Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 18, 2018

Implementing ELF-informed Activities in an Elementary Level English Preparatory Classroom

  • Sibel Sert

    Sibel Sert has been an instructor at Mersin University School of Foreign Languages since 2009. Apart from giving general English courses for university preparatory students, she has been a Phd candidate at Cukurova University in Adana, Turkey since 2014. Her academic interests include ELF and related topics, skills teaching, and language education policies.

    and Yonca Özkan

    Yonca Özkan is an associate professor in the Department of English Language Teaching at Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey. She teaches undergraduate and graduate course in teacher education and second/foreign language teaching methodology. Her research focuses on pre-service language teacher education and technology integration into language teacher education. She is currently conducting a research study on ELF and teacher education.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

Upon the advocacy of the integration of English as a lingua franca, namely ELF, into English language teaching, some scholars (Hino & Oda, 2015) have focused on its possible implications for classroom settings. Implementing ELF-informed activities in an elementary level classroom within a norm-based educational setting, this study aimed to enable students to experience these activities, and explore their pre and post views regarding Standard English, the concepts of good English, and my English. In addition, it also investigated students’ preference for their educational setting after the implementation. The implementation took seven weeks and the activities were created by the researchers. Within a mixed method design, qualitative and quantitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews and two statement lists. The findings indicated that the majority of the students enjoyed the activities and their pre and post views regarding Standard English, good English and my English differ from each other. However, a substantial number of them preferred to be educated with Standard English in their language learning process. Findings also revealed that potential reasons behind this preference may be the domination of norm-based approach in their context, personal interests and prime objectives, and norm-based exams.

About the authors

Sibel Sert

Sibel Sert has been an instructor at Mersin University School of Foreign Languages since 2009. Apart from giving general English courses for university preparatory students, she has been a Phd candidate at Cukurova University in Adana, Turkey since 2014. Her academic interests include ELF and related topics, skills teaching, and language education policies.

Yonca Özkan

Yonca Özkan is an associate professor in the Department of English Language Teaching at Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey. She teaches undergraduate and graduate course in teacher education and second/foreign language teaching methodology. Her research focuses on pre-service language teacher education and technology integration into language teacher education. She is currently conducting a research study on ELF and teacher education.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank course participants for their enthusiasm and participation in the whole process of the study. We also thank Çukurova University Research Coordination Center for supporting this study under the project number 9765.

  1. Disclosure Statement: We have no conflict of interest to declare. And this research has not been submitted for publication nor has it been published in whole or in part elsewhere. We attest to the fact that all Authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission to Multicultural Learning and Teaching.

Appendix

A Appendix

Statement list 1

Statements
1. I think it is important to be able to speak SBr/Amr English.X
2. I think good English is being able to speak SBr/Amr English.X
3. I like the way I speak English.X
4. I try to imitate SBr/Amr. accent when speaking English.X
5. I feel uncomfortable because of my mother tongue effect.X

B Appendix

Statement list 2

Statements
1. I prefer Englishes other than Standard British/American English to be included in English lessons.X
2. I think understanding different Englishes is important for my English language education.X
3. I prefer Standard Br/Amr English to be central in English classes.X
4. I prefer my English to be like a British or American.X
5. I prefer World Cultures to be included in English classes along with British and American cultures.X
6. I prefer British and American culture to be central in English classes.X
7. I think it is important to have an awareness about World Culture for my English language education.X

C Appendix

Semi-structured Interview questions:

  1. What do you think about ELF-informed activities?

  2. What advantages and disadvantages have you experienced?

  3. Do you think they have an effect on your opinions as a language learner? Can you explain?

  4. Do you think such activities should be a part of English language teaching?

D Appendix

Let’s Sing

Pre-listening:

  1. What kind of music do you like?

  2. Do you listen to foreign musicians or bands?

  3. Who is your favourite musician/band from different countries or do you know any foreign musicians/bands? Who are they?

  4. Do you know the musicians in the photos below (here we provided students with photos of famous native and non-native singers)? Discuss with your partner and then try to guess who they are and where they are from.

(after the discussion, we asked them to go online and find samples of these musicians’ music and share them with the class.)

While listening:

In this section, we brought two versions of a famous song. One version was the original and acoustic version of the song sung by a British band. The other version was an acoustic cover version sung by a non-native musician.

  1. Now you are going to listen to a song by two different musicians/bands. First, listen and try to guess which one is native which one is non-native.

  2. First, watch the native version and then the non-native. While listening, try to note down the words you can hear from the versions under the related column for each. Share your answers with the classroom.

Column 1 (Native) Column 2 (Non-native)

(Then we gave the hand-outs with the lyrics on, but there were gaps for some words and we asked the students to fill in the gaps while listening to the versions of the song as video. Note that, we gave this handout after completed the above section.)

  1. Watch the videos first native and then non-native. Try to fill in the gaps.

Post-listening

Discuss the followings with your teacher and your classmates.

  1. Do you like the song?

  2. Which version is your favourite?

  3. Which one do you think is more intelligible?

Native____ Non-native____

  1. Can you guess which country they are from?

Native____ Non-native____

Homework: Go online and find a Turkish musician/band singing an English song. Listen to it and think about the following questions.

  1. How is his/her English?

  2. Is it intelligible? Can you understand him/her?

  3. Which features are different from a native?

Bring your sample to the classroom and say your opinions related to the questions above.

References

Bayyurt, Y., & Sifakis, N. (2017). Foundations of an EIL-aware teacher education. In A. Matsuda (Ed.), Preparing Teachers to Teach English as an International Language (pp. 3–18). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783097036-003Search in Google Scholar

Bektaş-Çetinkaya, Y. (2009). Languages of others: EFL students’ perception of and attitude toward English. Journal of Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 18(1), 109–120.Search in Google Scholar

Björkman, B. (2010). Spoken lingua franca English at a Swedish technical university: An investigation of form and communicative effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar

Björkman, B. (2013). English as a lingua franca: An investigation of form and communicative effectiveness. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110279542Search in Google Scholar

Cogo, A. (2012). English as a Lingua Franca: Concepts, use, and implications. ELT Journal, 66(1), 97–105.10.1093/elt/ccr069Search in Google Scholar

Cogo, A. (2015). English as a lingua franca: Descriptions, domains and applications. In H. Bowles & A. Cogo (Eds.), International perspectives on ELF-oriented teaching (pp. 1–13). London: Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9781137398093_1Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Lincoln: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, M. (2012). Towards a post-normative approach: Learning the pedagogy of ELF. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1(1), 141–170.10.1515/jelf-2012-0007Search in Google Scholar

Firth, A. (1995). Accounts in negotiation discourse: A single-case analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(2), 199–226.10.1016/0378-2166(94)00003-WSearch in Google Scholar

Grazzi, E. (2015). Linking ELF and ELT in secondary school through Web-mediation: The case of fanfiction. In H. Bowles & A. Cogo (Eds.), International perspectives on ELF-oriented teaching (pp. 55–72). London: Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9781137398093_4Search in Google Scholar

Hino, N., & Oda, S. (2015). Integrated practice in teaching English as an international language (IPTEIL): A classroom ELF pedagogy in Japan. In Y. Bayyurt & S. Akcan (Eds.), Current Perspectives on Pedagogy for ELF (pp. 35–47). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110335965.35Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2006). Global intelligibility and local diversity: Possibility or paradox. In R. Rubdy & M. Saraceni (Eds.), English in the world: Global rules, global roles (pp. 32–39). London and New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2009). World Englishes. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., & Dewey, M. (2011). Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching, 44(3), 281-315.10.1017/S0261444811000115Search in Google Scholar

Karakaş, A. (2016). Turkish lecturers’ and students’ perceptions of English in English-medium universities. (Ph.D. dissertation). Southampton: Southampton University.Search in Google Scholar

Karakaş, A. (2017). Students’ perceptions of ‘Good English’ and the underlying ideologies behind their perceptions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 487–509.Search in Google Scholar

Ke, I., & Cahyani, H. (2014). Learning to become users of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF): How ELF online communication affects Taiwanese learners‘ beliefs of English. System, 46, 28–38.10.1016/j.system.2014.07.008Search in Google Scholar

Kemper, E. A., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 273–296). Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Kohn, K. (2011). English as a lingua franca and the Standard English misunderstanding. In A. De Hower & A. Wilton (Eds.), English in Europe today. Sociocultural and educational perspectives (pp. 71–94). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/aals.8.06kohSearch in Google Scholar

Kohn, K. (2015). A pedagogical space for ELF in the English classroom. In Y. Bayyurt & S. Akcan (Eds.), Current Perspectives on Pedagogy for ELF (pp. 51–67). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110335965.51Search in Google Scholar

Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Lopriore, L., & Vettorel, P. (2015). Promoting awareness of Englishes and ELF in the English language classroom. In H. Bowles & A. Cogo (Eds.), International perspectives on ELF-oriented teaching (pp. 13–35). London: Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9781137398093_2Search in Google Scholar

MacKenzie, I. (2014). English as a lingua franca: Theorizing and teaching English. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315890081Search in Google Scholar

Ren, W., Chen, Y., & Lin, C. (2016). University students’ perceptions of ELF in mainland China and Taiwan. System, 56, 13–27.10.1016/j.system.2015.11.004Search in Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0243Search in Google Scholar

Sifakis, N. C. (2009). Teacher education in the post-modern era: Introducing a transformative dimension in the teaching of English as a Lingua Franca. Selected Papers from the 18th ISTAL, (pp. 345–353). Thessaloniki, Greece.Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, A. (2011). Introducing diversity of English into ELT: Student teachers’ responses. ELT Journal, 65(2), 145–153.10.1093/elt/ccq024Search in Google Scholar

Young, T., & Walsh, S. (2010). Which English? Whose English? An Investigation of ‘Non-native’Teachers’ Beliefs about Target Varieties. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23(2), 123–137.10.1080/07908311003797627Search in Google Scholar


Notes

A version of this paper was presented at SeLTAME 2018, Second Language Teaching/Acquisition in the Context of Multilingual Education Conference, Tbilisi/Georgia.


Published Online: 2018-12-18

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mlt-2018-0003/html
Scroll to top button