Demand-Side Contribution to Power System Frequency Regulation : -A Critical Review on Decentralized Strategies

References

1. Dagle JE, Winiarski DW, Donnelly M. End-use load control for power system dynamic stability enhancement. Technical report Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest Lab., 1997.10.2172/484515Search in Google Scholar

2. Molina-García A, Bouffard F, Kirschen DS. Decentralized demand-side contribution to primary frequency control. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2011;26:411–9.10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2048223Search in Google Scholar

3. NERC. Balancing and frequency control. Technical report. NERC Resources Subcommittee 2013.Search in Google Scholar

4. Delavari A, Kamwa I. Simulation-based investigation of optimal demand-side primary frequency regulation. IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE) 2016.Search in Google Scholar

5. Zhao C, Topcu U, Li N, Low S. Design and stability of load-side primary frequency control in power systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 2014;59:1177–89.10.1109/TAC.2014.2298140Search in Google Scholar

6. Rebours YG, Kirschen DS, Trotignon M, Rossignol S. A survey of frequency and voltage control ancillary services Part I: Technical features. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2007;22:350–7.10.1109/TPWRS.2006.888963Search in Google Scholar

7. Delavari A, Kamwa I. Virtual inertia-based load modulation for power system primary frequency regulation. Power and Energy Society General Meeting. IEEE 2017. (in press).10.1109/PESGM.2017.8274601Search in Google Scholar

8. Pandey SK, Mohanty SR, Kishor N. A literature survey on load–frequency control for conventional and distribution generation power systems. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2013;25:318–34.10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.029Search in Google Scholar

9. Callaway DS, Hiskens IA. Achieving controllability of electric loads. Proc IEEE. 2011;99:184–99.10.1109/JPROC.2010.2081652Search in Google Scholar

10. Strbac G. Demand side management: benefits and challenges. Energy Policy. 2008;36:4419–26.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.030Search in Google Scholar

11. Huang AQ, Crow ML, Heydt GT, Zheng JP, Dale SJ. The future renewable electric energy delivery and management (freedom) system: the energy internet. Proc IEEE. 2011;99:133–48.10.1109/JPROC.2010.2081330Search in Google Scholar

12. Ulbig A, Borsche TS, Andersson G. Impact of low rotational inertia on power system stability and operation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6435 2013.10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02615Search in Google Scholar

13. Biegel B, Westenholz M, Hansen LH, Stoustrup J, Andersen P, Harbo S. Integration of flexible consumers in the ancillary service markets. Energy. 2014;67:479–89.10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.073Search in Google Scholar

14. Tielens P, Van Hertem D. Grid inertia and frequency control in power systems with high penetration of renewables. Young Researchers Symposium in Electrical Power Engineering, 6th ed.; Delft, The Netherlands, 16–17 April, 2012Search in Google Scholar

15. Delille G, François B, Malarange G. Dynamic frequency control support: a virtual inertia provided by distributed energy storage to isolated power systems. In: Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe), PES, IEEE.2010;1–8.10.1109/ISGTEUROPE.2010.5638887Search in Google Scholar

16. Dehghanpour K, Afsharnia S. Electrical demand side contribution to frequency control in power systems: a review on technical aspects. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2015;41:1267–76.10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.015Search in Google Scholar

17. Palmer M, Tachibana M, Senjyu T, Funabashi T, Saber AY, Datta M. Grid stabilization with decentralized controllable loads using fuzzy control and droop characteristics. Int J Emerging Electr Power Syst. 2014;15:357–65.10.1515/ijeeps-2014-0022Search in Google Scholar

18. Yoza A, Uchida K, Yona A, Senju T. Optimal operation method of smart house by controllable loads based on smart grid topology. Int J Emerging Electr Power Syst. 2013;14:411–20.10.1515/ijeeps-2012-0059Search in Google Scholar

19. Nassor TS, Senjyu T, Yona A. Enhancement of voltage stability of dc smart grid during islanded mode by load shedding scheme. Int J Emerging Electr Power Syst. 2015;16:491–501.10.1515/ijeeps-2015-0016Search in Google Scholar

20. Surender Reddy S, Abhyankar A, Bijwe P. Co-optimization of energy and demand-side reserves in day-ahead electricity markets. Int J Emerging Electr Power Syst. 2015;16:195–206.10.1515/ijeeps-2014-0020Search in Google Scholar

21. Biegel B, Hansen LH, Andersen P, Stoustrup J. Primary control by on/off demand-side devices. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2013;4:2061–71.10.1109/TSG.2013.2257892Search in Google Scholar

22. Schweppe FC, Tabors RD, Kirtley JL, Outhred HR, Pickel FH, Cox AJ. Homeostatic utility control. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst 1980;1151–63.10.1109/TPAS.1980.319745Search in Google Scholar

23. Balijepalli VM, Pradhan V, Khaparde SA, Shereef RM. Review of demand response under smart grid paradigm. In: Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-India (ISGT India), IEEE 2011:236–43.Search in Google Scholar

24. Kamwa I, Grondin R, Asber D, Gingras J, Trudel G. Active-power stabilizers for multimachine power systems: challenges and prospects. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1998;13:1352–8.10.1109/59.736276Search in Google Scholar

25. Black JW, Ilic M. Demand-based frequency control for distributed generation. Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, volume 1 IEEE. 2002;427–432.10.1109/PESS.2002.1043270Search in Google Scholar

26. Trudnowski D, Donnelly M, Lightner E. Power-system frequency and stability control using decentralized intelligent loads. Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition, IEEE. 2006;1453–9.10.1109/TDC.2006.1668732Search in Google Scholar

27. Kirby BJ. Spinning reserve from responsive loads. Department of Energy, 2003.10.2172/885551Search in Google Scholar

28. Donnelly M, Trudnowski D, Mattix S, Dagle J. Autonomous demand response for primary frequency regulation, Technical report, PNNL-21152. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2012. .10.2172/1118120Search in Google Scholar

29. Bertoldi P, Atanasiu B. Electricity consumption and efficiency trends in the enlarged European Union. IES–JRC. European Union: 2007.Search in Google Scholar

30. Arteconi A, Hewitt N, Polonara F. State of the art of thermal storage for demand-side management. Appl Energy. 2012;93:371–89.10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.045Search in Google Scholar

31. Donnelly M, Boyd P, Lu N, Huang Z. Grid friendly appliance (GFA) controller development. Electric Distribution Transformation Program Review FY04 2003.Search in Google Scholar

32. Lu N, Hammerstrom DJ. Design considerations for frequency responsive grid friendly tm appliances. Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition, IEEE. 2006;647–652.Search in Google Scholar

33. QDR Q. Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them,Technical Report. Washington, DC: US Department Energy, 2006. .Search in Google Scholar

34. Soliman SA, Helal I, Youssef A. Electric load management using electricity tariff algorithm. Int J Emerging Electr Power Syst., 2007, vol. 8, no 5, p. 3.10.2202/1553-779X.1185Search in Google Scholar

35. Chakir M, Kamwa I, Le Huy H. Centralized-decentralized control of responsive demand to enable primary and 10-min reserves. EIC Climate Change Technology Conference, at Montral, QC, Canada, 2015:1–12.Search in Google Scholar

36. Andreasson M, Dimarogonas DV, Johansson KH, Sandberg H. Distributed vs. centralized power systems frequency control. 12th European Control Conference, ECC 2013; Zurich; Switzerland; 17 July 2013 through 19 July 2013. 2013;2013:3524–3529.10.23919/ECC.2013.6669721Search in Google Scholar

37. Belhomme R, Asua RC, Valtorta G, Paice A, Bouffard F, Rooth R, et al. Smart Grids for Distribution. IET-CIRED. CIRED Seminar, IET. ADDRESS-Active demand for the smart grids of the future. 2008:1–4.10.1049/ic:20080438Search in Google Scholar

38. Peeters E, Six D, Hommelberg M, Belhomme R, Bouffard F. The ADDRESS project: an architecture and markets to enable active demand. Energy Market. 6th International Conference on the European, IEEE. 2009;1–5.10.1109/EEM.2009.5207145Search in Google Scholar

39. Peeters E, Belhomme R, C Batlle, F Bouffard, Karkkainen S, Six D, et al. ADDRESS: scenarios and architecture for active demand development in the smart grids of the future. Electricity Distribution-Part 1. 20th International Conference and Exhibition on, IET. 2009;1–4.10.1049/cp.2009.0738Search in Google Scholar

40. Donnelly M, Harvey D, Munson R, Trudnowski D. Frequency and stability control using decentralized intelligent loads: Benefits and pitfalls. Power and Energy Society General Meeting, IEEE 2010:1–6.10.1109/PES.2010.5589835Search in Google Scholar

41. Kalsi K, Zhang W, Lian J, Marinovici LD, Moya C, Dagle JE. Distributed smart grid asset control strategies for providing ancillary services, PNNL-22875, 2013.10.2172/1117087Search in Google Scholar

42. Kalsi K, Elizondo MA, Lian J, Zhang W, Marinovici LD, Calderon CM. Loads as a resource: Frequency responsive demand, Technical report, PNNL-23764. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Richland, WA, 2014.10.2172/1375380Search in Google Scholar

43. Zhao C, Topcu U, Low SH. Fast load control with stochastic frequency measurement. Power and Energy Society General Meeting, IEEE 2012:1–8.Search in Google Scholar

44. Zhao C, Topcu U, Low SH. Optimal load control via frequency measurement and neighborhood area communication. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2013;28:3576–3587.10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2261096Search in Google Scholar

45. Jahromi A, Bouffard F. Contingency-type reserve leveraged through aggregated thermostatically-controlled loads—Part I: Characterization and control. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 31.3, 2016: 1972–198010.1109/TPWRS.2015.2466175Search in Google Scholar

46. Jahromi A, Bouffard F. Contingency-type reserve leveraged through aggregated thermostatically-controlled loads—Part II: Characterization and control. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 31.3, 2016: 1981–1989.10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2466193Search in Google Scholar

47. Lian J, Hansen J, Marinovici LD, Kalsi K. Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), 2016, IEEE 2016:1–5. Hierarchical decentralized control strategy for demand-side primary frequency response.10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741267Search in Google Scholar

48. Dong L. Decentralized load frequency control for an interconnected power system with nonlinearities. American Control Conference (ACC) 2016, IEEE. 2016;5915–5920.10.1109/ACC.2016.7526597Search in Google Scholar

49. Muñoz-Benavente I, Gómez-Lázaro E, García-Sánchez T, Vigueras-Rodríguez A, Molina-García A. Implementation and assessment of a decentralized load frequency control: Application to power systems with high wind energy penetration. Energies. 2017;10:151.10.3390/en10020151Search in Google Scholar

50. Kamwa I, Grondin R, Asber D, Gingras J, Trudel G. Large-scale active-load modulation for angle stability improvement. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1999;14:582–590.10.1109/59.761884Search in Google Scholar

51. Moya C, Zhang W, Lian J, Kalsi K. A hierarchical framework for demand-side frequency control. American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE. 2014;52–57.10.1109/ACC.2014.6859304Search in Google Scholar

52. Yu X, Tomsovic K. Application of linear matrix inequalities for load frequency control with communication delays. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2004;19:1508–1515.10.1109/TPWRS.2004.831670Search in Google Scholar

53. Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sánchez CE, Gan D. Matpower: a Matlab power system simulation package Manual. Power Systems Engineering Research Center; Ithaca, NY, 1997.Search in Google Scholar