Summary
Holm Tetens develops in his book „Gott denken. Ein Versuch über rationale Theologie“ theoretical and practical arguments against a naturalistic and in favour of a theistic understanding of reality. In my paper I focus on Teten’s claim that we are rationally justified to hope for the truth of classical theism. I distinguish between rationally justified and unjustified forms of hope and argue that we are rationally justified to hope for the redemption of reality as promised by classical theism. However, this hope has a weaker basis of justification than Tetens seems to assume because serious objections to classical theism ought to be taken into consideration as well.
Zusammenfassung
Holm Tetens präsentiert in seinem Büchlein „Gott denken. Ein Versuch über rationale Theologie“ theoretische und praktische Argumente gegen eine naturalistische und zugunsten einer theistischen Deutung der Wirklichkeit. In meinem Aufsatz gehe ich auf Tetens Argumentation ein, dass wir rational gerechtfertigt sind, auf die Wahrheit des Theismus zu hoffen. Dabei unterscheide ich zwischen gerechtfertigten und nicht gerechtfertigten Formen des Hoffens. Ich argumentiere, dass wir als rationale Wesen zwar auf die Wahrheit des klassischen Theismus und somit die Erlösung der Welt durch Gott hoffen können. Allerdings dürfte diese Hoffnung eine schwächere Rechtfertigungsgrundlage haben als Tetens anzunehmen scheint, da gewichtige Einwände gegen den klassischen Theismus berücksichtigt werden müssen.
References
Marilyn McCORD ADAMS, God Because of Evil: A Pragmatic Argument from Evil for Belief in God, in The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil. ed. by Justin McBRAYER& Daniel HOWARD-SYNDER (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013), 160–173. 10.1002/9781118608005.ch11Search in Google Scholar
Andrew CHIGNELL, Rational Hope, Moral Order, and the Revolution of the Will, in The Divine Order, Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives, ed. by Eric WATKINS (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), 197–218. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199934409.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
William CLIFFORD, The Ethics of Belief, in Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions, ed. by. Eleonore STUMP & Michael MURRAY (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 1999), 269–273. Search in Google Scholar
Richard DAWKINS, A River out of Eden. A Darwinian View of Life, (New York: Basic Books, 1995). Search in Google Scholar
Sabine DÖRING 2014, “What May I hope? Why It Can Be Rational To Rely On One’s Hope,” in European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6.3 (2014), 117–129. 10.24204/ejpr.v6i3.166Search in Google Scholar
Frederick FERRÉ, Language, Logic and God, (New York: Literary Licensing, 1961).Search in Google Scholar
Jennifer FAUST, Can Religious Arguments ‘Persuade’? in International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63.1–3 (2008), 71–86.10.1007/978-1-4020-8377-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Georg GASSER, Worldviews, the Problem of Evil, and Rational Discourse: Thoughts on the Framework of Stump’s Defence, in European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4.3 (2012), 137–153. 10.24204/ejpr.v4i3.281Search in Google Scholar
Daniel HOWARD-SYNDER, Theodicy, in Readings in the Philosophy of Religion. 2nd Edition, ed. by Kelly James CLARK, (Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2008), 324–340.Search in Google Scholar
Winfried LÖFFLER: Einführung in die Religionsphilosophie (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 2006).10.1163/157007307781787606Search in Google Scholar
Stephen MUMFORD, Miracles: Metaphysics and Modality, in Religious Studies 37.2 (2001), 191–202. 10.1017/S0034412501005595Search in Google Scholar
Philip PETTIT, Hope and Its Place in Mind, in Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 592.1 (2004), 152–165. 10.1177/0002716203261798Search in Google Scholar
William RUDDICK, Hope and Deception, in Bioethics 13.3–4 (1999), 343–357. 10.1111/1467-8519.00162Search in Google Scholar
Holm TETENS, Die Möglichkeit Gottes. Ein religionsphilosophischer Versuch, in Sinnkritisches Philosophieren, ed. by Sebastian HÖDL & Henning TEGTMEYER, (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013a), 11–38. 10.1515/9783110296679.11Search in Google Scholar
Holm TETENS, Der Glaube an die Wissenschaften und der methodische Atheismus – Zur religiösen Dialektik der wissenschaftlich-technischen Zivilisation, in Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 55.3 (2013b), 271–283. 10.1515/nzsth-2013-0016Search in Google Scholar
Holm TETENS, Gott denken. Ein Versuch über rationale Theologie, (Stuttgart: reclam, 2015). Search in Google Scholar
Jon WHEATLEY, Wishing and Hoping, in Analysis 18.6 (1958), 121–131. 10.1093/analys/18.6.121Search in Google Scholar
Gerhard VOLLMER, Can Everything Be Rationally Explained Everywhere in the World? in How Successful Is Naturalism? Ed. by Georg Gasser, (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008), 25–47.10.1515/9783110328950.25Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
