Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Faulkner AM, Peake MJ. Bicarbonate interference with Hitachi chloride electrodes. Ann Clin Biochem 1991;28:107–8.10.1177/000456329102800121Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Dimeski G, Clague AE. Bicarbonate interference with chloride-ion-selective electrodes. Clin Chem 2004;50:1106–7.10.1373/clinchem.2004.033589Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, García-Lario JV, Hernández A, Jiménez CV, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:491–500.10.1080/00365519950185229Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Sweat Testing: Sample Collection and Quantitative Chloride Analysis; Approved Guideline – 3rd ed. CLSI document C34-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007 (ISBN 1-56238-713-8).Search in Google Scholar
5. Hulstein JJ, van’t Sant P. Sweat analysis using indirect ion-selective electrode on the routine chemistry analyser meets UK guidelines. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:374–6.10.1258/acb.2011.011001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
