Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter July 21, 2018

Correlation between Travel Speed, Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Wear Characteristics of Ni-Based Hardfaced Deposits over 316LN Austenitic Stainless Steel

  • S. Gnanasekaran EMAIL logo , G. Padmanaban , V. Balasubramanian , Hemant Kumar and Shaju K. Albert

Abstract

Laser hardfacing were produced using a high power Disk laser of 4 kW maximum power as a heat source to melt and bond the Colmonoy-5 powder on to AISI 316 LN stainless steel substrate. Significant difference in melting points between the austenitic stainless steel (ASS) substrate and Ni-based Colmonoy alloy results in substantial dilution of the hardfaced deposit from the substrate. In this present study, the effect of travel speed (TS) on microstructure, microhardness and wear characteristics laser hardfaced deposits were investigated. The phase constitution, microstructure and hardness of laser hardfaced deposits were examined by optical microscope, scanning electron microscope, energy dispersion spectroscopy, x-ray diffraction and Vickers hardness tester. The TS was varied between 300 and 500 mm/min. The other parameters such as, laser power, powder feed rate, and defocusing distance were kept constant. From this investigation, it is found that the deposit hardness increased from 750 HV to 800 HV with decreasing in TS. The TS increases, bead height decreased and dilution and depth of penetration increased. Due to higher TS the faster cooling rate takes place, it causes the cracking and porosity. Microhardness and wear resistance are slightly improved in the TS of 400 mm/min. The microstructures of deposit layer are composed of Ni-rich carbide, boride and silicide, this are the responsible for higher hardness and better wear resistance.

Introduction

Austenitic stainless steel (ASS, 316 LN) is the major construction material for prototype fast breeder reactor (PFBR). The main vessel, inner vessel, grid plate, and primary piping, etc., whose service temperatures are above 427 °C, are made of 316LN ASS containing 0.06–0.08 % Nitrogen. For primary and secondary piping systems of PFBR, ASS 316LN are preferred due to its corrosion resistance and good creep strength [1]. It is well-known that ASSs have poor wear characteristics during sliding. Their wear rates are typically high and they exhibit a marked tendency to suffer severe damage by galling and seizing. As ASS 316LN material is highly prone to galling and seizing under the sliding contact at high temperature. To avoid the problem of galling, which is an extreme form of adhesive wear, hardfacing of the mating surfaces has been widely used [2].

In comparison to conventional surface-deposition technologies such as spray and fuse or arc-welding processes, laser hardfacing/cladding has distinct advantages including minimal dilution from the base metal, lower heat input and hence less distortion and smaller heat affected zone in the substrate component, fully dense coatings with metallurgical bonding to the substrate, excellent control of the layer thickness and composition, better surface quality and tight dimensional tolerances with higher material usage and little or no after-machining, the possibility of selective and precise deposition on sensitive high-value components, etc [3, 4]. Up to now, laser hardfacing has not been used as widely as the conventional techniques because of drawbacks such as comparatively high capital cost, low deposition rates, and large residual stresses resulting in high cracking susceptibility [5]. The issues of high capital cost and low deposition rates have largely been solved in recent years by technological advances such as the introduction of high power diode laser and high power disk lasers with a beam as wide as 1 inch and integration of inductive heating modules to laser hardfacing heads. For example, with the laser as the only energy source, deposition rates of 9 kg/h of Inconel 625 corrosion protective coatings on large cylindrical components are reported. Furthermore, a deposition rate of 14–16 kg/h of Inconel 625 can be achieved with the simultaneous application of an 8-kW laser and 12-kW induction power [6].

Although the induction assisted laser hardfacing systems are also reported to greatly reduce the cracking problem of laser clad deposits, cracking is still the biggest materials engineering challenge for a more widespread application of laser hardfacing, especially for high hardness alloys such as Ni-Cr-B-Si-C [3]. Ni-Cr-B-Si-C hardfacing alloys are among the most widely used alloys for applications requiring corrosion and wear resistance. These alloys with their low melting point and self-fluxing properties were originally developed for spray and fuse applications. In recent years, laser-deposition technologies were successfully used to produce dense Ni-Cr-B-Si-C coatings with metallurgical bonding to the substrate and superior functional properties [7, 8, 9]. Despite the desirable corrosion and wear properties of Ni-Cr-B-Si-C alloys and their potential for many surface coatings, as well as repair and free-form manufacturing applications [3, 10, 11], high cracking propensity poses a serious drawback to their usage in laser-deposition technologies [12].

During the solidification and the subsequent rapid cooling, shrinkage of the melt pool and the constraint of the substrate may produce tensile stresses in the clad layer up to several hundred MPa [3]. When combined with the low ductility of the clad layer, these tensile stresses can surpass the ultimate tensile strength of the deposit and result in a rapid propagation of cracks. In this cracking process, both tensile stresses and ductility of the deposits play a role. Hence, the efforts to solve the cracking problem of laser-deposited coatings have been focused on either reducing the tensile stresses in the hardfaced layers or increasing the ductility of the deposited alloys. The combination of laser cladding and simultaneous induction preheating, which is being increasingly used to deposit crack-free Ni-Cr-B-Si-C coatings [13, 14]. Li et al. studied the influences of processing parameters on forming characterizations during laser hardfacing. They reported that processing parameters are closely related, so would produce intricate effects on the properties of the hardfacing deposit [15]. Zhang et al. reported that effect of processes parameter on bead height, bead width, penetration depth and dilution of laser hardfaced Colmonoy 6 deposits are analyzed. Increasing the travel speed (TS), bead height and bead width decreased however, penetration depth and dilution increased [16].

High rate of cooling (Faster TS) during solidification which is believed to improve the functional properties of the deposits such as hardness. In addition to increase the cooling rate and of course reducing the processing time, higher TS is reported to improve the energy efficiency of the process [17, 18, 19]. Due to these benefits, there is a motivation to increase the TS during the laser hardfacing process. On the other hand, hardfacing at higher TSs increases the risk of forming defects, e.g. crack and porosity, in the deposited layers [20, 21]. In this investigation more complete picture about correlation between TS, microhardness and wear resistance of laser hardfaced deposit. Also answer the question of whether faster TS beneficial or not and hence accepting the higher risk of forming defects is compensated by a significant improvement in the hardness and wear resistance of deposit.

Experimental details

Substrate and powder details

The chemical composition of the base metal was obtained using a vacuum spectrometer. The chemical composition of the base metal and powder is presented in Tables 1 and 2. Physical properties of hardfaced powder shown in the Table 3. Rolled plates of 12 mm thickness has been used as the base material. The substrate was preheated to 450°C to relieve the internal stresses and also to reduce the cooling rate to avoid the formation of cracks after deposition. The average thickness of deposit was about 1–2 mm on the stainless steel. Table 4 shows fixing the working range of TS, based on multiple trials the working range has been fixed. After hardfacing, the deposits were cut into small samples for the metallography study. Five ml Ethanol, 3 ml HNO3 and 10 ml HF was used to etch the transverse cross-section of the deposit. A Vickers microhardness testing machine (Make: SHIMADZU, Japan; Model: HMV−2T) was employed to measure the hardness across the hardfaced deposit cross section with a load of 0.5 kg and dwell time of 15 s. Microstructural analysis was carried out using a light optical microscope (OM) (Make: MEIJI, Japan; Model: MIL−7100) incorporated with an image analyzing software (Metal Vision).

Table 1:

Chemical composition (wt %) of substrate material.

AISI 316LNCNiCrMoSiMnCuNbSPWFe
0.02012.5517.272.350.291.690.0470.020.0270.0260.03Bal
Table 2:

Chemical composition (wt %) of hardfaced powder.

Colmonoy-5CFeCrSiBONi
0.413.1010.444.022.260.03Bal
Table 3:

Physical properties of hardfaced powder.

Flow rate(sec/50 g)App. density (g/cm3)Hardness

(HRC)
Particle size (mesh) μm
164.5051–54± 45 to 180
Table 4:

Macrostructure analysis for fixing the working range of travel speed.

Parameters rangeMacrographName of the defectReason
TS>500 mm/minCracksLow heat input (Faster cooling)
TS<300 mm/minDilution and Bead hightHigher heat input

Laser hardfacing setup

The system for laser hardfacing consists of solid state disc laser Trumpf TruDisk 8002, which emits on wavelength 1030 nm and maximal available power is 5300 W. The laser radiation is coupled via 600 μm optical fiber to Practice coaxial four-way cladding head YC52. The cladding head is equipped with motorized collimator which allows changing of laser spot diameter in the range from 1.26 to 3.37 mm. The hardfacing head is mounted on industrial robot Fanuc M-710iC. The pure argon (99.9 %) was used as a powder feeding gas and also as a shielding gas. The laser hardfacing system is on the Figure 1. The experiments were conducted by forming a single layer.

Figure 1: Arrangements of laser hardfacing.
Figure 1:

Arrangements of laser hardfacing.

Dilution

Hardfaced specimens were extracted by sectioning at the middle of the deposit. Metallographic procedures were followed to polish the specimen surface and specimens were etched using 2 % Nital. Bead profile and bead geometries as shown in Figure 2 were visualized and recorded using the scanner at high resolution. Area (%A and %B) was calculated using image analyzing software (Metal Vision). Dilution was calculated using the following expression [2].

Dilution(%)=BA+B×100%.
Figure 2: Bead profile and bead geometries.
Figure 2:

Bead profile and bead geometries.

Results and discussions

Effects of TS on macrostructure, microstructure

The macrostructure of the hardfaced specimens is shown in the Figures 3 and 4. TS varied between 300 mm/min, 400 mm/min, 500 mm/min and other parameters are kept in to constant (Table 5). At lower TS 300 mm/min, bead height higher and dilution, penetration depth is low for the reason that repetitive heating due to slow TS, powder flow is high so bead height increased. Impact of TS on macrostructure, we can see that bead height decrease with increasing the TS, however, penetration depth and dilution increase (Figure 5). In actuality, while expanding the TS, the energy utilized for building up the bead gets less, so the bead height decrease. In any case, in the meantime, the energy for heating the base material becomes much more, thus the penetration depth and dilution increase.

Figure 3: Effect of travel speed on macrostructure.
Figure 3:

Effect of travel speed on macrostructure.

Figure 4: Effect of travel speed on deposit thicknesses.
Figure 4:

Effect of travel speed on deposit thicknesses.

Figure 5: Effects of travel speed on bead height, penetration depth and dilution.
Figure 5:

Effects of travel speed on bead height, penetration depth and dilution.

Table 5:

Processes parameter and heat input for travel speed.

Travel speed (mm/min)Laser power (W)Powder feed rate (g/min)Defocusing distance (mm)Heat input (J/mm)Specific energy(E) (kJ/g)Powder density (g/mm2)
300150072730012.850.00777
4002250.00583
5001800.00466

The effects of the TS on the microstructure are shown in Figures 6(a-c). When the TS is 300 mm/min, coarse dendrites are observed in the deposit layer. When the laser TS is increased to 400 mm/min, the coarse dendrites are relatively fine. When laser TS is further increased to 500 mm/min, the dendrites are finer. So, for low TS, the growth of the γ-nickel is characterized by coarse columnar dendrites, the phases between the γ-nickel dendrites are eutectic phases. As the TS increases, the γ-nickel dendrites become fine. Microstructure of the nickel-based laser hardfaced deposits are directly related to the hardfacing parameters considered, for example, the laser power, powder feed rate, TS and defocusing distance. In the present investigation, laser powder, powder feed rate, and defocusing distance are fixed, so the effects of the TS are examined. The microstructure of the hardfaced samples with TS are related more obviously in terms of specific energy ES (kJ/g). Specific energy is defined as energy available per unit mass. Es=P/PFR kJ/g, where P is the laser power [22]. Microstructure at each region depends on the cooling rate and temperature gradient. In the laser deposited Ni-based layer, the main solidification structure is characterized by columnar crystals at the bottom and equiaxed crystals on the top surface. Due to the high-temperature gradient (G) and lower solidification rate (V), at the solid–liquid interface, epitaxial growth from the substrate occurs in the bottom area, showing a typical directional solidification characteristic. In the top area of the melt pool, columnar crystals disappear and equiaxed crystals appear due to the local lower G and higher V conditions [22, 23]. Figures 7(a-d) shows that the Scanning electron microstructure of hardfaced samples differs from a cellular to a dendritic morphology with increasing TS, equivalent to decreasing specific energy. This is because low specific energy will lead to a lesser molten-clad mass temperature, which thus brings about a colder substrate. Hence, a higher cooling rate for ensuing the solidification process. Remember that dendritic solidification is promoted by high temperature gradient and lower solidification rate.

Figure 6: Effect of travel speed on microstructure.
Figure 6:

Effect of travel speed on microstructure.

Figure 7: Scanning electron micrograph for various regions.
Figure 7:

Scanning electron micrograph for various regions.

Laser deposits consist of three general components: Cr-rich precipitates such as CrB, CrC, Ni solid solution dendrites, Ni-B-Si binary and ternary eutectic phases including NiB, NiSi (Figures 7(a-d)) [24]. Microstructural analysis of the hardfaced deposit in the back scattered image (BSE) mode show two distinct types of precipitates: floret (Eutectics) and grey (Cr23C7). Figure 7(d) represents a BSE image of the microstructure of Colmonoy 5 deposit. Floret and grey precipitates are marked and shown in the Figures 7(c) and (d), respectively, while the white matrix is marked in Figure 7(b). The EDS analysis (Figure 8(b)) identifies floret region as γ-(Ni, Fe)/Cr7C3 eutectic. As shown in Figure 8(b), the EDS result confirms that the darker blocky region contains Ni solid solution γ- (Ni, Fe). The precipitates in the fine lamellar regions are Ni3Si, and they form the eutectic structure γ-(Ni, Fe)/Ni3Si with the matrix (Figure 7(c)). Liyanage et al. reported the presence of Ni3Si in their work [25]. The EDS analysis shows that many chromium boride precipitates are CrB (black region) around the γ-(Ni, Fe)/Cr7C3 eutectic region and some of them connect to the precipitate tips of the floret in shape.

Figure 8: Scanning electron micrograph of the deposit and spot EDS.
Figure 8:

Scanning electron micrograph of the deposit and spot EDS.

Figure 9 shows XRD analysis of the deposit indicating that the precipitates mainly correspond to the phases (Ni,Fe)3B, Ni3Si, Cr7C3, Cr23C7, CrB, and Ni3B. The fcc γ-nickel peaks are most prominent [26]. EDS elemental mapping of the deposit is shown in (Figures 10(a–f)). SEM image of the deposit is shown Figure 10(a) and respective elemental maps of chromium, iron, nickel and silicon are shown in Figure 10(b–e). Figure 10(c) shows that the precipitates are rich in chromium and depleted in nickel content. From Figure 10(d), it is evident that the needle-like structure is chromium rich phase. Figures 11(a-c) shows the EDS line scan qualitative compositional profiles of the constituent elements across the substrate–deposit interface of the hardfaced layers. It infers that Fe content observed in the hardfaced deposit is mainly from the substrate material as Colmonoy-5 powder contains minimal Fe content (3.10 wt % Fe) (Figure 12(a-c)). This Fe content is used as a metallurgical measure for the dilution of the deposit, and to compare various hardfaced deposits. The amounts of dilution were diverse in all the laser hardfaced deposits, depending upon the TS (refer Figures 12(a, b, c)). The amount of dilution is found to not much variations with increasing TS [27]. The dilution of Fe in the clad layer deposited at intermediate TS (400 mm/min) is inferior, passing from ~ 10 cps at the substrate/clad interface (20 µm) to ~ 5 cps in the deposit. Moreover, dilution of the substrate from clad material is negligible.

Figure 9: XRD diffraction pattern of the deposit.
Figure 9:

XRD diffraction pattern of the deposit.

Figure 10: Scanning electron micrograph of the deposit, EDS and elemental mapping.
Figure 10:

Scanning electron micrograph of the deposit, EDS and elemental mapping.

Figure 11: EDS line scan of the constituent elements across substrate/deposit interface. Hardfaced layer deposited at travel speed (a) 300 mm/min, (b) 400 mm/min, (c) 500 mm/min.
Figure 11:

EDS line scan of the constituent elements across substrate/deposit interface. Hardfaced layer deposited at travel speed (a) 300 mm/min, (b) 400 mm/min, (c) 500 mm/min.

Figure 12: Effect of travel speed on Iron (Fe) content.
Figure 12:

Effect of travel speed on Iron (Fe) content.

In contrast, the dilution of hardfaced deposit deposited with higher TS (500 mm/min) is moderate (10–12 cps) near the substrate/deposit interface (~ 30–35 µm) and decreased to 6 cps above the interface, remaining constant along the track. Moderate dilution is recorded in the lower TS of 300 mm/min, ~ 10–14 cps, near the interface (30–40 µm) of the deposit, which indicate alloying of deposit material with the substrate throughout the deposit. When increasing the TS, the energy used for building up the bead gets less, however, at the same time, the energy for heating the base material becomes much more, thus the penetration depth and dilution increase. Figure 13 shows the Ni, Cr, C and Si content variations in the substrate/deposit interface and deposits for different TS. It’s conformed that absents of Ni in all Cr rich regions (refer Figure 13). Similarly C and Si peaks are absorbed, based on that the precipitates are conformed. The overall Fe content in the deposit varied depending on their dilution with the substrate. EDS analysis also reveals higher Fe content near the interface and decreased further away from interface. In the EDS analysis, it is not possible to quantify the amount of boron in the deposit. Despite the fact that no quantitative results are available for this element, boron seems to be distributed in the track, although it cannot be specified certainly if it is preferentially located in the solid solution or in the precipitates. The differences between the initial and final compositions may be due to the boron and carbon contents which are impossible to quantify with the analysis technique used. Gurumoorthy et.al. reported that needle-like structure is rich in carbon and floret-like structure is rich in boron [28]. Hemmati et.al. reported that as Fe content increases, borides slowly reduce. Likewise, significantly lower amounts of Ni–Si–B eutectic phases form as a result of Fe pickup. In addition, higher Fe content modified and crushed the precipitation of CrB at the start and the formation of Ni–Si–B eutectics at the end of the solidification. Dismissal of the strengthening components dropped the hardness of the deposit [29].

Figure 13: Effect of travel speed on Nickel (Ni), Chromium (Cr), Carbon (C) and Slicon (Si) content.
Figure 13:

Effect of travel speed on Nickel (Ni), Chromium (Cr), Carbon (C) and Slicon (Si) content.

Effect of TS on microhardness

The hardness profile across the deposit, interface and substrate is shown in Figure 14. It can be observed that with the increasing of the distance, the hardness profiles all present increasing trend. It is apparent that the microhardness of the laser hardfacing deposit is much higher than that of the substrate and the interface is significantly improved. In case of microhardness on TS, there is no much different in hardness in all case. It can be seen that clad passes produced at lower TS generally registered higher hardness (800 HV) than those clad at higher TS (750 HV), average base metal hardness is around 230 HV. An average of three times increases in the hardness of the Colmonoy 5 deposits are observed compared to the substrate.

Figure 14: Effects of travel speed on microhardness.
Figure 14:

Effects of travel speed on microhardness.

The high hardness of these Ni based hardfacing alloys are due to presence of a large number of boride and carbide precipitates in the matrix [24, 28]. Consequently, the hardness increases as a result of fine microstructure. So, the wear resistance has been related to hardness. The higher hardness of the deposit is attributed to the existence of uniformly distributed carbides and borides precipitates. Similarly, with an increasing TS, the heating temperature of the powder particles decrease and faster cooling rate which leads to cracking.

Effects of TS on dry sliding wear behavior

Pin-on-disc wear test was conducted as per ASTM G99–05 [30]. Wear test was conducted for substrate and hardfaced deposits. Wear test parameters are shown in Table 6. Wear tests were carried out under self-mating condition at room temperature. Maximum weight loss at the initial stage of the wear test is recorded. Weight loss is attributed to the asperities on the wear surface of specimens, which result in the confined contact area of the friction pair than its nominal counterpart. With the test running, the asperities flake off the surface, and the weight loss stabilized [31, 32].

Table 6:

Pin on disc wear test parameters.

ParametersValues
PinD=10 mm, L=20 mm
DiscD=160 mm, W=8 mm
Load50 N
Velocity range1 m/s
Sliding distance500 m

The specimen used for friction and wear tests were made by single-pass laser hardfaced deposits. The coefficient of friction of the specimen with lower TS (300 mm/min) deposit is consequently lower than that of specimen made with higher TS (500 mm/min). Figure 15 displays the coefficient of friction graphs. It shows specimen without laser hardfacing (substrate) is 0.47–0.5 and laser deposits are 0.142, 0.15, and 0.253 for TS of 300, 400, and 500 mm/min, respectively. Increasing the TS, coefficient of friction increased. Compared to higher TS hardfaced deposit, lower TS hardfaced deposit shows little bit higher wear resistance. On the other hand, as the TS increases, less powder is available per unit length of the clad pass (Ref Table 5), so wear resistance is low. Deposit made with lower TS shows better wear resistance compare to higher TS. This enactment is because of the hard phases in the deposit which plays a protective role during the wear test and improves the wear resistance of materials, such as chromium borides (with a hardness of 2575 VHN) and chromium carbides (with a hardness of 1670 VHN) [33]. The wear resistance of specimen with and without hardfacing (substrate) is shown in Figure 16. The mean weight loss of substrate specimen is 0.62 g, but the mean weight loss of specimen with laser hardfacing is varied between 0.02779, 0.02836 and 0.03472 g for TS of 300, 400, and 500 mm/min correspondingly. Hence, 25–30 times increase in wear resistance of AISI 316LN ASS has been recorded after laser hardfacing of Colmonoy 5 powder.

Figure 15: Coefficient of friction graphs for substrate and different travel speed.
Figure 15:

Coefficient of friction graphs for substrate and different travel speed.

Figure 16: Effects of travel speed on weight loss.
Figure 16:

Effects of travel speed on weight loss.

Conclusions

The laser hardfacing of Colmonoy 5 powder on AISI 316LN ASS was investigating in details, we can get a few conclusions as following:

  1. The TS bead affect the quality of bead. When the TS increased, bead height and bead width decrease however, penetration depth and dilution slightly increase. Because faster TS (500 mm/min) powder density is low, so excess laser power melt the substrate. When the TS is low (300 mm/min), coarse dendrites are observed in the deposit layer, because of high heat input.

  2. Microstructure of the hardfaced deposit consists of γ-Ni solid solution phase as dendrite. The interdendritic constituent comprises γ-Ni and Ni-rich borides. The microstructure also discloses the presence of a large number of precipitate particles as well as chromium-rich carbides and borides.

  3. Laser hardfaced sample exhibited the better wear resistance compared to substrate. This enactment is because of the hard phases in the deposit which plays a protective role throughout the wear test and improves the wear resistance of materials. The effect of TS on wear resistance and microhardness is not as noticeable. But TS is an impartment processes parameter for other point of view like cracking, bead height. The TS of 400 mm/min gives better deposit because of moderate dilution, fine dendrites, and moderate bead height.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to UGC-DAE consortium for providing financial assistance to carry out this investigation (Project No. CSR-KN/CRS-56/2013–14/656 dated 04.09.13). Authors wish to express their sincere thanks to M/s. Geometrix Laser Solutions Pvt Limited, Tada for laser hardfacing facility. Authors also express their sincere thanks to The Director, IGCAR, Kalpakkam for the base metal supply.

References

[1] S.L. Mannan, S.C. Chetal, B. Raj and S.B. Bhoje, Materials R&D for Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor, Edited by S.L. Mannan and M.D. Mathew, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam (2003).Search in Google Scholar

[2] G. Chakraborty, N. Kumar, C.R. Das, S.K. Albert, A.K. Bhaduri, S. Dash and A.K. Tyagi, Surf. Coat. Technol., 244 (2014) 180–188.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.02.013Search in Google Scholar

[3] K.P. Cooper, Laser surface processing in ASM Handbook, 10th Edition, Vol. 18, Friction, Lubrication, and Wear Technology, Edited by George E. Totten, ASM International (1992), pp. 861–872.Search in Google Scholar

[4] J.T.M. De Hosson, V. Ocelık, U.O.B. De Oliveira and D.I. Vainchtein, Int. J. Mater. Res., 100 (2009) 1343–1360.10.3139/146.110203Search in Google Scholar

[5] Y. Huang and X. Zeng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 256 (2010) 5985–5992.10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.106Search in Google Scholar

[6] E. Beyer, New Industrial Systems & Concepts for Highest Laser Cladding Efficiency. http://www.lia.org/blog/2011/05/high-performance-laser-cladding.Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Conde, F. Zubiri and J. De Damborenea, Sci. Eng. A., 334 (2002) 233–238.10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01808-1Search in Google Scholar

[8] J.M. Miguel, J.M. Guilemany and S. Vizcaino, Tribol. Int., 36 (2003) 181–187.10.1016/S0301-679X(02)00144-5Search in Google Scholar

[9] E. Ferna´Ndez, M. Cadenas, R. Gonza´Lez, C. Navas, R. Ferna´Ndez and J. De Damborenea, Wear., 259 (2005) 870–875.10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.063Search in Google Scholar

[10] C.P. Paul, A. Jain, P. Ganesh, J. Negi and A.K. Nath, Opt. Lasers Eng., 44 (2006) 1096–1109.10.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.08.005Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Angelastro, S.L. Campanelli and A.D. Ludovico, Adv. Mater. Res., 83–86 (2009) 842–849.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.83-86.842Search in Google Scholar

[12] D. Wang, E. Liang, M. Chao and B. Yuan, Surf. Coat. Technol., 202 (2008) 1371–1378.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.036Search in Google Scholar

[13] S. Zhou, X. Dai and H. Zheng, Opt. Laser Technol., 43 (2011) 613–621.10.1016/j.optlastec.2010.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[14] Y. Huang, X. Zeng, Q. Hu and S. Zhou, Appl. Surf. Sci., 255 (2009) 3940–3945.10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.050Search in Google Scholar

[15] Y.M. Li, H.O. Yang, X. Lin, W.D. Huang, J.G. Li and Y.H. Zhou, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 360 (2003) 18–25.10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00435-0Search in Google Scholar

[16] H. Zhang, Y. Shi, M. Kutsuna and G.J. Xu, Nucl. Eng. Des., 240 (2010) 2691–2696.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.05.040Search in Google Scholar

[17] K. Partes, T. Seefeld, G. Sepold and F. Vollertsen, High efficiency laser cladding at elevated processing speed, in: 24th ICALEO Congress Proceedings, LIA, Miami, FL., 2005: pp. 621–628.10.2351/1.5060436Search in Google Scholar

[18] K. Partes, G. Sepold and J. Mater, Process. Technol., 195 (2008) 27–33.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.052Search in Google Scholar

[19] K. Partes, Surf. Coat. Technol., 204 (2009) 366–371.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.07.041Search in Google Scholar

[20] I. Hemmati, Laser-Deposited Metallic Coatings: Processing, Characterization, Alloy Development, Ph.D Thesis, University of Groningen, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[21] S. Gnanasekaran, G. Padmanaban, V. Balasubramanian, H. Kumar and S.K. Albert, J Mech Behav Mater., 26 (2017) 113–126.10.1515/jmbm-2017-0020Search in Google Scholar

[22] L.C. Lim, Q. Ming and Z.D. Chen, Surf. Coatings Technol., 106 (1998) 183–192.10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00525-8Search in Google Scholar

[23] Majumdar J. Dutta and I. Manna, Laser-Assisted Fabrication of Materials, Salmon Tower Building, New York City, United States: Springer Series in Materials Science, 161 (2012).10.1007/978-3-642-28359-8_1Search in Google Scholar

[24] S. Gnanasekaran, G. Padmanaban, V. Balasubramanian and L. Manuf, Mater. Process., 4 (2017) 178–192.10.1007/s40516-017-0045-zSearch in Google Scholar

[25] T. Liyanage, G. Fisher and A.P. Gerlich, Surf. Coatings Technol., 205 (2010) 759–765.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.095Search in Google Scholar

[26] Powder diffraction File: PDF-2 database (computer file), JCPDS International Centre for diffraction Data, Newton Square, PA, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Q. Ming, L.C. Lim and Z.D. Chenc, Surf. Coatings Technol., 106 (1998) 174–182.10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00524-6Search in Google Scholar

[28] K. Gurumoorthy, M. Kamaraj, K.P. Rao, A.S. Rao and S. Venugopal, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 456 (2007) 11–19.10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.121Search in Google Scholar

[29] I. Hemmati, V. Ocelik and J.T.M. De Hosson, Mater. Lett., 84 (2012) 69–72.10.1016/j.matlet.2012.06.054Search in Google Scholar

[30] ASTM G 99 – 04, Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk Apparatus, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2016), www.astm.org.Search in Google Scholar

[31] ASM Metal Handbook, ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1993) Vol. 6 9th 794–795.Search in Google Scholar

[32] H. Ocken, Surf. Coatings Technol., 76–77 (1995) 456–461.10.1016/0257-8972(95)02573-1Search in Google Scholar

[33] C. Sudha, P. Shankar, R.V.S. Rao, R. Thirumurugesan, M. Vijayalakshmi and B. Raj, Surf. Coatings Technol., 202 (2008) 2103–2112.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.063Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-11-26
Accepted: 2018-04-08
Published Online: 2018-07-21
Published in Print: 2019-02-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 3.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2017-0176/html
Scroll to top button