Skip to main content
Log in

Novel Frailty Screening Questionnaire (FSQ) Predicts 8-Year Mortality in Older Adults in China

  • Original Research
  • Physical Frailty
  • Published:
The Journal of Frailty & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although frailty status greatly impacts health care in countries with rapidly aging populations, little is known about the frailty status in Chinese older adults.

Objectives

Given the increased health care needs associated with frailty, we sought to develop an easily applied self-report screening tool based on four of the syndromic frailty components and sought to validate it in a population of older adults in China.

Design

Prospective epidemiological cohort study.

Setting

Community-dwelling residents living in Beijing, China.

Participants

1724 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years in 2004 with an 8-year follow up.

Measurements

We developed a simple self-report frailty screening tool—the Frailty Screening Questionnaire (FSQ)—based on the modified Fried frailty components. The predictive ability for outcome was assessed by age and sex adjusted Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

According to FSQ criteria, 7.1% of the participants were frail. Frailty was associated with poor physical function, fractures, falls, and mortality. Both frailty and pre-frailty were associated with a higher mortality rate: frailty—hazards ratio (HR), 3.94, 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.16–4.92, P<0.001; pre-frailty—HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.57–2.27, P <0.001; adjusted models for this variable did not affect the estimates of the association. Among the four frailty components, slowness was the strongest predictor of mortality. The combination of the four components provided the best risk prediction.

Conclusions

FSQ is a self-report frailty measurement tool that can be rapidly performed to identify older adults with higher risk of adverse health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EEO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review. Eur J Intern Med 2016;31:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morley JE, Vellas B, Abellan van Kan G, et al. Frailty consensus: A call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14:392–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. Journals Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M146–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007;62:722–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaslavsky O, Zelber-Sagi S, Gray SL, et al. Comparison of Frailty Phenotypes for Prediction of Mortality, Incident Falls, and Hip Fracture in Older Women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016;64:1858–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Paulson D, Lichtenberg PA. The Paulson–Lichtenberg Frailty Index: evidence for a self-report measure of frailty. Aging Ment Health 2017;19:892–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buta BJ, Walston JD, Godino JG, et al. Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments. Ageing Res Rev 2016;26:53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zimmer Z, Kaneda T, Tang Z, Fang X. Explaining Late Life Urban vs. Rural Health Discrepancies in Beijing. Soc Forces 2010;88:1885–908.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma L, Zhang L, Tang Z, et al. Use of the frailty index in evaluating the prognosis of older people in Beijing: A cohort study with an 8-year follow-up. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2016;64:172–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma L, Zhao X, Tang Z, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of hypertension in the elderly in Beijing, China. PLoS One 2015;10:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ma L, Tang Z, Sun F, et al. Risk factors for depression among elderly subjects with hypertension living at home in China. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:2923–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu C, Smit E, Xue Q-L, Odden MC. Prevalence and Correlates of Frailty among Community-Dwelling Chinese Older Adults: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017;73:102–108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma L, Tang Z, Zhang L, Sun F, Chan P. Prevalence of frailty and associated factors in the community-dwelling population of China. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018;66:559–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng Z, Guan S, Ding H, et al. Prevalence and Incidence of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older People: Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging II. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016;64:1281–6. doi:10.1111/jgs.14135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi J, Yang Z, Song X, et al. Sex differences in the limit to deficit accumulation in late middle-aged and older Chinese People: Results from the Beijing longitudinal study of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69:702–9. doi:10.1093/gerona/glt143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rockwood K, Howlett SE, MacKnight C, et al. Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: report from the Canadian study of health and aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004;59:1310–7. doi:10.1093/gerona/59.12.1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bandeen-Roche K, Seplaki CL, Huang J, et al. Frailty in Older Adults: A Nationally Representative Profile in the United States. Journals Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 2015;70:1427–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gordon EH, Peel NM, Samanta M, Theou O, Howlett SE, Hubbard RE. Sex differences in frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Gerontol 2017;89:30–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoogendijk EO, Abellan van Kan G, Guyonnet S, Vellas B, Cesari M. Components of the Frailty Phenotype in Relation to the Frailty Index: Results From the Toulouse Frailty Platform. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015;16:855–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Woo J. Walking Speed: A Summary Indicator of Frailty? J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015;16:635–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 2011;305:50–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Woo J, Leung J, Zhang T. Successful Aging and Frailty: Opposite Sides of the Same Coin? J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016;17:797–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of Deficits as a Proxy Measure of Aging. Sci World J 2001;1:323–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Turner G, Clegg A. Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General Practitioners report. Age Ageing 2014;43:744–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhe Tang or Jeremy D. Walston.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, L., Tang, Z., Chan, P. et al. Novel Frailty Screening Questionnaire (FSQ) Predicts 8-Year Mortality in Older Adults in China. J Frailty Aging 8, 33–38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2018.38

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2018.38

Key words

Navigation