Progress on sorption-enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production

References

Aaron D, Tsouris C. Separation of CO₂ from flue gas: a review. Sep Sci Technol 2005; 40: 321–348.10.1081/SS-200042244Search in Google Scholar

Abanades JC. The maximum capture efficiency of CO₂ using a carbonation/calcination cycle of CaO/CaCO₃. Chem Eng J 2002; 90: 303–306.10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00126-2Search in Google Scholar

Abanades JC, Anthony EJ, Lu DY, Salvador C, Alvarez D. Capture of CO₂ from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO. AIChE J 2004; 50: 1614–1622.10.1002/aic.10132Search in Google Scholar

Abanades JC, Grasa G, Alonso M, Rodriguez N, Anthony EJ, Romeo LM. Cost structure of a postcombustion CO₂ capture system using CaO. Environ Sci Technol 2007; 41: 5523–5527.10.1021/es070099aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Abanades JC, Murillo R, Fernandez JR, Grasa G, Martínez I. New CO₂ capture process for hydrogen production combining Ca and Cu chemical loops. Environ Sci Technol 2010; 44: 6901–6904.10.1021/es101707tSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Aceves Olivas DY, Baray Guerrero MR, Escobedo Bretado MA, Marques da Silva Paula M, Salinas Gutiérrez J, Guzmán Velderrain V, López Ortiz A, Collins-Martínez V. Enhanced ethanol steam reforming by CO₂ absorption using CaO, CaO*MgO or Na₂ZrO₃. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2014; 39: 16595–16607.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.156Search in Google Scholar

Adanez J, Abad A, Garcia-Labiano F, Gayan P, de Diego LF. Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog Energ Combust Sci 2012; 38: 215–282.10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Adhikari S, Fernando SD, Haryanto A. Hydrogen production from glycerol: an update. Energ Convers Manage 2009; 50: 2600–2604.10.1016/j.enconman.2009.06.011Search in Google Scholar

Adris AM, Pruden BB, Lim CJ, Grace JR. On the reported attempts to radically improve the performance of the steam methane reforming reactor. Can J Chem Eng 1996; 74: 177–186.10.1002/cjce.5450740202Search in Google Scholar

Agar DW. The dos and don’ts of adsorptive reactors. In: Sundmacher K, Kienle A, Seidel-Morgenstern A, editors. Integrated chemical processes: synthesis, operation, analysis, and control. Weinheim: Wiley, 2005: 203–231.10.1002/3527605738.ch7Search in Google Scholar

Aida T, Silveston PL. Cyclic separating reactors. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.10.1002/9780470988688Search in Google Scholar

Aida T, Silveston PL. Chapter 9. In: Pressure swing reactors, cyclic separating reactors. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007: 170–220.Search in Google Scholar

Albrecht KO, Wagenbach KS, Satrio JA, Shanks BH, Wheelock TD. Development of a CaO-based CO₂ sorbent with improved cyclic stability. Ind Eng Chem Res 2008; 47: 7841–7848.10.1021/ie8007743Search in Google Scholar

Allam RJ, Chiang R, Hufton JR, Middleton P, Weist EL, White V. Development of the sorption enhanced water gas shift process. In: Thomas DC, Benson SM, editors. Carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geologic formations, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005: 227–256.10.1016/B978-008044570-0/50099-4Search in Google Scholar

Alpay E, Ding Y. Equilibria and kinetics of CO₂ adsorption on hydrotalcite adsorbent. Chem Eng Sci 2000; 55: 3461–3474.10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00596-5Search in Google Scholar

Anantharaman R, Bolland O, Booth N, Dorst Ev, Ekstrom C, Fernandes ES, Franco F, Macchi E, Manzolini G, Nikolic D, Pfeffer A, Prins M, Rezvani S, Robinson L. Carbon-free electricity by SEWGS: advanced materials, reactor-, and process design, European best practice guidelines for assessment of CO₂ capture technologies. Milan: CAESAR, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Angeli SD, Monteleone G, Giaconia A, Lemonidou AA. State-of-the-art catalysts for CH₄ steam reforming at low temperature. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2014; 39: 1979–1997.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Armor JN. The multiple roles for catalysis in the production of H₂. Appl Catal A 1999; 176: 159–176.10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00244-0Search in Google Scholar

Arstad B, Blom R, Bakken E, Dahl I, Jakobsen JP, Røkke P. Sorption-enhanced methane steam reforming in a circulating fluidized bed reactor system. Energy Procedia 2009; 1: 715–720.10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.094Search in Google Scholar

Arstad B, Prostak J, Blom R. Continuous hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam methane reforming (SE-SMR) in a circulating fluidized bed reactor: sorbent to catalyst ratio dependencies. Chem Eng J 2012; 189–190: 413–421.10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.057Search in Google Scholar

Auerbach SM, Carrado KA, Dutta PK. Handbook of layered materials. Hoboken: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2004.10.1201/9780203021354Search in Google Scholar

Auprêtre F, Descorme C, Duprez D. Bio-ethanol catalytic steam reforming over supported metal catalysts. Catal Commun 2002; 3: 263–267.10.1016/S1566-7367(02)00118-8Search in Google Scholar

Babita K, Sridhar S, Raghavan KV. Membrane reactors for fuel cell quality hydrogen through WGSR – review of their status, challenges and opportunities. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2011; 36: 6671–6688.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.107Search in Google Scholar

Balasubramanian B, Lopez Ortiz A, Kaytakoglu S, Harrison DP. Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process. Chem Eng Sci 1999; 54: 3543–3552.10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00425-4Search in Google Scholar

Barelli L, Bidini G, Gallorini F, Servili S. Hydrogen production through sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and membrane technology: a review. Energy 2008; 33: 554–570.10.1016/j.energy.2007.10.018Search in Google Scholar

Barker R. The reversibility of the reaction CaCO₃=CaO+CO₂. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 1973; 23: 733–742.10.1002/jctb.5020231005Search in Google Scholar

Barreto L, Makihira A, Riahi K. The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: a sustainable development scenario. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2003; 28: 267–284.10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00074-5Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia SK, Perlmutter DD. Effect of the product layer on the kinetics of the CO₂-lime reaction. AIChE J 1983; 29: 79–86.10.1002/aic.690290111Search in Google Scholar

Bhatta LKG, Subramanyam S, Chengala MD, Olivera S, Venkatesh K. Progress in hydrotalcite like compounds and metal-based oxides for CO₂ capture: a review. J Cleaner Prod 2015; 103: 171–196.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.059Search in Google Scholar

Boon J, Cobden PD, van Dijk HAJ, Annaland MvS. High-temperature pressure swing adsorption cycle design for sorption-enhanced water-gas shift. Chem Eng Sci 2015; 122: 219–231.10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.034Search in Google Scholar

Breen JP, Burch R, Coleman HM. Metal-catalysed steam reforming of ethanol in the production of hydrogen for fuel cell applications. Appl Catal B 2002; 39: 65–74.10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00075-9Search in Google Scholar

Broda M, Kierzkowska AM, Baudouin D, Imtiaz Q, Copéret C, Müller CR. Sorbent-enhanced methane reforming over a Ni-Ca-based, bifunctional catalyst sorbent. ACS Catal 2012; 2: 1635–1646.10.1021/cs300247gSearch in Google Scholar

Brun-Tsekhovoi AR, Zadorin AN, Katsobashvili YR, Kourdyumov SS. The process of catalytic steam-reforming of hydrocarbons in the presence of carbon dioxide acceptor. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Hydrogen Energy Conference. New York: Pergamon Press, 1986: 885–900.Search in Google Scholar

Cai WJ, de la Piscina PR, Homs N. Hydrogen production from the steam reforming of bio-butanol over novel supported Co-based bimetallic catalysts. Bioresour Technol 2012; 107: 482–486.10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.081Search in Google Scholar

Cai W, de la Piscina PR, Homs N. Oxidative steam reforming of bio-butanol for hydrogen production: effects of noble metals on bimetallic CoM/ZnO catalysts (M=Ru, Rh, Ir, Pd). Appl Catal B 2014a; 145: 56–62.10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.03.016Search in Google Scholar

Cai W, Homs N, de la Piscina PR. Renewable hydrogen production from oxidative steam reforming of bio-butanol over CoIr/CeZrO₂ catalysts: relationship between catalytic behaviour and catalyst structure. Appl Catal B 2014b; 150: 47–56.10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.11.032Search in Google Scholar

Carrette L, Friedrich KA, Stimming U. Fuel cells: principles, types, fuels, and applications. ChemPhysChem 2000; 1: 162–193.10.1002/1439-7641(20001215)1:4<162::AID-CPHC162>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar

Carvill BT, Hufton JR, Anand M, Sircar S. Sorption-enhanced reaction process. AIChE J 1996; 42: 2765–2772.10.1002/aic.690421008Search in Google Scholar

Cavallaro S, Freni S. Ethanol steam reforming in a molten carbonate fuel cell. A preliminary kinetic investigation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 1996; 21: 465–469.10.1016/0360-3199(95)00107-7Search in Google Scholar

Cavallaro S, Mondello N, Freni S. Hydrogen produced from ethanol for internal reforming molten carbonate fuel cell. J Power Sources 2001; 102: 198–204.10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00800-XSearch in Google Scholar

Chanburanasiri N, Ribeiro AM, Rodrigues AE, Arpornwichanop A, Laosiripojana N, Praserthdam P, Assabumrungrat S. Hydrogen production via sorption enhanced steam methane reforming process using Ni/CaO multifunctional catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011; 50: 13662–13671.10.1021/ie201226jSearch in Google Scholar

Chang F-W, Yang H-C, Roselin LS, Kuo W-Y. Ethanol dehydrogenation over copper catalysts on rice husk ash prepared by ion exchange. Appl Catal A 2006; 304: 30–39.10.1016/j.apcata.2006.02.017Search in Google Scholar

Chao Z, Wang Y, Jakobsen JP, Fernandino M, Jakobsen HA. Numerical investigation of the sorption enhanced steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed reactor. Energy Procedia 2012; 26: 15–21.10.1016/j.egypro.2012.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Chaubey R, Sahu S, James OO, Maity S. A review on development of industrial processes and emerging techniques for production of hydrogen from renewable and sustainable sources. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2013; 23: 443–462.10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.019Search in Google Scholar

Chen D, He L. Towards an efficient hydrogen production from biomass: a review of processes and materials. ChemCatChem 2011; 3: 490–511.10.1002/cctc.201000345Search in Google Scholar

Chen H, Zhang T, Dou B, Dupont V, Williams P, Ghadiri M, Ding Y. Thermodynamic analyses of adsorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2009; 34: 7208–7222.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.070Search in Google Scholar

Chen H, Ding Y, Cong NT, Dou B, Dupont V, Ghadiri M, Williams PT. A comparative study on hydrogen production from steam-glycerol reforming: thermodynamics and experimental. Renew Energ 2011; 36: 779–788.10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.026Search in Google Scholar

Chen Y, Zhao Y, Zheng C, Zhang J. Numerical study of hydrogen production via sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed reactor at relatively low temperature. Chem Eng Sci 2013; 92: 67–80.10.1016/j.ces.2013.01.024Search in Google Scholar

Choi S, Drese JH, Jones CW. Adsorbent materials for carbon dioxide capture from large anthropogenic point sources. ChemSusChem 2009; 2: 796–854.10.1002/cssc.200900036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cobden PD, Elzingaa GD, Booneveld S, Dijkstra JW, Jansen D, van den Brink RW. Sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming: CaO-CaCO₃ capture technology. Energy Procedia 2009; 1: 733–739.10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.097Search in Google Scholar

Collins-Martinez V, Escobedo Bretado M, Meléndez Zaragoza M, Salinas Gutiérrez J, Ortiz AL. Absorption enhanced reforming of light alcohols (methanol and ethanol) for the production of hydrogen: thermodynamic modeling. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2013; 38: 12539–12553.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.146Search in Google Scholar

Comas J, Laborde M, Amadeo N. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production from ethanol using CaO as a CO₂ sorbent. J Power Sources 2004; 138: 61–67.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.05.059Search in Google Scholar

Cunha AF, Wu Y-J, Díaz-Alvarado FA, Santos JC, Vaidya PD, Rodrigues AE. Steam reforming of ethanol on a Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst coupled with a hydrotalcite-like sorbent in a multilayer pattern for CO₂ uptake. Can J Chem Eng 2012a; 90: 1514–1526.10.1002/cjce.20662Search in Google Scholar

Cunha AF, Wu Y-J, Santos JC, Rodrigues AE. Steam reforming of ethanol on copper catalysts derived from hydrotalcite-like materials. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012b; 51: 13132–13143.10.1021/ie301645fSearch in Google Scholar

Cunha AF, Wu Y-J, Santos JC, Rodrigues AE. Sorption enhanced steam reforming of ethanol on hydrotalcite-like compounds impregnated with active copper. Chem Eng Res Des 2013; 91: 581–592.10.1016/j.cherd.2012.09.015Search in Google Scholar

Cunha AF, Wu Y-J, Li P, Yu J-G, Rodrigues AE. Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of ethanol on a novel K-Ni-Cu-hydrotalcite hybrid material. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014; 53: 3842–3853.10.1021/ie5000938Search in Google Scholar

Díaz Alvarado F, Gracia F. Oxidative steam reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production: thermodynamic analysis including different carbon deposits representation and CO₂ adsorption. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2012; 37: 14820–14830.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.158Search in Google Scholar

Da Silva AL, Müller IL. Hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of oxygenated hydrocarbons (ethanol, glycerol, n-butanol and methanol): thermodynamic modelling. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2011; 36: 2057–2075.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.051Search in Google Scholar

Davda RR, Shabaker JW, Huber GW, Cortright RD, Dumesic JA. A review of catalytic issues and process conditions for renewable hydrogen and alkanes by aqueous-phase reforming of oxygenated hydrocarbons over supported metal catalysts. Appl Catal B 2005; 56: 171–186.10.1016/B978-008044696-7/50038-6Search in Google Scholar

Dean CC, Blamey J, Florin NH, Al-Jeboori MJ, Fennell PS. The calcium looping cycle for CO₂ capture from power generation, cement manufacture and hydrogen production. Chem Eng Res Des 2011; 89: 836–855.10.1016/j.cherd.2010.10.013Search in Google Scholar

Derevschikov VS, Lysikov AI, Okunev AG. Sorption properties of lithium carbonate doped CaO and its performance in sorption enhanced methane reforming. Chem Eng Sci 2011; 66: 3030–3038.10.1016/j.ces.2011.04.008Search in Google Scholar

Dewoolkar KD, Vaidya PD. Improved hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming over hydrotalcite- and calcium-based hybrid materials. Energ Fuel 2015; 29: 3870–3878.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00584Search in Google Scholar

Di Carlo A, Bocci E, Zuccari F, Dell’Era A. Numerical investigation of sorption enhanced steam methane reforming process using computational fluid dynamics Eulerian- Eulerian code. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010; 49: 1561–1576.10.1021/ie900748tSearch in Google Scholar

Ding Y, Alpay E. Adsorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming. Chem Eng Sci 2000; 55: 3929–3940.10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00597-7Search in Google Scholar

Ding Y, Alpay E. High temperature recovery of CO₂ from flue gases using hydrotalcite adsorbent. Process Saf Environ Prot 2001; 79: 45–51.10.1205/095758201531130Search in Google Scholar

Dou B, Dupont V, Rickett G, Blakeman N, Williams PT, Chen H, Ding Y, Ghadiri M. Hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol. Bioresour Technol 2009; 100: 3540–3547.10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Dou B, Wang C, Chen H, Song Y, Xie B. Continuous sorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol to high-purity hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2013; 38: 11902–11909.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.026Search in Google Scholar

Dou B, Song Y, Wang C, Chen H, Yang M, Xu Y. Hydrogen production by enhanced-sorption chemical looping steam reforming of glycerol in moving-bed reactors. Appl Energ 2014a; 130: 342–349.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.061Search in Google Scholar

Dou BL, Song YC, Wang C, Chen HS, Xu YJ. Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of biodiesel byproduct glycerol: issues and challenges. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2014b; 30: 950–960.10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.029Search in Google Scholar

Dou B, Wang C, Song Y, Chen H, Jiang B, Yang M, Xu Y. Solid sorbents for in-situ CO₂ removal during sorption-enhanced steam reforming process: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2016a; 53: 536–546.10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.068Search in Google Scholar

Dou B, Jiang B, Song Y, Zhang C, Wang C, Chen H, Du B, Xu Y. Enhanced hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced steam reforming from glycerol with in-situ CO₂ removal in a fixed-bed reactor. Fuel 2016b; 166: 340–346.10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.002Search in Google Scholar

Duraiswamy K, Chellappa A, Smith G, Liu Y, Li M. Development of a high-efficiency hydrogen generator for fuel cells for distributed power generation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010; 35: 8962–8969.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.016Search in Google Scholar

Erickson PA, Tang H-Y, Vernon DR. Reformation of hydrocarbon fuels. In: Sherif SA, Goswami DY, Stefanakos EK, Steinfeld A, editors. Handbook of hydrogen energy. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2014: 23–59.Search in Google Scholar

Escobedo Bretado M, Delgado Vigil MD, Collins Martinez VH, López Ortiz A. Thermodynamic analysis for the production of hydrogen through sorption enhanced water gas shift (SEWGS). Int J Chem React Eng 2008; 6: 1553–1568.10.2202/1542-6580.1553Search in Google Scholar

Escobedo Bretado MA, Delgado Vigil MD, Gutiérrez JS, López Ortiz A, Collins-Martínez V. Hydrogen production by absorption enhanced water gas shift (AEWGS). Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010; 35: 12083–12090.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.07.025Search in Google Scholar

Feng HZ, Lan PQ, Wu SF. A study on the stability of a NiO-CaO/Al₂O₃ complex catalyst by La₂O₃ modification for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2012; 37: 14161–14166.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.099Search in Google Scholar

Fermoso J, He L, Chen D. Production of high purity hydrogen by sorption enhanced steam reforming of crude glycerol. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2012; 37: 14047–14054.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.084Search in Google Scholar

Fernández JR, Abanades JC. Conceptual design of a Ni-based chemical looping combustion process using fixed-beds. Appl Energ 2014; 135: 309–319.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.069Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira-Aparicio P, Benito MJ, Sanz JL. New trends in reforming technologies: from hydrogen industrial plants to multifuel microreformers. Catal Rev 2005; 47: 491–588.10.1080/01614940500364958Search in Google Scholar

Frusteri F, Freni S, Spadaro L, Chiodo V, Bonura G, Donato S, Cavallaro S. H₂ production for MC fuel cell by steam reforming of ethanol over MgO supported Pd, Rh, Ni and Co catalysts. Catal Commun 2004; 5: 611–615.10.1016/j.catcom.2004.07.015Search in Google Scholar

Gallucci F, Fernandez E, Corengia P, van Sint Annaland M. Recent advances on membranes and membrane reactors for hydrogen production. Chem Eng Sci 2013; 92: 40–66.10.1016/j.ces.2013.01.008Search in Google Scholar

Gallucci K, Micheli F, Barisano D, Villone A, Foscolo P, Rossi L. CO₂ sorption-enhanced processes by hydrotalcite-like compounds at different temperature levels. Int J Chem React Eng 2015; 13: 143–152.10.1515/ijcre-2014-0131Search in Google Scholar

Garcia-Gallastegui A, Iruretagoyena D, Gouvea V, Mokhtar M, Asiri AM, Basahel SN, Al-Thabaiti SA, Alyoubi AO, Chadwick D, Shaffer MSP. Graphene oxide as support for layered double hydroxides: enhancing the CO₂ adsorption capacity. Chem Mater 2012; 24: 4531–4539.10.1021/cm3018264Search in Google Scholar

García-Lario AL, Grasa GS, Murillo R. Performance of a combined CaO-based sorbent and catalyst on H₂ production, via sorption enhanced methane steam reforming. Chem Eng J 2015; 264: 697–705.10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.116Search in Google Scholar

Gazzani M, Macchi E, Manzolini G. CO₂ capture in integrated gasification combined cycle with SEWGS – part A: thermodynamic performances. Fuel 2013; 105: 206–219.10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.048Search in Google Scholar

Gil MV, Fermoso J, Rubiera F, Chen D. H₂ production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of biomass-derived bio-oil in a fluidized bed reactor: an assessment of the effect of operation variables using response surface methodology. Catal Today 2015; 242 Part A: 19–34.10.1016/j.cattod.2014.04.018Search in Google Scholar

Gorin E, Retallick BW. Method for the production of hydrogen. US3108857 A, U.S., 1963.Search in Google Scholar

Grande CA, Lopes FV, Ribeiro AM, Loureiro JM, Rodrigues AE. Adsorption of off-gases from steam methane reforming (H₂, CO₂, CH₄, CO and N₂) on activated carbon. Sep Sci Technol 2008; 43: 1338–1364.10.1080/01496390801940952Search in Google Scholar

Gunduz S, Dogu T. Sorption-enhanced reforming of ethanol over Ni- and Co-incorporated MCM-41 type catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012; 51: 8796–8805.10.1021/ie201852fSearch in Google Scholar

Halabi MH, de Croon MHJM, van der Schaaf J, Cobden PD, Schouten JC. Reactor modeling of sorption-enhanced autothermal reforming of methane. Part I: performance study of hydrotalcite and lithium zirconate-based processes. Chem Eng J 2011; 168: 872–882.10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.015Search in Google Scholar

Halabi MH, de Croon MHJM, van der Schaaf J, Cobden PD, Schouten JC. High capacity potassium-promoted hydrotalcite for CO₂ capture in H₂ production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2012a; 37: 4516–4525.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Halabi MH, de Croon MHJM, van der Schaaf J, Cobden PD, Schouten JC. Kinetic and structural requirements for a CO₂ adsorbent in sorption enhanced catalytic reforming of methane – Part I: reaction kinetics and sorbent capacity. Fuel 2012b; 99: 154–164.10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.016Search in Google Scholar

Harrison DP. Sorption-enhanced hydrogen production: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 2008; 47: 6486–6501.10.1021/ie800298zSearch in Google Scholar

Harrison DP. Calcium enhanced hydrogen production with CO₂ capture. Energy Procedia 2009; 1: 675–681.10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.089Search in Google Scholar

Harrison DP, Peng Z. Low-carbon monoxide hydrogen by sorption-enhanced reaction. Int J Chem React Eng 2003; 1: 1–12.10.2202/1542-6580.1055Search in Google Scholar

Haryanto A, Fernando S, Murali N, Adhikari S. Current status of hydrogen production techniques by steam reforming of ethanol: a review. Energ Fuel 2005; 19: 2098–2106.10.1021/ef0500538Search in Google Scholar

He L, Berntsen H, Chen D. Approaching sustainable H₂ production: sorption enhanced steam reforming of ethanol. J Phys Chem A 2009a; 114: 3834–3844.10.1021/jp906146ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

He L, Berntsen H, Ochoa-Fernández E, Walmsley J, Blekkan E, Chen D. Co-Ni catalysts derived from hydrotalcite-like materials for hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming. Top Catal 2009b; 52: 206–217.10.1007/s11244-008-9157-1Search in Google Scholar

He L, Berntsen H, Chen D. Approaching sustainable H₂ production: sorption enhanced steam reforming of ethanol. J Phys Chem A 2010a; 114: 3834–3844.10.1021/jp906146ySearch in Google Scholar

He L, Parra JMS, Blekkan EA, Chen D. Towards efficient hydrogen production from glycerol by sorption enhanced steam reforming. Energ Environ Sci 2010b; 3: 1046–1056.10.1039/b922355jSearch in Google Scholar

Hildenbrand N, Readman J, Dahl IM, Blom R. Sorbent enhanced steam reforming (SESR) of methane using dolomite as internal carbon dioxide absorbent: limitations due to Ca(OH)₂ formation. Appl Catal A 2006; 303: 131–137.10.1016/j.apcata.2006.02.015Search in Google Scholar

Hla SS, Park D, Duffy GJ, Edwards JH, Roberts DG, Ilyushechkin A, Morpeth LD, Nguyen T. Kinetics of high-temperature water-gas shift reaction over two iron-based commercial catalysts using simulated coal-derived syngases. Chem Eng J 2009; 146: 148–154.10.1016/j.cej.2008.09.023Search in Google Scholar

Holladay JD, Hu J, King DL, Wang Y. An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catal Today 2009; 139: 244–260.10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039Search in Google Scholar

Hou T, Zhang S, Chen Y, Wang D, Cai W. Hydrogen production from ethanol reforming: catalysts and reaction mechanism. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2015; 44: 132–148.10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.023Search in Google Scholar

Hufton JR, Mayorga S, Sircar S. Sorption-enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production. AIChE J 1999a; 45: 248–256.10.1002/aic.690450205Search in Google Scholar

Hufton JR, Weigel SJ, Waldron WF, Rao M, Nataraj S, Sircar S, Gaffney TR. Sorption enhanced reaction process (SERP) for production of hydrogen. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 1999b.Search in Google Scholar

Hutson ND, Speakman SA, Payzant EA. Structural effects on the high temperature adsorption of CO₂ on a synthetic hydrotalcite. Chem Mater 2004; 16: 4135–4143.10.1021/cm040060uSearch in Google Scholar

Ida J-i, Lin YS. Mechanism of high-temperature CO₂ sorption on lithium zirconate. Environ Sci Technol 2003; 37: 1999–2004.10.1021/es0259032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Iliuta I, Radfarnia HR, Iliuta MC. Hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced steam glycerol reforming: sorption kinetics and reactor simulation. AIChE J 2013; 59: 2105–2118.10.1002/aic.13979Search in Google Scholar

Iulianelli A, Ribeirinha P, Mendes A, Basile A. Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen generation via conventional and membrane reactors: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2014; 29: 355–368.10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.032Search in Google Scholar

Jang HM, Lee KB, Caram HS, Sircar S. High-purity hydrogen production through sorption enhanced water gas shift reaction using K₂CO₃-promoted hydrotalcite. Chem Eng Sci 2012; 73: 431–438.10.1016/j.ces.2012.02.015Search in Google Scholar

Jang HM, Kang WR, Lee KB. Sorption-enhanced water gas shift reaction using multi-section column for high-purity hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2013; 38: 6065–6071.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.125Search in Google Scholar

Jansen D, van Selow E, Cobden P, Manzolini G, Macchi E, Gazzani M, Blom R, Henriksen PP, Beavis R, Wright A. SEWGS technology is now ready for scale-up! Energy Procedia 2013; 37: 2265–2273.10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.107Search in Google Scholar

Jeong K, Sircar S, Caram HS. Modeling of heat recovery from a steam-gas mixture in a high-temperature sorption process. AIChE J 2012; 58: 312–321.10.1002/aic.12564Search in Google Scholar

Johnsen K, Grace JR, Elnashaie SS, Kolbeinsen L, Eriksen D. Modeling of sorption-enhanced steam reforming in a dual fluidized bubbling bed reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006a; 45: 4133–4144.10.1021/ie0511736Search in Google Scholar

Johnsen K, Ryu HJ, Grace JR, Lim CJ. Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane in a fluidized bed reactor with dolomite as CO₂-acceptor. Chem Eng Sci 2006b; 61: 1195–1202.10.1016/j.ces.2005.08.022Search in Google Scholar

Jones LW. Toward a liquid hydrogen fuel economy. Engineering technical report. University of Michigan, Michigan, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

Kato Y, Ando K, Yoshizawa Y. Study on a regenerative fuel reformer for a zero-emission vehicle system. J Chem Eng Jpn 2003; 36: 860–866.10.1252/jcej.36.860Search in Google Scholar

Kato M, Nakagawa K, Essaki K, Maezawa Y, Takeda S, Kogo R, Hagiwara Y. Novel CO₂ absorbents using lithium-containing oxides. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 2005; 2: 467–475.10.1016/B978-008044276-1/50250-6Search in Google Scholar

Kierzkowska AM, Pacciani R, Müller CR. CaO-based CO₂ sorbents: from fundamentals to the development of new, highly effective materials. ChemSusChem 2013; 6: 1130–1148.10.1002/cssc.201300178Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kim J-N, Ko CH, Yi KB. Sorption enhanced hydrogen production using one-body CaO-Ca₁₂Al₁₄O₃₃-Ni composite as catalytic absorbent. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2013; 38: 6072–6078.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.022Search in Google Scholar

Kim H, Jang HD, Choi M. Facile synthesis of macroporous Li₄SiO₄ with remarkably enhanced CO₂ adsorption kinetics. Chem Eng J 2015; 280: 132–137.10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.127Search in Google Scholar

Koehle M, Mhadeshwar A. Microkinetic modeling and analysis of ethanol partial oxidation and reforming reaction pathways on platinum at short contact times. Chem Eng Sci 2012; 78: 209–225.10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.017Search in Google Scholar

Koumpouras GC, Alpay E, Stepanek F. Mathematical modelling of low-temperature hydrogen production with in situ CO₂ capture. Chem Eng Sci 2007; 62: 2833–2841.10.1016/j.ces.2007.02.011Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence P, Grünewald M. Multifunctionality at particle level – studies for adsorptive catalysts. In: Schmidt-Traub H, Górak A, editors. Integrated reaction and separation operations. Berlin: Springer, 2006: 339–359.Search in Google Scholar

Le Chatelier HL. Sur un énoncé général des lois des équilibres chimiques. C R Acad Sci 1884; 99: 786–789.Search in Google Scholar

Lee I-D, Kadlec RH. Effects of adsorbent and catalyst distributions in pressure swing reactors. AIChE Symp Ser 1988; 84: 167–176.Search in Google Scholar

Lee CH, Lee KB. Application of one-body hybrid solid pellets to sorption-enhanced water gas shift reaction for high-purity hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2014; 39: 18128–18134.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.160Search in Google Scholar

Lee K, Verdooren A, Caram H, Sircar S. Chemisorption of carbon dioxide on potassium-carbonate-promoted hydrotalcite. J Colloid Interface Sci 2007a; 308: 30–39.10.1016/j.jcis.2006.11.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Lee KB, Beaver MG, Caram HS, Sircar S. Chemisorption of carbon dioxide on sodium oxide promoted alumina. AIChE J 2007b; 53: 2824–2831.10.1002/aic.11312Search in Google Scholar

Lee KB, Beaver MG, Caram HS, Sircar S. Novel thermal-swing sorption-enhanced reaction process concept for hydrogen production by low-temperature steam-methane reforming. Ind Eng Chem Res 2007c; 46: 5003–5014.10.1021/ie0701064Search in Google Scholar

Lee KB, Beaver MG, Caram HS, Sircar S. Production of fuel-cell grade hydrogen by thermal swing sorption enhanced reaction concept. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2008; 33: 781–790.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.10.018Search in Google Scholar

Lee CH, Mun S, Lee KB. Application of multisection packing concept to sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming reaction for high-purity hydrogen production. J Power Source 2015; 281: 158–163.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.175Search in Google Scholar

LeValley TL, Richard AR, Fan M. The progress in water gas shift and steam reforming hydrogen production technologies – a review. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2014; 39: 16983–17000.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.041Search in Google Scholar

Li M. Equilibrium calculation of gaseous reactive systems with simultaneous species adsorption. Ind Eng Chem Res 2008; 47: 9263–9271.10.1021/ie800408mSearch in Google Scholar

Li M. Thermodynamic analysis of adsorption enhanced reforming of ethanol. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2009; 34: 9362–9372.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.054Search in Google Scholar

Li S, Gong J. Strategies for improving the performance and stability of Ni-based catalysts for reforming reactions. Chem Soc Rev 2014; 43: 7245–7256.10.1039/C4CS00223GSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Li Z-s, Cai N-s, Yang J-b. Continuous production of hydrogen from sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming in two parallel fixed-bed reactors operated in a cyclic manner. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006; 45: 8788–8793.10.1021/ie061010xSearch in Google Scholar

Li Y, Wang W, Chen B, Cao Y. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production via glycerol steam reforming with CO₂ adsorption. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010; 35: 7768–7777.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.074Search in Google Scholar

Li B, Wei L, Yang H, Wang X, Chen H. The enhancing mechanism of calcium oxide on water gas shift reaction for hydrogen production. Energy 2014a; 68: 248–254.10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.088Search in Google Scholar

Li C-C, Wu U-T, Lin H-P. Cyclic performance of CaCO₃@mSiO₂ for CO₂ capture in a calcium looping cycle. J Mater Chem A 2014b; 2: 8252–8257.10.1039/C4TA00516CSearch in Google Scholar

Liguras DK, Kondarides DI, Verykios XE. Production of hydrogen for fuel cells by steam reforming of ethanol over supported noble metal catalysts. Appl Catal B 2003; 43: 345–354.10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00327-2Search in Google Scholar

Lima da Silva A, Müller IL. Hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of oxygenated hydrocarbons (ethanol, glycerol, n-butanol and methanol): thermodynamic modelling. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2011a; 36: 2057–2075.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.051Search in Google Scholar

Lima da Silva A, Müller IL. Towards H₂-rich gas production from unmixed steam reforming of methane: thermodynamic modeling. J Power Sources 2011b; 196: 8568–8582.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.035Search in Google Scholar

Lindborg H, Jakobsen HA. Sorption enhanced steam methane reforming process performance and bubbling fluidized bed reactor design analysis by use of a two-fluid model. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009; 48: 1332–1342.10.1021/ie800522pSearch in Google Scholar

Liu K, Song C, Subramani V. Hydrogen and syngas production and purification technologies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.10.1002/9780470561256Search in Google Scholar

Liu W, An H, Qin C, Yin J, Wang G, Feng B, Xu M. Performance enhancement of calcium oxide sorbents for cyclic CO₂ capture – a review. Energ Fuel 2012a; 26: 2751–2767.10.1021/ef300220xSearch in Google Scholar

Liu Y, Li Z, Xu L, Cai N. Effect of sorbent type on the sorption enhanced water gas shift process in a fluidized bed reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012b; 51: 11989–11997.10.1021/ie301100ySearch in Google Scholar

Llorca J, Homs N, Sales J, de la Piscina PR. Efficient production of hydrogen over supported cobalt catalysts from ethanol steam reforming. J Catal 2002; 209: 306–317.10.1006/jcat.2002.3643Search in Google Scholar

Llorca J, de la Piscina PR, Dalmon J-A, Sales J, Homs N. CO-free hydrogen from steam-reforming of bioethanol over ZnO-supported cobalt catalysts: effect of the metallic precursor. Appl Catal B 2003; 43: 355–369.10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00326-0Search in Google Scholar

Llorca J, Homs N, Sales J, Fierro J-LG, Ramírez de la Piscina P. Effect of sodium addition on the performance of Co-ZnO-based catalysts for hydrogen production from bioethanol. J Catal 2004; 222: 470–480.10.1016/j.jcat.2003.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Lopez Ortiz A, Harrison DP. Hydrogen production using sorption-enhanced reaction. Ind Eng Chem Res 2001; 40: 5102–5109.10.1021/ie001009cSearch in Google Scholar

Lu ZP, Rodrigues AE. Pressure swing adsorption reactors: simulation of three-step one-bed process. AIChE J 1994; 40: 1118–1137.10.1002/aic.690400705Search in Google Scholar

Lu ZP, Loureiro JM, Rodrigues AE. Simulation of pressure swing adsorption reactors. In: CHEMPOR’93. Int. Chem. Eng. Conf, Porto, Portugal, 1993a.Search in Google Scholar

Lu ZP, Loureiro JM, Rodrigues AE, Levan MD. Simulation of a three-step one-column pressure swing adsorption process. AIChE J 1993b; 39: 1483–1496.10.1002/aic.690390908Search in Google Scholar

Lu H, Lu Y, Rostam-Abadi M. CO₂ sorbents for a sorption-enhanced water-gas-shift process in IGCC plants: a thermodynamic analysis and process simulation study. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2013; 38: 6663–6672.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.067Search in Google Scholar

Lysikov A, Derevschikov V, Okunev A. Sorption-enhanced reforming of bioethanol in dual fixed bed reactor for continuous hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2015; 40: 14436–14444.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.029Search in Google Scholar

MacKenzie A, Granatstein DL, Anthony EJ, Abanades JC. Economics of CO₂ capture using the calcium cycle with a pressurized fluidized bed combustor. Energ Fuel 2007; 21: 920–926.10.1021/ef0603378Search in Google Scholar

Mahishi MR, Sadrameli MS, Vijayaraghavan S, Goswami DY. Hydrogen production from ethanol: a thermodynamic analysis of a novel sorbent enhanced gasification process. ASME Conf Proc 2005; 2005: 455–463.10.1115/IMECE2005-81458Search in Google Scholar

Manzolini G, Macchi E, Gazzani M. CO₂ capture in integrated gasification combined cycle with SEWGS – part B: economic assessment. Fuel 2013; 105: 220–227.10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.043Search in Google Scholar

Manzolini G, Jansen D, Wright AD. Sorption-enhanced fuel conversion. In: Gallucci F, Annaland MvS, editors. Process intensification for sustainable energy conversion. The Atrium: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Martavaltzi CS, Lemonidou AA. Hydrogen production via sorption enhanced reforming of methane: development of a novel hybrid material – reforming catalyst and CO₂ sorbent. Chem Eng Sci 2010; 65: 4134–4140.10.1016/j.ces.2010.04.038Search in Google Scholar

Mas V, Kipreos R, Amadeo N, Laborde M. Thermodynamic analysis of ethanol/water system with the stoichiometric method. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2006; 31: 21–28.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Mattos LV, Jacobs G, Davis BH, Noronha FB. Production of hydrogen from ethanol: review of reaction mechanism and catalyst deactivation. Chem Rev 2012; 112: 4094–4123.10.1021/cr2000114Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Mayorga SG, Hufton JR, Sircar S, Gaffney TR. Sorption enhanced reaction process for production of hydrogen. Phase 1 final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 1997.10.2172/631160Search in Google Scholar

Meyer J, Mastin J, Bjørnebøle T-K, Ryberg T, Eldrup N. Techno-economical study of the zero emission gas power concept. Energy Procedia 2011; 4: 1949–1956.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.075Search in Google Scholar

Morbidelli M, Servida A, Varma A. Optimal catalyst activity profiles in pellets. 1. The case of negligible external mass transfer resistance. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1982; 21: 278–284.10.1021/i100007a015Search in Google Scholar

Morgenstern DA, Fornango JP. Low-temperature reforming of ethanol over copper-plated Raney nickel: a new route to sustainable hydrogen for transportation. Energ Fuel 2005; 19: 1708–1716.10.1021/ef049692tSearch in Google Scholar

Motay MTD, Marechal M. Préparation industrielle de l’hydrogène. Bull Mens Soc Chim Paris 1868; 9: 334.Search in Google Scholar

Murray ML, Hugo Seymour E, Pimenta R. Towards a hydrogen economy in Portugal. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2007; 32: 3223–3229.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.02.027Search in Google Scholar

Nahar G, Dupont V. Hydrogen production from simple alkanes and oxygenated hydrocarbons over ceria-zirconia supported catalysts: review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2014; 32: 777–796.10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.040Search in Google Scholar

Nahil MA, Wang X, Wu C, Yang H, Chen H, Williams PT. Novel bi-functional Ni-Mg-Al-CaO catalyst for catalytic gasification of biomass for hydrogen production with in situ CO₂ adsorption. RSC Adv 2013; 3: 5583–5590.10.1039/c3ra40576aSearch in Google Scholar

Nair BN, Yamaguchi T, Kawamura H, Nakao S-I, Nakagawa K. Processing of lithium zirconate for applications in carbon dioxide separation: structure and properties of the powders. J Am Ceram Soc 2004; 87: 68–74.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00068.xSearch in Google Scholar

Najmi B, Bolland O, Westman SF. Simulation of the cyclic operation of a PSA-based SEWGS process for hydrogen production with CO₂ capture. Energy Procedia 2013; 37: 2293–2302.10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.110Search in Google Scholar

Nakagawa K, Ohashi T. A novel method of CO₂ capture from high temperature gases. J Electrochem Soc 1998; 145: 1344–1346.10.1149/1.1838462Search in Google Scholar

Ni M, Leung DY, Leung MK. A review on reforming bio-ethanol for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2007; 32: 3238–3247.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.038Search in Google Scholar

Ochoa-Fernández E, Rønning M, Grande T, Chen D. Nanocrystalline lithium zirconate with improved kinetics for high-temperature CO₂ capture. Chem Mater 2006; 18: 1383–1385.10.1021/cm052075dSearch in Google Scholar

Ochoa-Fernandez E, Haugen G, Zhao T, Ronning M, Aartun I, Borresen B, Rytter E, Ronnekleiv M, Chen D. Process design simulation of H₂ production by sorption enhanced steam methane reforming: evaluation of potential CO₂ acceptors. Green Chem 2007; 9: 654–662.10.1039/B614270BSearch in Google Scholar

Oliveira EL, Grande CA, Rodrigues AE. CO₂ sorption on hydrotalcite and alkali-modified (K and Cs) hydrotalcites at high temperatures. Sep Purif Technol 2008; 62: 137–147.10.1016/j.seppur.2008.01.011Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira ELG, Grande CA, Rodrigues AE. Effect of catalyst activity in SMR-SERP for hydrogen production: commercial vs. large-pore catalyst. Chem Eng Sci 2011; 66: 342–354.10.1016/j.ces.2010.10.030Search in Google Scholar

Palo DR, Dagle RA, Holladay JD. Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production. Chem Rev 2007; 107: 3992–4021.10.1021/cr050198bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Panagiotopoulou P, Papadopoulou C, Matralis H, Verykios X. Production of renewable hydrogen by reformation of biofuels. Wiley Interdisc Rev Energ Environ 2014; 3: 231–253.10.1002/9781118957844.ch9Search in Google Scholar

Pröll T, Kolbitsch P, Bolhàr-Nordenkampf J, Hofbauer H. A novel dual circulating fluidized bed system for chemical looping processes. AIChE J 2009; 55: 3255–3266.10.1002/aic.11934Search in Google Scholar

Ram Reddy MK, Xu ZP, Lu GQ, Diniz da Costa JC. Layered double hydroxides for CO₂ capture: structure evolution and regeneration. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006; 45: 7504–7509.10.1021/ie060757kSearch in Google Scholar

Ratnasamy C, Wagner JP. Water gas shift catalysis. Catal Rev 2009; 51: 325–440.10.1080/01614940903048661Search in Google Scholar

Rawadieh S, Gomes VG. Catalyst-adsorbent configurations in enhancing adsorptive reactor performance. Int J Chem React Eng 2007; 5: 1–19.10.2202/1542-6580.1428Search in Google Scholar

Rawadieh S, Gomes V. An integrated multifunctional reactor for steam reforming. In: 8th World Congress of Chemical Engineering. Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering, Montréal, 2009a.Search in Google Scholar

Rawadieh S, Gomes VG. Steam reforming for hydrogen generation with in situ adsorptive separation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2009b; 34: 343–355.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.10.038Search in Google Scholar

Reßler S, Elsner MP, Dittrich C, Geisler S. Reactive gas adsorption. In: Integrated reaction and separation operations. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 149–190.10.1007/3-540-30304-9_4Search in Google Scholar

Reijers HTJ, Valster-Schiermeier SEA, Cobden PD, van den Brink RW. Hydrotalcite as CO₂ sorbent for sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane. Ind Eng Chem Res 2005; 45: 2522–2530.10.1021/ie050563pSearch in Google Scholar

Reijers HTJ, Valster-Schiermeier SEA, Cobden PD, van den Brink RW. Hydrotalcite as CO₂ sorbent for sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006; 45: 2522–2530.10.1021/ie050563pSearch in Google Scholar

Reijers HTJ, Elzinga GD, Cobden PD, Haije WG, van den Brink RW. Tandem bed configuration for sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011a; 5: 531–537.10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.007Search in Google Scholar

Reijers R, van Selow E, Cobden P, Boon J, van den Brink R. SEWGS process cycle optimization. Energy Procedia 2011b; 4: 1155–1161.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.168Search in Google Scholar

Ribeiro AM, Grande CA, Lopes FV, Loureiro JM, Rodrigues AE. A parametric study of layered bed PSA for hydrogen purification. Chem Eng Sci 2008; 63: 5258–5273.10.1016/j.ces.2008.07.017Search in Google Scholar

Ritter JA, Ebner AD. State-of-the-art adsorption and membrane separation processes for hydrogen production in the chemical and petrochemical industries. Sep Sci Technol 2007; 42: 1123–1193.10.1080/01496390701242194Search in Google Scholar

Rohland B, Plzak V. The PEMFC-integrated CO oxidation – a novel method of simplifying the fuel cell plant. J Power Source 1999; 84: 183–186.10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00315-8Search in Google Scholar

Rostrup-Nielsen JR. Catalytic steam reforming. In: Andersen JR, Boudart M, editors. Catalysis: science and technology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Rostrup-Nielsen JR. Fuels and energy for the future: the role of catalysis. Catal Rev Sci Eng 2004; 46: 247–270.10.1081/CR-200036716Search in Google Scholar

Rostrup-Nielsen JR. Steam reforming. In: Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Rostrup-Nielsen JR, Rostrup-Nielsen T. Large-scale hydrogen production. CATTECH 2002; 6: 150–159.10.1023/A:1020163012266Search in Google Scholar

Rout KR, Jakobsen HA. A numerical study of pellets having both catalytic- and capture properties for SE-SMR process: kinetic- and product layer diffusion controlled regimes. Fuel Process Technol 2013; 106: 231–246.10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.07.029Search in Google Scholar

Rusten HK, Ochoa-Fernández E, Chen D, Jakobsen HA. Numerical investigation of sorption enhanced steam methane reforming using Li₂ZrO₃ as CO₂-acceptor. Ind Eng Chem Res 2007a; 46: 4435–4443.10.1021/ie061525oSearch in Google Scholar

Rusten HK, Ochoa-Fernández E, Lindborg H, Chen D, Jakobsen HA. Hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming using lithium oxides as CO₂-acceptor. Ind Eng Chem Res 2007b; 46: 8729–8737.10.1021/ie070770kSearch in Google Scholar

Sá S, Silva H, Brandão L, Sousa JM, Mendes A. Catalysts for methanol steam reforming – a review. Appl Catal B 2010; 99: 43–57.10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.015Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez R, Chao Z, Solsvik J, Jakobsen H. One dimensional two-fluid model simulations of the SE-SMR process operated in a circulating fluidized bed reactor. Procedia Eng 2012; 42: 1282–1291.10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.520Search in Google Scholar

San Román MS, Holgado MJ, Jaubertie C, Rives V. Synthesis, characterisation and delamination behaviour of lactate-intercalated Mg,Al-hydrotalcite-like compounds. Solid State Sci 2008; 10: 1333–1341.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2008.01.026Search in Google Scholar

Sardin M, Villermaux J. Esterification catalysee par une resine echangeuse de cation dans un reacteur chromatographique. Nouv J Chim 1979; 3: 255–261.Search in Google Scholar

Satrio JA, Shanks BH, Wheelock TD. Development of a novel combined catalyst and sorbent for hydrocarbon reforming. Ind Eng Chem Res 2005; 44: 3901–3911.10.1021/ie040284mSearch in Google Scholar

Schmidt-Traub H, Górak A. Integrated reaction and separation operations modelling and experimental validation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Sehested J. Four challenges for nickel steam-reforming catalysts. Catal Today 2006; 111: 103–110.10.1016/j.cattod.2005.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Shokrollahi Yancheshmeh M, Radfarnia HR, Iliuta MC. High temperature CO₂ sorbents and their application for hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam reforming process. Chem Eng J 2016; 283: 420–444.10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.060Search in Google Scholar

Smith R, Loganathan M, Shantha MS. A review of the water gas shift reaction kinetics. Int J Chem React Eng 2010; 8: 1–32.10.2202/1542-6580.2238Search in Google Scholar

Solsvik J, Jakobsen HA. A numerical study of a two property catalyst/sorbent pellet design for the sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming process: modeling complexity and parameter sensitivity study. Chem Eng J 2011; 178: 407–422.10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.045Search in Google Scholar

Solsvik J, Jakobsen HA. A two property catalyst/sorbent pellet design for the sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming process: mathematical modeling and numerical analysis. Energy Procedia 2012; 26: 31–40.10.1016/j.egypro.2012.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Solsvik J, Chao Z, Jakobsen HA. Modeling and simulation of bubbling fluidized bed reactors using a dynamic one-dimensional two-fluid model: the sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming process. Adv Eng Software 2015; 80: 156–173.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.011Search in Google Scholar

Soykal II, Sohn H, Ozkan US. Effect of support particle size in steam reforming of ethanol over Co/CeO₂ catalysts. ACS Catal 2012; 2: 2335–2348.10.1021/cs3004159Search in Google Scholar

Sultana KS, Chen D. Enhanced hydrogen production by in situ CO₂ removal on CaCeZrO_x nanocrystals. Catal Today 2011; 171: 43–51.10.1016/j.cattod.2011.04.019Search in Google Scholar

Sun J, Wang Y. Recent advances in catalytic conversion of ethanol to chemicals. ACS Catal 2014; 4: 1078–1090.10.1021/cs4011343Search in Google Scholar

Sundmacher K, Kienle A, Seidel-Morgenstern A. Integrated chemical processes: synthesis, operation, analysis, and control. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2005.10.1002/3527605738Search in Google Scholar

Ulibarri MA, Pavlovic I, Barriga C, Hermosín MC, Cornejo J. Adsorption of anionic species on hydrotalcite-like compounds: effect of interlayer anion and crystallinity. Appl Clay Sci 2001; 18: 17–27.10.1016/S0169-1317(00)00026-0Search in Google Scholar

Vaidya PD, Rodrigues AE. Insight into steam reforming of ethanol to produce hydrogen for fuel cells. Chem Eng J 2006; 117: 39–49.10.1016/j.cej.2005.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Vaidya PD, Rodrigues AE. Glycerol reforming for hydrogen production: a review. Chem Eng Technol 2009; 32: 1463–1469.10.1002/ceat.200900120Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk E, Walspurger S, Cobden P, van den Brink R. Testing of hydrotalcite based sorbents for CO₂ and H₂S capture for use in sorption enhanced water gas shift. Energy Procedia 2011a; 4: 1110–1117.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.162Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk HAJ, Walspurger S, Cobden PD, van den Brink RW, de Vos FG. Testing of hydrotalcite-based sorbents for CO₂ and H₂S capture for use in sorption enhanced water gas shift. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011b; 5: 505–511.10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.011Search in Google Scholar

van Selow ER, Cobden PD, Verbraeken PA, Hufton JR, van den Brink RW. Carbon capture by sorption-enhanced water-gas shift reaction process using hydrotalcite-based material. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009; 48: 4184–4193.10.1021/ie801713aSearch in Google Scholar

van Selow ER, Cobden PD, van Dijk HAJ, Walspurger S, Verbraeken PA, Jansen D. Qualification of the ALKASORB sorbent for the sorption-enhanced water-gas shift process. Energy Procedia 2013; 37: 180–189.10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.100Search in Google Scholar

Waldron WE, Hufton JR, Sircar S. Production of hydrogen by cyclic sorption enhanced reaction process. AIChE J 2001; 47: 1477–1479.10.1002/aic.690470623Search in Google Scholar

Wang Y-N, Rodrigues AE. Hydrogen production from steam methane reforming coupled with in situ CO₂ capture: conceptual parametric study. Fuel 2005; 84: 1778–1789.10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.005Search in Google Scholar

Wang J-H, Lee C, Lin M. Mechanism of ethanol reforming: theoretical foundations. J Phys Chem C 2009; 113: 6681–6688.10.1021/jp810307hSearch in Google Scholar

Wang W, Cao Y. Hydrogen production via sorption enhanced steam reforming of butanol: thermodynamic analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2011; 36: 2887–2895.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.110Search in Google Scholar

Wang X, Li M, Li S, Wang H, Wang S, Ma X. Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming with/without calcium oxide sorbent: a comparative study of thermodynamic and experimental work. Fuel Process Technol 2010a; 91: 1812–1818.10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Wang Y, Chao Z, Jakobsen HA. 3D simulation of bubbling fluidized bed reactors for sorption enhanced steam methane reforming processes. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2010b; 2: 105–113.10.1016/j.jngse.2010.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Wang Y, Chao Z, Jakobsen HA. CFD modelling of CO₂ capture in the SE-SMR process in the fluidized bed reactors. Chem Eng Trans 2010c; 21: 601–606.Search in Google Scholar

Wang Q, Luo J, Zhong Z, Borgna A. CO₂ capture by solid adsorbents and their applications: current status and new trends. Energ Environ Sci 2011a; 4: 42–55.10.1039/C0EE00064GSearch in Google Scholar

Wang S, Yan S, Ma X, Gong J. Recent advances in capture of carbon dioxide using alkali-metal-based oxides. Energ Environ Sci 2011b; 4: 3805–3819.10.1039/c1ee01116bSearch in Google Scholar

Wang X, Wang N, Wang L. Hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of propane: a thermodynamic investigation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2011c; 36: 466–472.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.021Search in Google Scholar

Wang Y, Chao Z, Chen D, Jakobsen HA. SE-SMR process performance in CFB reactors: simulation of the CO₂ adsorption/desorption processes with CaO based sorbents. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011d; 5: 489–497.10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Wang Y, Chao Z, Jakobsen HA. Numerical study of hydrogen production by the sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming process with online CO₂ capture as operated in fluidized bed reactors. Clean Technol Environ Policy 2011e; 13: 559–565.10.1007/s10098-011-0368-ySearch in Google Scholar

Wang S, Shen H, Fan S, Zhao Y, Ma X, Gong J. Enhanced CO₂ adsorption capacity and stability using CaO-based adsorbents treated by hydration. AIChE J 2013; 59: 3586–3593.10.1002/aic.14126Search in Google Scholar

Wang C, Dou B, Song Y, Chen H, Xu Y, Xie B. High temperature CO₂ sorption on Li₂ZrO₃ based sorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014a; 53: 12744–12752.10.1021/ie502042pSearch in Google Scholar

Wang J, Huang L, Yang R, Zhang Z, Wu J, Gao Y, Wang Q, O’Hare D, Zhong Z. Recent advances in solid sorbents for CO₂ capture and new development trends. Energ Environ Sci 2014b; 7: 3478–3518.10.1039/C4EE01647ESearch in Google Scholar

Wang J, Wang Y, Jakobsen HA. The modeling of circulating fluidized bed reactors for SE-SMR process and sorbent regeneration. Chem Eng Sci 2014c; 108: 57–65.10.1016/j.ces.2013.12.012Search in Google Scholar

Wang C, Dou B, Jiang B, Song Y, Du B, Zhang C, Wang K, Chen H, Xu Y. Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol on Ni-based multifunctional catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2015a; 40: 7037–7044.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.023Search in Google Scholar

Wang W, Xu Z, Guo Z, Jiang C, Chu W. Layered double hydroxide and related catalysts for hydrogen production and a biorefinery. Chin J Catal 2015b; 36: 139–147.10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60229-1Search in Google Scholar

Wess R, Nores-Pondal F, Laborde M, Giunta P. Single stage H₂ production, purification and heat supply by means of sorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol. A thermodynamic analysis. Chem Eng Sci 2015; 134: 86–95.10.1016/j.ces.2015.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Williams GR, O’Hare D. Towards understanding, control and application of layered double hydroxide chemistry. J Mater Chem 2006; 16: 3065–3074.10.1039/b604895aSearch in Google Scholar

Wiltowski T, Mondal K, Campen A, Dasgupta D, Konieczny A. Reaction swing approach for hydrogen production from carbonaceous fuels. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2008; 33: 293–302.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.07.053Search in Google Scholar

Wright AD, White V, Hufton JR, Quinn R, Cobden PD, van Selow ER. CAESAR: development of a SEWGS model for IGCC. Energy Procedia 2011; 4: 1147–1154.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.167Search in Google Scholar

Wu X, Wu S. Production of high-purity hydrogen by sorption-enhanced steam reforming process of methanol. J Energ Chem 2015; 24: 315–321.10.1016/S2095-4956(15)60317-5Search in Google Scholar

Wu G, Zhang C, Li S, Huang Z, Yan S, Wang S, Ma X, Gong J. Sorption enhanced steam reforming of ethanol on Ni-CaO-Al₂O₃ multifunctional catalysts derived from hydrotalcite-like compounds. Energ Environ Sci 2012a; 5: 8942–8949.10.1039/c2ee21995fSearch in Google Scholar

Wu Y-J, Díaz-Alvarado FA, Santos JC, Gracia F, Cunha AF, Rodrigues AE. Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of ethanol: thermodynamic comparison of CO₂ sorbents. Chem Eng Technol 2012b; 35: 847–858.10.1002/ceat.201100534Search in Google Scholar

Wu HJ, La Parola V, Pantaleo G, Puleo F, Venezia AM, Liotta LF. Ni-based catalysts for low temperature methane steam reforming: recent results on Ni-Au and comparison with other bi-metallic systems. Catalysts 2013a; 3: 563–583.10.3390/catal3020563Search in Google Scholar

Wu Y-J, Li P, Yu J-G, Cunha AF, Rodrigues AE. K-promoted hydrotalcites for CO₂ capture in sorption enhanced reactions. Chem Eng Technol 2013b; 36: 567–574.10.1002/ceat.201200694Search in Google Scholar

Wu Y-J, Li P, Yu J-G, Cunha AF, Rodrigues AE. Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of ethanol on NiMgAl multifunctional materials: experimental and numerical investigation. Chem Eng J 2013c; 231: 36–48.10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.125Search in Google Scholar

Wu Y-J, Li P, Yu J-G, Cunha AF, Rodrigues AE. Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of ethanol for continuous high-purity hydrogen production: 2D adsorptive reactor dynamics and process design. Chem Eng Sci 2014a; 118: 83–93.10.1016/j.ces.2014.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Wu Y-J, Li P, Yu J, Cunha AF, Rodrigues AE. High-purity hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced steam reforming of ethanol: a cyclic operation simulation study. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014b; 53: 8515–8527.10.1021/ie403265kSearch in Google Scholar

Xie M, Zhou Z, Qi Y, Cheng Z, Yuan W. Sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming by in situ CO₂ capture on a CaO-Ca₉Al₆O₁₈ sorbent. Chem Eng J 2012; 207–208: 142–150.10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.032Search in Google Scholar

Xiong R, Ida J, Lin YS. Kinetics of carbon dioxide sorption on potassium-doped lithium zirconate. Chem Eng Sci 2003; 58: 4377–4385.10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00319-1Search in Google Scholar

Xiu G-h, Li P, Rodrigues AE. Sorption-enhanced reaction process with reactive regeneration. Chem Eng Sci 2002a; 57: 3893–3908.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00245-2Search in Google Scholar

Xiu G-h, Soares JL, Li P, Rodrigues AE. Simulation of five-step one-bed sorption-enhanced reaction process. AIChE J 2002b; 48: 2817–2832.10.1002/aic.690481210Search in Google Scholar

Xiu G-h, Li P, Rodrigues AE. New generalized strategy for improving sorption-enhanced reaction process. Chem Eng Sci 2003; 58: 3425–3437.10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00200-8Search in Google Scholar

Xiu GH, Li P, Rodrigues AE. Subsection-controlling strategy for improving sorption-enhanced reaction process. Chem Eng Res Des 2004; 82: 192–202.10.1205/026387604772992765Search in Google Scholar

Xu J, Froment GF. Methane steam reforming, methanation and water-gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics. AIChE J 1989; 35: 88–96.10.1002/aic.690350109Search in Google Scholar

Xu P, Zhou Z, Zhao C, Cheng Z. Catalytic performance of Ni/CaO-Ca₅Al₆O₁₄ bifunctional catalyst extrudate in sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming. Catal Today 2016; 259: 347–353.10.1016/j.cattod.2015.05.026Search in Google Scholar

Yang RT. Adsorbents Fundamentals and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2003.10.1002/047144409XSearch in Google Scholar

Yang W, Kim Y, Liu PKT, Sahimi M, Tsotsis TT. A study by in situ techniques of the thermal evolution of the structure of a Mg-Al-CO₃ layered double hydroxide. Chem Eng Sci 2002; 57: 2945–2953.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00185-9Search in Google Scholar

Yin J, Qin C, An H, Liu W, Feng B. High-temperature pressure swing adsorption process for CO₂ separation. Energ Fuel 2011; 26: 169–175.10.1021/ef201142wSearch in Google Scholar

Yong Z, Rodrigues AE. Hydrotalcite-like compounds as adsorbents for carbon dioxide. Energy Convers Manage 2002; 43: 1865–1876.10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00125-XSearch in Google Scholar

Yong Z, Mata VG, Rodrigues AE. Adsorption of carbon dioxide onto hydrotalcite-like compounds (HTlcs) at high temperatures. Ind Eng Chem Res 2000; 40: 204–209.10.1021/ie000238wSearch in Google Scholar

Yong Z, Mata V, Rodrigues AE. Adsorption of carbon dioxide at high temperature – a review. Sep Purif Technol 2002; 26: 195–205.10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00165-4Search in Google Scholar

Yong ST, Ooi CW, Chai S-P, Wu X. Review of methanol reforming-Cu-based catalysts, surface reaction mechanisms, and reaction schemes. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2013; 38: 9541–9552.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.023Search in Google Scholar

Yu C-H, Huang C-H, Tan C-S. A review of CO₂ capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2012; 12: 745–769.10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132Search in Google Scholar

Züttel A, Borgschulte A, Schlapbach L. Hydrogen as a Future Energy Carrier. Darmstadt, Germany: Wiley, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang Q, Han D, Liu Y, Ye Q, Zhu Z. Analysis of CO₂ sorption/desorption kinetic behaviors and reaction mechanisms on Li₄SiO₄. AIChE J 2013; 59: 901–911.10.1002/aic.13861Search in Google Scholar

Zhu X, Wang Q, Shi Y, Cai N. Layered double oxide/activated carbon-based composite adsorbent for elevated temperature H₂/CO₂ separation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2015; 40: 9244–9253.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.116Search in Google Scholar