209/0295-5075/19/3/001Search in Google Scholar

Hoomans BPB, Kuipers JAM, Briels WJ, Van Swaaij WPM. Discrete particle simulation of bubble and slug formation in a two-dimensional gas-fluidised bed: a hard-sphere approach. Chem Eng Sci 1996; 51: 99–118.10.1016/0009-2509(95)00271-5Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins MA. Discrete element modeling with dilated particles. Eng Comput 2004; 21: 422–430.10.1108/02644400410519866Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins MA, Louge MY. Inelastic microstructure in rapid granular flows of smooth disks. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn 1991; 3: 47–57.10.1063/1.857863Search in Google Scholar

Hou C, Ge W. Nano-fluidization under high gravity – A perspective view from simulation. Chem Eng Sci 2007; 62: 6794–6805.10.1016/j.ces.2007.07.063Search in Google Scholar

Hou C, Xu J, Wang P, Huang W, Wang X. Efficient GPU-accelerated molecular dynamics simulation of solid covalent crystals. Comput Phys Commun 2013a; 184: 1364–1371.10.1016/j.cpc.2013.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Hou C, Xu J, Wang P, Huang W, Wang X, Ge W, He X, Guo L, Li J. Petascale molecular dynamics simulation of crystalline silicon on Tianhe-1A. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 2013b; 27: 307–317.10.1177/1094342012456047Search in Google Scholar

Houlsby G. Potential particles: a method for modelling non-circular particles in DEM. Comput Geotech 2009; 36: 953–959.10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Householder AS. Principles of numerical analysis. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill, 1953.Search in Google Scholar

Hu HH. Direct simulation of flows of solid-liquid mixtures. Int J Multiphase Flow 1996; 22: 335–352.10.1016/0301-9322(95)00068-2Search in Google Scholar

Hu HH, Joseph DD, Crochet MJ. Direct simulation of fluid particle motions. Theory Comput Fluid Dyn 1992; 3: 285–306.10.1007/BF00717645Search in Google Scholar

Hu HH, Patankar NA, Zhu MY. Direct numerical simulation of fluid-solid systems using the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian technique. J Comput Phys 2001; 169: 427–462.10.1006/jcph.2000.6592Search in Google Scholar

Hu S, Liu X, Li J. Steady-state modeling of radial heterogeneity in the fully developed region of a CFB riser. In: Xiaoshu Cai and Jerry Heng, editors. UK-China International Particle Technology Forum IV, Shanghai, 2013a.Search in Google Scholar

Hu S, Liu X, Li J. Steady-state modeling of axial heterogeneity in CFB risers based on one-dimensional EMMS model. Chem Eng Sci 2013b; 96: 165–173.10.1016/j.ces.2013.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Hu S, Liu X, Zhang N, Li J, Ge W, Wang W. Quantifying cluster dynamics to improve EMMS drag law and radial heterogeneity description in coupling with gas-solid two-fluid method. Chem Eng J 2017; 307: 326–338.10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.084Search in Google Scholar

Huang WX, Sung H. An immersed boundary method for fluid-flexible structure interaction. Comput Method Appl Mech 2009; 198: 2650–2661.10.1016/j.cma.2009.03.008Search in Google Scholar

Hughes TJ, Feijóo GR, Mazzei L, Quincy JB. The variational multiscale method – a paradigm for computational mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1998; 166: 3–24.10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00079-6Search in Google Scholar

Igci Y, Iv ATA, Pannala S, O’Briens T, Sundaresan S. Filtered two-fluid models for fluidized gas-particle suspensions. AIChE J 2008; 54: 1431–1448.10.1002/aic.11481Search in Google Scholar

Inamuro T. Lattice Boltzmann methods for viscous fluid flows and for two-phase fluid flows. Fluid Dyn Res 2006; 38: 641–659.10.1007/978-3-642-01273-0_1Search in Google Scholar

Intel. Intel many integrated core architecture. University of Cambridge, 2010. http://www.many-core.group.cam.ac.uk/ukgpucc2/talks/Elgar.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Intel. Molecular dynamics optimization on Intel^® many integrated core architecture (Intel^® MIC). Intel Cooperation, 2013. http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/molecular-dynamics-optimization-on-intel-many-integrated-core-architecture-intel-mic.Search in Google Scholar

Inutsuka SI. Reformulation of smoothed particle hydrodynamics with Riemann solver. J Comput Phys 2002; 179: 238–267.10.1006/jcph.2002.7053Search in Google Scholar

Iwashita K, Oda M. Rolling resistance at contacts in simulation of shear band development by DEM. J Eng Mech 1998; 124: 285–292.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:3(285)Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger HM, Nagel SR, Behringer RP. Granular solids, liquids, and gases. Rev Mod Phys 1996; 68: 1259–1273.10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1259Search in Google Scholar

Jajcevic D, Siegmann E, Radeke C, Khinast JG. Large-scale CFD-DEM simulations of fluidized granular systems. Chem Eng Sci 2013; 98: 298–310.10.1016/j.ces.2013.05.014Search in Google Scholar

Jensen RP, Bosscher PJ, Plesha ME, Edil TB. DEM simulation of granular media – structure interface: effects of surface roughness and particle shape. Int J Numer Anal Methods in Geomech 1999; 23: 531–547.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199905)23:6<531::AID-NAG980>3.0.CO;2-VSearch in Google Scholar

Jia X, Williams RA. A packing algorithm for particles of arbitrary shapes. Powder Technol 2001; 120: 175–186.10.1016/S0032-5910(01)00268-6Search in Google Scholar

Jiang MJ, Yu HS, Harris D. A novel discrete model for granular material incorporating rolling resistance. Comput Geotech 2005; 32: 340–357.10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Jiang T, Ouyang J, Ren J, Yang B, Xu X. A mixed corrected symmetric SPH (MC-SSPH) method for computational dynamic problems. Comput Phys Commun 2012; 183: 50–62.10.1016/j.cpc.2011.08.016Search in Google Scholar

Johnson KL. Contact mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.10.1017/CBO9781139171731Search in Google Scholar

Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE. Simulation of multiple spheres falling in a liquid-filled tube. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1996; 134: 351–373.10.1016/0045-7825(95)00988-4Search in Google Scholar

Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc London Ser A 1971; 324: 301–313.10.1098/rspa.1971.0141Search in Google Scholar

Jones JE. On the determination of molecular fields. II. From the equation of state of a gas. Proc R Soc London Ser A 1924; 106: 463–477.10.1098/rspa.1924.0082Search in Google Scholar

Jop P, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O. A constitutive law for dense granular flows. Nature 2006; 441: 727–730.10.1038/nature04801Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983; 79: 926–935.10.1063/1.445869Search in Google Scholar

Kadau K, Germann TC, Lomdahl PS. Molecular dynamics comes of age: 320 billion atom simulation on BlueGene/L. Int J Mod Phys C 2006; 17: 1755–1761.10.1142/S0129183106010182Search in Google Scholar

Kale KG, Lew AJ. Parallel asynchronous variational integrators. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2007; 70: 291–321.10.1002/nme.1880Search in Google Scholar

Kalé L, Skeel R, Bhandarkar M, Brunner B, Gursoy A, Krawetz N, Phillips J, Shinozaki A, Varadarajan K, Schulten K. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 1999; 151: 283–312.10.1006/jcph.1999.6201Search in Google Scholar

Kalyanaraman R. Nucleation energetics during homogeneous solidification in elemental metallic liquids. J Appl Phys 2008; 104: 033506.10.1063/1.2961329Search in Google Scholar

Kandhai D, Derksen JJ, Van den Akker HEA. Interphase drag coefficients in gas-solid flows. AIChE J 2003; 49: 1060–1065.10.1002/aic.690490423Search in Google Scholar

Kang Q, Zhang D, Chen S, He X. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of chemical dissolution in porous media. Phys Rev E 2002; 65: 036318.10.1103/PhysRevE.65.036318Search in Google Scholar

Karimipour S, Pugsley T. Application of the particle in cell approach for the simulation of bubbling fluidized beds of Geldart A particles. Powder Technol 2012; 220: 63–69.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.09.026Search in Google Scholar

Karplus M, Petsko GA. Molecular dynamics simulations in biology. Nature 1990; 347: 631–639.10.1038/347631a0Search in Google Scholar

Kazari M, Roko K, Kawaguchi T, Tanaka T, Tsuji Y. A study on conditions for similarity of particle motion in numerical simulation of dense gas-solid two phase flow. In: Akimi Serizawa, Tohru Fukano and Jean Bataille, editors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Multiphase Flow. Kyoto, Japan. 1995: 9–15.Search in Google Scholar

Kempe T, Fröhlich J. An improved immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particle laden flows. J Comput Phys 2012; 231: 3663–3684.10.1016/j.jcp.2012.01.021Search in Google Scholar

Ketterhagen WR, Curtis JS, Wassgren CR, Kong A, Narayan PJ, Hancock BC. Granular segregation in discharging cylindrical hoppers: a discrete element and experimental study. Chem Eng Sci 2007; 62: 6423–6439.10.1016/j.ces.2007.07.052Search in Google Scholar

Ketterhagen WR, Ende MTA, Hancock BC. Process modeling in the pharmaceutical industry using the discrete element method. J Pharm Sci 2009; 98: 442–470.10.1002/jps.21466Search in Google Scholar

Khan AR, Richardson JF. Pressure gradient and friction factor for sedimentation and fluidization of uniform spheres in liquids. Chem Eng Sci 1990; 45: 255–265.10.1016/0009-2509(90)87097-CSearch in Google Scholar

Kidanemariam AG, Uhlmann M. Interface-resolved direct numerical simulation of the erosion of a sediment bed sheared by laminar channel flow. Int J Multiphase Flow 2014; 67: 174–188.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.08.008Search in Google Scholar

Kitron A, Elperin T, Tamir A. Monte Carlo simulation of gas-solids suspension flows in impinging streams reactors. Int J Multiphase Flow 1990; 16: 1–17.10.1016/0301-9322(90)90033-FSearch in Google Scholar

Koch DL, Hill RJ. Inertial effects in suspension and porous-media flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2001; 33: 619–647.10.1146/annurev.fluid.33.1.619Search in Google Scholar

Koch DL, Sangani AS. Particle pressure and marginal stability limits for a homogeneous mono-disperse gas fluidized bed: kinetic theory and numerical simulations. J Fluid Mech 1999; 400: 229–263.10.1017/S0022112099006485Search in Google Scholar

Kodam M, Curtis J, Hancock B, Wassgren C. Discrete element method modeling of bi-convex pharmaceutical tablets: contact detection algorithms and validation. Chem Eng Sci 2012; 69: 587–601.10.1016/j.ces.2011.11.011Search in Google Scholar

Koelman J, Hoogerbrugge PJ. Dynamic simulations of hard-sphere suspensions under steady shear. Europhys Lett 1993; 21: 363–368.10.1209/0295-5075/21/3/018Search in Google Scholar

Kohn W, Sham LJ. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev 1965; 140: 1133–1138.10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133Search in Google Scholar

Koplik J, Banavar JR. Molecular dynamics of interface rupture. Phys of Fluids A 1993; 5: 521–536.10.1063/1.858879Search in Google Scholar

Koshizuka S, Oka Y. Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid. Nucl Sci Eng 1996; 123: 421–434.10.13182/NSE96-A24205Search in Google Scholar

Koumoutsakos P. Multiscale flow simulations using particles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2005; 37: 457–487.10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175753Search in Google Scholar

Kriebitzsch SHL, Van der Hoef MA, Kuipers JAM. Drag force in discrete particle models – continuum scale or single particle scale? AIChE J 2013a; 59: 316–324.10.1002/aic.13804Search in Google Scholar

Kriebitzsch SHL, Van der Hoef MA, Kuipers JAM. Fully resolved simulation of a gas-fluidized bed: a critical test of DEM models. Chem Eng Sci 2013b; 91: 1–4.10.1016/j.ces.2012.12.038Search in Google Scholar

Kruggel-Emden H, Simsek E, Rickelt S, Wirtz S, Scherer V. Review and extension of normal force models for the discrete element method. Powder Technol 2007; 171: 157–173.10.1016/j.powtec.2006.10.004Search in Google Scholar

Kruggel-Emden H, Elskamp F. Modeling of screening processes with the discrete element method involving non-spherical particles. Chem Eng Technol 2014; 37: 847–856.10.1002/ceat.201300649Search in Google Scholar

Kruggel-Emden H, Wirtz S, Scherer V. A study on tangential force laws applicable to the discrete element method (DEM) for materials with viscoelastic or plastic behavior. Chem Eng Sci 2008; 63: 1523–1541.10.1016/j.ces.2007.11.025Search in Google Scholar

Kruggel-Emden H, Wirtz S, Simsek E, Scherer V. Modeling of granular flow and combined heat transfer in hoppers by the discrete element method (DEM). J Pressure Vessel Technol 2006; 128: 439–444.10.1115/1.2218349Search in Google Scholar

Kuang SB, Yu AB. Micromechanic modeling and analysis of the flow regimes in horizontal pneumatic conveying. AIChE J 2011; 57: 2708–2725.10.1002/aic.12480Search in Google Scholar

Kuang SB, Chu KW, Yu AB, Zou ZS, Feng YQ. Computational investigation of horizontal slug flow in pneumatic conveying. Ind Eng Chem Res 2008; 47: 470–480.10.1021/ie070991qSearch in Google Scholar

Kumar D, Patra AK, Pitman EB, Chi H. Parallel Godunov smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with improved treatment of boundary conditions and an application to granular flows. Comput Phys Commun 2013; 184: 2277–2286.10.1016/j.cpc.2013.05.014Search in Google Scholar

Kuwagi K, Takeda H, Horio M. The similar particle assembly (SPA) model: an approach to large-scale discrete element (DEM) simulation. Fluidization XI 2004; 160: 243–250.Search in Google Scholar

Kwapinska M, Saage G, Tsotsas E. Mixing of particles in rotary drums: a comparison of discrete element simulations with experimental results and penetration models for thermal processes. Powder Technol 2006; 161: 69–78.10.1016/j.powtec.2005.08.038Search in Google Scholar

Kwon J, Monaghan JJ. Sedimentation in homogeneous and inhomogeneous fluids using SPH. Int J Multiphase Flow 2015; 72: 155–164.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Ladd A. Numerical simulations of particulate suspensions via a discretized Boltzmann equation. Part I: theoretical foundation. J Fluid Mech 1994a; 271: 285–310.10.1017/S0022112094001771Search in Google Scholar

Ladd A. Numerical simulations of particulate suspensions via a discretized Boltzmann equation. Part II: numerical results. J Fluid Mech 1994b; 271: 311–339.10.1017/S0022112094001783Search in Google Scholar

Lallemand P, d’Humières D, Luo L, Rubinstein R. Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: three-dimensional model for linear viscoelastic fluids. Phys Rev E 2003; 67: 021203.10.1103/PhysRevE.67.021203Search in Google Scholar

Langston P, Kennedy AR. Discrete element modelling of the packing of spheres and its application to the structure of porous metals made by infiltration of packed beds of NaCl beads. Powder Technol 2014; 268: 210–218.10.1016/j.powtec.2014.08.018Search in Google Scholar

Langston PA, Tüzün U, Heyes DM. Continuous potential discrete particle simulations of stress and velocity fields in hoppers: transition from fluid to granular flow. Chem Eng Sci 1994; 49: 1259–1275.10.1016/0009-2509(94)85095-XSearch in Google Scholar

Langston PA, Al-Awamleh MA, Fraige FY, Asmar BN. Distinct element modelling of non-spherical frictionless particle flow. Chem Eng Sci 2004; 59: 425–435.10.1016/j.ces.2003.10.008Search in Google Scholar

Langston P, Kennedy AR, Constantin H. Discrete element modelling of flexible fibre packing. Comput Mater Sci 2015; 96, Part A: 108–116.10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Larsson P, Hess B, Lindahl E. Algorithm improvements for molecular dynamics simulations. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011; 1: 93–108.10.1002/wcms.3Search in Google Scholar

Lee T, Lin CL. A characteristic Galerkin method for discrete Boltzmann equation. J Comput Phys 2001; 171: 336–356.10.1006/jcph.2001.6791Search in Google Scholar

Lemieux M, Léonard G, Doucet J, Leclaire LA, Viens F, Chaouki J, Bertrand F. Large-scale numerical investigation of solids mixing in a V-blender using the discrete element method. Powder Technol 2008; 181: 205–216.10.1016/j.powtec.2006.12.009Search in Google Scholar

Lesieur M, Métais O, Comte P. Large-eddy simulations of turbulence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.10.1017/CBO9780511755507Search in Google Scholar

Levitt M, Warshel A. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 1975; 253: 694–698.10.1038/253694a0Search in Google Scholar

Lew A, Marsden JE, Ortiz M, West M. Variational time integrators. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2004; 60: 153–212.10.1002/nme.958Search in Google Scholar

Lewis JG, Geijn RAV. Distributed memory matrix-vector multiplication and conjugate gradient algorithms. In: Supercomputing 93 Conference. Portland, OR: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993: 484–492.Search in Google Scholar

Lian G, Thornton C, Adams MJ. A theoretical study of the liquid bridge forces between two rigid spherical bodies. J Colloid Interface Sci 1993; 161: 138–147.10.1006/jcis.1993.1452Search in Google Scholar

Lian G, Thornton C, Adams MJ. Discrete particle simulation of agglomerate impact coalescence. Chem Eng Sci 1998; 53: 3381–3391.10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00152-3Search in Google Scholar

Li J. Multiscale-modeling and method of energy minimization for particle-fluid two-phase flow. Beijing, China: Institute of Chemical Metallurgy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1987.10.1016/B978-0-08-036225-0.50013-7Search in Google Scholar

Li J. Compromise and resolution – exploring the multi-scale nature of gas-solid fluidization. Powder Technol 2000; 111: 50–59.10.1016/S0032-5910(00)00238-2Search in Google Scholar

Li J. Approaching virtual process engineering with exploring mesoscience. Chem Eng J 2015; 278: 541–555.10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Li T, Guenther C. MFIX-DEM simulations of change of volumetric flow in fluidized beds due to chemical reactions. Powder Technol 2012; 220: 70–78.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.09.025Search in Google Scholar

Li Y, Kwauk M. The dynamics of fast fluidization. In: Grace JR, Matsen JM, editors. Fluidization. New York: Pergamon Press, 1980: 537–544.10.1007/978-1-4684-1045-7_57Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Kwauk M. Particle-fluid two-phase flow the energy-minimization multi-scale method. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Kwauk M. Exploring complex systems in chemical engineering – the multi-scale methodology. Chem Eng Sci 2003; 58: 521–535.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00577-8Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Tung YJ, Kwauk M. Multi-scale modeling and method of energy minimization in particle-fluid two-phase flow. In: Basu P, Large JF, editors. Circulating fluidized bed technology III. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1988: 89–103.10.1016/B978-0-08-036225-0.50013-7Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Reh L, Kwauk M. Application of the principle of energy minimization to fluid-dynamics of circulating fluidized bed. In: Basu P, Horio M, Hasatani M, editors. Circulating fluidized bed technology II. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990: 105–111.Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Wen L, Ge W, Cui H, Ren J. Dissipative structure in concurrent-up gas-solid flow. Chem Eng Sci 1998; 53: 3367–3379.10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00130-4Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Mason DJ, Mujumdar AS. A numerical study of heat transfer mechanisms in gas-solids flows through pipes using a coupled CFD and DEM model. Drying Technology 2003; 21: 1839–1866.10.1081/DRT-120025511Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Zhang J, Ge W, Liu X. Multi-scale methodology for complex systems. Chem Eng Sci 2004; 59: 1687–1700.10.1016/j.ces.2004.01.025Search in Google Scholar

Li X, Chu X, Feng YT. A discrete particle model and numerical modeling of the failure modes of granular materials. Eng Comput 2005a; 22: 894–920.10.1108/02644400510626479Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Webb C, Pandiella S, Campbell GM, Dyakowski T, Cowell A, McGlinchey D. Solids deposition in low-velocity slug flow pneumatic conveying. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensification 2005b; 44: 167–173.10.1016/j.cep.2004.02.011Search in Google Scholar

Li Y, Xu Y, Thornton C. A comparison of discrete element simulations and experiments for ‘sandpiles’ composed of spherical particles. Powder Technol 2005c; 160: 219–228.10.1016/j.powtec.2005.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Ge W, Kwauk M. Meso-scale phenomena from compromise – a common challenge, not only for chemical engineering. 2009a; arXiv: 0912.5407v3.Search in Google Scholar

Li Y, Yong X, Jiang S. DEM simulations and experiments of pebble flow with monosized spheres. Powder Technol 2009b; 193: 312–318.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.009Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Ge W, Wang W, Yang N. Focusing on the meso-scales of multi-scale phenomena – in search for a new paradigm in chemical engineering. Particuology 2010; 8: 634–639.10.1016/j.partic.2010.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Li S, Marshall JS, Liu G, Yao Q. Adhesive particulate flow: the discrete-element method and its application in energy and environmental engineering. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2011; 37: 633–668.10.1016/j.pecs.2011.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Li T, Garg R, Galvin J, Pannala S. Open-source MFIX-DEM software for gas-solids flows: part II – validation studies. Powder Technol 2012a; 220: 138–150.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.09.020Search in Google Scholar

Li T, Gopalakrishnan P, Garg R, Shahnam M. CFD-DEM study of effect of bed thickness for bubbling fluidized beds. Particuology 2012b; 10: 532–541.10.1016/j.partic.2012.02.006Search in Google Scholar

Li C, Huang W, Hou C, Ge W. Multi-scale simulation of grain boundary structure effects in poly-Si thin film solar cell. Int J Mod Phys C 2013a; 24: 1350045.10.1142/S0129183113500459Search in Google Scholar

Li J, Ge W, Wang W, Yang N, Liu X, Wang L, He X, Wang X, Wang J, Kuauk M. From multiscale modeling to meso-science. Berlin: Springer, 2013b.10.1007/978-3-642-35189-1Search in Google Scholar

Li B, Zhou G, Ge W, Wang L, Wang X, Guo L, Li J. A multi-scale architecture for multi-scale simulation and its application to gas-solid flows. Particuology 2014; 15: 160–169.10.1016/j.partic.2013.07.004Search in Google Scholar

Li Y, Zhang C, Li C, Liu Z, Ge W. Simulation of the effect of coke deposition on the diffusion of methane in zeolite ZSM-5 with different shapes. Chem Eng J 2017. In revision.10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.055Search in Google Scholar

Li T, Wang L, Rogers W, Zhou G, Ge W. An approach for drag correction based on the local heterogeneity for gas-solid flows. AIChE J 2017; doi:10.1002/aic.15507.Search in Google Scholar

Lim KW, Andrade JE. Granular element method for three-dimensional discrete element calculations. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 2014; 38: 167–188.10.1002/nag.2203Search in Google Scholar

Lin X, Ng TT. Contact detection algorithms for three-dimensional ellipsoids in discrete element modelling. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 1995; 19: 653–659.10.1002/nag.1610190905Search in Google Scholar

Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 2011; 334: 517–520.10.1126/science.1208351Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Liu MB, Liu GR. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): an overview and recent developments. Arch Comput Methods Eng 2010; 17: 25–76.10.1007/s11831-010-9040-7Search in Google Scholar

Liu WK, Jun S, Zhang YF. Reproducing kernel particle methods. Int J Numer Anal Met 1995; 20: 1081–1106.10.1002/fld.1650200824Search in Google Scholar

Liu MB, Xie WP, Liu GR. Modeling incompressible flows using a finite particle method. Appl Math Modell 2005; 29: 1252–1270.10.1016/j.apm.2005.05.003Search in Google Scholar

Liu X, Ge W, Xiao Y, Li J. Granular flow in a rotating drum with gaps in the side wall. Powder Technol 2008; 182: 241–249.10.1016/j.powtec.2007.06.029Search in Google Scholar

Liu X, Xu X. Modelling of dense gas-particle flow in a circulating fluidized bed by distinct cluster method (DCM). Powder Technol 2009; 195: 235–244.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Liu Y, Chen J, Ge W, Wang J, Wang W. Acceleration of CFD simulation of gas-solid flow by coupling macro-/meso-scale EMMS model. Powder Technol 2011; 212: 289–295.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.04.035Search in Google Scholar

Liu X, Guo L, Xia Z, Lu B, Zhao M, Meng F, Li Z, Li J. Harnessing the power of virtual reality. Chem Eng Prog 2012; 108: 28–33.Search in Google Scholar

Liu M, Shao J, Li H. Numerical simulation of hydro-elastic problems with smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. J Hydrodyn 2013a; 25: 673–682.10.1016/S1001-6058(13)60412-6Search in Google Scholar

Liu PY, Yang RY, Yu AB. Self-diffusion of wet particles in rotating drums. Phys Fluids 2013b; 25: 481–490.10.1063/1.4807596Search in Google Scholar

Liu J, Sun Q, Jin F, Liu Q. Studies on structural and mechanical properties under isostatic compression with large-scale discrete element simulations. Acta Mech Solida Sin 2014a; 27: 129–136.10.1016/S0894-9166(14)60023-9Search in Google Scholar

Liu X, Jiang Y, Liu C, Wang W, Li J. Hydrodynamic modeling of gas-solid bubbling fluidization based on energy-minimization multiscale (EMMS) theory. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014b; 53: 2800–2810.10.1021/ie4029335Search in Google Scholar

Liu X, Wang L. Ge W. Meso-scale statistical properties of gas-solid flow – A direct numerical simulation (DNS) study. AIChE J 2017; 63: 3–14.10.1002/aic.15489Search in Google Scholar

Lopes DS, Silva MT, Ambrósio JA, Flores P. A mathematical framework for rigid contact detection between quadric and superquadric surfaces. Multibody Syst Dyn 2010; 24: 255–280.10.1007/s11044-010-9220-0Search in Google Scholar

Lu LS, Hsiau SS. DEM simulation of particle mixing in a sheared granular flow. Particuology 2008; 6: 445–454.10.1016/j.partic.2008.07.006Search in Google Scholar

Lu B, Zhang N, Wang W, Li J. 3-D Full-Loop Simulation of an industrial-scale circulating fluidized-bed boiler. AIChE J 2012; 59: 1108–1117.10.1002/aic.13917Search in Google Scholar

Lu L, Xu J, Ge W, Yue Y, Liu X, Li J. EMMS-based discrete particle method (EMMS-DPM) for simulation of gas-solid flows. Chem Eng Sci 2014; 120: 67–87.10.1016/j.ces.2014.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Lu G, Third JR, Müller CR. Discrete element models for non-spherical particle systems: from theoretical developments to applications. Chem Eng Sci 2015; 127: 425–465.10.1016/j.ces.2014.11.050Search in Google Scholar

Lu L, Xu J, Ge W, Gao G, Jiang Y, Zhao M, Liu X, Li J. Computer virtual experiment on fluidized beds using a coarse-grained discrete particle method – EMMS-DPM. Chem Eng Sci 2016; 155: 314–337.10.1016/j.ces.2016.08.013Search in Google Scholar

Lucy LB. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astron J 1977; 82: 1013–1024.10.1086/112164Search in Google Scholar

Lun CKK, Savage SB, Jeffrey DJ, Chepurniy N. Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flow field. J Fluid Mech 1984; 140: 223–256.10.1017/S0022112084000586Search in Google Scholar

Luo K, Wang Z, Fan J, Cen K. Full-scale solutions to particle-laden flows: multidirect forcing and immersed boundary method. Phys Rev E 2007; 76: 066709.10.1103/PhysRevE.76.066709Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Luo K, Wu F, Yang S, Fan J. CFD-DEM study of mixing and dispersion behaviors of solid phase in a bubbling fluidized bed. Powder Technol 2015; 274: 482–93.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.046Search in Google Scholar

Luo K, Tan J, Wang Z, Fan J. Particle-resolved direct numerical simulation of gas-solid dynamics in experimental fluidized beds. AIChE J 2016; 62: 1917–1932.10.1002/aic.15186Search in Google Scholar

Luttmann E, Ensign DL, Vaidyanathan V, Houston M, Rimon N, Oland J, Jayachandran G, Friedrichs MS, Pande VS. Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on the cell processor and playstation 3. J Comput Chem 2009; 30: 268–274.10.1002/jcc.21054Search in Google Scholar PubMed

MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mttos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Kuczera JW, Yin D, Karplus M. Allatom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998; 102: 3586–3616.10.1021/jp973084fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Mackerell AD, Feig M, Brooks CL. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2004; 25: 1400–1415.10.1002/jcc.20065Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ma J, Ge W, Wang X, Wang J, Li J. High-resolution simulation of gas-solid suspension using macro-scale particle methods. Chem Eng Sci 2006; 61: 7096–7106.10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.042Search in Google Scholar

Ma J, Ge W, Xiong Q, Wang J, Li J. Direct numerical simulation of particle clustering in gas-solid flow with a macro-scale particle method. Chem Eng Sci 2009; 64: 43–51.10.1016/j.ces.2008.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Majumdar S, Iaccarino G, Durbin P. RANS solver with adaptive structured boundary non-conforming grids. Cent Turbul Res Annu Res Briefs 2001; 353–366.Search in Google Scholar

Mansy SS, Schrum JP, Krishnamurthy M, Tobe S, Treco DA, Szostak JW. Template-directed synthesis of a genetic polymer in a model protocell. Nature 2008; 454: 122–125.10.1038/nature07018Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Markauskas D, Kačianauskas R. Compacting of particles for biaxial compression test by the discrete element method. J Civ Eng Manag 2006; 12: 153–161.10.3846/13923730.2006.9636387Search in Google Scholar

Marrink SJ, Tieleman DP. Perspective on the Martini model. Chem Soc Rev 2013; 42: 6801–6822.10.1039/c3cs60093aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Martin C, Schneider L, Olmos L, Bouvard D. Discrete element modeling of metallic powder sintering. Scripta Mater 2006; 55: 425–428.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.017Search in Google Scholar

Mason DR. Faster neighbour list generation using a novel lattice vector representation. Comput Phys Commun 2005; 170(1): 31–41.10.1016/j.cpc.2005.03.111Search in Google Scholar

Masson C, Baliga BR. A control-volume finite element method for dilute gas-solid particle flows. Comput Fluids 1994; 23: 1073–1096.10.1016/0045-7930(94)90005-1Search in Google Scholar

Mateo-Ortiz D, Méndez R. Relationship between residence time distribution and forces applied by paddles on powder attrition during the die filling process. Powder Technol 2015; 278: 111–117.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.03.015Search in Google Scholar

Matsen JM. Mechanism of choking and entrainment. Powder Technol 1982; 32: 21–33.10.1016/0032-5910(82)85003-1Search in Google Scholar

May LBH, Golick LA, Phillips KC, Shearer M, Daniels KE. Shear-driven size segregation of granular materials: modeling and experiment. Phys Rev E 2010; 81: 051301.10.1103/PhysRevE.81.051301Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA. Dreiding – a generic force-field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem 1990; 94: 8897–8909.10.1021/j100389a010Search in Google Scholar

McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M. Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 1977; 267: 585–590.10.1038/267585a0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

McCarthy JJ, Jasti V, Marinack M, Higgs CF. Quantitative validation of the discrete element method using an annular shear cell. Powder Technol 2010; 203: 70–77.10.1016/j.powtec.2010.04.011Search in Google Scholar

McNamara GR, Zanetti G. Use of the Boltzmann equation to simulate lattice-gas automata. Phys Rev Lett 1988; 61: 2332–2335.10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2332Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Mehrabadi M, Tenneti S, Garg R, Subramaniam S. Pseudo-turbulent gas-phase velocity fluctuations in homogeneous gas-solid flow: fixed particle assemblies and freely evolving suspensions. J Fluid Mech 2015; 770: 210–246.10.1017/jfm.2015.146Search in Google Scholar

Meleán Y, Sigalotti LDG, Hasmy A. On the SPH tensile instability in forming viscous liquid drops. Comput Phys Commun 2004; 157: 191–200.10.1016/j.comphy.2003.11.002Search in Google Scholar

Meneveau C, Katz J. Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2000; 32: 1–32.10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Mezhericher M, Levy A. Border I. Probabilistic hard-sphere model of binary particle-particle interactions in multiphase flow of spray dryers. Int J Multiphase Flow 2012; 43: 22–38.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Mikami T, Kamiya H, Horio M. Numerical simulation of cohesive powder behavior in a fluidized bed. Chem Eng Sci 1998; 53: 1927–1940.10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00325-4Search in Google Scholar

Milioli CC, Milioli FE, Holloway W, Agrawal K, Sundaresan S. Filtered two-fluid models of fluidized gas-particle flows: new constitutive relations. AIChE J 2013; 59: 3265–3275.10.1002/aic.14130Search in Google Scholar

Minatti L, Paris E. A SPH model for the simulation of free surface granular flows in a dense regime. Appl Math Modell 2015; 39: 363–382.10.1016/j.apm.2014.05.034Search in Google Scholar

Mindlin RD, Deresiewica H. Elastic spheres in contact under varying oblique forces. J Appl Mech 1953; 20: 327–344.10.1007/978-1-4613-8865-4_35Search in Google Scholar

Mishra BK. A review of computer simulation of tumbling mills by the discrete element method: part II – practical applications. Int J Miner Process 2003; 71: 95–112.10.1016/S0301-7516(03)00031-0Search in Google Scholar

Mittal R, Iaccarino G. Immersed boundary methods. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2005; 37: 239–261.10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175743Search in Google Scholar

Mittal R, Dong H, Bozkurttas M, Najjar F, Vargas A, von Loebbecke A. A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries. J Comput Phys 2008; 227: 4825–4852.10.1016/j.jcp.2008.01.028Search in Google Scholar

Mohaupt M, Minier JP, Tanière A. A new approach for the detection of particle interactions for large-inertia and colloidal particles in a turbulent flow. Int J Multiphase Flow 2011; 37: 746–755.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Mohd-Yusof J. Combined immersed boundary/b-spline methods for simulation of flow in complex geometries. Cent Turbul Res Annu Res Briefs 1997; 317–328.Search in Google Scholar

Mokhtar M, Kuwagi K, Takami T, Hirano H, Horio M. Validation of the similar particle assembly (SPA) model for the fluidization of Geldart’s group A and D particles. AIChE J 2012; 58: 87–98.10.1002/aic.12568Search in Google Scholar

Mollon G, Zhao J. Generating realistic 3D sand particles using Fourier descriptors. Granular Matt 2013; 15: 95–108.10.1007/s10035-012-0380-xSearch in Google Scholar

Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 1992; 30: 543–574.10.1007/978-94-011-4780-4_110Search in Google Scholar

Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Rep Prog Phys 2005; 68: 1703–1759.10.1007/978-94-011-4780-4_110Search in Google Scholar

Monaghan JJ, Kocharyan A. SPH simulation of multi-phase flow. Comput Phys Commun 1995; 87: 225–235.10.1016/0010-4655(94)00174-ZSearch in Google Scholar

Morales JJ, Nuevo MJ. Comparison of link-cell and neighbourhood tables on a range of computers. Comput Phys Commun 1992; 69: 223–228.10.1016/0010-4655(92)90161-QSearch in Google Scholar

Moseler M, Landman U. Formation, stability, and breakup of nanojets. Science 2000; 289: 1165–1169.10.1126/science.289.5482.1165Search in Google Scholar

Mostoufi N, Chaouki J. Prediction of effective drag coefficient in fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 1999; 54: 851–858.10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00290-5Search in Google Scholar

Moysey PA, Thompson MR. Modelling the solids inflow and solids conveying of single-screw extruders using the discrete element method. Powder Technol 2005; 153: 95–107.10.1016/j.powtec.2005.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Mueth DM, Jaeger HM, Nagel SR. Force distribution in a granular medium. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids 1999; 57: 3164–3169.10.1103/PhysRevE.57.3164Search in Google Scholar

Müller CR, Holland DJ, Sederman AJ, Scott SA, Dennis JS, Gladden LF. Granular temperature: comparison of magnetic resonance measurements with discrete element model simulations. Powder Technol 2008; 184: 241–253.10.1016/j.powtec.2007.11.046Search in Google Scholar

Munjiza A, Andrews KRF. NBS contact detection algorithm for bodies of similar size. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1998; 43: 131–149.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980915)43:1<131::AID-NME447>3.0.CO;2-SSearch in Google Scholar

Mustoe G, Miyata M. Material flow analyses of noncircular-shaped granular media using discrete element methods. J Eng Mech 2001; 127: 1017–1026.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:10(1017)Search in Google Scholar

Naik S, Chaudhuri B. Quantifying dry milling in pharmaceutical processing: a review on experimental and modeling approaches. J Pharm Sci 2015; 104: 2401–2413.10.1002/jps.24512Search in Google Scholar

Naik S, Malla R, Shaw M, Chaudhuri B. Investigation of comminution in a Wiley Mill: experiments and DEM simulations. Powder Technol 2013; 237: 338–354.10.1016/j.powtec.2012.12.019Search in Google Scholar

Nakamura H, Watano S. Numerical modeling of particle fluidization behavior in a rotating fluidized bed. Powder Technol 2007; 171: 106–117.10.1016/j.powtec.2006.08.021Search in Google Scholar

Nedderman RM. Statics and kinematics of granular materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.10.1017/CBO9780511600043Search in Google Scholar

Nelson MT, Humphrey W, Gursoy A, Dalke A, Kale L, Skeel RD, Schulten K. NAMD: a parallel, object-oriented molecular dynamics program. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 1996; 10: 251–268.10.1177/109434209601000401Search in Google Scholar

Nezami EG, Hashash YMA, Zhao D, Ghaboussi J. A fast contact detection algorithm for 3-D discrete element method. Comput Geotech 2004; 31: 575–587.10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Nieuwland JJ, Huizenga P, Kuipers JAM, Van Swaaij WPM. Hydrodynamic modelling of circulating fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 1994; 48: 5803–5811.10.1016/0009-2509(94)00350-5Search in Google Scholar

Ning Z, Boerefijn R, Ghadiri M, Thornton C. Distinct element simulation of impact breakage of lactose agglomerates. Adv Powder Technol 1997; 8: 15–37.10.1016/S0921-8831(08)60477-XSearch in Google Scholar

Nishiura D, Matsuo MY, Sakaguchi H. ppohDEM: Computational performance for open source code of the discrete element method. Comput Phys Commun 2014; 185: 1486–1495.10.1016/j.cpc.2014.02.014Search in Google Scholar

Noble DR, Torczynski JR. A lattice Boltzmann method for partially saturated computational cells. Int J Mod Phys C 1998; 9: 1189–1201.10.1142/S0129183198001084Search in Google Scholar

O’Brien T, Syamlal M. Particle cluster effects in the numerical simulation of a circulating fluidized bed. In: Avidan AA, editor. Preprint volume for CFB IV. Somerset: AIChE 1994: 430–435.Search in Google Scholar

Oesterle B, Petitjean A. Simulation of particle-to-particle interactions in gas solid flows. Int J Multiphase Flow 1993; 19: 199–211.10.1016/0301-9322(93)90033-QSearch in Google Scholar

O’Rourke P. Collective drop effects on vaporizing sprays. PhD Thesis. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University 1981.Search in Google Scholar

Osher S, Fedkiw RP. Level set methods: an overview and some recent results. J Comput Phys 2001; 169: 463–502.10.1006/jcph.2000.6636Search in Google Scholar

Otto M, Bouchaud JP, Claudin P, Socolar JES. Anisotropy in granular media: classical elasticity and directed-force chain network. Phys Rev E 2003; 67: 031302.10.1103/PhysRevE.67.031302Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Owen PJ, Cleary PW. Prediction of screw conveyor performance using the discrete element method (DEM). Powder Technol 2009, 193: 274–288.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.012Search in Google Scholar

Owen DRJ, Feng YT, Yu J, Perić D. Finite/discrete element analysis of multi-fracture and multi-contact phenomena. In: Palma JMLM, Dongarra J, Hernández V, editors. Vector and parallel processing – VECPAR 2000. Springer-Verlag, 2000: 483–505.10.1007/3-540-44942-6_40Search in Google Scholar

Ouyang J, Li J. Particle-motion-resolved discrete model for simulating gas-solid fluidization. Chem Eng Sci 1999a; 54: 2077–2083.10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00413-8Search in Google Scholar

Ouyang J, Li J. Discrete simulations of heterogeneous structure and dynamic behavior in gas-solid fluidization. Chem Eng Sci 1999b; 54: 5427–5440.10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00275-4Search in Google Scholar

Páll S, Abraham M, Kutzner C, Hess B, Lindahl E. Tackling exascale software challenges in molecular dynamics simulations with GROMACS. In: Markidis S, Laure S, editors. Solving software challenges for exascale. Springer International Publishing, 2015: 3–27.10.1007/978-3-319-15976-8_1Search in Google Scholar

Pan TW, Joseph DD, Bai R, Glowinski R, Sarin V. Fluidization of 1204 spheres: simulation and experiment. J Fluid Mech 2002; 451: 169–191.10.1017/S0022112001006474Search in Google Scholar

Parteli EJR. DEM simulation of particles of complex shapes using the multisphere method: application for additive manufacturing. AIP Conf Proc 2013; 1542: 185–188.10.1063/1.4811898Search in Google Scholar

Patankar NA. A formulation for fast computations of rigid particulate flows. Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs 2001; 185–196.Search in Google Scholar

Patankar SV. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, series in computational methods in mechanics and thermal science. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

Patankar NA, Singh P, Joseph DD, Glowinski R, Pan TW. A new formulation of the distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. Int J Multiphase Flow 2000; 26: 1509–1524.10.1016/S0301-9322(99)00100-7Search in Google Scholar

Paulick M, Morgeneyer M, Kwade A. Review on the influence of elastic particle properties on DEM simulation results. Powder Technol 2015; 283: 66–76.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.03.040Search in Google Scholar

Pedro G. A simple algorithm to accelerate the computation of non-bonded interactions in cell-based molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2007; 28: 570–573.10.1002/jcc.20563Search in Google Scholar

Perutz MF. Electrostatic effects in proteins. Science 1978; 201: 1187–1191.10.1126/science.694508Search in Google Scholar

Peskin CS. Flow patterns around heart valves: a digital computer method for solving the equations of motion. PhD thesis. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, 1972.10.1016/0021-9991(72)90065-4Search in Google Scholar

Peskin CS. Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J Comput Phys 1977; 25: 220–252.10.1016/0021-9991(77)90100-0Search in Google Scholar

Peskin CS. The fluid dynamics of heart valves: experimental, theoretical, and computational methods. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1982; 14: 235–259.10.1146/annurev.fl.14.010182.001315Search in Google Scholar

Peters JF, Hopkins MA, Kala R, Wahl RE. A poly-ellipsoid particle for non-spherical discrete element method. Eng Comput 2009; 26: 645–657.10.1108/02644400910975441Search in Google Scholar

Phillips TP, Roberts GW. Lattice Boltzmann models for non-Newtonian flows. IMA J Appl Math 2011; 76: 790–816.10.1093/imamat/hxr003Search in Google Scholar

Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kalé L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1781–1802.10.1002/jcc.20289Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Picano F, Breugem WP, Brandt L. Turbulent channel flow of dense suspensions of neutrally buoyant spheres. J Fluid Mech 2015; 764: 463–487.10.1017/jfm.2014.704Search in Google Scholar

Piegl L, Tiller W. The NURBS Book, 2nd ed., New York: Springer, 1997.10.1007/978-3-642-59223-2Search in Google Scholar

Pischke P, Kneer R, Schmidt DP. A comparative validation of concepts for collision algorithms for stochastic particle tracking. Comput Fluids 2015; 113: 77–86.10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.01.018Search in Google Scholar

Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 1995; 117: 1–19.10.2172/10176421Search in Google Scholar

Plimpton S, Hendrickson B. Parallel molecular dynamics with the embedded atom method. In: Paul Bristowe JB, Newsam J, editors. Materials Research Society Symposium Proc. Cambridge Univ Press, 1992; 291: 37–42.Search in Google Scholar

Plimpton S, Hendrickson B. A new parallel method for molecular dynamics simulation of macromolecular systems. J Comput Chem 1996; 17: 326–337.10.2172/10181391Search in Google Scholar

Polashenski W, Chen JC. Measurement of particle phase stresses in fast fluidized beds. Ind Eng Chem Res 1999; 38: 705–713.10.1021/ie980354nSearch in Google Scholar

Pöschel T, Saluena C, Schwager T. Scaling properties of granular materials. Phys Rev E 2001; 64: 011308.10.1007/3-540-44424-6_13Search in Google Scholar

Potapov AV, Hunt ML, Campbell CS. Liquid-solid flows using smoothed particle hydrodynamics and the discrete element method. Powder Technol 2001; 116: 204–213.10.1016/S0032-5910(00)00395-8Search in Google Scholar

Pournin L, Weber M, Tsukahara M, Ferrez J-A, Ramaioli M, Liebling TM. Three-dimensional distinct element simulation of spherocylinder crystallization. Granular Matter 2005; 7: 119–126.10.1007/s10035-004-0188-4Search in Google Scholar

Powell MS, Weerasekara NS, Cole S, LaRoche RD, Favier J. DEM modelling of liner evolution and its influence on grinding rate in ball mills. Miner Eng 2011; 24: 341–351.10.1016/j.mineng.2010.12.012Search in Google Scholar

Prigogine I. Introduction to thermodynamics of irreversible processes, 3rd ed., Hoboken: Wiley, 1967.Search in Google Scholar

Qi DW. Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of particles in non-zero-Reynolds-number flows. J Fluid Mech 1999; 385: 41–62.10.1017/S0022112099004401Search in Google Scholar

Qi H. Application of GPU-based discrete simulation to the study of flow and mixing mechanisms of granular materials. Doctorial Dissertation. The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Qi H, Xu J, Zhou G, Chen F, Ge W, Li J. Numerical investigation of granular flow similarity in rotating drums. Particuology 2015a; 22: 119–127.10.1016/j.partic.2014.10.012Search in Google Scholar

Qi H, Zhou G, Yu F, Ge W, Li J. Researches on mixing of granular materials with discrete element method. Prog Chem 2015b; 27: 113–124 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

Qian YH, d’Humieres D, Lallemand P. Lattice BGK models for Navier-Stokes equation. Europhys Lett 1992; 17: 479–484.10.1209/0295-5075/17/6/001Search in Google Scholar

Quentrec B, Brot C. New method for searching for neighbors in molecular dynamics computations. J Comput Phys 1973; 13: 430–432.10.1016/0021-9991(73)90046-6Search in Google Scholar

Rabczuk T, Belytschko T, Xiao S. Stable particle methods based on Lagrangian kernels. Comput Methods Appl Math 2004; 193: 1035–1063.10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.005Search in Google Scholar

Radeke CA, Glasser BJ, Khinast JG. Large-scale powder mixer simulations using massively parallel GPU architectures. Chem Eng Sci 2010; 65: 6435–6442.10.1016/j.ces.2010.09.035Search in Google Scholar

Rafiee A, Thiagarajan KP. An SPH projection method for simulating fluid-hypoelastic structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2009; 198: 2785–2795.10.1016/j.cma.2009.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Rahman A. Correlations in the motion of atoms in liquid argon. Phys Rev 1964; 136: 405–411.10.1103/PhysRev.136.A405Search in Google Scholar

Raji A, Favier J. Model for the deformation in agricultural and food particulate materials under bulk compressive loading using discrete element method. I: Theory, model development and validation. J Food Eng 2004; 64: 359–371.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.11.004Search in Google Scholar

Ramkrishna D. The status of population balances. Rev Chem Eng 1985; 3: 49–95.10.1515/REVCE.1985.3.1.49Search in Google Scholar

Ransing RS, Lewis RW, Gethin DT. Using a deformable discrete-element technique to model the compaction behaviour of mixed ductile and brittle particulate systems. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A 2004; 362: 1867–1884.10.1098/rsta.2004.1421Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rapaport DC. The art of molecular dynamics simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511816581Search in Google Scholar

Rapaport DC. Hexagonal convection patterns in atomistically simulated fluids. Phys Rev E 2006; 73: 88–99.10.1103/PhysRevE.73.025301Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rapaport DC. Microscale swimming: the molecular dynamics approach. Phys Rev Lett 2007; 99: 1349–1358.10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.238101Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rapaport DC. Molecular dynamics studies of swimming at the microscopic scale. Comput Phys Commun 2008; 179: 155–158.10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.022Search in Google Scholar

Rapaport DC. Simulational nanoengineering: molecular dynamics implementation of an atomistic Stirling engine. Phys Rev E 2009; 79: 706–723.10.1103/PhysRevE.79.047702Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rapaport DC. Teraflops and beyond: GPU-based MD studies of emergent phenomena. Physics Procedia 2015; 68: 115–119.10.1016/j.phpro.2015.07.119Search in Google Scholar

Rapaport DC, Clementi E. Eddy formation in obstructed fluid flow: a molecular dynamics study. Phys Rev Lett 1986; 57: 695–698.10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.695Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Remy B, Khinast JG, Glasser BJ. Discrete element simulation of free flowing grains in a four-bladed mixer. AIChE J 2009; 55: 2035–2048.10.1002/aic.11876Search in Google Scholar

Ren X, Xu J, Qi H, Cui Li, Ge W, Li J. GPU-based discrete element simulation on a tote blender for performance improvement. Powder Technol 2013; 239: 348–357.10.1016/j.powtec.2013.02.019Search in Google Scholar

Renzo AD, Maio FPD. Comparison of contact-force models for the simulation of collisions in DEM-based granular flow codes. Chem Eng Sci 2004; 59: 525–541.10.1016/j.ces.2003.09.037Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds O. On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of the criterion. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A 1895; 186: 123–164.10.1098/rsta.1895.0004Search in Google Scholar

Richardson FL. Weather prediction by numerical process. Cambridge: The University Press, 1922.Search in Google Scholar

Ritchie WB, Thomas PA. Multiphase smoothed-particle hydrodynamics. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2001; 323: 743–756.10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04268.xSearch in Google Scholar

Roache PJ. Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1997; 29: 123–160.10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.123Search in Google Scholar

Robinson M, Ramaioli M, Luding S. Fluid-particle flow simulations using two-way-coupled mesoscale SPH-DEM and validation. Int J Multiphase Flow 2014; 59: 121–134.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.11.003Search in Google Scholar

Rothenburg L, Bathurst RJ. Numerical simulation of idealized granular assemblies with plane elliptical particles. Comput Geotech 1991; 11: 315–329.10.1016/0266-352X(91)90015-8Search in Google Scholar

Roul P, Schinner A, Kassner K. Simulation of the strain distribution under a two-dimensional sand pile. Powder Technol 2011, 214: 406–414.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.08.039Search in Google Scholar

Rowe PN. A convenient empirical equation for estimation of Richard-Zaki exponent. Chem Eng Sci 1987; 42: 2795–2796.10.1016/0009-2509(87)87035-5Search in Google Scholar

Sakai M, Koshizuka S. Large-scale discrete element modeling in pneumatic conveying. Chem Eng Sci 2009; 64: 533–539.10.1016/j.ces.2008.10.003Search in Google Scholar

Sakai M, Yamada Y, Shigeto Y, Shibata K, Kawasaki VM, Koshizuka S. Large-scale discrete element modeling in a fluidized bed. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2010; 64: 1319–1335.10.1002/fld.2364Search in Google Scholar

Sakai M, Takahashi H, Pain CC, Latham J-P, Xiang J. Study on a large-scale discrete element model for fine particles in a fluidized bed. Adv Powder Technol 2012; 23: 673–681.10.1016/j.apt.2011.08.006Search in Google Scholar

Sakai M, Abe M, Shigeto Y, Mizutani S, Takahashi H, Viré A, Percival JR, Xiang J, Pain CC. Verification and validation of a coarse grain model of the DEM in a bubbling fluidized bed. Chem Eng J 2014; 244: 33–43.10.1016/j.cej.2014.01.029Search in Google Scholar

Sakano M, Tadashi Y, Hiroshi N. Numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed using discrete element method with imaginary sphere model. Jpn J Multiphase Flow 2000; 14: 66–73.10.3811/jjmf.14.66Search in Google Scholar

Schanz D, Metten B, Kurz T, Lauterborn W. Molecular dynamics simulations of cavitation bubble collapse and sonoluminescence. New J Phys 2012; 14: 113019.10.1088/1367-2630/14/11/113019Search in Google Scholar

Schlick T, Skeel RD, Brunger AT, Kal LV, Board JA, Hermans J, Schulten K. Algorithmic challenges in computational molecular biophysics. J Comput Phys 1999; 151: 9–48.10.1006/jcph.1998.6182Search in Google Scholar

Schlick CP, Fan Y, Isner AB, Umbanhowar PB, Ottino JM, Lueptow RM. Modeling segregation of bidisperse granular materials using physical control parameters in the quasi-2D bounded heap. AIChE J 2015; 61: 1524–1534.10.1002/aic.14780Search in Google Scholar

Shah S, Myöhänen K, Kallio S, Hyppänen T. CFD simulations of gas-solid flow in an industrial-scale circulating fluidized bed furnace using subgrid-scale drag models. Particuology 2015; 18: 66–75.10.1016/j.partic.2014.05.008Search in Google Scholar

Shan X, Chen H. Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components. Phys Rev E 1993; 47: 1815–1819.10.1103/PhysRevE.47.1815Search in Google Scholar

Shan X, Chen H. Simulation of nonideal gases and liquid-gas phase transitions by the lattice Boltzmann equation. Phys Rev E 1994; 49: 2941–2948.10.1103/PhysRevE.49.2941Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shao X, Shi Y, Yu Z. Combination of the fictitious domain method and the sharp interface method for direct numerical simulation of particulate flows with heat transfer. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2012; 55: 6775–6785.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.085Search in Google Scholar

Sharma N, Patankar NA. A fast computation technique for the direct numerical simulation of rigid particulate flows. J Comput Phys 2005; 205: 439–457.10.1016/j.jcp.2004.11.012Search in Google Scholar

Shaw DE. A fast, scalable method for the parallel evaluation of distance-limited pairwise particle interactions. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1318–1328.10.1002/jcc.20267Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shaw DE, Deneroff MM, Dror RO, Kuskin JS, Larson RH, Salmon JK, Young C, Batson B, Bowers KJ, Chao JC, Eastwood MP, Gagliardo J, Grossman JP, Ho CR, Ierardi DJ, Kolossváry I, Klepeis JL, Layman T, McLeavey C, Moraes MA, Mueller R, Priest EC, Shan Y, Spengler J, Theobald M, Towles B, Wang SC. Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation. SIGARCH Comput Archit News 2007; 35: 1–12.10.1145/1250662.1250664Search in Google Scholar

Shaw DE, Grossman JP, Bank JA, Batson B, Butts JA, Chao JC, Deneroff MM, Dror RO, Even A, Fenton CH, Forte A, Gagliardo J, Gill G, Greskamp B, Ho CR, Ierardi DJ, Iserovich L, Kuskin JS, Larson RH, Layman T, Lee L-S, Lerer AK, Li C, Killebrew D, Mackenzie KM, Mok SYH, Moraes MA, Mueller R, Nociolo LJ, Peticolas JL, Quan T, Ramot D, Salmon JK, Scarpazza DP, Schafer UB, Siddique N, Snyder CW, Spengler J, Tang PTP, Theobald M, Toma H, Towles B, Vitale B, Wang SC, Young C. Anton 2: raising the bar for performance and programmability in a special-purpose molecular dynamics supercomputer. Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC14), Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Shekhar A, Nomura KI, Kalia RK, Nakano A, Vashishta P. Nanobubble collapse on a silica surface in water: billion-atom reactive molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev Lett 2013; 111: 184503.10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.184503Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shi X, Lim SP. A LBM-DLM/FD method for 3D fluid-structure interactions. J Comput Phys 2007; 226: 2028–2043.10.1016/j.jcp.2007.06.031Search in Google Scholar

Shi X, Phan-Thien N. Distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method in the framework of lattice Boltzmann method for fluid-structure interactions. J Comput Phys 2005; 206: 81–93.10.1016/j.jcp.2004.12.017Search in Google Scholar

Shi Z, Wang W, Li J. A bubble-based EMMS model for gas-solid bubbling fluidization. Chem Eng Sci 2011; 66: 5541–5555.10.1016/j.ces.2011.07.020Search in Google Scholar

Sierakowski AJ, Prosperetti A. Resolved-particle simulation by the Physalis method: enhancements and new capabilities. J Comput Phys 2016; 309: 164–184.10.1016/j.jcp.2015.12.057Search in Google Scholar

Simone M, Mario R, Luciano C. Efficient particle labeling in atomistic simulations. J Chem Phys 2007; 126: 2448–2454.Search in Google Scholar

Simsek E, Brosch B, Wirtz S, Scherer V, Krüll F. Numerical simulation of grate firing systems using a coupled CFD/discrete element method (DEM). Powder Technol 2009; 193: 266–273.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.011Search in Google Scholar

Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon Weather Rev 1963; 91: 99–164.10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Smith W. Molecular-dynamics on hypercube parallel computers. Comput Phys Commun 1991; 62: 229–248.10.1016/0010-4655(91)90097-5Search in Google Scholar

Smolinski P, Belytschko T, Neal M. Multi-time-step integration using nodal partitioning. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1988; 26: 349–359.10.1002/nme.1620260205Search in Google Scholar

Snider D. An incompressible three-dimensional multiphase particle-in-cell model for dense particle flows. J Comput Phys 2001; 170: 523–549.10.1006/jcph.2001.6747Search in Google Scholar

Snider D, Banerjee S. Heterogeneous gas chemistry in the CPFD Eulerian-Lagrangian numerical scheme (ozone decomposition). Powder Technol 2010; 199: 100–106.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.04.023Search in Google Scholar

Socolar JES, Schaeffer DG, Claudin P. Directed force chain networks and stress response in static granular materials. Eur Phys J E 2002; 7: 353–370.10.1140/epje/i2002-10011-7Search in Google Scholar

Solnordal CB, Kenche V, Hadley TD, Feng Y, Witt PJ, Lim KS. Simulation of an internally circulating fluidized bed using a multiphase particle-in-cell method. Powder Technol 2015; 274: 123–134.10.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.045Search in Google Scholar

Sommerfeld M. Modelling of particle-wall collisions in confined gas-particle flows. Int J Multiphase Flow 1992; 18: 905–926.10.1016/0301-9322(92)90067-QSearch in Google Scholar

Sommerfeld M. The importance of inter-particle collisions in horizontal gas-solid channel flows. ASME 1995; 228: 335–346.Search in Google Scholar

Sommerfeld M. Validation of a stochastic lagrangian modelling approach for inter-particle collisions in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Int J Multiphase Flow 2001; 27: 1829–1858.10.1016/S0301-9322(01)00035-0Search in Google Scholar

Spalart PR. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2000; 21: 252–263.10.1016/B978-008043328-8/50001-1Search in Google Scholar

Spalding DB. Numerical computation of multi-phase fluid flow and heat transfer. Recent Adv Numer Methods Fluids 1980; 1: 139–167.Search in Google Scholar

Streett WB, Tildesley DJ, Saville G. Multiple time-step methods in molecular dynamics. Mol Phys 1978; 35: 639–648.10.1080/00268977800100471Search in Google Scholar

Stone JE, Phillips JC, Freddolino PL, Hardy DJ, Trabuco LG, Schulten K. Accelerating molecular modeling applications with graphics processors. J Comput Chem 2007; 28: 2618–2640.10.1002/jcc.20829Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ström H, Sasic S. A multiphase DNS approach for handling solid particles motion with heat transfer. Int J Multiphase Flow 2013; 53: 75–87.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Su J, Gu Z, Xu X. Discrete element simulation of particle flow in arbitrarily complex geometries. Chem Eng Sci 2011; 66: 6069–6088.10.1016/j.ces.2011.08.025Search in Google Scholar

Su M, Zhao H. Modifying the inter-phase drag via solid volume fraction gradient for CFD simulation of fast fluidized beds. AIChE J 2017; doi:10.1002/aic.15573.Search in Google Scholar

Succi S. Lattice Boltzmann 2038. Europhys Lett 2015; 109: 50001.10.1209/0295-5075/109/50001Search in Google Scholar

Sudah OS, Arratia PE, Alexander A, Muzzio FJ. Simulation and experiments of mixing and segregation in a tote blender. AICHE J 2005; 51: 836–844.10.1002/aic.10448Search in Google Scholar

Suikkanen H, Ritvanen J, Jalali P, Kyrki-Rajamäki R. Discrete element modelling of pebble packing in pebble bed reactors. Nucl Eng Des 2014; 273: 24–32.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.02.022Search in Google Scholar

Sun X, Sakai M, Yamada Y. Three-dimensional simulation of a solid-liquid flow by the DEM-SPH method. J Comput Phys 2013; 248: 147–176.10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.019Search in Google Scholar

Sundaresan S. Reflections on mathematical models and simulation of gas-particle flows. In: Knowlton T, editor. 10th International Conference on Circulating Fluidized Beds and Fluidization Technology. Sun River, OR: Engineering Conferences International, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Sussman M, Puckett EG. A coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing 3D and axisymmetric incompressible two-phase flows. J Comput Phys 2000; 162: 301–337.10.1006/jcph.2000.6537Search in Google Scholar

Swegle J, Hicks D, Attaway S. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis. J Comput Phys 1995; 116: 123–134.10.1006/jcph.1995.1010Search in Google Scholar

Swope W, Andersen H, Berens P, Wilson KR. A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: application to small water clusters. J Chem Phys 1982; 76: 637–649.10.1063/1.442716Search in Google Scholar

Syamlal M, O’Brian TJ. Simulation of granular layer inversion in liquid fluidized beds. Int J Multiphase Flow 1988; 14: 473–481.10.1016/0301-9322(88)90023-7Search in Google Scholar

Tagami N, Mujumdar A, Horio M. DEM simulation of polydisperse systems of particles in a fluidized bed. Particuology 2009; 7: 9–18.10.1016/j.partic.2008.11.008Search in Google Scholar

Takeda H, Esaki N, Doi K, Murakami H, Yamasaki K, Kawase Y. Flow simulation in bubble columns in regard to bubble coalescence and break-up utilizing LES and DEM. J Chem Eng Jpn 2004; 37: 976–989.10.1252/jcej.37.976Search in Google Scholar

Tan ML, Qian YH, Goldhirsch I, Orszag S. A lattice-BGK approach to simulating granular flows. J Stat Phys 1995; 81: 87–92.10.1007/BF02179970Search in Google Scholar

Tan ZJ, Lim KM, Khoo BC, Wang DS. An indirect-forcing immersed boundary method for incompressible viscous flows with interfaces on irregular domains. Commun Comput Phys 2009; 6: 997–1021.10.4208/cicp.2009.v6.p997Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka T, Yonemura S, Kiribayashi K, Tsuji Y. Cluster formation and particle-induced instability in gas-solid flows predicted by the DSMC method. JSME Int J Ser B 1996; 39: 239–245.10.1299/jsmeb.39.239Search in Google Scholar

Tang D, Ge W, Wang X, Ma J, Guo L, Li J. Parallelizing of macro-scale pseudo-particle modeling for particle-fluid systems. China Ser B Chem 2004; 47: 434–442.10.1007/BF02990905Search in Google Scholar

Tang Y, Kriebitzsch SHL, Peters EAJF, Van der Hoef MA, Kuipers JAM. A methodology for highly accurate results of direct numerical simulations: drag force in dense gas-solid flows at intermediate Reynolds number. Int J Multiphase Flow 2014; 62: 73–86.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Tang Y, Lau YM, Deen NG, Peters EAJF, Kuipers JAM. Direct numerical simulations and experiments of a pseudo-2D gas-fluidized bed. Chem Eng Sci 2016a; 143: 166–180.10.1016/j.ces.2015.12.026Search in Google Scholar

Tang Y, Peters EAJF, Kuipers JAM. Direct numerical simulations of dynamic gas-solid suspensions. AIChE J 2016b; 62: 1958–1969.10.1002/aic.15197Search in Google Scholar

Tavassoli H, Kriebitzsch SHL, Van der Hoef MA, Peters EAJF, Kuipers JAM. Direct numerical simulation of particulate flow with heat transfer. Int J Multiphase Flow 2013; 57: 29–37.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Tenneti S, Garg R, Hrenya CM, Fox RO, Subramaniam S. Direct numerical simulation of gas-solid suspensions at moderate Reynolds number: quantifying the coupling between hydrodynamic forces and particle velocity fluctuations. Powder Technol 2010; 203: 57–69.10.1016/j.powtec.2010.03.042Search in Google Scholar

Tenneti S, Garg R, Subramaniam S. Drag law for monodisperse gas-solid systems using particle-resolved direct numerical simulation of flow past fixed assemblies of spheres. Int J Multiphase Flow 2011; 37: 1072–1092.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.05.010Search in Google Scholar

Tenneti S, Mehrabadi M, Subramaniam S. Stochastic Lagrangian model for hydrodynamic acceleration of inertial particles in gas-solid suspensions. J Fluid Mech 2016; 788: 695–729.10.1017/jfm.2015.693Search in Google Scholar

Tersoff J. New empirical approach for the structure and energy of covalent systems. Phys Rev B 1988a; 37: 6991–7000.10.1103/PhysRevB.37.6991Search in Google Scholar

Tersoff J. Empirical interatomic potential for silicon with improved elastic properties. Phys Rev B 1988b; 38: 9902–9905.10.1103/PhysRevB.38.9902Search in Google Scholar

Tezduyar T, Behr M, Liou J. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces – the deformingspatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1992a; 94: 339–351.10.1016/0045-7825(92)90059-SSearch in Google Scholar

Tezduyar T, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces – the deformingspatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1992b; 94: 353–371.10.1016/0045-7825(92)90060-WSearch in Google Scholar

Thakur SC, Ooi JY, Ahmadian H. Scaling of discrete element model parameters for cohesionless and cohesive solid. Powder Technol 2016; 293: 130–137.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.05.051Search in Google Scholar

Theuerkauf J, Witt P, Schwesig D. Analysis of particle porosity distribution in fixed beds using the discrete element method. Powder Technol 2006; 165: 92–99.10.1016/j.powtec.2006.03.022Search in Google Scholar

Ting JM. An ellipse-based micromechanical model for angular granular materials. In: Proc. ASCE Engineering Mechanics Specialty Conf., Mechanics Computing in the 1990’s and Beyond, Columbus, OH: ASCE 1991; 2: 1214–1218.Search in Google Scholar

Ting JM. A robust algorithm for ellipse-based discrete element modelling of granular materials. Comput Geotech 1992; 13: 175–186.10.1016/0266-352X(92)90003-CSearch in Google Scholar

Ting JM, Khwaja M, Meachum LR, Rowell JD. An ellipse-based discrete element model for granular materials. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 1993; 17: 603–623.10.1002/nag.1610170902Search in Google Scholar

Tordesillas A, Zhang J, Behringer R. Buckling force chains in dense granular assemblies: physical and numerical experiments. Geomech Geoeng 2009; 236: 3–16.10.1080/17486020902767347Search in Google Scholar

Tryggvason G, Bunner B, Esmaeeli A, Juric D, Al-Rawahi N, Tauber W, Han J, Nas S, Jan YJ. A front-tracking method for the computations of multiphase flow. J Comput Phys 2001; 169: 708–759.10.1006/jcph.2001.6726Search in Google Scholar

Tseng YH, Ferziger J. A ghost-cell immersed boundary method for flow in complex geometry. J Comput Phys 2003; 192: 593–623.10.1016/j.jcp.2003.07.024Search in Google Scholar

Tsuji Y, Tanaka T, Ishida T. Lagrangian numerical simulation of plug flow of cohesionless particles in a horizontal pipe. Powder Technol 1992; 71: 239–250.10.1016/0032-5910(92)88030-LSearch in Google Scholar

Tsuji Y, Kawaguchi T, Tanaka T. Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed. Powder Technol 1993; 77: 79–87.10.1016/0032-5910(93)85010-7Search in Google Scholar

Tsuji T, Yabumoto K, Tanaka T. Spontaneous structures in three-dimensional bubbling gas-fluidized bed by parallel DEM-CFD coupling simulation. Powder Technol 2008; 184: 132–140.10.1016/j.powtec.2007.11.042Search in Google Scholar

Tunuguntla DR, Bokhove O, Thornton AR. A mixture theory for size and density segregation in shallow granular free-surface flows. J Fluid Mech 2014; 749: 99–112.10.1017/jfm.2014.223Search in Google Scholar

Turner CH, Brennan JK, Lisal M, Smith WR, Johnson, JK, Gubbins KE. Simulation of chemical reaction equilibria by the reaction ensemble Monte Carlo method: a review. Mol Simul 2008; 34: 119–146.10.1002/chin.200843274Search in Google Scholar

Udaykumar HS, Mittal R, Shyy W. Computation of solid-liquid phase fronts in the sharp interface limit on fixed grids. J Comput Phys 1999; 153: 535–574.10.1006/jcph.1999.6294Search in Google Scholar

Udaykumar HS, Mittal R, Rampunggoon P, Khanna A. A sharp interface Cartesian grid method for simulating flows with complex moving boundaries. J Comput Phys 2001; 174: 345–380.10.1006/jcph.2001.6916Search in Google Scholar

Udaykumar HS, Mittal R, Rampunggoon P. Interface tracking finite volume method for complex solid-fluid interactions on fixed meshes. Commun Numer Methods Eng 2002; 18: 89–97.10.1002/cnm.468Search in Google Scholar

Uhlmann M. An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows. J Comput Phys 2005; 209: 448–476.10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.017Search in Google Scholar

Uhlmann M, Doychev T. Sedimentation of a dilute suspension of rigid spheres at intermediate Galileo numbers: the effect of clustering upon the particle motion. J Fluid Mech 2014; 752: 310–348.10.1017/jfm.2014.330Search in Google Scholar

Van den Akker HE. Toward a truly multiscale computational strategy for simulating turbulent two-phase flow processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010; 49: 10780–10797.10.1021/ie1006382Search in Google Scholar

Van der Hoef MA, Beetstra R, Kuipers JAM. Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of low-Reynolds-number flow past mono- and bidisperse arrays of spheres: results for the permeability and drag force. J Fluid Mech 2005; 528: 233–254.10.1017/S0022112004003295Search in Google Scholar

Van der Hoef M, Van Sint Annaland M, Deen N, Kuipers J. Numerical simulation of dense gas-solid fluidized beds: a multiscale modeling strategy. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2008; 40: 47–70.10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102130Search in Google Scholar

Van der Spoel D, Hess B. GROMACS – the road ahead. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011; 1: 710–715.10.1002/wcms.50Search in Google Scholar

Van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJC. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1701–1718.10.1002/jcc.20291Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Van Duin AC, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard WA. ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J Phys Chem A 2001; 105: 9396–9409.10.1021/jp004368uSearch in Google Scholar

Van Wachem BGM, Bakker AF, Schouten JC, Heemels MW, de Leeuw SW. Simulation of fluidized beds with lattice gas cellular automata. J Comput Phys 1997; 135: 1–7.10.1006/jcph.1997.5719Search in Google Scholar

Verlet L. Computer “experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Phys Rev 1967; 159: 98–103.10.1103/PhysRev.159.98Search in Google Scholar

Verzicco R, Mohd-Yusof J, Orlandi P, Howarth D. LES in complex geometries using boundary body forces. AIAA J 2000; 38: 427–433.10.2514/2.1001Search in Google Scholar

Verzicco R, Fatica M, Iaccarino G, Moin P, Khalighi B. Large eddy simulation of a road-vehicle with drag reduction devices. AIAA J 2002; 40: 2447–2455.10.2514/2.1613Search in Google Scholar

Vikhansky A. Lattice-Boltzmann method for yield-stress liquids. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 2008; 155: 95–100.10.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Villone MM, Hulsen MA, Anderson PD, Maffettone PL. Simulations of deformable systems in fluids under shear flow using an arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian technique. Comput Fluids 2014; 90: 88–100.10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.11.016Search in Google Scholar

Vlahini I, Andrade J, Andö E, Viggiani G. From 3D tomography to physics-based mechanics of geomaterials. In: Proceedings of ASCE, International Workshop in Computing in Civil Engineering 2013; 339–345.10.1061/9780784413029.043Search in Google Scholar

Vowinckel B, Kempe T, Fröhlich J. Fluid-particle interaction in turbulent open channel flow with fully-resolved mobile beds. Adv Water Resour 2014; 72: 32–44.10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.04.019Search in Google Scholar

Vu-Quoc L, Zhang X, Walton OR. A 3-D discrete-element method for dry granular flows of ellipsoidal particles. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2000; 187: 483–528.10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00337-0Search in Google Scholar

Walton OR, Braun RL. Viscosity, granular-temperature and stress calculations for shearing assemblies of inelastic frictional disks. J Rheol 1986; 30: 949–980.10.1122/1.549893Search in Google Scholar

Wang J. Length scale dependence of effective inter-phase slip velocity and heterogeneity in gas-solid suspensions. Chem Eng Sci 2008; 63: 2294–2298.10.1016/j.ces.2008.01.021Search in Google Scholar

Wang X, Ge W. The Mole-8.5 supercomputing system. In: Vetter JS, editor. Contemporary high performance computing. CRC Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Wang W, Chen Y. Chapter Four-Mesoscale modeling: beyond local equilibrium assumption for multiphase flow. Adv Chem Eng 2015; 47: 193–277.10.1016/bs.ache.2015.10.009Search in Google Scholar

Wang W, Li J. Simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach – Extension of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level. Chem Eng Sci 2007; 62: 208–231.10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.017Search in Google Scholar

Wang TF, Wang JF. Two-fluid model based on the lattice Boltzmann equation. Phys Rev E 2005; 71: 045301.10.1103/PhysRevE.71.045301Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Wang X, Guo L, Ge W, Tang D, Ma J, Yang Z, Li J. Parallel implementation of macro-scale pseudo-particle simulation for particle-fluid systems. Comput Chem Eng 2005; 29: 1543–1553.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Wang J, Ge W, Li J. Eulerian simulation of heterogeneous gas-solid flows in CFB risers: EMMS-based sub-grid scale model with a revised cluster description. Chem Eng Sci 2008a; 63: 1553–1571.10.1016/j.ces.2007.11.023Search in Google Scholar

Wang Z, Fan J, Luo K. Combined multi-direct forcing and immersed boundary method for simulating flows with moving particles. Int J Multiphase Flow 2008b; 34: 283–302.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2007.10.004Search in Google Scholar

Wang J, Zhao B, Li J. Toward a mesoscale-structure-based kinetic theory for heterogeneous gas-solid flow: particle velocity distribution function. AIChE J 2016; doi: 10.1002/aic.15244.Search in Google Scholar

Wang S, Liu H, Lu H, Liu W, Ding J, Li W. Flow behavior of clusters in a riser simulated by direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Chem Eng J 2005; 106: 197–211.10.1016/j.cej.2004.12.036Search in Google Scholar

Wang L, Zhou G, Wang X, Xiong Q, Ge W. Direct numerical simulation of particle-fluid systems by combining time-driven hard-sphere model and lattice Boltzmann method. Particuology 2010; 8: 379–382.10.1016/j.partic.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Wang L, Zhang B, Wang XW, Ge W, Li J. Lattice Boltzmann based discrete simulation for gas-solid fluidization. Chem Eng Sci 2013; 101: 228–239.10.1016/j.ces.2013.06.019Search in Google Scholar

Wang D, Servin M, Mickelsson KO. Outlet design optimization based on large-scale nonsmooth DEM simulation. Powder Technol 2014a, 253: 438–443.10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.046Search in Google Scholar

Wang Q, Yang H, Wang P, Lu J, Liu Q, Zhang H, Wei L, Zhang M. Application of CPFD method in the simulation of a circulating fluidized bed with a loop seal. Part II – Investigation of solids circulation. Powder Technol 2014b; 253: 822–828.10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.040Search in Google Scholar

Warshel A, Weiss RM. An empirical valence bond approach for comparing reactions in solutions and in enzymes. J Am Chem Soc 1980; 102: 6218–6226.10.1021/ja00540a008Search in Google Scholar

Washino K, Hsu CH, Kawaguchi T, Tsuji Y. Similarity model for DEM simulation of fluidized bed. J Soc Powder Technol Jpn 2007; 44: 198–205 (in Japanese).10.4164/sptj.44.198Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe H, Suzuki M, Ito N. Huge-scale molecular dynamics simulation of multibubble nuclei. Comput Phys Commun 2013; 184: 2775–2784.10.1016/j.cpc.2013.07.023Search in Google Scholar

Wei M, Wang L, Li J. Unified stability condition for particulate and aggregative fluidization – Exploring energy dissipation with direct numerical simulation. Particuology 2013; 11: 232–241.10.1016/j.partic.2012.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Welling U, Germano G. Efficiency of linked cell algorithms. Comput Phys Commun 2011; 182: 611–615.10.1016/j.cpc.2010.11.002Search in Google Scholar

Wellmann C, Lillie C, Wriggers P. A contact detection algorithm for superellipsoids based on the common-normal concept. Eng Comput 2008; 25: 432–442.10.1108/02644400810881374Search in Google Scholar

Wen C, Yu Y. Mechanics of fluidization. Chem Eng Prog Symp Ser 1966; 62: 100–111.Search in Google Scholar

Wensrich CM, Katterfeld A. Rolling friction as a technique for modelling particle shape in DEM. Powder Technol 2012; 217: 409–417.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.057Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox DC. Turbulence modeling for CFD. Birmingham: Birmingham Press, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Willett CD, Adams MJ, Johnson SA, Seville JP. Capillary bridges between two spherical bodies. Langmuir 2000; 16: 9396–9405.10.1021/la000657ySearch in Google Scholar

Wood BD, Apte SV, Liburdy JA, Ziazi RM, He X, Finn JR, Patil VA. A comparison of measured and modeled velocity fields for a laminar flow in a porous medium. Adv Water Resour 2015; 85: 45–63.10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.08.013Search in Google Scholar

Wu W, Li J, Yang L, Kwauk M. Critical condition for particle aggregation in particle-fluid two-phase flow. J Eng Thermophys 1992; 13: 324.Search in Google Scholar

Wu C, Berrouk AS, Nandakumar K. Three-dimensional discrete particle model for gas-solid fluidized beds on unstructured mesh. Chem Eng J 2009; 152: 514–529.10.1016/j.cej.2009.05.024Search in Google Scholar

Wu C, Cheng Y, Ding Y, Jin Y. CFD-DEM simulation of gas-solid reacting flows in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process. Chem Eng Sci 2010; 65: 542–549.10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.026Search in Google Scholar

Wu S, Kou M, Xu J, Guo X, Du K, Shen W, Sun J. DEM simulation of particle size segregation behavior during charging into and discharging from a Paul-Wurth type hopper. Chem Eng Sci 2013; 99: 314–323.10.1016/j.ces.2013.06.018Search in Google Scholar

Wylie JJ, Koch DL, Ladd AJ. Rheology of suspensions with high particle inertia and moderate fluid inertia. J Fluid Mech 2003; 480: 95–118.10.1017/S0022112002003531Search in Google Scholar

Xie H. Drag coefficient of fluidized particles at high Reynolds numbers. Chem Eng Sci 1997; 52: 3051–3052.10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00058-4Search in Google Scholar

Xiong Q, Li B, Chen F, Ma J, Ge W, Li J. Direct numerical simulation of sub-grid structures in gas-solid flow-GPU implementation of macro-scale pseudo-particle modeling. Chem Eng Sci 2010; 65: 5356–5365.10.1016/j.ces.2010.06.035Search in Google Scholar

Xiong Q, Deng L, Wang W, Ge W. SPH method for two-fluid modeling of particle-fluid fluidization. Chem Eng Sci 2011; 66: 1859–1865.10.1016/j.ces.2011.01.033Search in Google Scholar

Xiong Q, Li B, Zhou G, Fang X, Xu J, Wang J, He X, Wang X, Wang L, Ge W, Li J. Large-scale DNS of gas-solid flows on Mole-8.5. Chem Eng Sci 2012; 71: 422–430.10.1016/j.ces.2011.10.059Search in Google Scholar

Xu B, Yu A. Numerical simulation of the gas-solid flow in a fluidized bed by combining discrete particle method with computational fluid dynamics. Chem Eng Sci 1997; 52: 2785–2809.10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00081-XSearch in Google Scholar

Xu M, Ge W, Li J. A discrete particle model for particle-fluid flow with considerations of sub-grid structures. Chem Eng Sci 2007; 62: 2302–2308.10.1016/j.ces.2006.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Xu J, Qi H, Fang X, Lu L, Ge W, Wang X, Xu M, Chen F, He X, Li J. Quasi-real-time simulation of rotating drum using discrete element method with parallel GPU computing. Particuology 2011a; 9: 446–450.10.1016/j.partic.2011.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Xu J, Wang X, He X, Ren Y, Wei Ge W, Li J. Application of the Mole-8.5 supercomputer: probing the whole influenza virion at the atomic level. Chin Sci Bull 2011b; 56: 2114–2118.10.1007/s11434-011-4543-7Search in Google Scholar

Xu M, Chen F, Liu X, Ge W, Li J. Discrete particle simulation of gas-solid two-phase flows with multi-scale CPU-GPU hybrid computation. Chem Eng J 2012; 207–208: 746–757.10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.049Search in Google Scholar

Xu W, DeCroix DS, Sun X. Mechanistic based DEM simulation of particle attrition in a jet cup. Powder Technol 2014; 253: 385–392.10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.031Search in Google Scholar

Xu J, Li X, Hou C, Wang L, Zhou G, Ge W, Li J. Engineering molecular dynamics simulation in chemical engineering. Chem Eng Sci 2015; 121: 200–216.10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.051Search in Google Scholar

Xu J, Lu L, Ge W, Li J. Discrete simulation based on the EMMS paradigm and its applications in chemical engineering. CIESC J 2016; 67: 14–26.Search in Google Scholar

Yang J, Renken A. A generalized correlation for equilibrium of forces in liquid-solid fluidized beds. Chem Eng J 2003; 92: 7–14.10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00084-0Search in Google Scholar

Yang N, Wang W, Ge W, Li J. CFD simulation of concurrent-up gas-solid flow in circulating fluidized beds with structure-dependent drag coefficient. Chem Eng J 2003a; 96: 71–80.10.1016/j.cej.2003.08.006Search in Google Scholar

Yang N, Wang W, Ge W, Li J. Choosing structure-dependent drag coefficient in modeling gas-solid two-phase flow. China Particuology 2003b; 1, 38–41.10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60098-0Search in Google Scholar

Yang N, Wang W, Ge W, Wang L, Li J. Simulation of heterogeneous structure in a circulating fluidized-bed riser by combining the two-fluid model with the EMMS approach. Ind Eng Chem Res 2004; 43: 5548–5561.10.1021/ie049773cSearch in Google Scholar

Yang R, Jayasundara CT, Yu A, Curry D. DEM simulation of the flow of grinding media in IsaMill. Miner Eng 2006; 19: 984–994.10.1016/j.mineng.2006.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Yang R, Yu A, Choi SK, Coates MS, Chan HK. Agglomeration of fine particles subjected to centripetal compaction. Powder Technol 2007, 184: 122–129.10.1016/j.powtec.2007.08.010Search in Google Scholar

Yang S, Luo K, Fang M, Zhang K, Fan J. Parallel CFD-DEM modeling of the hydrodynamics in a lab-scale double slot-rectangular spouted bed with a partition plate. Chem Eng J 2014; 236: 158–170.10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.082Search in Google Scholar

Yao Z, Wang J, Liu G, Cheng M. Improved neighbor list algorithm in molecular simulations using cell decomposition and data sorting method. Comput Phys Commun 2004; 161: 27–35.10.1016/j.cpc.2004.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Yin X, Sundaresan S. Fluid-particle drag in low-Reynolds-number polydisperse gas-solid suspensions. AIChE J 2009a; 55: 1352–1368.10.1002/aic.11800Search in Google Scholar

Yin X, Sundaresan S. Drag law for bidisperse gas-solid suspensions containing equally sized spheres. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009b; 48: 227–241.10.1021/ie800171pSearch in Google Scholar

Yip S, Boon JP. Molecular hydrodynamics, 2nd ed. New York: Dover Publications. 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Yonemura S, Tannaka T, Tsuji Y. Cluster formulation in gas-solid flow predicted by the DSMC method. ASME 1993; 166: 303.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshino M, Hotta Y, Hirozane T, Endo M. A numerical method for incompressible non-Newtonian fluid flows based on the lattice Boltzmann method. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 2007; 147: 69–78.10.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Yu Y, Saxén H. Segregation behavior of particles in a top hopper of a blast furnace. Powder Technol 2014; 262: 233–241.10.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.010Search in Google Scholar

Yu Z, Shao X. A direct-forcing fictitious domain method for particulate flows. J Comput Phys 2007; 227: 292–314.10.1016/j.jcp.2007.07.027Search in Google Scholar

Yu A, Xu B. Particle-scale modelling of gas-solid flow in fluidisation. J Chem Technol Biotech 2003; 78: 111–121.10.1002/jctb.788Search in Google Scholar

Yu F, Zhou G, Xu J, Ge W. Enhanced axial mixing of rotating drums with alternately arranged baffles. Powder Technol 2015; 286: 276–287.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.08.032Search in Google Scholar

Yue X, Zhang H, Ke C, Luo C, Shu S, Tan Y, Feng C. A GPU-based discrete element modeling code and its application in die filling. Comput Fluids 2015; 110: 235–244.10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.11.020Search in Google Scholar

Yuen DA, Wang L, Chi X, Johnsson L, Ge W, Shi Y. GPU solutions to multi-scale problems in science and engineering. Berlin: Springer, 2013.10.1007/978-3-642-16405-7Search in Google Scholar

Zaidi AA, Tsuji T, Tanaka T. Direct numerical simulation of finite sized particles settling for high Reynolds number and dilute suspension. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2014; 50: 330–341.10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Zhang C. HS-PP-SS Coupled Simulation and Its Applications in Chemical Engineering. Doctorial Dissertation. Beijing, China: The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang C, Ge W, Zhao M, Hou C. A multilevel-skin neighbor list algorithm for molecular dynamics simulation. Comp Phys Comm 2017. In revision.10.1016/j.cpc.2017.09.017Search in Google Scholar

Zhang L, Liu K, You C. Fictitious domain method for fully resolved reacting gas-solid flow simulation. J Comput Phys 2015; 299: 215–228.10.1016/j.jcp.2015.07.010Search in Google Scholar

Zhang Z, Prosperetti A. A second-order method for three-dimensional particle simulation. J Comput Phys 2005; 210: 292–324.10.1016/j.jcp.2005.04.009Search in Google Scholar

Zhang Y, Reese JM. The drag force in two-fluid models of gas-solid flows. Chem Eng Sci 2003; 58: 1641–1644.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00659-0Search in Google Scholar

Zhang W, You C. Numerical approach to predict particle breakage in dense flows by coupling multiphase particle-in-cell and Monte Carlo methods. Powder Technol 2015; 283: 128–136.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.05.025Search in Google Scholar

Zhang J, Hu Z, Ge W, Zhang Y, Li T, Li J. Application of the discrete approach to the simulation of size segregation in granular chute flow. Ind Eng Chem Res 2004; 43: 5521–5528.10.1021/ie034254fSearch in Google Scholar

Zhang J, Ge W, Li J. Simulation of heterogeneous structures and analysis of energy consumption in particle-fluid systems with pseudo-particle modeling. Chem Eng Sci 2005; 60: 3091–3099.10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.057Search in Google Scholar

Zhang M, Chu K, Wei F, Yu A. A CFD-DEM study of the cluster behavior in riser and downer reactors. Powder Technol 2008; 184: 151–165.10.1016/j.powtec.2007.11.036Search in Google Scholar

Zhang Y, Ge W, Wang X, Yang C. Validation of EMMS-based drag model using lattice Boltzmann simulations on GPUs. Particuology 2011; 9: 365–373.10.1016/j.partic.2011.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Zhang C, Lu P, Chen Y. Molecular dynamics simulation of electroosmotic flow in rough nanochannels. Int Commun Heat Mass 2014; 59: 101–105.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.10.024Search in Google Scholar

Zhao Y, Jiang M, Liu Y, Zheng J. Particle-scale simulation of the flow and heat transfer behaviors in fluidized bed with immersed tube. AIChE J 2009; 55: 3109–3124.10.1002/aic.11956Search in Google Scholar

Zhao Y, Ding Y, Wu C, Cheng Y. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamics in downers using a CFD-DEM coupled approach. Powder Technol 2010; 199: 2–12.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.04.014Search in Google Scholar

Zhao G, Perilla JR, Yufenyuy EL, Meng X, Chen B, Ning J, Ahn J, Gronenborn AM, Schulten K, Aiken C, Zhang P. Mature HIV-1 capsid structure by cryo-electron microscopy and all-atom molecular dynamics. Nature 2013; 497: 643–646.10.1038/nature12162Search in Google Scholar

Zheng M, Li X, Guo L. Algorithms of GPU-enabled reactive force field (ReaxFF) molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph Model 2013; 41: 1–11.10.1016/j.jmgm.2013.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Zheng Q, Yu A. Finite element investigation of the flow and stress patterns in conical hopper during discharge. Chem Eng Sci 2015; 129: 49–57.10.1016/j.ces.2015.02.022Search in Google Scholar

Zhong W, Zhang Y, Jin B, Zhang M. Discrete element method simulation of cylinder-shaped particle flow in a gas-solid fluidized bed. Chem Eng Technol 2009; 32: 386–391.10.1002/ceat.200800516Search in Google Scholar

Zhou G, Ge W. Progress of smoothed particle hydrodynamics in complex flows. CIESC J 2014; 65: 1145–1161 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

Zhou Y, Wright BD, Yang R, Xu B, Yu A. Rolling friction in the dynamic simulation of sandpile formation. Physica A 1999; 269: 536–553.10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00183-1Search in Google Scholar

Zhou H, Flamant G, Gauthier D. DEM-LES of coal combustion in a bubbling fluidized bed. Part I: gas-particle turbulent flow structure. Chem Eng Sci 2004a; 59: 4193–4203.10.1016/S0009-2509(04)00293-3Search in Google Scholar

Zhou H, Flamant G, Gauthier D. DEM-LES simulation of coal combustion in a bubbling fluidized bed Part II: coal combustion at the particle level. Chem Eng Sci 2004b; 59: 4205–4215.10.1016/S0009-2509(04)00294-5Search in Google Scholar

Zhou Y, Yu A, Stewart RL, Bridgwater J. Microdynamic analysis of the particle flow in a cylindrical bladed mixer. Chem Eng Sci 2004c; 59: 1343–1364.10.1016/j.ces.2003.12.023Search in Google Scholar

Zhou G, Ge W, Li J. Smoothed particles as a non-Newtonian fluid: a case study in Couette flow. Chem Eng Sci 2010; 65: 2258–2262.10.1016/j.ces.2009.12.020Search in Google Scholar

Zhou G, Wang L, Wang X, Ge W. Galilean-invariant algorithm coupling immersed moving boundary conditions and Lees-Edwards boundary conditions. Phys Rev E 2011; 84: 066701.10.1103/PhysRevE.84.066701Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhou G, Ge W, Li J. Theoretical analysis on the applicability of traditional SPH method. Chin Sci Bull 2013; 58: 2970–2978.10.1007/s11434-013-5889-9Search in Google Scholar

Zhou G, Xiong Q, Wang L, Wang X, Ren X, Ge W. Structure-dependent drag in gas-solid flows studied with direct numerical simulation. Chem Eng Sci 2014; 116: 9–22.10.1016/j.ces.2014.04.025Search in Google Scholar

Zhou B, Wang J, Zhao B. Micromorphology characterization and reconstruction of sand particles using micro X-ray tomography and spherical harmonics. Eng Geol 2015; 184: 126–137.10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.11.009Search in Google Scholar

Zhu H, Yu A. Averaging method of granular materials. Phys Rev E 2002; 66: 021302.10.1103/PhysRevE.66.021302Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhu H, Zhou Z, Yang R, Yu A. Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: theoretical developments. Chem Eng Sci 2007; 62: 3378–3396.10.1016/j.ces.2006.12.089Search in Google Scholar

Zhu H, Zhou Z, Yang R, Yu A. Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: a review of major applications and findings. Chem Eng Sci 2008; 63: 5728–5770.10.1016/j.ces.2008.08.006Search in Google Scholar

Zhu H, Zhou Z, Hou Q, Yu A. Linking discrete particle simulation to continuum process modelling for granular matter: theory and application. Particuology 2011; 9: 342–357.10.1016/j.partic.2011.01.002Search in Google Scholar