Abstract
It is a well-known feature of Aristotle’s biology that he resorts to the analogy with human art to explain the concept of final causality operative in living things. In this Aristotle’s theory of biology is explicitly anti-Empedoclean: whereas for Empedocles a randomly generated animal part is preserved if it happens to suit an expedient function, for Aristotle the formal nature produces an animal part with a useful function in view. In this article, by contrast, I focus on those cases in Aristotle’s biology in which nature adapts an apparently purposeless part to some useful function (for example, the omentum). I argue that such cases not only indicate a partial return of Empedocles’ logic of generation but are also thought by Aristotle by analogy with human prudence (as opposed to human art). To consider Aristotle’s account of nature as prudent is not only to disclose a hitherto underappreciated aspect of his biology but also to gain a more comprehensive understanding of prudence in his ethics.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Michael Naas, Sean Kirkland, and Cameron Coates at DePaul University for the many conversations that resulted in this article. I would also like to thank Marta Jimenez, Adriel Trott, Michael Shaw, and Joshua Lo for their comments and suggestions at the 2019 meeting of the Ancient Philosophy Society in Hartford, CT. Finally, I am grateful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers of Apeiron for their help and suggestions at various stages in preparing this article.
References
Aubenque, P. 2014. La prudence chez Aristote. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.10.3917/puf.aube.2014.01Search in Google Scholar
Balme, D. 1987. “Teleology and Necessity.” In Gotthelf and Lennox, 275–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511552564.015Search in Google Scholar
Brague, R. 1988. Aristote et la question du monde. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 1990. “Nature and Craft in Aristotelian Teleology.” In Devereux and Pellegrin, 85–100.10.1017/CBO9780511551086.007Search in Google Scholar
Coates, C., and J. Lennox. 2020. “Aristotle on the Unity of the Nutritive and Reproductive Functions.” Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy. Forthcoming.10.1163/15685284-BJA10024Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1987. “Hypothetical Necessity and Natural Teleology.” In Gotthelf and Lennox, 243–74.10.1017/CBO9780511552564.014Search in Google Scholar
Detienne, M., and J.-P. Vernant. 1991. Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, trans. Janet Lloyd.Search in Google Scholar
Devereux, D., and P. Pellegrin. 1990. Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote. Paris: CNRS.Search in Google Scholar
Dudley, J. 2012. Aristotle’s Concept of Chance: Accidents, Cause, Necessity, and Determinism. New York: SUNY Press.10.1353/book16130Search in Google Scholar
Foster, S. E. 1997. “Aristotle and Animal Phronesis.” Philosophical Inquiry 19 (3): 27–38.10.5840/philinquiry1997193/43Search in Google Scholar
Frank, P., ed. 1956. The Validation of Scientific Theories. Boston: Collier Books.Search in Google Scholar
Gauthier, R. A., and J. Y. Jolif. 1970. L’Ethique à Nicomaque: Introduction, Traduction et Commentaire. Paris: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A., ed. 1985. Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Pittsburg: Mathesis Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1987. “Aristotle’s Conception of Final Causality.” In Gotthelf and Lennox, 204–42.10.1017/CBO9780511552564.013Search in Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012. “The Place of the Good in Aristotle’s Natural Teleology.” In Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology, 45–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287956.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A., and J. Lennox, eds. 1987. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511552564Search in Google Scholar
Granger, H. 1993. “Aristotle on the Analogy between Action and Nature.” Classical Quarterly 43 (1): 168–76.10.1017/S0009838800044244Search in Google Scholar
Henry, D., and K. M. Nielsen, eds. 2015. Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511846397Search in Google Scholar
Hull, D. 1967. “The Conflict Between Spontaneous Generation and Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” Proceedings of the Inter-American Congress of Philosophy 7: 245–50.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2005. Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199285306.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2015. “Luck in Aristotle’s Physics and Ethics.” In Henry and Nielsen, 254–75.10.1017/CBO9780511846397.014Search in Google Scholar
Kirkland, S. D. 2007. “The Temporality of Phronêsis in the Nicomachean Ethics.” Ancient Philosophy 27: 127–40.10.5840/ancientphil200727131Search in Google Scholar
Koyré, A. 1956. “Influence of Philosophical Trends on the Foundation of Scientific Theories.” In Frank, 192–203.Search in Google Scholar
Kullman, W. 1985. “Different Concepts of the Final Cause in Aristotle.” In Gotthelf, 169–76.Search in Google Scholar
Labarriere, J.-L. 1990. “De la phronesis animale.” In Devereux and Pellegrin, 405–28.Search in Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2001a. “Are Aristotelian Species Eternal?” In Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science, 131–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2001b. Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals, Translated with a Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00262098Search in Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2001c. “Teleology, Chance, and Aristotle’s Theory of Spontaneous Generation.” In Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology, 229–49.10.1353/hph.1982.0040Search in Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2015. “Aristotle on the Biological Roots of Virtue: The Natural History of Natural Virtue.” In Henry and Nielsen, 206–11.10.1017/CBO9780511846397.011Search in Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2010a. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511762499Search in Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2010b. “Nature as a Good Housekeeper: Secondary Teleology and Material Necessity in Aristotle’s Biology.” Apeiron 43 (4): 117–42.10.1515/APEIRON.2010.43.4.117Search in Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2017. “Biology and Teleology in Aristotle’s Account of the City.” In Rocca, 107–24.10.1017/9781139567855.008Search in Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. M. 2015. “Aristotle on Principles in Ethics: Political Science as the Science of the Human Good.” In Henry and Nielsen, 29–48.10.1017/CBO9780511846397.003Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2001. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817915Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2013. Aristotle on Practical Wisdom: Nicomachean Ethics VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1dv0thtSearch in Google Scholar
Redard, G. 1953. Recherches sur ΧΡΗ, ΧΡΗΣΘΑΙ. Étude sémantique. Paris: Champion.Search in Google Scholar
Rocca, J., ed. 2017. Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139567855Search in Google Scholar
Solinas, M. 2015. From Aristotle’s Teleology to Darwin’s Genealogy: The Stamp of Inutility. translated by J. Douglas. London: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137445773Search in Google Scholar
Tipton, J. 2014. Philosophical Biology in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-01421-0Search in Google Scholar
Vigo, A. 1996. Zeit und Praxis bei Aristoteles: Die Nikomachische Ethik und die zeit-ontologischen Voraussetzungen der venunftgesteuerten Handelns. Freiburg: Karl Alber.Search in Google Scholar
Witt, C. 2015. “‘As If By Convention Alone’: The Unstable Ontology of Aristotle’s Ethics.” In Henry and Nielsen, 276–92.10.1017/CBO9780511846397.015Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
