Abstract
We optically study the as-yet little explored multiferroic material, BaTiO3-BiFeO3 (BTO-BFO), that has demonstrated enhanced magnetic properties, a higher DC resistance in comparison to BFO, and improved magnetoelectric coupling. Our studies include: ultrafast time resolved differential reflection, optically induced birefringence, and second-harmonic nano-imaging of the ferroic order. We observe a strong sensitivity to pump/probe polarizations, photo-induced ferroelectric poling on a picosecond timescale, as well as the generation of photo-induced coherent acoustic phonons with a frequency of
1 Introduction
Multiferroic materials can exhibit simultaneous ferroelectric, ferromagnetic, and ferroelastic order (Eerenstein, Mathur, and Scott 2006, Zhao et al. 2006). They have been proposed for the conversion of light at optical frequencies into THz frequencies (Rana et al. 2009), DC polarizations (Yang et al. 2009), and for the fabrication of multifunctional devices (Eerenstein, Mathur, and Scott 2006, Cheong and Mostovoy 2007, Ramesh and Spaldin 2007). BiFeO3 (BFO) is a single phase multiferroic and has attracted a lot of interest due to its high Néel and Curie temperatures, as well as its ferroelectric and anti-ferromagnetic properties (Ederer and Spaldin 2005, Hur et al. 2004, Ryu et al. 2011). In BFO based systems, optically induced birefringence (Rivera and Schmid 1997), optically induced strain waves (Lejman et al. 2014, Chen et al. 2012), and electrical control of acoustic phonons (Rovillain et al. 2010) have been observed.
One inherent challenge in utilizing BFO for multifunction devices is that the large leakage currents, due to increased conductivity from oxygen vacancies and Fe ions, degrade its ferroelectric properties. In this paper we focus on a solid-state solution of BaTiO3-BiFeO3 (BTO-BFO) where the addition of another perovskite material reduces the conductivity of the composite material (Park et al. 2010, Yang et al. 2013). In addition, previous investigations on the BTO-BFO solid solutions have found the presence of a morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) (Yang et al. 2013). Further, this solid-state solution was an enhanced magnetoelectric properties for mole fraction between 72.5 %–75 % BFO with the 72.5 % BFO samples showing the strongest magneto-electric coupling. In these samples the enhancement of magnetic properties were attributed to active spin modulation of ordered Fe-O-Fe bond (Park et al. 2010, Yang et al. 2013). It was found that the substitution of large
In this work, we report time resolved and second harmonic generation (SHG) measurements of (1–x)BTO–(x)BFO
2 Experimental Approach
For our optical measurements we used a Ti:Sapphire amplifier with repetition rate of 1kHz, center wavelength of 800 nm, and pulse duration of 100 fs. The laser pulses were split into a pump and a probe beam. The pump pulses were delayed using a moving mirror, then frequency doubled to 400 nm via a 0.5 mm thick BBO crystal. The pump and probe beams were focused and overlapped on the sample at an angle of 45°. The probe beam has a spot size of
In order to relate the macroscopic measurements that average over multiple domains to the underlying microscopic domain order, we use the symmetry selectivity of SHG both in far-field, and for near-field nano-imaging, in scattering scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) geometry, to determine symmetry characteristics and the ferroelectric (FE) domain texture of the BTO-BFO films as described previously (Neacsu et al. 2009, Atkin et al. 2012). Figure 1(a) shows the schematic of the experiment, based on a combination of a parabolic mirror based excitation and detection scheme (Sackrow et al. 2008), with axial illumination and detection and a shear-force AFM based near-field SHG imaging implementation (Neacsu et al. 2009). Pump radiation provided from a Ti:sapphire oscillator (Femtolasers Inc., with
3 Results and Discussions
The poly-crystalline BTO-BFO for this study is composed of a mixture of BTO and BFO and was grown on platinized (100) silicon substrate using KrF excimer pulsed laser
For TRDR measurements, we employed a two color technique, with the pump wavelength of 400 nm (3.09 eV) between the bandgaps of BFO (2.67 eV) (Xu et al. 2009) and BTO (3.50 eV) (Joshi and Desu 1997; An et al. 2011; Jin et al. 2012), where our optical absorption measurements demonstrated a large absorption at 400 nm, and the probe wavelength of 800 nm (1.55 eV) below both bandgaps. In Figure 3, we show examples of the TRDR, where the difference between the pump and the probe polarizations are 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° (where 0° refers to the pump and probe polarizations being parallel), as shown in the inset of Figure 3. These pump-probe transients display a sharp initial decrease in the reflectivity, followed by a fast recovery over 2 ps, and finally a slower relaxation towards zero. This observation was consistent over all the probed spots, suggesting that the local disorder in the poly-crystalline film is not playing an important role, even in the presence of long range anisotropy in this film.
The fits to
Although the probe frequency is sub-bandgap, the change in reflectivity is still due to the complex refractive index associated with interband transitions. Excitation and subsequent phonon-mediated energy relaxation of carriers changes the occupation of electron and hole states which leads to fast variation of the complex refractive index. Another possible “intermediate time” scattering mechanism can originate from the diffusion of the photoexcited carriers (for 400 nm pulses, the absorption length in this material is about 32 nm) across the film thickness where they can recombine due to defects at the interface. In BFO, the photo-excited carriers are expected to have a relatively long lifetime (1–2 ns) (Sheu et al. 2012), which could not be detected in the range of our experimental setup. In addition, time-resolved synchrotron x-ray diffraction measurements in BFO, demonstrated that the strain developed within 100 ps, relaxed in several ns (Wen et al. 2013).
For longer time scales, as shown in Figure 4, there is also a sinusoidal oscillation in the TRDR. The black line in Figure 4 is the sinusoidal fit to the observed oscillation and has a frequency of
Using 800 nm with the absorption length of
We also explored the transient birefringence by probing the changes in the polarization of the reflected probe pulses
The decay of
Our SHG results both in near- and far-field, demonstrate similar sensitivity to polarization, as observed in our TRDR and TROIB measurements. Figure 6(a) shows a far-field rotational SHG anisotropy detected in the reflection mode with P- and S-polarized excitation (Pin and Sin), and indicates a significant net sample ferroelectric polarization (offset angle due to arbitrary sample orientation with respect to incident polarization). The Sin SHG signal is larger than for Pin due to the loss of in-plane electric field component due to the angle of incidence. The finite signal is the result of incomplete domain cancelation due to the small laser focus, angle of incidence, and retardation effects. However, no specific domain contrast is observed in the far-field SHG response (Figure 6(b)). It is also of note, that we do not observe the presence of any magnon side bands which have been previously observed in BFO (Ramirez et al. 2009). On the other hand, distinct ferroelectric (FE) domain contrast is observed in near-field SHG imaging (Figure 6(c) and (d)) under both SinSout and PinPout polarization combination as a superposition of amplitude and heterodyne phase contrast SHG due to interference with the far-field SHG background, as described previously (Neacsu et al. 2009; Atkin et al. 2012). Despite the polycrystalline film structure, distinct FE contrast is observed with domains extending over multiple crystallites. The FE domains are highly disordered but otherwise exhibit predominantly two (SinSout), or one (PinPout) dominant orientations, as also seen in the 2D Fourier transformed image (inset). These FE features are generally observed over extended sample regions. The spatial features are similar to the complex domain structures of BFO thin films and other multiferroics systems as observed previously by TEM and piezo-response force microscopy (PFM) (Zhao et al. 2006). Furthermore, both the generation of far field SHG and the magnitude of the TROIB response are sensitive to the polarization of the pump pulses suggesting a link between these two phenomena. The transient nature of the TROIB response combined with our observations of large ferroelectric domains in the nano-SHG cause us to attribute this response to optically driven poling in the BTO-BFO.
In summary, we report time-resolved and SHG measurements of (1-x)BTO-(x)BFO
Award Identifier / Grant number: FA9550-14-1-037
Funding statement: This work has been supported by AFOSR through grant FA9550-14-1-0376 and the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech. This work made use of the ICTAS Nanoscale Characterization and Fabrication Laboratory (NCFL) facility.
References
Akimov, A. V., A. V. Scherbakov, D. R. Yakovlev, C. T. Foxon, and M. Bayer. 2006. “Ultrafast Band-Gap Shift Induced by a Strain Pulse in Semiconductor Heterostructures.” Physical Review Letters 97:037401.Search in Google Scholar
An, Y. Q., A. J. Taylor, S. D. Conradson, S. A. Trugman, T. Durakiewicz, and G. Rodriguez. 2011. “Ultrafast Hopping Dynamics of 5F Electrons in the Mott Insulator UO2 Studied by Femtosecond Pump-Probe Spectroscopy.” Physical Review Letters 106:207402.Search in Google Scholar
Atkin, J. M., S. Berweger, A. C. Jones, and M. B. Raschke. 2012. “Nano-Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy of Order, Phases, and Domains in Complex Solids.” Advances in Physics 61:745–842.Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, D. W., C. J. Stanton, and K. Hess. 1990. “Numerical Studies of Femtosecond Carrier Dynamics in GaAs.” Physical Review B 42:3423–34.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, L. Y., J. C. Yang, C. W. Luo, C. W. Laing, K. H. Wu, J. -Y. Lin, T. M. Uen, J. Y. Juang, Y. H. Chu, and T. Kobayashi. 2012. “Ultrafast Photoinduced Mechanical Strain in Epitaxial BiFeO3 Thin Films.” Applied Physics Letters 101:041902.Search in Google Scholar
Cheong, S. -W., and M. Mostovoy. 2007. “Multiferroics: A Magnetic Twist for Ferroelectricity.” Nature Materials 6:13–20.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, S., A. Baruth, and S. Adenwalla. 2010. “Magnetization Dynamics Triggered by Surface Acoustic Waves.” Applied Physics Letters 97:232507.Search in Google Scholar
Ederer, C., and N. A. Spaldin. 2005. “Weak Ferromagnetism and Magnetoelectric Coupling in Bismuth Ferrite.” Physical Review B 71:060401.Search in Google Scholar
Eerenstein, W., N. D. Mathur, and J. F. Scott. 2006. “Multiferroic and Magnetoelectric Materials.” Nature 442:759–65.Search in Google Scholar
Esat, F., A. J. Bell, and T. P. Comyn. 2014. “Microstructure development of BiFeO3-PbTiO3 films deposited by pulsed laser deposition on platinum substrates.” Acta Materialia 66:44–53.Search in Google Scholar
Hong, K. -H., J. Kim, S. -H. Lee, and J. K. Shin. 2008. “Strain-Driven Electronic Band Structure Modulation of Si Nanowires.” Nano Letters 8:1335–40.Search in Google Scholar
Hur, N., S. Park, P. A. Sharma, J. S. Ahn, S. Guha, and S. W. Cheong. 2004. “Electric Polarization Reversal and Memory in a Multiferroic Material Induced by Magnetic Fields.” Nature 429:392–5.Search in Google Scholar
Jin, Z., Y. Xu, Z. Zhang, G. Li, X. Lin, G. Ma, Z. Cheng, and X. Wang. 2012. “Structural Dependent Ultrafast Electron-Phonon Coupling in Multiferroic BiFeO3 Films.” Applied Physics Letters 100:071105.Search in Google Scholar
Joshi, P., and S. Desu. 1997. “Structural, Electrical, and Optical Studies on Rapid Thermally Processed Ferroelectric BaTiO3 Thin Films Prepared by Metallo-Organic Solution Deposition Technique.” Thin Solid Films 300:289–94.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, S., and V. Gopalan. 2001. “Strain-Tunable Photonic Band Gap Crystals.” Applied Physics Letters 78:3015–17.Search in Google Scholar
Kini, R. N., K. Nontapot, G. A. Khodaparast, R. E. Welser, and L. J. Guido. 2008. “Time Resolved Measurements of Spin and Carrier Dynamics in InAs Films.” Journal of Applied Physics 103:064318.Search in Google Scholar
Lejman, M., G. Vaudel, I. C. Infante, P. Gemeiner, V. E. Gusev, B. Dkhil, and P. Ruello. 2014. “Giant Ultrafast Photo-Induced Shear Strain in Ferroelectric BiFeO3.” Nature Communications 5:1–7.Search in Google Scholar
Li, J., Z. Liu, Y. Tu, S. -T. Ho, I. W. Jung, L. Ocola, and B. Wessels. 2013. “Photonic Crystal Waveguide Electro-Optic Modulator with a Wide Bandwidth.” Journal of Light-Wave Technology 31:1601–7.Search in Google Scholar
Magill, B. A., M. Bishop, S. A. McGill, Y. Zhou, A. Chopra, D. Maurya, H. -C. Song, S. Priya, and G. A. Khodaparast. 2015. “Ultrafast Magneto-Optical Spectroscopy of BiFeO3-BaTiO3 Based Structures.” Proc. of SPIE 9551:95510T.Search in Google Scholar
Moss, D. M., A. V. Akimov, B. A. Glavin, M. Henini, and A. J. Kent. 2011. “Ultrafast Strain-Induced Current in a GaAs Schottky Diode.” Physical Review Letters 106:066602.Search in Google Scholar
Neacsu, C. C., B. B. van Aken, M. Fiebig, and M. B. Raschke. 2009. “Second-Harmonic Near-Field Imaging of Ferroelectric Domain Structure of YMnO3.” Physical Review B 79:100107.Search in Google Scholar
Park, T. -J., G. C. Papaefthymiou, A. J. Viescas, Y. Lee, H. Zhou, and S. S. Wong. 2010. “Composition-Dependent Magnetic Properties of BiFeO3-BaTiO3 Solid Solution Nanostructures.” Physical Review B 82:024431.Search in Google Scholar
Pradarutti, B., G. Matthus, S. Riehemann, G. Notni, J. Limpert, S. Nolte, and A. Tnnermann. 2007. “Electro-Optical Sampling of Ultrashort THz Pulses by fs-Laser Pulses at 530 Nm with BaTiO3.” Journal of Applied Physics 102:093105.Search in Google Scholar
Ramesh, R., and N. A. Spaldin. 2007. “Multiferroics: Progress and Prospects in Thin Films.” Nature Materials 6:21–9.Search in Google Scholar
Ramirez, M. O., A. Kumar, S. A. Denev, N. J. Podraza, X. S. Xu, R. C. Rai, Y. H. Chu, J. Seidel, L. W. Martin, S. -Y. Yang, et al. 2009. “Magnon Sidebands and Spin-Charge Coupling in Bismuth Ferrite Probed by Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy.” Physical Review B 79:224106.Search in Google Scholar
Rana, D. S., I. Kawayama, K. Mavani, K. Takahashi, H. Murakami, and M. Tonouchi. 2009. “Understanding the Nature of Ultrafast Polarization Dynamics of Ferroelectric Memory in the Multiferroic BiFeO3.” Advanced Materials 21:2881–5.Search in Google Scholar
Rivera, J. P., and H. Schmid. 1997. “On the Birefringence of Magnetoelectric BiFeO3.” Ferroelectrics 204:23–33.Search in Google Scholar
Rovillain, P., R. de Sousa, Y. Gallais, A. Sacuto, M. A. Masson, D. Colson, A. Forget, M. Bibes, A. Barthlmy, and M. Cazayous. 2010. “Electric-Field Control of Spin Waves at Room Temperature in Multiferroic BiFeO3.” Nature Materials 9:975–9.Search in Google Scholar
Ruello, P., T. Pezeril, S. Avanesyan, G. Vaudel, V. Gusev, I. C. Infante, and B. Dkhil. 2012. “Photoexcitation of Gigahertz Longitudinal and Shear Acoustic Waves in BiFeO3 Multiferroic Single Crystal.” Applied Physics Letters 100:212906.Search in Google Scholar
Ryu, J., C. -W. Baek, Y. -S. Lee, N. -K. Oh, G. Han, J. -W. Kim, B. -D. Hahn, J. -J. Choi, W. -H. Yoon, J. -H. Choi, et al. 2011. “Enhancement of Multiferroic Properties in BiFeO3-Ba (Cu1/3Nb2/3)O3: Film Fabricated by Aerosol Deposition.” Journal of the American Ceramic Society 94:355–8.Search in Google Scholar
Sackrow, M., C. Stanciu, M. A. Lieb, and A. J. Meixner. 2008. “Imaging Nanometre-Sized Hot Spots on Smooth Au Films with High-Resolution Tip-Enhanced Luminescence and Raman Near-Field Optical Microscopy.” ChemPhysChem 9:316–20.Search in Google Scholar
Sheu, Y. M., S. A. Trugman, Y. -S. Park, S. Lee, H. T. Yi, S. -W. Cheong, Q. X. Jia, A. J. Taylor, and R. P. Prasankumar. 2012. “Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics and Radiative Recombination in Multiferroic BiFeO3.” Applied Physics Letters 100:242904.Search in Google Scholar
Stanton, C. J., and D. W. Bailey. 1992. “Rate Equations for the Study of Femtosecond Intervalley Scattering in Compound Semiconductors.” Physical Review B 45:8369–77.Search in Google Scholar
Sterbinsky, G. E., B. W. Wessels, J. -W. Kim, E. Karapetrova, P. J. Ryan, and D. J. Keavney. 2010. “Strain-Driven Spin Reorientation in Magnetite/Barium Titanate Heterostructures.” Applied Physics Letters 96:092510.Search in Google Scholar
Takahashi, K., N. Kida, and M. Tonouchi. 2006. “Terahertz Radiation by an Ultrafast Spontaneous Polarization Modulation of Multiferroic BiFeO3 Thin Films.” Physical Review Letters 96:117402.Search in Google Scholar
Ulman, M., D. W. Bailey, L. H. Acioli, F. G. Vallée, C. J. Stanton, E. P. Ippen, and J. G. Fujimoto. 1993. “Femtosecond Tunable Nonlinear Absorption Spectroscopy in Al0.1Ga0.9As.” Physical Review B 47:10267–78.Search in Google Scholar
Wen, H., P. Chen, M. P. Cosgriff, D. A. Walko, J. H. Lee, C. Adamo, R. D. Schaller, J. F. Ihlefeld, E. M. Dufresne, D. G. Schlom, et al. 2013. “Electronic Origin of Ultrafast Photoinduced Strain in BiFeO3.” Physical Review Letters 110:037601.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, X. S., T. V. Brinzari, S. Lee, Y. H. Chu, L. W. Martin, A. Kumar, S. McGill, R. C. Rai, R. Ramesh, V. Gopalan, et al. 2009. “Optical Properties and Magnetochromism in Multiferroic BiFeO3.” Physical Review B 79:134425.Search in Google Scholar
Yang, S. -C., A. Kumar, V. Petkov, and S. Priya. 2013. “Room-Temperature Magnetoelectric Coupling in Single-Phase BaTiO3-BiFeO3 System.” Journal of Applied Physics 113:144101.Search in Google Scholar
Yang, S. Y., L. W. Martin, S. J. Byrnes, T. E. Conry, S. R. Basu, D. Paran, L. Reichertz, J. Ihlefeld, C. Adamo, A. Melville, et al. 2009. “Photovoltaic Effects in BiFeO3.” Applied Physics Letters 95.Search in Google Scholar
Zak, J., E. R. Moog, C. Liu, and S. D. Bader. 1990. “Fundamental magneto-optics.” Journal of Applied Physics 68:4203.Search in Google Scholar
Zak, J., E. R. Moog, C. Liu, and S. D. Bader. 1991. “Magneto-optics of multilayers with arbitrary magnetization directions.” Physical Review B 43:6243.Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, T., A. Scholl, F. Zavaliche, K. Lee, M. Barry, A. Doran, M. P. Cruz, Y. H. Chu, C. Ederer, N. A. Spaldin, et al. 2006. “Electrical Control of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Multiferroic BiFeO3 Films at Room Temperature.” Nature Materials 5:823–9.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter