Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society (한국지반환경공학회 논문집)

Korean Geo-Environmental Society (한국지반환경공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Flood Inundation Models using Topographic Feature

지형요소를 이용한 홍수범람해석 모형의 비교

  • Moon, Changgeon (Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Civil and Environmental Engineering) ;
  • Lee, Jungsik (Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Civil and Environmental Engineering) ;
  • Cho, Sunggeun (Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Civil and Environmental Engineering) ;
  • Shin, Shachul (Andong National University, Department of Civil Engineering)
  • Received : 2013.10.23
  • Accepted : 2013.12.09
  • Published : 2014.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare flood inundation models for small stream basin. HEC-RAS model was used for the analysis of one dimensional hydraulics and HEC-GeoRAS, Ras Mapper and RiverCAD models were applied for the flood inundation analysis in Gum Chung stream. Flood inundations are to simulate by flood inundation models using observed data and rainfall on each frequency and to compare with inundation area based on the flood plain maps. The results of this study are as follows; Area of flood inundations by HEC-GeoRAS model is similar to that of flood plain map and appears in order of RAS Mapper and RiverCAD model. Flood inundation area by RiverCAD model is to estimate lager than that of RAS Mapper and HEC-GeoRAS model in flood area on each frequency and the results show that they have a little difference in models of flood inundation analysis at small stream. Comparing the area of flood inundations by flood depth, the results of three models are relatively similar in flood depth as 2.0 m below, and RiverCAD model shows a significant difference in flood depth as 2.0 m or more.

본 연구의 목적은 소하천 유역에 대한 홍수범람해석 모형을 비교하는 것이다. 검청천을 대상으로 1차원 수리모형인 HEC-RAS와 범람해석을 위한 HEC-GeoRAS, RAS Mapper, RiverCAD 모형을 적용하여 홍수범람해석을 수행하였다. 실측 강우량과 빈도별 홍수량을 적용하여 3가지 모형에 따른 홍수범람해석을 모의하였으며, 해석결과와 당시 조사된 침수흔적도를 비교하고 각 모형들의 빈도별, 침수심별에 따라 홍수범람면적을 비교하였다. 실측 강우량을 적용하여 해석된 홍수범람면적은 HEC-GeoRAS 모형의 결과가 침수흔적도와 비교적 유사하게 나타났다. 또한, 빈도별 설계홍수량을 적용하여 해석된 범람면적은 RAS Mapper 모형이 가장 크게 나타났으며, 3가지 모형의 전체 범람면적 차이가 10% 이내로 비교적 유사한 결과를 나타내었다. 침수심별 범람면적을 비교한 결과 침수심 2.0 m 이하 구간에서는 3가지 모형의 결과가 비교적 유사하게 나타났으며, 침수심 2.0 m 이상의 구간에서 RiverCAD 모형의 범람면적이 비교적 큰 차이를 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ackerman, C. T., Jensen, M. R. and Brunner, G. W. (2010), Geospatial capabilities of HEC-RAS for model development and mapping, 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Institute for Water Resources, U. S. Corps of Engineers, pp. 1-6.
  2. Boss International (2000), BOSS RiverCAD river modeling system, User's Manual, pp. 1-1-1-2..
  3. HEC (2010), HEC-RAS river analysis system, User's Manual, Version 4.1, CPD-68, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Institute for Water Resources, U. S. Corps of Engineers, pp. 1-1-1-5.
  4. HEC (2011), HEC-GeoRAS-An extension for support of HEC-RAS using ArcGIS, User's Manual, Version 4.3.93, CPD-83, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Institute for Water Resources, U. S. Corps of Engineers, pp. 1-1-1-3.
  5. Lee, J. S., Park, J. Y., Moon, C. G. and Jang, J. U. (2010), A study on the flood inundation analysis using RiverCAD and HEC-RAS, Journal of Korea Society of Hazard Mitigation Conference, pp. 648-651 (in Korean).
  6. Merwade, V. (2010), Tutorial on using HEC-GeoRAS with ArcGIS, pp. 1-34.
  7. Moon, C. G., Park, J. Y. and Lee, J. S. (2009), A Comparison of flood inundation method in medium to small sized catchment, Proceedings of Korea Society of Hazard Mitigation Conference, pp. 1476-1481 (in Korean).
  8. Shin, H. S., Lee, J. H. and Park, M. J. (2001), Analysis of small stream floods and GIS inundation model method, Proceedings of Korea Water Resources Association Conference, pp. 513-517 (in Korean).
  9. Uiseong-Gun (2003), Guideline for small streams implementation projects, pp. 123-161 (in Korean).