The Defence by Design framework: Conceptual foundations and potential applications | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Design, Business & Society
  4. Volume 7, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2055-2106
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2114

Abstract

With rapid advancements in technology radically impacting and changing current ways of working globally, many industries and sectors, including the Defence force, are implementing new approaches to respond to and address these challenges. Design thinking is one approach to assist in this response, as it provides a novel process for solving complex problems. This article presents a specific design approach for addressing contextual Defence problems in the form of a design thinking framework based on a review of the existing literature concerning design and Defence. The article contends with the role of design as a value-added methodology in Defence strategy and development, and it reports on a unique set of design thinking capabilities for a Defence-specific context that are not only essential for the implementation of a design-led approach to innovation but are of great assistance in overcoming its associated challenges. The Defence by Design framework works with an identified military objective that, when applied, overcomes the natural bias that Defence personnel may exhibit during routine gaps and opportunities analysis. By detailing the different stages of the framework, and demonstrating their iterative nature, through the documentation of a working example – ‘Man Overboard’ – this article presents a new approach yet to be realized in Defence globally.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00028_1
2020-10-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ancker, C. J., and Flynn, M.. ( 2010;), ‘ Exercising command and control in an era of persistent conflict. ’, Military Review, 90:2, pp. 13–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, J.. ( 2012;), ‘ From systemic operational design (SOD) to a systemic approach to design and planning: A Canadian experience. ’, Canadian Military Journal, 12:3, pp. 35–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Banach, S. J.. ( 2009;), ‘ Educating by design: Preparing leaders for a complex world. ’, Military Review, 89:2, pp. 96–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Banach, S. J., and Ryan, A.. ( 2009;), ‘ The art of design: A design methodology. ’, Military Review, 89:2, pp. 105–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baxter, K.,, Courage, C., and Caine, K.. ( 2015), Understanding Your Users: A Practical Guide to User Research Methods, San Francisco, CA:: Elsevier;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Black, C. N.,, Newton, R. D.,, Nobles, M. A., and Ellis, D. C.. ( 2018;), ‘ U.S. Special Operations Command’s future, by design. ’, Joint Force Quarterly, 90, pp. 42–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, T.. ( 2008;), ‘ Design thinking. ’, Harvard Business Review, 6 June, pp. 84–92, https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking. Accessed 30 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, T.. ( 2009), Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organisations and Inspires Innovation, New York:: Harper Collins;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, T.. ( 2015;), ‘ When everyone is doing design thinking, is it still a competitive advantage?. ’, Harvard Business Review, 8 August, pp. 2–3, https://hbr.org/2015/08/when-everyone-is-doing-design-thinking-is-it-still-a-competitive-advantage. Accessed 30 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bryant, S.,, Straker, K., and Wrigley, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ The typologies of power: Energy utility business models in an increasingly renewable sector. ’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, pp. 1032–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchanan, R.. ( 1992;), ‘ Wicked problems in design thinking. ’, Design Issues, 8:2, pp. 5–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bullock, X., and Vitor, B.. ( 2010;). ‘ Design: How, not why. ’, Military Review, 90:2, pp. 102–08, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20100430_art016.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cardon, E., and Leonard, S.. ( 2010;), ‘ Unleashing design: Planning and the art of battle command. ’, Military Review, 90:2, pp. 2–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Collins, J. A., and Chiaramonte, M. W.. ( 2017;), ‘ Project-based learning and design thinking: Fomenting agility and innovation in government. ’, IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Wisconsin, USA, 23–26 July, pp. 1–8, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8013938. Accessed 3 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins, J., and Mills, G.. ( 2019;), ‘ Digital age education: Preparing warriors for hybrid warfare at air force Cyberworx. ’, in J. Ridolfo, and W. Hart-Davidson. (eds), Rhet Ops: Rhetoric and Information Warfare, Pittsburgh, PA:: University of Pittsburgh Press;, pp. 183–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Department of the Army ( 2015), Army Design Methodology, Washington, DC:: Department of the Army;, https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/atp5_0x1.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Design Council ( 2019;), ‘ The double diamond: 15 years on. ’, Design Council, 3 September, https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/double-diamond-15-years. Accessed 30 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dorst, K.. ( 2011;), ‘ The core of “design thinking” and its application. ’, Design Studies, 32:6, pp. 521–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dorst, K.. ( 2015), Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design, Cambridge, MA:: The MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. d.School ( 2020;), ‘ A virtual crash course in design thinking. ’, Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University, https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/a-virtual-crash-course-in-design-thinking. Accessed 30 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Elfers, M. W.. ( 2014;), ‘ Marine corps planning process: Ain’t broke. ’, Marine Corps Gazette, 98:12, pp. 39–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Frumin, A.,, Moss, T., and Ellis, D. C.. ( 2018;), ‘ Institute for National Strategic Security, National Defense University is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to PRISM. ’, PRISM, 7:3, pp. 68–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Garrett, A., and Wrigley, C.. ( 2019;), ‘ Navigating market opportunity: Traditional market research and deep customer insight methods. ’, Qualitative Market Research, 22:3, pp. 456–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Graicer, O.. ( 2017;), ‘ Self disruption: Seizing the high ground of systemic operational design (SOD). ’, Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 17:4, pp. 21–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Graves, T., and Stanley, B. E.. ( 2013;), ‘ Design and operational art: A practical approach to teaching the army design methodology. ’, Military Review, 93, pp. 53–59, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20130831_art011.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Howard, Z.. ( 2015;), ‘ Understanding design thinking in practice: A qualitative study of design led professionals working with large organisations. ’, doctoral thesis, Melbourne:: Swinburne University of Technology;, https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/. Accessed 30 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. IDEO ( 2020;), ‘ IDEO, design thinking. ’, https://designthinking.ideo.com/resources. Accessed 30 January 2020.
  28. Jackson, A. P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Towards a multi-paradigmatic methodology for military planning: An initial toolkit. ’, The Archipelago, 4 March, http://militaryepistemology.com/multiparadigm2018/. Accessed 30 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Jackson, A. P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Introduction: What is design thinking and how is it of use to the Australian defence force?. ’, in A. P. Jackson. (ed.), Design Thinking: Applications for the Australian Defence Force, Joint Studies Paper Series No 3, Canberra:: ACT and ADC Publications;, pp. 1–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kimbell, L.. ( 2011;), ‘ Rethinking design thinking: Part I. ’, Design and Culture, 3:23, pp. 285–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kopsch, T., and Fox, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Embracing complexity: Adjusting processes to meet the challenges of the contemporary operating environment. ’, Army Press Online Journal, 16:34, pp. 1–6, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2016-Online-Exclusive-Articles/Embracing-Complexity-Adjusting-Processes/. Accessed 10 August 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kulzy, W. W.. ( 2019;), ‘ (Design) thinking through strategic-level wargames for innovative solutions. ’, Phalanx, 52:2, pp. 56–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Margolin, V.. ( 2012;), ‘ The United States in World War II: Scientists, engineers, designers. ’, Design Issues, 29:1, pp. 14–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Markowski, S.,, Hall, P., and Dessi, A.. ( 1997;), ‘ Defence and the management of Australia’s defence technology. ’, Prometheus, 15:2, pp. 223–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Martin, R.. ( 2009), The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking Is the Next Competitive Advantage, Boston, MA:: Harvard Business Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Mazzara, J. N.. ( 2011;), ‘ Words mean things: Understand the terminology being used. ’, Marine Corps Gazette, 95:6, pp. 23–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Mosely, G.,, Wright, N., and Wrigley, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ Facilitating design thinking: A comparison of design expertise. ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, pp. 177–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Nelson, H. G., and Stolterman, E.. ( 2012), The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World, Cambridge, MA:: The MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Norman, D.. ( 2016;), ‘ When you come to a fork in the road take it: The future of design. ’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Business, 2:4, pp. 343–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Nusem, E.,, Wrigley, C., and Matthews, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Developing design capability in nonprofit organizations. ’, Design Issues, 33:1, pp. 61–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Nusem, E.,, Wrigley, C., and Matthews, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Toward design orientation and integration: Driving design from awareness to action. ’, Design Issues, 35:3, pp. 35–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Price, R.,, Wrigley, C., and Straker, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Not just what they want, but why they want it: Traditional market research to deep customer insights. ’, Qualitative Market Research, 18:2, pp. 230–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Proctor, P.. ( 2011;), ‘ Fighting to understand: A practical example of design at the battalion level. ’, Military Review, 91:2, pp. 69–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Pruitt, J., and Adlin, T.. ( 2006), The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design, San Francisco, CA:: Elsevier;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Schnaubelt, C. M.. ( 2009;), ‘ Complex operations and interagency operational art. ’, PRISM, 1:1, pp. 37–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Simon, H. A.. ( 1969), The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA:: The MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Snowden, D. J., and Boone, M. E.. ( 2007;), ‘ A leader’s framework for decision making. ’, Harvard Business Review, 85:11, pp. 68–76, https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making. Accessed 30 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Straker, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Defence by design: Redesigning the acquisition process for the Royal Australian Air Force. ’, Journal of Design, Business and Society, 3:2, pp. 145–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Straker, K.,, Mosely, G., and Wrigley, C.. ( 2019;), ‘ Identifying a set of line manager personas to guide new product introduction strategy. ’, Strategy and Leadership, 47:4, pp. 34–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Straker, K., and Nusem, E.. ( 2019;), ‘ Designing value propositions: An exploration and extension of Sinek’s “Golden Circle” model. ’, Journal of Business, Design and Society, 5:1, pp. 59–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Tomitsch, M.,, Wrigley, C.,, Borthwick, N.,, Ahmadpour, N.,, Frawley, J.,, Kocaballi, A. B.,, Nunez-Pacheco, C.,, Straker, K., and Loke, L.. ( 2018), Design. Think. Make. Break. Repeat: A Handbook of Methods, Amsterdam:: BIS Publishers;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Tyler, B. J.. ( 2014), Intelligence and Design: Thinking about Operational Art, Maxwell Air Force Base, AL:: Air University Press;, http://jstor.org/stable/resrep13873.1. Accessed 3 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Verganti, R.. ( 2009), Design-Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules and of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean, Boston, MA:: Harvard Business Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Wass de Czege, H.. ( 2009;), ‘ Systemic operational design: Learning and adapting in complex missions. ’, Military Review, 89:1, pp. 2–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Wrigley, C.. ( 2017;), ‘ Principles and practices of a design-led approach to innovation. ’, International Journal of Design, Creativity and Innovation, 5:3&4, pp. 235–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wrigley, C.,, Mosely, G., and Mosely, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Defining military design thinking: An extensive, critical review. ’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation, 7:1, pp. 104–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Wrigley, C.,, Mosely, G.,, Gill, M., and Reid, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Air force by design: Applying design for transient capability advantages. ’, in A. P. Jackson. (ed.), Design Thinking: Applications for the Australian Defence Force, Joint Studies Paper Series No 3, Canberra:: ACT and ADC Publications;, pp. 51–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Wrigley, C.,, Nusem, E., and Straker, K.. ( 2020;), ‘ Implementing design thinking: Understanding organizational conditions. ’, California Management Review, 62:2, pp. 125–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Wrigley, C., and Straker, K.. ( 2019), Affected: Emotionally Engaging Customers in the Digital Age, Milton:: Wiley;.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Zweibelson, B.. ( 2017;), ‘ An application of theory: Second generation military design on the horizon. ’, Small Wars Journal, 19 February, https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/an-application-of-theory-second-generation-military-design-on-the-horizon. Accessed 3 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Zweibelson, B.. ( 2019;), ‘ The multidisciplinary design movement: A frame for realizing industry, security, and academia interplay. ’, Small Wars Journal, 10 January, https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/multidisciplinary-design-movement-frame-realizing-industry-security-and-academia-interplay. Accessed 3 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Zweibelson, B., and Morgan, G.. ( 2015;), ‘ An awkward tango: Pairing traditional military planning to design and why it currently fails to work. ’, Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 16:1, pp. 11–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Wrigley, Cara,, Rana, Harjit,, Hinton, Peta, and Mosely, Genevieve. ( 2020;), ‘ The Defence by Design framework: Conceptual foundations and potential applications. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 7:2, pp. 211–32, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00028_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00028_1
Loading
The Defence by Design framework: Conceptual foundations and potential applications
Journal of Design, Business & Society 7, 211 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00028_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00028_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00028_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): defence innovation; design innovation; design process; design thinking; military design thinking; military innovation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error