Abstract
Faulkner’s The Reivers exemplifies the Quixotic Picaresque-a conflation of the narrative modes exhibited in Lazarillo de Tormes and Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote. This essay explores the correlation between Spain’s transition from feudalism to a modern mercantile society and the United States’ transition from an agrarian society based on slavery to a modern industrial nation within the cultural contexts of these novels. In each of these works, a series of trickster figures undertake performative acts of deception, particularly the masking tradition of Carnival, in order to endure the hardships of modernity. However, whereas most tricksters tend to be solely focused on pragmatic individual objectives, quixotic pícaros maintain a sense of idealism that leads them to consider the Other and thus act in the name of communal prosperity. These selfless tricksters meta-theatrically parody the generic social conventions in which they reside in order to subvert the hegemony that seeks to oppress and marginalise them and fellow members of their communities. In performing an array of identities and social roles, these quixotic pícaros contribute to the opacity of modern multicultural nation-states, and thus, disrupt all social hierarchies leading to the regeneration of the public body, mobility, and a more utopian world.
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: The University of Texas Press, 1981.Search in Google Scholar
-----. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Helene Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.Search in Google Scholar
Cervantes, Miguel de. Don Quixote. Trans. Edith Grossman. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Costello, Brannon. Plantation Airs: Racial Paternalism and the Transformations of Class in Southern Fiction, 1945-1971. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Ellison, Ralph. Shadow and Act. New York: Random House, 1964.Search in Google Scholar
Faulkner, William. The Reivers. New York: Vintage International, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Gates, Henry Louis Jr. The Signifying Monkey: A Theory of African American Literary Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Ginés, Montserrat. The Southern Inheritors of Don Quixote. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Iffland, James. De fiestas y aguafiestas: risa, locura e ideología en Cervantes y Avellaneda. Madrid: Iberoamericana, 1999.10.31819/9783865279170Search in Google Scholar
Maravall, José Antonio. Utopia and Counterutopia in the “Quixote.” Trans. Robert W. Felkel. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Reed, Walter L. An Exemplary History of the Novel: The Quixotic versus the Picaresque. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1981.Search in Google Scholar
Scheub, Harold. Trickster and Hero: Two Characters in the Oral and Written Traditions of the World. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Stein, Jean. “William Faulkner, The Art of Fiction No. 12.” The Paris Review 12.1 (Spring 1956): 28-52.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, Walter. “Faulkner’s Reivers: How to Change the Joke without Slipping the Yoke,” Faulkner and Race: Faulkner and Yoknapatawpha, 1986. Eds. Doreen Fowler and Ann J. Abadie. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1987: 111-29.Search in Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Ryuichi. Faulkner’s Artistic Vision: The Bizarre and the Terrible. Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
