Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 19, 2014

A prospective drug use evaluation of antihypertensive drugs in in-patients of a tertiary referral care hospital

  • Ajmal Mankadavath , Dilip Chandrasekhar EMAIL logo , Tina Thomas , Fathimath Zuhra , Shanoob Kaipanthodi and Jafer Chalil Parambil

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a chronic illness associated with high morbidity and mortality. Once hypertension is diagnosed, starting antihypertensive therapy on a long-term basis along with regular follow up is important. Standardizing treatment guidelines and conducting drug utilization studies at regular intervals help physicians to prescribe drugs rationally. The present study was conducted to analyze the prescription patterns of antihypertensive drugs in a tertiary care referral hospital in Malabar region, Kerala, India.

Methods: The study was conducted at the General Medicine and Cardiology Department involving the in-patients. Patients suffering from essential hypertension with or without other co-morbidities were included in the study. The frequency and proportion of prescribing different groups of antihypertensive drugs as monotherapy or combination therapy, and prescription of fixed drug combinations (FDCs) were analyzed. A total of 200 hypertensive patients were included in the study. Patient data were collected from in-patient’s case sheets and direct interviews with the patients and their observers.

Results: The majority of the patients were females with 56%, whereas the males comprised 44%, with most of the patients suffering from stage-II hypertension. The study revealed that a high proportion of the hypertensive patients had co-morbid diabetes mellitus. The most commonly prescribed class of antihypertensive drugs was angiotensin receptor blockers, followed by calcium channel blockers and β-blockers. With regard to patient therapy, 32.0% received monotherapy, whereas 68.0% received combination therapy, 16% of which received FDCs.

Conclusions: The study shows that clinical pharmacists can play a key role in promoting rational prescription and improving adherence to medication.


Corresponding author: Dilip Chandrasekhar, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Alshifa College of Pharmacy, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, 679325, India, E-mail:

References

1. Biradar SS, Rajashekhar K, Srinivas R, Raju SA. Assessment of pharmacist mediated patient counseling on hypertension incompliance with quality of life in south Indian city. Int Res J Pharm 2012;3:18–26.Search in Google Scholar

2. Joshi M, Rao BS, Khan GM. Study of drug use in essential hypertension and their compliance. Kathman U J Sci Eng Tech 2006;2:1–18.Search in Google Scholar

3. Narendranath S, Somashekar HS, Reshma SR, Keerthi Sagar J, Ramachandra K. Prescriptive pattern of antihypertensives in tertiary care hospital using DU-90%. Int J Pharm Res Dev 2011;4:107–13.Search in Google Scholar

4. Dipiro JT, Talbert RL, Matzke GR, Wells BG, editors. Pharmacotherapy: A pathophysiological approach. Washington, DC: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 7th ed. 130–71.Search in Google Scholar

5. Susan R, Anu K, Achu T, Soumya G, Vijayakumar K, Anish TS. Antihypertensive drug compliance across clinic and community settings, in Thiruvananthapuram, south India. Health Sci 2012;1:2.Search in Google Scholar

6. Khurshid F, Aqil M, Alam MS, Kapur P, Pillai KK. Antihypertensive medication prescribing patterns in a university teaching hospital in south Delhi. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2012;3:2057–63.Search in Google Scholar

7. Augustine L, Prasanth NV, Sanal Dev KT, Jasmin S, Kappekkat Y, Shinu C, et al. A study conducted on prescribing pattern and cost of antihypertensive drugs in a tertiary level hospital in South Malabar region of Kerala. Der Pharma Chemica 2010;2:332–41.Search in Google Scholar

8. Bajaj j K, Sood M, Singh SJ, Jerath P. Prescription patterns of antihypertensive drugs and adherence to JNC VII guidelines in a tertiary care hospital in north India. Int J Med Clin Res 2012;3:118–20.10.9735/0976-5530.3.2.118-120Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-9-3
Accepted: 2014-7-17
Published Online: 2014-8-19
Published in Print: 2015-5-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 11.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbcpp-2013-0131/html
Scroll to top button