Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter Mouton January 18, 2014

Understanding Timelines: Conceptual Metaphor and Conceptual Integration

  • Seana Coulson EMAIL logo and Cristobal Pagán Cánovas
From the journal Cognitive Semiotics

Abstract

One of the most broadly investigated topics in the conceptual metaphor literature is the importance of spatial construals for thinking and talking about time. We address the relationship between conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) and conceptual integration theory (CIT) by exploring how people understand timelines - both as graphical objects, in discourse about timelines taken from newspapers and the web, and in poetic examples. The inferential structure of the timeline is well captured by the conceptual metaphors TIME IS SPACE and EVENTS ARE OBJECTS. Instantiated graphically, the timeline serves as a material anchor for a conceptual integration network representing partial cognitive models of time, lines, objects, and a hybrid model known as a ‘blend’. Understood in respect to this network, the analogue properties of the line give it novel computational properties facilitating inferences about the events that the timeline represents. The history of the modern timeline suggests that it reflects a distributed cognitive process, involving multiple individuals over a large span of time and illustrating the importance of cultural evolution in the development of conceptual integration networks. Analysis of both poetry and everyday discourse about timelines suggests that conventional mapping schemas are best viewed not as determining the interpretation of timelines but as providing soft constraints that help guide interpretation. Future metaphor research will best proceed via a merger of techniques from CMT and CIT, characterizing metaphor as involving complex networks of mappings that can be updated flexibly as a function of context and goals.

Published Online: 2014-01-18
Published in Print: 2009-12-01

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.198/html
Scroll to top button