Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton December 19, 2017

Discourse and discrimination in Charlottesville: The rhetoric of white supremacists during the violent unrest in August 2017

  • Anna Szilágyi

    Anna Szilágyi is an adjunct professor of communication at the Savannah College of Art and Design in Hong Kong. She explores a wide range of phenomena, including the rhetorical mechanisms of manipulation and discrimination. Her recent publications include: “‘Threatening Other’ or ‘Role-Model Brother’? China in the Eyes of the British and the Hungarian Far-Right.” [Special Issue: Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres] Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1): 151–172, 2015. She is the author of the “Linguistic Self-Defense Guide Against Antisemitism” (2016) which was published in English, French, Greek, and Hungarian as part of the pan-European “Get the Trolls Out!” youth education campaign.

    EMAIL logo
From the journal Lodz Papers in Pragmatics

Abstract

This paper explores the discourse of white supremacists in the context of the violent protests that took place in August 2017, in the American city of Charlottesville. During the demonstrations, one person was killed and many others were seriously injured after a car rammed into the anti-racist and anti-fascist counter-protestors. The research scrutinizes the utterances of the white supremacist protestors before, during, between, and after the demonstrations, as presented in the Vice News documentary, “Charlottesville: Race and Terror”. The systematic analysis emphasizes that the rhetoric of the white supremacists was blatantly discriminatory and racist, and the significance of this in the assessment of the violent demonstrations shall not be downplayed. The rhetoric of the white supremacists in Charlottesville targeted Black Americans, Jews, and political opponents. The speakers utilized a full-fledged rhetorical arsenal to discriminate against and attack the out-groups. This included (1) plural personal pronouns; (2) the possessive form “ouf”; (3) victim-victimizer reversals; (4) vulgar referencing; (5) dehumanizing metaphors; and (6) appeals to violence. Through introducing the role and relevance of these devices in the language of white supremacists in Charlottesville, the research also maps their interconnectedness in the analyzed discourses in particular and in discriminatory and racist rhetoric in general.

About the author

Anna Szilágyi

Anna Szilágyi is an adjunct professor of communication at the Savannah College of Art and Design in Hong Kong. She explores a wide range of phenomena, including the rhetorical mechanisms of manipulation and discrimination. Her recent publications include: “‘Threatening Other’ or ‘Role-Model Brother’? China in the Eyes of the British and the Hungarian Far-Right.” [Special Issue: Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres] Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1): 151–172, 2015. She is the author of the “Linguistic Self-Defense Guide Against Antisemitism” (2016) which was published in English, French, Greek, and Hungarian as part of the pan-European “Get the Trolls Out!” youth education campaign.

References

Adams, Josh & Vincent J. Roscigno. 2005. White supremacists, oppositional culture and the world wide web. Social Forces 84(2). 759–778. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3598477.10.1353/sof.2006.0001Search in Google Scholar

Al Jazeera. 2017. Charlottesville: What we know about James Alex Fields. August 13. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/08/charlottesville-james-alex-fields-1708131112027 08.html (accessed 12 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

American Revolution. 2017. FULL: Richard Spencer Speech at University of Florida (10/19/17). October 19. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZK_999sTgU&t=749s (accessed 21 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Andrighetto, Luca, Paolo Riva, Alessandro Gabbiadini & Chiara Volpato. 2016. Excluded from all humanity: Animal metaphors exacerbate the consequences of social exclusion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35(6). 628–644.10.1177/0261927X16632267Search in Google Scholar

Atton, Chris. 2006. Far-right media on the internet: Culture, discourse and power. New Media and Society, 8(4). 573–587.10.1177/1461444806065653Search in Google Scholar

Baider, Fabienne H. & Maria Constantinou. 2014. Language of cyber-politics: “Imaging/imagining” communities. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 10(2). 213–243.10.1515/lpp-2014-0012Search in Google Scholar

Baider, Fabienne H., Anna Constantinou & Anastasia Petrou.2017. Metaphors related to othering the non-natives. In Stavros Assimakopoulos, Fabienne H. Baider & Sharon Millar (eds.), Online hate speech in the EU: A discourse-analytic perspective, 5–13. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

BBC. 2017a. Charlottesville: Trump condemns hatred but dodges question. August 13. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-40913649/charlottesville-trump-condemns-hatred-but-dodges-question (accessed 12 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

BBC. 2017b. Charlottesville: Trump repeats “both sides” rhetoric. September 15. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41262866 (accessed 12 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

BBC. 2017c. White nationalists return to Charlottesville. 8 October. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41543631 (accessed21 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Berbrier, Mitch. 1998. “Half the battle”: Cultural resonance, framing processes, and ethnic affectations in contemporary white separatist rhetoric. Social Problems 45(4). 431–450.10.2307/3097206Search in Google Scholar

Berbrier, Mitch. 2000. The victim ideology of white supremacists and white separatists in the United States. Sociological Focus 33(2). 175–191.10.1080/00380237.2000.10571164Search in Google Scholar

Brindle, Andrew. 2016. The language of hate. A corpus linguistic analysis of white supremacist language. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315731643Search in Google Scholar

Bromwich, Jonah Engel & Alan Bliner. 2017. What we know about James Alex Fields, driver charged in Charlottesville killing. September 13. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/13/us/james-alex-fields-charlottesville-driver-.html (accessed 12 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Christopher. 2009. WWW.HATE.COM: White Supremacist Discourse on the Internet and the Construction of Whiteness Ideology. Howard Journal of Communications 20(2). 189–208.10.1080/10646170902869544Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, Geraint O. 2012. A comparative discourse analysis of the construction of “in-groups” in the 2005 and 2010 manifestos of the British National Party. Discourse and Society 23(3). 245–258.10.1177/0957926511433477Search in Google Scholar

Gunter, Joel. 2017. A reckoning in Charlottesville. August 13. BBC. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40914748 (accessed 4 November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Ben & Warren Murray. 2017. Donald Trump under fire after failing to denounce Virginia White supremacists. The Guardian, August 13.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/12/ charlottesville-protest-trump-condemns-violence-many-sides (accessed 12 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark & George Lakoff 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Khazan, Olga. 2017. How white supremacists use victimhood to recruit. A sociologist explores how racists paint themselves as the innocent ones. August 15. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ science/archive/2017/08/the-worlds-worst-support-group/536850/ (accessed 21 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Kopytowska, Monika (ed.). 2017. Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.93Search in Google Scholar

Kopytowska, Monika, Grabowski Łukasz & Julita Woźniak. 2017. Mobilizing against the Other: Cyberhate, refugee crisis, and proximization. In Monika Kopytowska (ed.), Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres, 57–97. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.93.11kopSearch in Google Scholar

Kuisma, Mikko. 2013. “Good” and “bad” immigrants: The economic nationalism of the true Finns’ immigration discourse. In Umut Korkut, Gregg Bucken-Knapp, Aidan McGarry, Jonas Hinnfors & Helen Drake (eds.), Discourses and politics of migration in Europe, 93–108. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137310903_6Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, Vt.: Chelsea Green.Search in Google Scholar

Mátay, Mónika & Ildikó Kaposi. 2008. Radicals online: The Hungarian street protests of 2006 and the Internet. In Karol Jakubowicz & Miklós Sükösd (eds.), Finding the right place on the map: Central and Eastern European media change in global perspective, 277–296. Bristol: Intellect Books.Search in Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas. 2010. Metaphor, nation and the Holocaust: The concept of the body politic. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203847282Search in Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas. 2017. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. In Monika Kopytowska (ed.), Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres, 41–56. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.93.02musSearch in Google Scholar

Reisigl, Martin & Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and discrimination: The rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Smitherman, Geneva & Teun A. van Dijk (eds.). 1988. Discourse and discrimination. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stack, Liam. 2017. Charlottesville violence and Trump’s reaction draw criticism abroad. The New York Times. August 17. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/world/charlottesville-trump-world-reaction.html (accessed 12 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Szilágyi, Anna. 2016. Watch Out for Personal Pronouns! In Get the Trolls Out! Linguistic Self-Defense Guide against Antisemitism. May 24. http://www.getthetrollsout.org/what-we-do/linguistic-self-defmce-gmde-agamst-antisemitism/item/76-watch-out-for-personal-pronouns.html (accessed 12 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

USA Today. 2017. “Go home, racist!” Richard Spencer shouted down at University of Florida speech. October 19. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/10/19/richard-spencer-shouted-down-university-florida-speech/781966001/ (accessed 21 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Wetherell, Margaret & Jonathan Potter. 1992. Mapping the language of racism. Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth & John E. Richardson (eds.). 2013. Analyzing fascist discourse: European fascism in talk and text. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203071847Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth, Majid KhosraviNik & Brigitte Mral (eds.). 2013. Right wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781472544940Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-12-19
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2017-0014/html
Scroll to top button