Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 3, 2017

Analysis about Heat Transfer of Vegetables during Cold Shock Treatment and Preservation Quality after Storage

  • Yang Zhao EMAIL logo , Chen Mingfeng , Chen Aiqiang , Zhang Na and Zhao Songsong

Abstract

This study investigated the heat transfer mechanism and preservation quality of axisymmetric vegetables during cold shock treatment (CST). A simulation model of heat transfer was developed based on geometrical and biological characteristics of the vegetables by finite element difference method. CST for cucumbers and carrots with cold water at 0°C (40 min), 2°C (20, 40 and 60 min) and 4°C (40 min) was conducted to evaluate the relationships between heat transfer characteristics and preservation quality. The comparative analysis shown that the simulated results agreed well with measured results. Meanwhile, in terms of weight loss, firmness and POD activity, CST with cold water at 2°C for 40 min could achieve the most positive effect on preserving cucumbers. The cucumber during treatment experienced whole variable temperature stage and appropriate constant temperature stage so as to reach optimal preservation quality.

Funding statement: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 51276124 and 51476111), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No.20130032130006), and by Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City (Grant No. 16JCZDJC33900).

References

1. Ogata K, Sakamoto T. Cold-shock effect on keeping quality of Japanese apricot fruits and tomato fruits. St Inst Hort Kyoto University. 1979;9:146–150.Search in Google Scholar

2. Zhang Z, Kohei N, Shigenori M. Comparison of the antioxidant enzymes of broccoli after cold or heat shock treatment at different storage temperatures. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2009;54(2):101–105.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.05.006Search in Google Scholar

3. Makoto I, Philip GC. Cold shock treatment of mature green tomatoes to delay color development and increase shelf life during room temperature storage. Proc Fla State Hort Soc. 1986;99:143–145.Search in Google Scholar

4. Hofman PJ, Stubbings BA, Adkins MF, Corcoran RJ, White A, Woolf AB. Low temperature conditioning before cold disinfestations improves ‘Hass’ avocado fruit quality. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2003;28(1):123–133. .10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00175-8Search in Google Scholar

5. Zhang HY, Yang SY, Joyce DC, Jiang YM, Qu HX, Duan XW. Physiology and quality response of harvested banana fruit to cold shock. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2010;55(3):154–159.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.11.006Search in Google Scholar

6. Jiao S, Johnson JA, Tang J, Mattinson DS, Fellman JK, Davenport TL,et al. Tolerance of codling moth, and apple quality associated with low pressure/low temperature treatments. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2013;85:136–140.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.06.001Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhao ZL, Jiang WO, Cao JK, Zhao YM, Gu YH. Effect of cold-shock treatment on chilling injury in mango (Mangifera indica L. cv.‘Wacheng’) fruit. J Sci Food Agric. 2006;86:2458–2462.10.1002/jsfa.2640Search in Google Scholar

8. Alique R, Zamorano JP, Martínez MA, Alonso J. Effect of heat and cold treatments on respiratory metabolism and shelf-life of sweet cherry, type picota cv “Ambrunés”. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2005;35(2):153–165.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.07.003Search in Google Scholar

9. Pan JC, Bhownik SR. Finite element analysis of transient heat transfer in fresh tomatoes during cooling. Trans ASAE. 1991;34(3):972–976.10.13031/2013.31758Search in Google Scholar

10. Rao KV, Narasimham G, Murthy MV. Analysis of co-current hydraircooling of food products in bulk. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 1992;13(3):300–310.10.1016/0142-727X(92)90044-ASearch in Google Scholar

11. Goral D, Kluza F, Kozlowicz K. Assessment of heat transfer and mass change during fruits Impingement Pre-Cooling. J Food Eng. 2014;10(1):183–189.10.1515/ijfe-2013-0020Search in Google Scholar

12. Tatsuki M, Hayama H, Yoshioka H, Nakamura Y. Cold pre-treatment is effective for 1-MCP efficacy in ‘Tsugaru’ apple fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2011;62(3):282–287.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.07.005Search in Google Scholar

13. Tacken E, Ireland H, Gunaseelan K, Karunairetnam S, Wang D, Schultz K,et al. The role of ethylene and cold temperature in the regulation of the apple Polygalacturonase1 gene and fruit softening. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(1):294–305.10.1104/pp.109.151092Search in Google Scholar

14. Sahin S, Sumnu SG. Physical properties of foods [M]. New York: Springer New York; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

15. Ghisalberti L, Kondjoyan A. Convective heat transfer coefficients between air flow and a short cylinder. Effect of air velocity and turbulence. Effect of body shape, dimensions and position in the flow. J Food Eng. 1999;42(1):33–44.10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00100-4Search in Google Scholar

16. Kondjoyan A, Daudin J. Effects of free stream turbulence intensity on heat and mass transfers at the surface of a circular cylinder and an elliptical cylinder, axis ratio4. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1995;38(10):1735–1749.10.1016/0017-9310(94)00338-VSearch in Google Scholar

17. Zalba B, Marín JM, Cabeza LF, Mehling H. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications. Appl Thermal Eng. 2003;23(3):251–283.10.1016/S1359-4311(02)00192-8Search in Google Scholar

18. Birla S, Wang S, Tang J. Computer simulation of radio frequency heating of model fruit immersed in water. J Food Eng. 2008;84(2):270–280.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.05.020Search in Google Scholar

19. Zhang N, Yang Z, Chen AQ, Zhao SS. Effects of intermittent heat treatment on sensory quality and antioxidant enzymes of cucumber. Scientia Hortic. 2014;170:39–44.10.1016/j.scienta.2014.02.032Search in Google Scholar

20. Cao JK, Jiang WB, Zhao YM. Experiment guidance of postharvest physiology and biochemistry of fruits[J]. Beijing: China Light Industry Press; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

21. Wilson LG, Fry JC. Extensin – A major cell wall glycoprotein. Plant Cell Environ. 1986;9(4):239–260.10.1111/j.1365-3040.1986.tb01737.xSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-2-3
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2015-0369/html
Scroll to top button