Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A GENERALIZATION OF THE PARETIAN LIBERAL PARADOX

Year 1999, Volume: 2 Issue: 12, 139 - 149, 10.06.1999

Ahmet Kara

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.691206

Abstract

Bu makale, Paretian Liberal Paradoksu 'nu geçişken olmayan tercihleri kapsayacak şekilde genelleştirmekte ve genelleştirilmiş paradoksun ortadan kalkacağı bazı koşulları belirlemektedir.

Keywords

paretian paradoksu

References

  • [1] Sen. A. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
  • [2] Ng. Y.K. 1971. "The Possibility of a Paretian Liberal: Impossibility Theorems andCardinal Utility." Journal of Political Economy 79: 1397-1402.
  • [3J Gibbard, A. 1974. "A Pareto Consistent Libertarian Claim." Journal of Economic Theory 7: 388-410.
  • [4] Aldrich. .1. 1977. "The Dilemma of a Paretian Liberal: Some Consequences of Sen's Theorem." Public Choice 30: 1-22.
  • [5] Breyer. F. 1977. "The liberal Paradox. Decisiveness over Issues and Domain Restrictions." Z Nationalökonomie 37: 45-60.
  • [6] Pressler, .1. 1987. "Rights and Social Choice: Is There a Paretian Libertarian Paradox." Economics and Philosophy 3: 1-22.
  • [71 Kelsey. D. 1988. "What is Responsible for the Paretian Epidemic?" Social Choice and Welfare 5: 303-306.
  • [8j Suzumura. K. 1990. "Voluntary Exchange of Rights and the Liberal Paradox." Economic Review (Keizai- Kenkyu) 41 (2): 129-136.
  • [9] Kara. A. 1999a. "A Paradox of Social Rationality: Are There Choice Contexts Where Individual Irrationality is More Conducive Than Individual Rationality to Producing Rational Social Preferences?" Rationality and Society. forthcoming
  • [101 Kara. A. 1999b. "A Utilitarian Resolution of the Paretian Liberal Paradox. "Öneri: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2(11): 101-103.
  • 1111 Tversky. A. 1969. "Intransitivity of Preferences." Psychological Review ~6: 31-48.
  • 1121 May. K. 1954. "Intransitivity. Utility and the Aggregation of Preference Patterns." Econometrica 22: 1- 13.
  • 1131 MacC'rimmon. K.R. and S. Larsson. 1979. "Utility Theory: Axioms versus "Paradoxes"." In Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. M. Allais and O. Hagen (eds). Dordrecht. Holland: D. Reidel.
  • [14] Fishburn. P.C. 1984. "SSB Utility Theory: An Economic Perspective. "Mathematical Social Science 8: 63-94.
  • [15] Steedman. I. and U. Krause. 1986. "Goethe's Faust. Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and the Individual Decision- faker." In Multiple Self. .1. Elster (ed.[.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • [16] Weinstein. A.A. 1968. "Individual Preference Intransitivity." Southern Economic Journal 34: 335-343.
  • [17] Bar-Hillel. M. and A. Margalit. 1988. "How Vicious are Cycles oflntransitive Choice?" Theory and Decision 24: 1 19-145.

Year 1999, Volume: 2 Issue: 12, 139 - 149, 10.06.1999

Ahmet Kara

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.691206

Abstract

References

  • [1] Sen. A. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
  • [2] Ng. Y.K. 1971. "The Possibility of a Paretian Liberal: Impossibility Theorems andCardinal Utility." Journal of Political Economy 79: 1397-1402.
  • [3J Gibbard, A. 1974. "A Pareto Consistent Libertarian Claim." Journal of Economic Theory 7: 388-410.
  • [4] Aldrich. .1. 1977. "The Dilemma of a Paretian Liberal: Some Consequences of Sen's Theorem." Public Choice 30: 1-22.
  • [5] Breyer. F. 1977. "The liberal Paradox. Decisiveness over Issues and Domain Restrictions." Z Nationalökonomie 37: 45-60.
  • [6] Pressler, .1. 1987. "Rights and Social Choice: Is There a Paretian Libertarian Paradox." Economics and Philosophy 3: 1-22.
  • [71 Kelsey. D. 1988. "What is Responsible for the Paretian Epidemic?" Social Choice and Welfare 5: 303-306.
  • [8j Suzumura. K. 1990. "Voluntary Exchange of Rights and the Liberal Paradox." Economic Review (Keizai- Kenkyu) 41 (2): 129-136.
  • [9] Kara. A. 1999a. "A Paradox of Social Rationality: Are There Choice Contexts Where Individual Irrationality is More Conducive Than Individual Rationality to Producing Rational Social Preferences?" Rationality and Society. forthcoming
  • [101 Kara. A. 1999b. "A Utilitarian Resolution of the Paretian Liberal Paradox. "Öneri: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2(11): 101-103.
  • 1111 Tversky. A. 1969. "Intransitivity of Preferences." Psychological Review ~6: 31-48.
  • 1121 May. K. 1954. "Intransitivity. Utility and the Aggregation of Preference Patterns." Econometrica 22: 1- 13.
  • 1131 MacC'rimmon. K.R. and S. Larsson. 1979. "Utility Theory: Axioms versus "Paradoxes"." In Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. M. Allais and O. Hagen (eds). Dordrecht. Holland: D. Reidel.
  • [14] Fishburn. P.C. 1984. "SSB Utility Theory: An Economic Perspective. "Mathematical Social Science 8: 63-94.
  • [15] Steedman. I. and U. Krause. 1986. "Goethe's Faust. Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and the Individual Decision- faker." In Multiple Self. .1. Elster (ed.[.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • [16] Weinstein. A.A. 1968. "Individual Preference Intransitivity." Southern Economic Journal 34: 335-343.
  • [17] Bar-Hillel. M. and A. Margalit. 1988. "How Vicious are Cycles oflntransitive Choice?" Theory and Decision 24: 1 19-145.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Eski Sayılar
Authors

Ahmet Kara This is me

Publication Date June 10, 1999
Published in Issue Year 1999 Volume: 2 Issue: 12

Cite

APA Kara, A. (1999). A GENERALIZATION OF THE PARETIAN LIBERAL PARADOX. Öneri Dergisi, 2(12), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.691206

15795

This web is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Öneri

Marmara UniversityInstitute of Social Sciences

Göztepe Kampüsü Enstitüler Binası Kat:5 34722  Kadıköy/İstanbul

e-ISSN: 2147-5377