Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 3, 2016

Individual differences in intentional and unintentional exposure to online pornography among Hong Kong Chinese adolescents

  • Cecilia M.S. Ma EMAIL logo , Daniel T.L. Shek and Catie C.W. Lai

Abstract

The current study aimed to test how gender and religion affect unintentional and intentional exposure to online pornography in Chinese adolescents. A total of 1401 secondary school students (age range from 11 to 16 years) participated in the study. Findings from multivariate analyses show that males reported higher levels of unintentional and intentional exposure to online pornography than females. Significant differences were found in adolescents’ religiosity, with students who had religious beliefs reporting a lower level of unintentional exposure to online pornography than their counterparts without religious beliefs. In terms of intentional exposure to online pornography, adolescents were more likely to be exposed if they were male and had religious beliefs. Such differences were not found in females. This study demonstrated the influence of demographic characteristics on exposure to online pornography among Chinese adolescents.

Acknowledgments

The present study is funded by a grant (Grant no. 25401414) of the Early Career Scheme of the Research Grants Council of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong.

References

1. Beaver W. The dilemma of internet pornography. Bus Soc Rev 2000;105:373–82.10.1111/0045-3609.00088Search in Google Scholar

2. Buzzell T. The effects of sophistication, access and monitoring on use of pornography in three technological contexts. Deviant Behav 2005;26:109–32.10.1080/01639620590518988Search in Google Scholar

3. Cooper A. Sexuality and the internet: surfing into the new millennium. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998;1:187–93.10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187Search in Google Scholar

4. Lenhart A, Maddenn M, Hitlin P. Teens and technology: youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet American Life Project, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

5. Livingstone S, Helsper EJ. Taking risks when communicating on the internet: the role of offline social-psychological factors in young people’s vulnerability to online risks. Inform Commun Soc 2007;10:619–44.10.1080/13691180701657998Search in Google Scholar

6. Mesch G, Talmud I. The quality of online and offline relationships: the role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships. Inform Soc 2006;22:137–48.10.1080/01972240600677805Search in Google Scholar

7. Flannery DJ, Rowe DC, Gulley BL. Impact of pubertal status, timing, and age on adolescent sexual experience and delinquency. J Adolesc Res 1993;8:21–40.10.1177/074355489381003Search in Google Scholar

8. Flood M. Exposure to pornography among youth in australia. J Sociol 2007;43:45–60.10.1177/1440783307073934Search in Google Scholar

9. Byrne D, Osland JA. Sexual fantasy and erotica/pornography: internal and external imagery. Psychol Pers Hum Sex 2000:283–305.Search in Google Scholar

10. Wolak J, Mitchell K, Finkelhor D. Unwanted and wanted exposure to online pornography in a national sample of youth Internet users. Pediatrics 2007;119:247–57.10.1542/peds.2006-1891Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Braun-Courville DK, Rojas M. Exposure to sexually explicit web sites and adolescent sexual attitudes and behaviors. J Adolesc Health 2009;45:156–62.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Peter J, Valkenburg PM. Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles 2007;56:381–95.10.1007/s11199-006-9176-ySearch in Google Scholar

13. Carroll JS, Padilla-Walker LM, Nelson LJ, Olson CD, Barry CM, Madsen SD. Generation XXX pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. J Adolesc Res 2008;23:6–30.10.1177/0743558407306348Search in Google Scholar

14. Svedin CG, Åkerman I, Priebe G. Frequent users of pornography: a population based epidemiological study of swedish male adolescents. J Adolesc 2011;34:779–88.10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.04.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Nelson LJ, Padilla-Walker LM, Carroll JS. “I believe it is wrong but I still do it”: a comparison of religious young men who do versus do not use pornography. Psychol Relig Spiritual 2010;2:136–47.10.1037/a0019127Search in Google Scholar

16. Vandenbosch L. Antecedents of adolescents’ exposure to different types of sexually explicit Internet material: a longitudinal study. Comput Human Behav 2015;50:439–48.10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.032Search in Google Scholar

17. Traeen B, Spitznogle K, Beverfjord A. Attitudes and use of pornography in the norwegian population 2002. J Sex Res 2004;41:193.10.1080/00224490409552227Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Exposure to internet pornography among children and adolescents: a national survey. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8:473–86.10.1089/cpb.2005.8.473Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Vanden Abeele M, Campbell SW, Eggermont S, Roe K. Sexting, mobile porn use, and peer group dynamics: boys’ and girls’ self-perceived popularity, need for popularity, and perceived peer pressure. Media Psychol 2014;17:6–33.10.1080/15213269.2013.801725Search in Google Scholar

20. Weber M, Quiring O, Daschmann G. Peers, parents and pornography: exploring adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit material and its developmental correlates. Sex Cult 2012;16:408–27.10.1007/s12119-012-9132-7Search in Google Scholar

21. Howard PE, Rainie L, Jones S. Days and nights on the internet. In: Wellman B, Haythornwaite C, editors. The internet in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2002:45–74.Search in Google Scholar

22. Hardy SA, Steelman MA, Coyne SM, Ridge RD. Adolescent religiousness as a protective factor against pornography use. J Appl Dev Psychol 2013;34:131–9.10.1016/j.appdev.2012.12.002Search in Google Scholar

23. Mesch GS. Social bonds and internet pornographic exposure among adolescents. J Adolesc 2009;32:601–18.10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Stack S, Wasserman I, Kern R. Adult social bonds and use of Internet pornography. Soc Sci Q 2004;85:75–88.10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501006.xSearch in Google Scholar

25. Regnerus MD. Forbidden fruit: Sex and religion in the lives of American teenagers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

26. Uecker JE. Religion, pledging, and the premarital sexual behavior of married young adults. J Marriage Fam 2008;70:728–44.10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00517.xSearch in Google Scholar

27. Sherkat DE, Ellison CG. The cognitive structure of a moral crusade: conservative protestantism and opposition to pornography. Soc Forces 1997;75:957–80.10.1093/sf/75.3.957Search in Google Scholar

28. Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Wolak J. The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the internet a national survey of risk, impact, and prevention. Youth Soc 2003;34:330–58.10.1177/0044118X02250123Search in Google Scholar

29. Peter J, Valkenburg PM. Adolescents and pornography: a review of 20 years of research. J Sex Res 2016;53:509–31.10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Chen AS, Leung M, Chen CH, Yang SC. Exposure to internet pornography among taiwanese adolescents. Soc Behav Pers 2013;41:157–64.10.2224/sbp.2013.41.1.157Search in Google Scholar

31. Thornburgh D, Lin HS. Youth, pornography, and the internet. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

32. Crockett LJ, Raffaelli M, Shen YL. Linking self-regulation and risk proneness to risky sexual behavior: pathways through peer pressure and early substance use. J Adolesc Res 2006;16:503–25.10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00505.xSearch in Google Scholar

33. McCullough ME, Willoughby BL. Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: associations, explanations, and implications. Psychol Bull 2009;135:69–93.10.1037/a0014213Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Dowshen N, Forke CM, Johnson AK, Kuhns LM, Rubin D, Garofalo R. Religiosity as a protective factor against HIV risk among young transgender women. J Adolesc Health 2011;48:410–4.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Ogland CP, Xu X, Bartkowski JP, Ogland EG. The association of religion and virginity status among Brazilian adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2011;48:651–3.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. McKenna KY, Bargh JA. Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2000;4:57–75.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6Search in Google Scholar

37. Derlega VJ, Metts S, Petronio S, Margulis ST. Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

38. Ševčíková A, Daneback K. Online pornography use in adolescence: age and gender differences. Eur J Dev Psychol 2014;11:674–86.10.1080/17405629.2014.926808Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-8-10
Accepted: 2016-9-10
Published Online: 2016-12-3

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijdhd-2017-7010/html
Scroll to top button