Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 13, 2014

Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus in Jordan

  • Mousa A. Abujbara , Mohammed I. Liswi , Mohammed S. El-Khateeb , Sarah E. Flanagan , Sian Ellard and Kamel M. Ajlouni EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objective: Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus (PNDM) is a rare heterogeneous form of diabetes that develops within the first 6 months of life. The objective of this study is to define the genetic etiology and incidence of permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus in Jordan.

Methods: This study was conducted in Jordan at the National Center of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, Amman, between 2006 and 2012. The study included 22 cases diagnosed with diabetes within the first year of life.

Results: The incidence of PNDM in Jordan was calculated as one case for every 203,221 live births. Mutations were found in six out of ten cases diagnosed before 6 months and included one homozygous ABCC8 p.R826W mutation, three cases with a heterozygous KCNJ11 p.R201C mutation, and two cases with a homozygous EIF2AK3 splicing mutation.

Conclusion: The genetic etiology of PNDM in Jordan is different from that seen in European countries and more similar to other Arab countries.


Corresponding author: Kamel M. Ajlouni, President of the National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, P.O. Box 13165, Amman 11942, Jordan, Phone: +962 6 5347810, Fax: +962 6 535 66 70, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Ms. Khadijah Al-Rashed for her great help and assistance with the manuscript and data collection. We thank Dr. D.J.G. Mackay and colleagues, in the Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, who performed the genetic testing for chromosome 6q24 abnormalities. Professor Sian Ellard is a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1. Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA, Walsh MC. Fanaroff and Martin’s neonatal-perinatal medicine: diseases of the fetus and infant, 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

2. Greeley SA, Naylor RN, Philipson LH, Bell GI. Neonatal diabetes: an expanding list of genes allows for improved diagnosis and treatment. Curr Diab Rep 2011;11:519–32.10.1007/s11892-011-0234-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Ellard S, Lango Allen H, De Franco E, Flanagan SE, Hysenaj G, et al. Improved genetic testing for monogenic diabetes using targeted next-generation sequencing. Diabetologia 2013;56:1958–63.10.1007/s00125-013-2962-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Doneray H, Houghton J, Tekgunduz KS, Balkir F, Caner I. Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus caused by a novel mutation in the KCNJ11 gene. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2014;27:367–71.10.1515/jpem-2013-0068Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Pearson ER, Flechtner I, Njolstad PR, Malecki MT, Flanagan SE, et al. Switching from insulin to oral sulfonylureas in patients with diabetes due to Kir6.2 mutations. N Engl J Med 2006;355:467–77.10.1056/NEJMoa061759Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Rafiq M, Flanagan SE, Patch AM, Shields BM, Ellard S, et al. Effective treatment with oral sulfonylureas in patients with diabetes due to sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) mutations. Diabetes Care 2008;31:204–9.10.2337/dc07-1785Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Rubio-Cabezas O, Flanagan SE, Damhuis A, Hattersley AT, Ellard S. KATP channel mutations in infants with permanent diabetes diagnosed after 6 months of life. Pediatr Diabetes 2012;13:322–5.10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00824.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Mackay DJ, Callaway JL, Marks SM, White HE, Acerini CL, et al. Hypomethylation of multiple imprinted loci in individuals with transient neonatal diabetes is associated with mutations in ZFP57. Nat Genet 2008;40:949–51.10.1038/ng.187Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Vaxillaire M, Dechaume A, Busiah K, Cave H, Pereira S, et al. New ABCC8 mutations in relapsing neonatal diabetes and clinical features. Diabetes 2007;56:1737–41.10.2337/db06-1540Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Gloyn AL, Pearson ER, Antcliff JF, Proks P, Bruining GJ, et al. Activating mutations in the gene encoding the ATP-sensitive potassium-channel subunit Kir6.2 and permanent neonatal diabetes. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1838–49.10.1056/NEJMoa032922Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Brickwood S, Bonthron DT, Al-Gazali LI, Piper K, Hearn T, et al. Wolcott-Rallison syndrome: pathogenic insights into neonatal diabetes from new mutation and expression studies of EIF2AK3. J Med Genet 2003;40:685–9.10.1136/jmg.40.9.685Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Habeb AM, Al-Magamsi MS, Eid IM, Ali MI, Hattersley AT, et al. Incidence, genetics, and clinical phenotype of permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus in northwest Saudi Arabia. Pediatr Diabetes 2012;13:499–505.10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00828.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Bappal B, Raghupathy P, de Silva V, Khusaiby SM. Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus: clinical presentation and epidemiology in Oman. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;80:F209–12.10.1136/fn.80.3.F209Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Russo L, Iafusco D, Brescianini S, Nocerino V, Bizzarri C, et al. Permanent diabetes during the first year of life: multiple gene screening in 54 patients. Diabetologia 2011;54:1693–701.10.1007/s00125-011-2094-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Greeley SA, Tucker SE, Worrell HI, Skowron KB, Bell GI, et al. Update in neonatal diabetes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2010;17:13–9.10.1097/MED.0b013e328334f158Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Habeb AM, Flanagan SE, Deeb A, Al-Alwan I, Alawneh H, et al. Permanent neonatal diabetes: different aetiology in Arabs compared to Europeans. Arch Dis Child 2012;97:721–3.10.1136/archdischild-2012-301744Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Varadarajan P, Sangaralingam T, Senniappan S, Jahnavi S, Radha V, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of infantile onset diabetes mellitus in southern India. Indian Pediatr 2013;50:759–63.10.1007/s13312-013-0219-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Hamamy H, Jamhawi L, Al-Darawsheh J, Ajlouni K. Consanguineous marriages in Jordan: why is the rate changing with time? Clin Genet 2005;67:511–6.10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00426.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

19. el-Hazmi MA, al-Swailem AR, Warsy AS, al-Swailem AM, Sulaimani R, et al. Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. J Med Genet 1995;32:623–6.10.1136/jmg.32.8.623Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Islam MM. The practice of consanguineous marriage in Oman: prevalence, trends and determinants. J Biosoc Sci 2012;44:571–94.10.1017/S0021932012000016Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplemental Material

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2014-0069) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2014-2-7
Accepted: 2014-3-31
Published Online: 2014-5-13
Published in Print: 2014-9-20

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 16.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpem-2014-0069/html
Scroll to top button