Computational approach to the study of morphological properties of polymer/fullerene blends in photovoltaics

References

[1] Jo J, Kim SS, Na SI, Yu BK, Kim DY. Time‐dependent morphology evolution by annealing processes on polymer:fullerene blend solar cells. Adv Funct Mater. 2009;19:866–74.10.1002/adfm.200800968Search in Google Scholar

[2] Wang M, Zhu L, Zhou M, Jiang C, Li Q. High efficiency organic bulk-heterojunction solar cells applying a new system of co-additives. Mater Lett. 2016;166:227–30.10.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.088Search in Google Scholar

[3] Nelson J. Polymer:fulerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Mater Today. 2011;14:462–70.10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70210-3Search in Google Scholar

[4] Brady MA, Su GM, Chabinyc ML. Recent progress in the morphology of bulk heterojunction photovoltaics. Soft Matt. 2011;7:11065–77.10.1039/c1sm06147jSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Scharber MC, Sariciftci NS. Efficiency of bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells. Prog Poly Sci. 2013;38:1929–40.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Sharma GD, Mikroyannidis JA, Roy SSS,MS, Thomas KRJ. Efficient bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices based on diketopyrrolopyrrole containing small molecule as donor and modified PCBM derivatives as electron acceptors. Organ Electr. 2012;13:1763–64.10.1016/j.orgel.2011.11.021Search in Google Scholar

[7] Liang Y, Xu Z, Xia J, Tsai ST, Wu Y, Li G, et al. For the bright future-bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells with power conversion efficiency of 7.4%. Adv Mater. 2010;22:135–38.10.1002/adma.200903528Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Yuan Y, Reece T, Sharma J,P, Poddar S, Ducharme S, Gruverman A, et al. Efficiency enhancement in organic solar cells with ferroelectric polymers. Nat Mater. 2011;10:296–302.10.1038/nmat2951Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Liu C, Zhan X, Li Z, He Y, Li J, Shen L, et al. Efficiency improvement of inverted organic solar cells via introducing a series of polyfluorene dots in electron transport layer. J Phys Chem C. 2015;29:16462–67.10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04079Search in Google Scholar

[10] Pastore M, Mosconi E, Angelis FD, Grätzel M. A computational investigation of organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells–benchmark, strategies, and open issues. J Phys Chem C. 2010;15:7205–12.10.1021/jp100713rSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Watkins PK, Walker AB, Verschoor GLB. Dynamical Monte Carlo Modelling of organic solar cells–the dependence of internal quantum efficiency on morphology. Nano Lett. 2005;9:1814–18.10.1021/nl051098oSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Arı M, Kanat Z, Dinçer H. Design, computational screening and synthesis of novel non-peripherally tetra hexylthio-substituted phthalocyanines as bulk heterojunction solar cell materials. Sol Ener Mater Sol Cell. 2016;134:1–8.10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.041Search in Google Scholar

[13] Deibel C, Dyakonov V. Polymer–fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Rep Prog Phys. 2010;73:1–39.10.1088/0034-4885/73/9/096401Search in Google Scholar

[14] Zhou H, Zhang Y, Seifter J, Collins SD, Luo C, Bazan GC, et al. High-efficiency polymer solar cells enhanced by solvent treatment. Adv Mater. 2013;25:1646–52.10.1002/adma.201204306Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Kumar CV, Cabau L, Viterisi A, Biswas S, Sharma GD, Palomares E. Solvent annealing control of bulk heterojunction organic solar cells with 6.6% efficiency based on a benzodithiophene donor core and dicyano acceptor units. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:20871–79.10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07130Search in Google Scholar

[16] Verploegen E, Mondal R, Bettinger CJ, Sok S, Toney MF, Bao Z. Effects of thermal annealing upon the morphology of polymer–fullerene blends. Adv Funct Mater. 2010;20:3519–29.10.1002/adfm.201000975Search in Google Scholar

[17] Krishnaswamy RK, Yang Q. Influence of phase segregation on the mechanical properties of binary blends of polyethylenes that differ considerably in molecular weight. Poly. 2007;48:5348–54.10.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.018Search in Google Scholar

[18] Bernardo G, Bucknall DG. Recent progress in the understanding and manipulation of morphology in polymer: fullerene photovoltaic cells. Optoelectr Adv Mater Dev. 2013;9:208–27.10.5772/51115Search in Google Scholar

[19] Xavier P, Rao P, Bose S. Nanoparticle induced miscibility in LCST polymer blends: critically assessing the enthalpic and entropic effects. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:47–64.10.1039/C5CP05852JSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Raba A, Cordan AS, Leroy Y. Two-dimensional simulation of organic bulk heterojunction solar cell: influence of the morphology. J Nanosci Nanotech. 2013;13:5164–69.10.1166/jnn.2013.7501Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Ragnetti M, Geiser D, Hocker H, Oberthur RC. Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) of cyclic and linear polystyrene in toluene. Macromol Chem. 1985;186:1701–09.10.1002/macp.1985.021860819Search in Google Scholar

[22] Roovers J. Dilute-solution properties of ring polystyrenes. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed. 1985;23:1117–26.10.1002/pol.1985.180230604Search in Google Scholar

[23] Hadziioannou G, Cotts PM, Tenbrinke G, Han CC, Lutzs P, Strazielle C, et al. Thermodynamic and hydrodynamic properties of dilute solutions of cyclic and linear polystyrenes. Macromol. 1987;20:493–97.10.1021/ma00169a006Search in Google Scholar

[24] Geyler S, Pakula T. Conformation of ring polymers in computer simulated melts. Macromol Chem Rapid Comm. 1988;9:617–23.10.1002/marc.1988.030090904Search in Google Scholar

[25] Iyer BVS, Lele AK, Shanbhag S. What is the size of a ring polymer in a ring-linear blend?Macromol. 2007;40:5995–6000.10.1021/ma0709295Search in Google Scholar

[26] M¨Uller M, Wittmer JP, Cates ME. Topological effects in ring polymers II: influence of persistence length. Phys Rev E. 2000;61:4078–89.10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4078Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Brown S, Lenczycki T, Szamel G. Influence of topological constraints on the statics and dynamics of ring polymers. Phys Rev E. 2001;63:1–4.10.1103/PhysRevE.63.052801Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Brown S, Szamel G. Computer simulation study of the structure and dynamics of ring polymers. J Chem Phys. 1998;109:6184–92.10.1063/1.477247Search in Google Scholar

[29] M¨Uller M, Wittmer JP, Cates ME. Topological effects in ring polymers: a computer simulation study. Phys Rev E. 1996;53:5063–74.10.1103/PhysRevE.53.5063Search in Google Scholar

[30] Cates ME, Deutsch JM. Conjectures on the statistics of ring polymers. J Phys. 1986;47:2121–28.10.1051/jphys:0198600470120212100Search in Google Scholar

[31] Halverson JD, Grest GS, Grosberg AY, Kremer K. Rheology of ring polymer melts: from linear contaminants to ring-linear blends. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:1–5.10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.038301Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Lee CK, Pao CW, Chen. CW. Multiscale molecular simulations of the nanoscale morphologies of P3HT: PCBM blends for bulk heterojunction organic photovoltaic cells. Ener Environ Sci. 2011;4:4124–32.10.1039/c1ee01508gSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Huang DM, Faller R, Do K, Moule AJ. Coarse-grained computer simulations of polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunctions for organic photovoltaic applications. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6:526–37.10.1021/ct900496tSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Huang DM, Moule AJ, Faller R. Characterization of polymer–fullerene mixtures for organic photovoltaics by systematically coarse-grained molecular simulations. Fluid Phas Equil. 2011;302:2–25.10.1016/j.fluid.2010.07.025Search in Google Scholar

[35] Kremer K, Grest GS. Dynamics of entangled linear polymer melts:  a molecular‐dynamics simulation. J Chem Phys. 1990;92:5057–64.10.1063/1.458541Search in Google Scholar

[36] Grest GS, Kremer K. Molecular dynamics simulation for polymers in the presence of a heat bath. Phys Rev. 1986;33:3628–31.10.1103/PhysRevA.33.3628Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Pellicane G, Tchoukouegno MM, Mola TG, Tsige M. Surface segregation driven by polymer topology. Phys Rev E. 2016;93:1–5.10.1103/PhysRevE.93.050501Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Megnidio-Tchoukouegno M, Gaitho FM, Mola GT, Tsige M, Pellicane G. Unravelling the surface composition of symmetric linear-cyclic polymer blends. Fluid Phas Equil. 2017;441:33–42.10.1016/j.fluid.2017.02.004Search in Google Scholar

[39] Weeks JD, Chandler J, Andersen HC. Role of repulsive forces in determining the equilibrium structure of simple liquids. J Chem Phys. 1971;54:5237–47.10.1063/1.1674820Search in Google Scholar

[40] Plimpton SJ. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys. 1995;117:1–19.10.2172/10176421Search in Google Scholar

[41] Kong J, Hwang IW, Lee K. Top-down approach for nanophase reconstruction in bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv Mater. 2014;26:1–8.10.1002/adma.201402182Search in Google Scholar

[42] Li TSI, Walker GC. Interfacial free energy governs single polystyrene chain collapse in water and aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:6530–40.10.1021/ja101155hSearch in Google Scholar

[43] Ray B, Nair PR, Garcia RE. Modeling and optimization of polymer based Bulk Heterojunction (BH) solar cell. Birck NCN Publicat. 2009;(Paper 521):1–5.10.1109/IEDM.2009.5424282Search in Google Scholar

[44] Lifshitz M, Slyozov VV. The kinetics of precipitation from supersaturated solid solutions. J Phys Chem Solid. 1961;19:35–50.10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3Search in Google Scholar

[45] Ji Y, Du C, Xu X, Hou T, Li Y. Characterising the morphology and efficiency of polymer solar cell by experiments and simulations. Molec Simul. 2016;42:836–45.10.1080/08927022.2015.1114176Search in Google Scholar

[46] Masahiko S, Itaru O, Yasuhito S, Kazuo T, Takashi O, Satoru I, et al. Highly efficient and stable solar cells based on thiazolothiazole and naphthobisthiadiazole copolymers. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–5.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Liang Y, Feng D, Wu Y, Tsai ST, Li G, Ray C, et al. Highly efficient solar cell polymers developed via fine-tuning of structural and electronic properties. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:7792–99.10.1021/ja901545qSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Walker B, Tamayo AB, Dang XD, Zalar P, Seo JH, Garcia A, et al. Nanoscale phase separation and high photovoltaic efficiency in solution-processed, small-molecule bulk heterojunction solar cell. Adv Funct Mater. 2009;19:3063–69.10.1002/adfm.200900832Search in Google Scholar

[49] Nam YM, Huh J, Jo WH. Optimization of thickness and morphology of active layer for high performance of bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells. Sol Ener Mater Sol Cell. 2010;94:1118–24.10.1016/j.solmat.2010.02.041Search in Google Scholar

[50] Allen JE, Black CT. Improved power conversion efficiency in bulk heterojunction organic solar cells with radial electron contacts. Acs Nano. 2011;5:7986–91.10.1021/nn2031963Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Zhou S, Sun JX. Mobility dependent effciencies of organic bulk-heterojunction solar cells with recommbination via tail. Int J Moder Phys B. 2013;27:28–32.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Tchoukouegno MM, Pellicane G, Tsige M, Mola GT. Nano-scale morphology dependent performance of thin film organic solar cells. J Mater Sci: Mater Electr. 2016;28:214–21.10.1007/s10854-016-5513-2Search in Google Scholar

[53] Facchetti A. π-Conjugated polymers for organic electronics and photovoltaic cell applications. Chem Mater. 2011;23:733–58.10.1021/cm102419zSearch in Google Scholar

[54] Shirakawa H, McDiarmid A, Heeger A. Focus article: twenty-five years of conducting polymers. Chem Comm. 2003;1:1–4.10.1039/b210718jSearch in Google Scholar

[55] Yu G, Gao J, Hummelen JC, Wudl F, Heeger AJ. Polymer photovoltaic cells: enhanced efficiencies via a network of internal donor-acceptor heterojunctions. Sci. 1995;270:1789–91.10.1126/science.270.5243.1789Search in Google Scholar

[56] Mola GT, Newayemedhin A. Correlation between LUMO offset of donor/acceptor molecules to an open circuit voltage in bulk heterojunction solar cell. Phys B: Cond Matt. 2014;445:56–59.10.1016/j.physb.2014.04.004Search in Google Scholar

[57] Peet J. Efficiency enhancement in low-bandgap polymer solar cells by processing with alkane dithiols. Nat Mater. 2007;6:497–500.10.1142/9789814317665_0006Search in Google Scholar

[58] Lee JK, Ma WL, Brabec CJ, Yuen J, Moon SJ, Kim JY, et al. Processing additives for improved efficiency from bulk heterojunction solar cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;139:3619–23.10.1021/ja710079wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Chan H. Polymer solar cells with enhanced open-circuit voltage and efficiency. Nat Photon. 2009;3:649–53.10.1038/nphoton.2009.192Search in Google Scholar

[60] Hou L. Replacing alkoxy groups with alkylthienyl groups–a feasible approach to improve the properties of photovoltaic polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011;50:9697–6702.10.1002/anie.201103313Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Aich BR, Lu J, Beaupré S, Leclerc M, Tao Y. Control of the active layer nanomorphology by using coadditives towards high-performance bulk heterojunction solar cells. Org Electron. 2012;13:1736–41.10.1016/j.orgel.2012.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[62] Zhang S, Ye L, Zhao W, Yang B, Wang Q, Hou J. Realizing over 10% efficiency in polymer solar cell by device optimization. Sci China Chem. 2014;58:248–56.10.1007/s11426-014-5273-xSearch in Google Scholar

[63] Varun V, Kazuaki K, Takeshi K, Tomoyuki K, Itaru O, Kazuo T, et al. Efficient inverted polymer solar cells employing favourable molecular orientation. Nat Photon. 2015;9:403–08.10.1038/nphoton.2015.84Search in Google Scholar

[64] Sungho N, Gyoelim B, Park S, Lee BR, Cha MJ, Lim DC, et al. Highly efficient inverted bulk-heterojunction solar cells with a gradiently-doped ZnO layer. Ener Environ Sci. 2016;9:240–46.10.1039/C5EE03045ESearch in Google Scholar

[65] Yiwei Z, Nicholas SW, Tao W, David LG. Fabricating high performance conventional and inverted polymer solar cells by spray coating in air. Vacuum. 2017;139:154–58.10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.09.017Search in Google Scholar

[66] Swager TM. 50th Anniversary perspective: conducting/semiconducting conjugated polymers. A personal perspective on the past and the future. Macromol. 2017;50:4867–86.10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00582Search in Google Scholar

[67] Weinberger BR, Akhtar M, Gau C. Polyacetylene photovoltaic devices. Synth Met. 1982;4:187–97.10.1016/0379-6779(82)90012-1Search in Google Scholar

[68] Scott JC, Karg S, Carter SA. Bipolar charge and current distributions in organic light-emitting diodes. J Appl Phys. 1993;82:1454–60.10.1063/1.365923Search in Google Scholar

[69] Holger S, Krebs FC. A brief history of the development of organic and polymeric photovoltaics. Sol Ener Mater Sol Cell. 2004;83:125–46.10.1016/j.solmat.2004.02.021Search in Google Scholar

[70] Zhang T, Birgersson E, Luther J. Closed-form expressions correlating exciton transport and interfacial charge carrier generation with the donor/acceptor morphology in organic bulk heterojunction solar cells. Phys B-Cond Matt. 2015;456:267–74.10.1016/j.physb.2014.08.051Search in Google Scholar

[71] Pramanik A, Sarkar B, Pal S, Sarkar P. Pentacene–fullerene bulk-heterojunction solar cell–a computational study. Phys Lett A. 2015;379:1036–42.10.1016/j.physleta.2015.01.040Search in Google Scholar

[72] Chen D, Zhang C, Wang Z, Zhang J, Feng Q, Xu S, et al. Performance comparison of conventional and inverted organic bulk heterojunction solar cells From optical and electrical aspects. IEEE Trans Electr Dev. 2013;60:451–57.10.1109/TED.2012.2224114Search in Google Scholar

[73] Oseni SO, Mola GT. Properties of functional layers in inverted thin film organic solar cells. Sol Ener Mater Sol Cell. 2017;160:241–56.10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.036Search in Google Scholar

[74] Oseni SO, Mola GT. The effect of uni- and binary solvent additives in PTB7:PC61BM based solar cells. Sol Ener Mater Sol Cell. 2017;150:66–72.10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.027Search in Google Scholar

[75] Yi Z, Ni W, Zhang Q, Li M, Kan B, Wan X, et al. Effect of thermal annealing on active layer morphology and performance for small molecule bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. J Mater Chem C. 2014;2:7247–55.10.1039/C4TC00994KSearch in Google Scholar

[76] Wong YQ, Wong HY, Tan CS, Meng HF. Performance optimization of organic solar cells. IEEE Photo J. 2014;6:1–27.10.1109/JPHOT.2014.2337896Search in Google Scholar

[77] Arbouch I, Karzazi Y, Hammouti BB. Organic photovoltaic cells: operating principles, recent developments and current challenges – review. Phys Chem News. 2014;72:73–84.Search in Google Scholar

[78] Li G, Chu CW, Shrotriya V, Huang J, Yanga Y. Efficient inverted polymer solar cells. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;88:1–5.10.1063/1.2212270Search in Google Scholar

[79] Karagiannidis PG, Kalfagiannis N, Georgiou D, Laskarakis A, Hastas NA, Pitsalidis C, et al. Effects of buffer layer properties and annealing process on bulk heterojunction morphology and organic solar cell performance. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:14624–32.10.1039/c2jm31277hSearch in Google Scholar

[80] You JY, Dou L, Yoshimura K, Kato T, Ohya K, Moriarty T, et al. A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency. Nat Comm. 2013;4:1–10.10.1038/ncomms2411Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[81] Zhou H, Zhang Y, Mai CK, Collins SD, Bazan GC, Nguyen TQ, et al. Polymer homo-tandem solar cells with best efficiency of 11.3%. Adv Mater. 2015;27:1767–73.10.1002/adma.201404220Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[82] MacKenzie RCI, Kirchartz T, Dibb GFA, Nelson J. Modeling nongeminate recombination in P3HT:PCBM solar cells. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:9806–13.10.1021/jp200234mSearch in Google Scholar