Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 18, 2017

Entropy Production in Chemical Reactors

  • Diego Kingston EMAIL logo and Adrián C. Razzitte

Abstract

We have analyzed entropy production in chemically reacting systems and extended previous results to the two limiting cases of ideal reactors, namely continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and plug flow reactor (PFR). We have found upper and lower bounds for the entropy production in isothermal systems and given expressions for non-isothermal operation and analyzed the influence of pressure and temperature in entropy generation minimization in reactors with a fixed volume and production. We also give a graphical picture of entropy production in chemical reactions subject to constant volume, which allows us to easily assess different options. We show that by dividing a reactor into two smaller ones, operating at different temperatures, the entropy production is lowered, going as near as 48 % less in the case of a CSTR and PFR in series, and reaching 58 % with two CSTR. Finally, we study the optimal pressure and temperature for a single isothermal PFR, taking into account the irreversibility introduced by a compressor and a heat exchanger, decreasing the entropy generation by as much as 30 %.

References

[1] B. Andresen, P. Salamon and R. S. Berry, Thermodynamics in finite time, Phys. Today37 (1984), 62.10.1063/1.2916405Search in Google Scholar

[2] I. L. Leites, D. A. Sama and N. Lior, The theory and practice of energy saving in the chemical industry: some methods for reducing thermodynamic irreversibility in chemical technology processes, Energy28 (2003), 55–97.10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00107-XSearch in Google Scholar

[3] E. Sauar, S. Kjelstrup and K. M. Lien, Equipartition of forces-extension to chemical reactions, Comp. Chem. Eng. S21 (1997), S29–S34.10.1016/S0098-1354(97)87474-1Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. R. De Groot and P. Mazur, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Dover, New York, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Bejan, Entropy generation minimization: The new Thermodynamics of finite size devices and finite time processes, Appl. Phys. Rev. 79 (1996), 1191–1218.10.1063/1.362674Search in Google Scholar

[6] B. Månsson and B. Andresen, Optimal temperature profile for an Ammonia reactor, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. 25 (1986), 59–65.10.1021/i200032a010Search in Google Scholar

[7] L. Nummedal, S. Kjelstrup and M. Costea, Minimizing the entropy production rate of an exothermic reactor with a constant heat transfer coefficient: The ammonia reaction, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42 (2003), 1044–1056.10.1021/ie020319nSearch in Google Scholar

[8] S. Kjelstrup, E. Johannesen, A. Røsjorde, L. Nummedal and D. Bedeaux, Minimizing the entropy production for the methanol producing reaction in a methanol reactor, Int. J. Appl. Thermodyn. 3 (2000), 147–153.Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. Kjelstrup and T. V. Island, The driving force distribution for minimum lost work in a chemical reactor far from equilibrium. Oxidation of SO2, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38 (1999), 3051.10.1021/ie9807452Search in Google Scholar

[10] E. Johannessen and S. Kjelstrup, Minimum entropy production in plug flow reactors: An optimal control problems solved for SO2 oxidation, Energy29 (2004), 2403–2423.10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.033Search in Google Scholar

[11] G. De Koeijer, E. Johannessen and S. Kjelstrup, The second law optimal path of a four-bed SO2 converter with five heat exchangers, Energy29 (2004), 525–546.10.1016/j.energy.2003.11.002Search in Google Scholar

[12] E. Johannessen and S. Kjelstrup, A highway in state space for reactors with minimum entropy production, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 (2005), 3347–3361.10.1016/j.ces.2005.01.026Search in Google Scholar

[13] L. Nummedal, A. Røsjorde, E. Johannessen and S. Kjelstrup, Second law optimization of a tubular steam reformer, Chem. Eng. Process. 44 (2005), 429–440.10.1016/j.cep.2004.06.005Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Røsjorde, S. Kjelstrup, E. Johannessen and R. Hansen, Minimizing the entropy production in a chemical process for dehydrogenation of propane, Energy32 (2007), 335–343.10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.013Search in Google Scholar

[15] O. Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[16] G. Froment and K. Bischoff, Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[17] C. Kanzow, N. Yamashita and M. Fukushima, Levenberg-Marquardt methods with strong convergence properties for solving nonlinear equations with convex constraints, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 172 (2004), 375–397.10.1016/j.cam.2004.02.013Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. Sandler, Chemical, Biochemical and Engineering Thermodynamics, 4th ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-9-6
Revised: 2017-1-15
Accepted: 2017-1-31
Published Online: 2017-2-18
Published in Print: 2017-6-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jnet-2016-0066/html
Scroll to top button