Through the Black Mirror: Discourses on gender and technology in popular culture

References

1. Akrich, M.. ( 1992;), ‘ The de-scription of technical objects. ’, in W. Bijker, and J. Law. (eds), Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 205–24.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Altered Carbon (2018–present, USA: Virago Productions) .
   [Google Scholar]
3. Attebery, B.. ( 2002), Decoding Gender in Science Fiction, New York:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baccolini, R., and Moylan, T.. ( 2003), Dark Horizons: Science and the Dystopian Imagination, New York:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beller, J.. ( 2006), The Cinematic Mode of Production: Attention Economy and the Society of the Spectacle, Lebanon, NH:: Dartmouth College Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Berg, A. J., and Lie, M.. ( 1995;), ‘ Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender?. ’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 20:3, pp. 332–51.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Black Mirror (2011–present, USA: Zeppotron / House of Tomorrow) .
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bystydzienski, J., and Bird, S.. ( 2006;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in J. Bystydzienski, and S. Bird. (eds), Removing Barriers: Women in Academic Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;, pp. 1–23.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chatman, S.. ( 1978), Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell UP;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chun, W. H. K.. ( 2012;), ‘ Race and/as technology, or how to do things to race. ’, in L. Nakamura, and P. Chow-White. (eds), Race after the Internet, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 44–66.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Conley, D., and Burroughs, B.. ( 2019;), ‘ Black Mirror, mediated affect and the political. ’, Culture, Theory and Critique, 60:2, pp. 139–53.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Davies, B., and Harré, R.. ( 1990;), ‘ Positioning: The discoursive production of selves. ’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20:1, pp. 43–63.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Debord, G.. ( [1967] 1983), Society of the Spectacle, Detroit, MI:: Black and Red;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dixon, W. W.. ( 2008;), ‘ Tomorrowland TV: The space opera and early science fiction television. ’, in J. P. Telotte. (ed.), The Essential Science Fiction Television Reader, Lexington, KY:: Kentucky University Press;, pp. 93–110.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Endsley, M. R.. ( 2017;), ‘ From here to autonomy: Lessons learned from human–automation research. ’, Human factors, 59:1, pp. 5–27.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eriksson-Zetterquist, U.. ( 2007;), ‘ Editorial: Gender and new technologies. ’, Gender, Work and Organization, 14:4, pp. 305–11.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Evans, C., and Gamman, L.. ( 1995;), ‘ The gaze revisited, or reviewing queer viewing. ’, in P. Burston, and C. Richardson. (eds), A Queer Romance: Lesbians, Gay Men and Popular Culture, London:: Routledge;, pp. 13–56.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Faulkner, W.. ( 2001;), ‘ The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. ’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 24:1, pp. 79–95.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gil-Juárez, A.,, Feliu, J., and Vitores, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Mutable technology, immutable gender: Qualifying the “co-construction of gender and technology” approach. ’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 66:1, pp. 56–62.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Giroux, H. A.. ( 2007;), ‘ Beyond the spectacle of terrorism: Rethinking politics in the society of the image. ’, Situations: Project of the Radical Imagination, 2:1, pp. 17–51.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hankerson, D.,, Marshall, A. R.,, Booker, J.,, El Mimouni, H.,, Walker, I., and Rode, J. A.. ( 2016, May;), ‘ Does technology have race?. ’, Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, ACM, pp. 473–86, http://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892578.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Haraway, D. J.. ( 1985;), ‘ Cyborg Manifesto: Science, technology, and social-feminist in the late 20th century. ’, Socialist Review, 80, pp. 65–108.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Helford, E. R.. ( 2000;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in E. R. Helford. (ed.), Fantasy Girls: Gender in the New Universe of Science Fiction and Fantasy Television, Boston, MA:: Rowman and Littlefield;, pp. 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hill, R.. ( 2008;), ‘ Anthology drama: Mapping the twilight zone’s cultural and mythological terrain. ’, in J. P. Telotte. (ed.), The Essential Science Fiction Television Reader, Lexington, KY:: Kentucky University Press;, pp. 111–26, https://www.muse.jhu.edu/book/3715.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Irwin, A., and Wynne, B.. ( 1996), Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jackson, D., and Mannix, J.. ( 2004;), ‘ Giving voice to the burden of blame: A feminist study of mothers’ experiences of mother blaming. ’, International Journal of Nursing Practice, 10:4, pp. 150–58, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2004.00474.x.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Johnson, B.. ( 2011), Science Fiction for Prototyping: Designing the Future with Science Fiction, San Francisco, CA:: Morgan and Claypool;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kiejziewicz, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Between technophobia and futuristic dreams: Visions of the possible technological development in Black Mirror and Westworld series. ’, Maska, 2:34, pp. 297–305, http://www.maska.psc.uj.edu.pl/documents/40768330/43096068/Maska_34.pdf/20dfff1a-7642-4ed9-8219-35878ff022bd.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kubrick, S.. ( 1968), 2001: A Space Odyssey, USA:: Stanley Kubrick Productions;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kymlicka, W.. ( 2002), Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lagesen, V.. ( 2015;), ‘ Gender and technology: From exclusion to inclusion. ’, in V. Lagesen (ed.)., International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, , 2nd ed.., Amsterdam:: Elsevier;, pp. 723–28.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lavigne, C.. ( 2013), Cyberpunk Women, Feminism and Science Fiction: A Critical Study, London:: Mc Farland and Co;.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lievrouw, L. A., and Livingstone, S.. ( 2006;), ‘ Introduction to the updated student edition. ’, in L. A. Lievrouw, and S. Livingstone. (eds), Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs, Updated Student Edition, London:: Sage Publications Ltd.;, pp. 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lohan, M.. ( 2000;), ‘ Constructive tensions in feminist technology studies. ’, Social Studies of Science, 30:6, pp. 895–916.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lohan, M., and Faulkner, W.. ( 2004;), ‘ Masculinities and technologies: Some introductory remarks. ’, Men and Masculinities, 6:4, pp. 319–29.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mahida, C. A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Dystopian future in contemporary science fiction. ’, Golden Research Thoughts, 1:1, pp. 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Martin, C., and McIntyre, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ The cyborg re-manifested: Black Mirror, cyberfeminism, and genre hybridity. ’, Outskirts, 1:18, pp. 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Moylan, T.. ( 2000), Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia and Dystopia, New York:: Westview Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mr. Robot ( 2015–2019, USA:: Universal Cable Productions / Universal Content Productions;).
    [Google Scholar]
40. Oldenziel, R.. ( 1999), Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America, 1870–1945, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Orlikowski, W. J.. ( 1992;), ‘ The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. ’, Organization Science, 3:3, pp. 398–427.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Piazza, R.,, Bednarek, M., and Rossi, F.. ( 2011;), ‘ Introduction: Analysing telecinematic discourse. ’, in R. Piazza,, M. Bednarek, and F. Rossi. (eds), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, Amsterdam:: John Benjamins Publishing;, pp. 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pinch, T. J., and Bijker, W. E.. ( 1984;), ‘ The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. ’, Social Studies of Science, 14:3, pp. 399–441.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Plant, S.. ( 1997), Zeros + Ones: Digital Women + the New Technoculture, London:: Fourth Estate;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Porter, M. J.,, Larson, D. L.,, Harthcock, A., and Berg Nellis, K.. ( 2002;), ‘ Re(de)fining narrative events: Examining television narrative structure. ’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 30:1, pp. 23–30.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Roberts, R.. ( 1993), A New Species: Gender and Science in Science Fiction, Urbana, IL:: University of Illinois Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ross, G.. ( 2012), The Hunger Games, USA:: Color Force;.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Russ, J.. ( [1973] 2017;), ‘ The image of women in science fiction. ’, in R. Latham. (ed.), Science Fiction Criticism: An Anthology of Essential Writings, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 200–10.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Star Trek ( 1966–69, USA:: Desilu Productions/Paramount Television;).
    [Google Scholar]
50. Teich, A. H.. ( 2008), Technology and the Future, , 11th ed., Boston, MA:: Wadsworth;.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Telotte, J. P.. ( 2008;), ‘ Introduction: The trajectory of science fiction television. ’, in J. P. Telotte. (ed), The Essential Science Fiction Television Reader, Lexington, KY:: Kentucky University Press;, pp. 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Teurlings, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Society of the spectacle. ’, in J. Teurlings. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, Malden, MA:: John Wiley & Sons;, pp. 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Tonkiss, F.. ( 1998;), ‘ Analysing discourse. ’, in C. Seale. (ed.), Researching Society and Culture, London:: Sage;, pp. 245–60.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Wajcman, J.. ( 2000;), ‘ Reflections on gender and technology studies: In what state is the art?. ’, Social Studies of Science, 30:3, pp. 447–64.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Wajcman, J.. ( 2004), TechnoFeminism, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Wajcman, J.. ( 2007;), ‘ From women and technology to gendered technoscience. ’, Information, Communication and Society, 10:3, pp. 287–98.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Wajcman, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ Feminist theories of technology. ’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34:1, pp. 143–52.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Westworld (2016–present, USA: HBO Entertainment) .
    [Google Scholar]
59. White, C., and Kinnick, K. N.. ( 2000;), ‘ One click forward and two clicks back: Portrayal of women using computers in television commercials. ’, Women’s Studies in Communication, 23:3, pp. 392–412.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Modugno, Chiara, and Krijnen, Tonny. ( 2020;), ‘ Through the Black Mirror: Discourses on gender and technology in popular culture. ’, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 12:1, pp. 3–19, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00011_1
    [Google Scholar]