Reviewed Publication:
Elisa Mattielo, Analogy in word-formation: A study of English neologisms and occasionalisms, 2017. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. x+247. ISBN 9783110548594.
References
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar
Cannon, Garland. 2000. Blending. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie – Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung – An international handbook on inflection and word-formation (Vol. 1), 952–956. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110111286.1.12.952Search in Google Scholar
COCA (2008–2012)=Mark Davies (comp.). The Corpus of Contemporary American English. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca.Search in Google Scholar
Ten Hacken, Pius & Renáta Panocová. 2011. Individual and social aspects of word formation. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny 58. 283–300.Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1974. Remarks on analogical change. In John M. Anderson & Charles Jones (eds.), Proceedings of the first international congress of historical linguistics, vol. 1: Syntax, morphology, internal and comparative reconstruction, 257–276. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Search in Google Scholar
OED. 2000–2017.=John Simpson (ed.) Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com.Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1880. Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar
Urban Dictionary (1999–2017), Urban Dictionary, initiated by Aaron Peckham, http://www.urbandictionary.com.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston