Swancutt, Diana M.. "Paraenesis in Light of Protrepsis. Troubling the Typical Dichotomy".
Early Christian Paraenesis in Context, edited by James Starr and Troels Engberg-Pedersen, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2004, pp. 113-154.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110916997.113Swancutt, D. (2004). Paraenesis in Light of Protrepsis. Troubling the Typical Dichotomy. In J. Starr & T. Engberg-Pedersen (Ed.),
Early Christian Paraenesis in Context (pp. 113-154). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110916997.113Swancutt, D. 2004. Paraenesis in Light of Protrepsis. Troubling the Typical Dichotomy. In: Starr, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. ed.
Early Christian Paraenesis in Context. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 113-154.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110916997.113Swancutt, Diana M.. "Paraenesis in Light of Protrepsis. Troubling the Typical Dichotomy" In
Early Christian Paraenesis in Context edited by James Starr and Troels Engberg-Pedersen, 113-154. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2004.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110916997.113Swancutt D. Paraenesis in Light of Protrepsis. Troubling the Typical Dichotomy. In: Starr J, Engberg-Pedersen T (ed.)
Early Christian Paraenesis in Context. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter; 2004. p.113-154.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110916997.113Copied to clipboard
