Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton September 2, 2015

Prosody, phonological domains and the structure of roots, stems and words in the Munda languages in a comparative/historical light

  • Gregory D. S. Anderson EMAIL logo

Abstract

Munda languages reveal competing word-level vs. phrase-level domains with respect to prosody, with weak-strong vs. strong-weak patterns, respectively. The prosodically strong syllable at the word-level is a root element that reflects cognacy across the family, while the word-frames they are embedded in frequently do not. Such a pattern of cognate roots and non-cognate word-frames is attested across the Austroasiatic phylum. The types of word-frames that such roots are embedded in reflect traces of a once-active system of semantically transparent prefixation or noun class marking, in addition to now mainly frozen systems of noun-verb stem compounding or noun incorporation. Word-level prosody in Munda is archaic, while phrase-level prosodic features are secondary and reflect local South Asian norms.

References

Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2001. A new classification of Munda: Evidence from comparative verb morphology. Indian Linguistics 62. 27–42.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2003. Dravidian influence on Munda. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 32(1). 27–48.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2004. Advances in Proto-Munda reconstruction. Mon-Khmer Studies 34. 159–184.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2007. The Munda verb. Typological perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110924251Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2008. Gtaʔ. In Gregory D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 682–763. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2014. Overview of the Munda languages: The westernmost branch of Austroasiatic. In Mathias Jenny & Paul Sidwell (eds.), 364–414. Austroasiatic languages. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004283572_006Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S. & K. David Harrison. 2008. Remo (Bonda). In G. D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 557–632. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S. & Norman H. Zide. 2001. Recent advances in the reconstruction of the Proto-Munda verb. In L. Brinton (ed.), Historical linguistics 1999, 13–30. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.215.03andSearch in Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S. & Norman H. Zide. 2002. Issues in Proto-Munda and Proto-Austroasiatic nominal derivation: The bimoraic constraint. In Marlys A. Macken (ed.), 55–74. Papers from the 10th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, South East Asian Studies Program, Monograph Series Press.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S.,Toshiki Osada & K. David Harrison. 2008. Ho and the other Kherwarian languages. In Gregory D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 195–255. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, Sudhibhushan. 1975a. Linguistic convergence in the Dravido-Munda culture area. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 4. 199–214.Search in Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, Sudhibhushan. 1975b. Studies in comparative Munda linguistics. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, Nancy & Mary M. Peterson. 1994. Kensiw glossary. Mon-Khmer Studies 23. 163–196.Search in Google Scholar

Das, A. R. 1977. A study on the Nicobarese language. Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India.Search in Google Scholar

Dasgupta, Kamalesh. 1977. A phrase book in Miju. Shillong: Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Search in Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gerard. 1976. Minor-syllable vocalism in Senoic languages. In Jenner et al. (eds.), Austroasiatic Studies, Part I & II (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication, 13), 229–248. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Search in Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gerard. 1989. Proto-Austroasiatic creaky voice. Mon-Khmer Studies 25. 139–154.Search in Google Scholar

Dondrup, Rinchin. 1988. A hand book on Sherdukpen language. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Search in Google Scholar

Donegan, Patricia J. 1993. Rhythm and vocalic drift in Munda and Mon-Khmer. Linguistics in the Tibeto-Burman Area 16(1). 1–43.Search in Google Scholar

Donegan, Patricia J. & David Stampe. 1983. Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. In John Richardson, M. Marks & A. Chukerman (eds.), The interplay of phonology, morphology, and syntax, 337–353. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Donegan, Patricia J. & David Stampe. 2004. Rhythm and synthetic drift of Munda. In R. Singh (ed.), Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2004, 3–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110179897.3Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, Jerold. 1995. English-Bolyu glossary. Mon-Khmer Studies 24. 133–160.Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, Jerold & Kenneth Gregerson. 1996. Bolyu tone in Vietic perspective. Mon-Khmer Studies 26. 117–134.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada. 2005. Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9(3). 351–390.10.1515/lity.2005.9.3.351Search in Google Scholar

Ferlus, Michél. 1974. Les langues du groupe Austroasiatique-Nord. ASEMI (Asie du sud-est et monde insulindien) 5(1). 39–68.Search in Google Scholar

Ghosh, Arun. 2008. Santali. In Gregory D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 11–98. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, La Vaughn H. 1992. On the track of Austric: Part I. Mon-Khmer Studies 21. 143–178.Search in Google Scholar

Horo, Luke & Priyankoo Sarmah. 2013. Acoustic analysis of vowels in Assam Sora. (Northeast Indian Linguistics (NEIL), 6), 1–12. Canberra: Australia National University.Search in Google Scholar

Horo, Luke & Priyankoo Sarmah. 2014. An acoustic analysis of vowel system size in Assam Sora. Presented at Himalayan Languages Symposium, Singapore, 16–18 July 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Jinfang. 1996. Bugan – a new Mon-Khmer language of Yunnan Province, China. Mon-Khmer Studies 26. 135–160.Search in Google Scholar

Mahapatra, Kageshwar & Norman H. Zide. 1972. Nominal combining forms in Gtaʔ. Indian Linguistics 33. 79–102.Search in Google Scholar

Man, Edward H. 1975. [1888–9]. A dictionary of the Central Nicobarese language. Delhi: Sanskaran Prakashak.Search in Google Scholar

Matisoff, James. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 135). Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Megu, Arak. 1990. Bokar language guide. Itanagar: Department of Cultural Affairs, Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, John D. & Carolyn Miller. 1996. Lexical comparison of Katuic Mon-Khmer languages with special focus on So-Bru groups of northeast Thailand. Mon-Khmer Studies 26. 255–290.Search in Google Scholar

Nai Pan Hla. 1976. A comparative study of Old Mon epigraphy and Modern Mon. In Jenner et al. (eds.), Austroasiatic studies, Part I & II, Oceanic (Linguistics Special Publication, 13), 891–918. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Search in Google Scholar

Osada, Toshiki. 2008. Mundari. In Gregory D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 99–164. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Patnaik, Manideepa. 2008. Juang. In Gregory D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 508–556. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Paulsen, Deborah A. 1992. Phonological reconstruction of Proto-Plang. Mon-Khmer Studies 18–19. 160–222.Search in Google Scholar

Peiros, Ilja. 1996. Katuic comparative dictionary (Pacific Linguistics C-132). Canberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Peiros, Ilja. 1998. Comparative linguistics in Southeast Asia (Pacific Linguistics C-142). Canberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, John. 2005. There’s a grain of truth to every “myth”, or, why the discussion of lexical classes in Mundari isn’t quite over yet. Linguistic Typology 9. 391–405.Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, John. 2008. Kharia. In Gregory D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 434–507. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Phan, John D. 2011. Muong is not a subgroup: Phonological evidence for a paraphyletic taxon in the Viet-Muong sub-family. Mon-Khmer Studies 40. 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Premsrirat, Suwilai. 1996. Phonological characteristics of So (Thavung), a Vietic language of Thailand. Mon-Khmer Studies 26. 161–176.Search in Google Scholar

Pucilowski, Anna. 2013. Topics in Ho morphosyntax and morphophonology. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Pulu, Jatan. 1991. A phrase book on Taraon language. Itanagar: Department of Cultural Affairs, Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Search in Google Scholar

Pulu, Jimi. 2002. A hand book on Idu Mishmi language. Itanagar: Department of Cultural Affairs, Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Search in Google Scholar

Radhakrishnan, R. 1981. The Nancowry word. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Ramya Tame. 2012. Sociolinguistic survey of the Bangru language of Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh. Presented at 34th All-India Conference of Linguists, Shillong, 2012, 1–3 November, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Shorto, Harry L. 2005. A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary. Canberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Kenneth D. 1975. The velar-animal prefix relic in Vietnam languages. Linguistics in the Tibeto-Burman Area 2(1). 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Starosta, Stanley. 1992. Sora combining forms and pseudo-compounding. Mon-Khmer Studies 18–19. 78–105.Search in Google Scholar

Tayeng, Aduk. 1976. Milang phrase book. Shillong: Directorate of Information and Public Relations.Search in Google Scholar

Tayeng, Aduk. 1990. Sulung language guide. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, David. 1992. On sesquisyllabic structure. Mon-Khmer Studies 21. 205–210.Search in Google Scholar

Zide, Norman H. 2008. Korku. In Gregory D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 256–298. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-9-2
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 18.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jsall-2015-0009/html
Scroll to top button