Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Effect of an eight-week high-intensity interval training programme on circulating sphingolipid levels in middle-aged adults at elevated cardiometabolic risk (SphingoFIT)—Protocol for a randomised controlled exercise trial

  • Justin Carrard ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    justin.carrard@chuv.ch, justin.carrard@unibas.ch

    Affiliations Division of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, SportAdo Centre, Children and Adolescent Surgery, Woman-Mother-Child Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

  • Manuel Hofer,

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • Luisa Prechtl,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • Eva Fleischlin,

    Roles Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • Manuel Huber,

    Roles Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • Hector Gallart-Ayala,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Metabolomics Platform, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

  • Tony Teav,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Metabolomics Platform, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

  • Denis Infanger,

    Roles Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • Christoph Höchsmann,

    Roles Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

  • Karsten Koehler,

    Roles Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

  • Timo Hinrichs,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • Henner Hanssen,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • Julijana Ivanisevic ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ JI and AST are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Metabolomics Platform, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

  • Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ JI and AST are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Division of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Abstract

Introduction

Evidence indicates that sphingolipid accumulation drives complex molecular alterations promoting cardiometabolic diseases. Clinically, it was shown that sphingolipids predict cardiometabolic risk independently of and beyond traditional biomarkers such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. To date, little is known about therapeutic modalities to lower sphingolipid levels. Exercise, a powerful means to prevent and treat cardiometabolic diseases, is a promising modality to mitigate sphingolipid levels in a cost-effective, safe, and patient-empowering manner.

Methods

This randomised controlled trial will explore whether and to what extent an 8-week fitness-enhancing training programme can lower serum sphingolipid levels of middle-aged adults at elevated cardiometabolic risk (n = 98, 50% females). The exercise intervention will consist of supervised high-intensity interval training (three sessions weekly), while the control group will receive physical activity counselling based on current guidelines. Blood will be sampled early in the morning in a fasted state before and after the 8-week programme. Participants will be provided with individualised, pre-packaged meals for the two days preceding blood sampling to minimise potential confounding. An ’omic-scale sphingolipid profiling, using high-coverage reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry, will be applied to capture the circulating sphingolipidome. Maximal cardiopulmonary exercise tests will be performed before and after the 8-week programme to assess patient fitness changes. Cholesterol, triglycerides, glycated haemoglobin, the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, static retinal vessel analysis, flow-mediated dilatation, and strain analysis of the heart cavities will also be assessed pre- and post-intervention. This study shall inform whether and to what extent exercise can be used as an evidence-based treatment to lower circulating sphingolipid levels.

Trial registration

The trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06024291) on August 28, 2023.

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death worldwide and represent a major socioeconomic concern for healthcare systems [13]. Early detection and treatment of patients at risk of CVD are crucial to combat this burden effectively [4]. However, clinical evaluations do not easily capture the risk of developing CVD, particularly in patients at intermediate risk [5]. For instance, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, a pillar of cardiovascular risk assessment, was shown to be elevated in only half of the patients hospitalised with coronary artery disease (CAD) [6]. Improving the risk stratification of intermediate-risk patients would enable more individualised primary prevention strategies and eventually reduce the burden related to CVD [5]. In the -omics era, there is a real need for novel pathophysiology-based phenotyping tools to improve cardiovascular risk stratification [7].

How sphingolipids drive cardiometabolic diseases

Sphingolipids constitute a family of bioactive lipids that modulate numerous biological processes and are involved in the pathogenesis of CAD, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [810]. Sphingolipid-mediated alterations that drive cardiometabolic conditions are illustrated in Fig 1. Briefly, once the triglyceride stores are saturated, in case of overnutrition, reduced energy expenditure or chronic inflammation, lipids in excess are redirected to form sphingolipids [11]. Primarily in muscle and liver cells, sphingolipids accumulate as ceramides, a particular subclass of sphingolipids [10]. Initially, this pathological ceramide accumulation 1) reduces the translocation of glucose transporters to the cell membrane, 2) improves fatty acid storage and uptake, and 3) impairs mitochondrial efficiency, resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species [12]. This initial phase of metabolism alteration leads to peripheral insulin resistance and NAFLD [11, 12]. Failure to manage this sphingolipid overload results in lipotoxicity, a phenomenon characterised by apoptosis and fibrosis, which leads to CAD, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), or T2DM [11, 12]. Lastly, ceramides in excess are also carried on LDL, where they drive LDL transcytosis through the endothelium and uptake into macrophages [13, 14]. This results in foam cell formation, vascular inflammation, and atherosclerosis [15]. Situated at the crossroads of overnutrition, dyslipidaemia, and inflammation, sphingolipid metabolism offers a unique opportunity to improve cardiometabolic risk stratification [9, 16].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Simplified overview of the molecular alterations and corresponding conditions related to sphingolipid accumulation.

Abbreviations: FFA = free fatty acids, acyl-CoA = acyl-coenzyme A, PP2A = protein phosphatase 2 A, PKCζ = protein kinase C zeta, Akt = serine–threonine kinase Akt, HSL = hormone-sensitive lipase, CD36 = cluster of differentiation 36, also known as a fatty acid translocase, SREBP-1 = sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1, TAG = triacylglycerides, MSS1 = mitochondrial fission factor 1, BAX = bcl-2-like protein 4, SMAD3 = Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3, NAFLD = non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus, NASH = non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, CAD = coronary artery disease. Blue boxes highlight pathophysiological changes and related clinical conditions. This figure is based on [12, 17].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302477.g001

Sphingolipid profiling–a pathophysiology-based tool for cardiometabolic risk stratification

The profiling of circulating sphingolipids emerged as a powerful tool for assessing the risk of developing cardiometabolic diseases [12]. Indeed, they predict the occurrence of CVD and T2DM beyond and independently of current prediction tools [18, 19] and can be non-invasively and reliably detected in blood [12]. A machine-learning approach revealed that comprehensive profiling of serum sphingolipids identified patients with CAD independently and more effectively than LDL cholesterol and triglycerides [8]. A score combining the blood level of the four most studied sphingolipid species, i.e., ceramide 16:0, ceramide 18:0, ceramide 24:0, and ceramide 24:1, was developed, and it outperformed the 2019 SCORE of the European Society of Cardiology in terms of cardiovascular risk prediction in primary prevention [2022]. The same score predicted CAD and stroke mortality beyond conventional lipids in primary and secondary prevention [18, 23]. Precisely ceramides could also predict T2DM occurrence ten years before the disease was diagnosed [19]. This ceramide score has been implemented clinically in private and public hospitals in Finland and at the Cleveland and Mayo Clinic [24, 25]. While the utility of sphingolipid phenotyping in cardiometabolic risk stratification is now well-established [15, 16], little is known about the possibilities of lowering sphingolipid levels.

Can exercise reduce circulating sphingolipid levels?

To measure circulating sphingolipids in clinical practice, it is essential to provide patients with evidence-based interventions that reduce sphingolipid levels and quantify the reduction expected from such an intervention. Exercise interventions are ideal candidates for mitigating sphingolipid levels. Indeed, exercise is a powerful polypill to prevent and treat cardiometabolic diseases [26]. Exercise interventions are cost-effective, safe, and patient-empowering [27, 28]. The molecular pathways underlying the beneficial effects of exercise are increasingly understood [29]; however, many mechanisms remain to be elucidated [29, 30]. Changes in sphingolipid metabolism might be one of the mechanisms through which exercise optimises cardiometabolic health. Indeed, regular exercise stimulates fatty acid β-oxidation, which redirects lipids toward energy production purposes (pathway a in Fig 1) and could reduce sphingolipid biosynthesis flux [31, 32]. In that way, exercise training could reverse pathological sphingolipid accumulation. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that circulating sphingolipids have been reported to be negatively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), a potent health marker [33, 34]. A preliminary study suggested regular exercise could mitigate sphingolipid levels [35]. However, this study was not powered and examined the sphingolipid response to a 12-week moderate-intensity continuous training. Yet it has been demonstrated that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a safe [36, 37] and a more effective way to improve CRF [3840] and insulin sensitivity [4144] both in healthy individuals and patients with cardiometabolic diseases. Furthermore, this study investigated only a limited number of sphingolipid species (n = 7). In contrast, high-throughput targeted lipidomics methods now allow for the comprehensive analysis of lipid metabolism at the molecular species level [4547].

Material and methods

Aim, objective, and hypothesis

The SphingoFIT study will explore whether and to what extent a supervised CRF-enhancing HIIT-based training programme can lower circulating sphingolipid levels in middle-aged individuals (50% females) at elevated cardiometabolic risk. Accordingly, the objective is to assess the effect of an 8-week CRF-enhancing HIIT-based training programme on a comprehensive panel of plasma sphingolipid species in sedentary adults aged 40 to 60 years (50% females) with overweight or obesity grade 1 but without any other symptomatic cardiometabolic diseases. The hypothesis is that sphingolipid levels will be reduced following the 8-week HIIT-based training programme.

Endpoints

The primary endpoints will be changes from pre- to post-intervention levels in the four sphingolipid species included in the ceramide-based score (i.e., ceramide 16:0, ceramide 18:0, ceramide 24:0, and ceramide 24:1) [24, 25]. The secondary endpoints will be changes in the other sphingolipids to be targeted (n = 57) in the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), retinal vessel analysis, and strain analysis of the heart cavities.

Study design and general considerations

This prospective two-arm, monocentric, randomised controlled trial will be conducted at the Department of Sport, Exercise, and Health of the University of Basel, Switzerland. It will follow the Declaration of Helsinki and the guidelines of Good Clinical Practice of the World Medical Association in 2013. The Ethics Committee of Northwest and Central Switzerland approved this protocol (EKNZ 2023–01345). Substantial changes to the protocol will be submitted to the Ethics Committee for approval before implementation, as required by Swiss law. The trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06024291) on August 28, 2023, and follows the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) reporting guidelines [48]. According to the SPIRIT reporting guidelines, all World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set items are summarised in Table 1. The SPIRIT Checklist is in the supplementary files (S1 Checklist). This is the first version of the protocol (12 February 2024). There will be no financial compensation for participation in the SphingoFIT study.

thumbnail
Table 1. Items from the World Health Organization trial registration data set.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302477.t001

Recruitment and eligibility criteria

This randomised controlled trial aims to include 98 participants (50% of females) aged between 40 and 60 years at elevated cardiometabolic risk. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria (Table 2) will be eligible for the study. To investigate whether circulating sphingolipid levels can be reduced following an 8-week HIIT intervention, including patients at elevated cardiometabolic risk but without symptomatic cardiometabolic diseases is ideal. Indeed, these patients are likely situated in the first phase of sphingolipid accumulation, which is believed to be reversible.

Inhabitants from the Basel area will be invited to participate in this study via advertisements in local newspapers and newsletters and on diverse social media channels. Detailed information on study procedures, risks, and benefits will be provided to participants by a study physician over the phone. They will also be informed about their right to withdraw from the study without consequences or the need to provide reasons. Following the phone call, all potential participants will be provided via e-mail with a participant information sheet and a consent form. They will be given at least 24 hours (after receiving the participant information sheet and consent form) to decide whether to participate. Formal written consent will be obtained before the participant is submitted to any study procedure. The recruitment will be continuous until the targeted 98 participants are enrolled.

Group allocation and randomisation

After the baseline examination, participants (n = 98, 50% females) will be randomly allocated to the intervention or the control group. Blocked randomisation will be used to reduce bias and balance participant allocation to both groups [49]. The randomisation process will be stratified by age and sex to ensure a balanced allocation of these variables between both groups. The randomisation code can be found here: https://github.com/JustinCarrard/SphingoFIT. The randomisation will be done by a statistician not involved in recruitment or data collection and will be revealed to participants and the study staff after the baseline examination. Therefore, participants, exercise scientists, and physicians supervising the intervention will be blinded for group allocation at baseline but not post-intervention.

Study procedure

The SPIRIT schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments are summarised in Fig 2 and complemented by Fig 3.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302477.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Schedule and sequence of study procedures as planned for study visits.

Abbreviations: ECG = electrocardiogram, CPET = cardio-pulmonary exercise testing, HIIT = high intensity interval training.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302477.g003

Eligibility screening

Screening for eligibility will be performed by phone, including the inclusion and exclusion criteria assessment. Participants who pass this screening will be invited to a clinical evaluation at the Department of Sport, Exercise and Health of the University of Basel.

1st visit–clinical and eligibility assessment.

A clinical assessment will be conducted, which includes vital sign evaluation (blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, oxygen saturation, and body temperature) and physical examination (focusing on cardiovascular and respiratory systems). Height and body weight will be measured to the nearest 0.5 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively, and the body mass index will be calculated. A resting and exercise ECG will be part of the clinical assessment to screen for cardiac contraindications to maximal exertion. Habitual PA will be assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire [50], validated in a Swiss context [51]. Maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) will be conducted on a cycle ergometer to determine VO2peak, peak heart rate and power output (Ergoselect 200; Ergoline, Bitz, Germany; MetaMax 3B; Cortex Biophysik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany). Finally, medical clearance will be given during this first visit. Participants successfully passing this screening will be invited for a baseline assessment. Instructions for the further procedures of the study will be provided.

2nd visit–collection of standardised meals.

To our knowledge, no evidence exists that food intake influences sphingolipid levels. Nevertheless, each participant will receive standardised, pre-packaged meals for the two days preceding blood sampling to minimise potential confounding. All participants will be fed to energy balance. Energy requirements will be calculated using the formulas of Mifflin St. Joer [52] and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Body Weight Planner [53, 54]. All diets will contain ~55% energy from carbohydrates, ~25% from fat, and ~20% from protein. To monitor diet adherence, participants will be instructed to return all non-consumed foods from the pre-packaged meals to the lab and take photos of additionally consumed foods for later analysis. Participants will also be asked to refrain from alcohol consumption during the dietary control period (i.e., the two days preceding blood sampling). Participants will be advised to eat as usual for the rest of the study.

Each participant will collect, at least three days before the baseline assessment, their standardised, pre-packaged meals for the two days preceding blood sampling. Depending on the delay between the first visit and the baseline assessment, this second visit can be combined with the first visit.

3rd visit–baseline assessment.

Trained medical staff will draw blood samples by venepuncture of the cubital fossa following an overnight fast pre-and post-intervention. The total volume of blood samples will be ca. 18 mL (1 × 2.7 mL potassium-EDTA, 1 × 7.5 mL serum-monovette, and 1 × 7.5 mL Li-heparin). Potassium-EDTA samples will be slightly shaken by hand before being frozen at − 80°C. To ensure complete coagulation, serum samples will be slightly shaken on a shaking platform for 10 min. Within a maximum of 30 min following blood sampling, serum and plasma samples will be centrifuged (at 2,000 g, that is, 4,500 rpm for 10 min at 20°C). Serum and plasma samples will be aliquoted, and aliquots will be frozen at − 80°C. Planned blood analyses for essential characterisation of risk factor profiles include total cholesterol, LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and HbA1c. Glucose and insulin will also be measured to estimate insulin resistance using the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) [55].

Body composition will be analysed before and after the intervention by the gold-standard, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a GE Lunar iDXA® machine (GE Lunar Inc., Madison, WI; software version 13.10). Study participants will fast within 6 hours before the measurement. Absolute and relative measures of total body fat mass and fat-free mass will be obtained. During the measurement, patients will be in a supine position [56]. The effective radiation dose from a single whole-body DXA (< 10 μSv) is similar to the normal background radiation received over one day at sea level [57]. Consequently, the effective radiation dose per study participant in the present study will be < 20 μSv, similar to the normal background radiation received over two days at sea level. For comparison purposes, body composition will also be analysed before and after the intervention by four-segment bioelectrical impedance analysis using the InBody 720 (Inbody Co. Ltd., Seoul, South Korea). Before the measure, participants must refrain from intense PA for 24 hours, fast for at least two hours, and be asked to void their bladder.

Retinal vessel diameters, a novel surrogate of microvascular health that responds positively to exercise intervention, will be assessed pre- and post-intervention as described in detail by Hanssen et al. [58]. Arteriolar and venular diameters will be measured using semiautomatic software based on a modified fundus camera (450FF; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Three valid images of each retina will be taken at an angle of 45° and with the optic disc in the centre. Retinal arterioles and venules within a distance of 0.5- to 1.0-disc diameter from the optic disc will be identified semi-automatically (Vesselmap 2; IMEDOS Systems, Jena, Germany). Vessel diameters will be averaged to central retinal arteriolar (CRAE) and venular equivalents (CRVE), as well as their ratio, using the Parr–Hubbard formula described elsewhere [59]. This reliable method has inter- and intra-observer interclass correlation coefficients between 0.78 and 0.99 [59, 60].

Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) reflects endothelial function as an early marker of atherosclerotic arterial damage [61]. It provides an in vivo, non-invasive, direct measure of artery function and health [62]. There is increasing evidence that FMD in humans is associated with traditional risk factors, cardiovascular diseases, and heart failure and predicts cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality [61, 63]. It is sensitive to changes in behavioural health shown for the Mediterranean diet, acute mental stress, or exercise training [6466]. Measurement of FMD of the brachial artery follows at least 15-20min of rest in the supine position using a high-resolution linear ultrasound array transducer with a semi-automatic detection program of the intima-media complex (EF, Unex Corporation, Nagoya, Japan). An occlusion cuff will be wrapped around the forearm with the proximal edge of the cuff at the elbow. Longitudinal images of the right brachial artery (typically at 3–5 cm above the elbow) are recorded at baseline and after cuff deflation following supra systolic compression (50 mmHg over the systolic blood pressure value) of the right forearm for 5 minutes until 3 minutes after deflation. Inter-reader and inter-session reliability of the FMD measurement were acceptable [67, 68].

Echocardiographic assessment, particularly atrial strain analysis—an emerging ultrasound-based technique—facilitates the comprehensive evaluation of atrial mechanics, offering invaluable insights into atrial fibrosis [69]. Atrial fibrosis, in turn, is a hallmark of atrial structural remodelling, which leads to atrial fibrillation, the most common cardiac arrhythmia with an ever-increasing prevalence [70, 71]. Strain analysis, a highly sensitive measure of cardiac function, has demonstrated responsiveness to even short periods of endurance exercise training, as observed in a 4-week HIIT intervention [72]. Standardised echocardiographic images will be systematically acquired in the supine position, adhering to international standards [73, 74]. The imaging process will use a state-of-the-art ultrasound system (Philips Epiq 7 Ultrasound System, Koninklijke Philips N.V., Amsterdam) equipped with a compatible broadband sector array transducer (S5-1, Philips, Koninklijke Philips N.V., Amsterdam). Post-acquisition, echocardiographic images will undergo meticulous analysis for strain parameters within the ultrasound workspace, utilising advanced software (TOMTEC Imaging Systems GmbH, Unterschleissheim, Germany).

Training intervention.

The exercise intervention will consist of a supervised HIIT (two walking- and one indoor cycling-based session weekly), starting with a habituation week at an intensity of 75% of the maximal heart rate (HRmax). In the following seven weeks, the participants will perform a HIIT based on the following protocol and for a total duration of 45 min per session (modified from Wisløff et al. [75]): warm-up for 10 min at 60%–70% HRmax followed by a high-intensity interval consisting of 4×4 min at 80%–95% HRmax with 3 min of active recovery at 60%–70% HRmax and a 10 min cool-down at 60%–70% HRmax. Heart rate will be monitored during training by Garmin HRM-Dual heart rate sensors combined with Garmin Forerunner 45S watches. Exercise scientists motivate the participants during the intervals and will control each participant’s heart rate during and after every training session. This protocol was chosen because it fulfils the requirements of a high-volume HIIT [76], has been extensively studied in both healthy and clinical populations, and its effects on CRF improvement are well-documented [39, 77]. In addition, it has been previously used by our research group, with high adherence and absence of drop-out observed in healthy participants and patients with cardiovascular risk factors [78, 79].

Control condition.

Asking physically inactive participants to maintain inactive habits may not reflect realistic conditions and is no longer considered the best option in a randomised controlled exercise intervention [80]. Indeed, most participants will be aware of the positive effects of PA or will become aware of them during an exercise intervention study [80]. Further, denying an exercise intervention to participants who would have benefited from it (for instance, participants at risk of cardiometabolic diseases) might be ethically questionable [80]. Following current practices [80], control group participants will be informed about the World Health Organization (WHO) PA guidelines at the beginning of the study [81]. After four weeks, the control group participants will get a phone call to enquire about their well-being.

4th visit–collection of standardised meals.

Each participant will collect, at least three days before the baseline assessment, their standardised, pre-packaged meals for the two days preceding blood sampling at post-intervention assessment. This visit can be combined with a training session for the intervention group.

5th visit–post-intervention assessment.

After completing the 8-week intervention, the same measurements from the baseline assessment will be repeated (including vital sign evaluation, clinical examination, height and weight measurement, BMI calculation, resting and exercise ECG). A second CPET will be performed to verify that the exercise intervention effectively improved CRF. Habitual PA will be re-assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire [50, 51]. Fig 4 summarises the study design.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Study design.

Abbreviations: HIIT = high intensity interval training, Cer = Ceramide, VO2peak = peak oxygen uptake.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302477.g004

Sphingolipid quantification

All plasma samples, stored at -80°C at the Department of Sport, Exercise and Health of the University of Basel until the end of the study, will be delivered on dried ice to the Metabolomics Unit of the Faculty of Biology and Medicine at the University of Lausanne.

Plasma samples, calibrators, and quality controls (QCs, 25μL) will be extracted by the addition of 100μL of methanol spiked with internal standards in 96 deep-well plates (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) using a Bravo automated liquid-handling platform (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). The extracts will be shaken (10 min at 1000 rpm) and centrifuged externally (15 min at 2700g at 15°C) (Hermle Z 326 K, Gosheim, Germany). The liquid handler will transfer the resulting supernatant (75 μL) into a new 96-well plate (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, United States) for the injection. Sphingolipid quantification will be performed by reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (RPLC-MS/MS) in positive ionisation mode, using a TSQ Altis triple-stage quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, United States) interfaced with Vanquish™ Duo UHPLC System, adapted from Checa et al. [82]. Briefly, the chromatographic separation is carried out on a Zorbax Eclipse plus C18 column (1.8 μm, 100 mm × 2.1 mm I.D) (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). The mobile phase comprises A = 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.2% formic acid in water and B = 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.2% formic acid in MeOH. The flow rate will be 600 μL/min, column temperature at 40°C, and sample injection volume at 4μl. Gradient elution starting at 75% of B will be linearly increased to 100% over 11 min and held at 100% until 17 min. The column will then be equilibrated to initial conditions for 3 minutes. Optimised HESI source parameters will be set as follows: spray voltage 3500 V, Sheath Gas (Arb) = 60, Aux Gas (Arb) = 15, Sweep Gas (Arb) = 1 and Ion Transfer Tube Temperature 380°C. Nitrogen will be used as the nebuliser, and argon will be used as the collision gas (1.5mTorr); the vaporiser temperature will be set at 350°C. Optimised compound-dependent parameters will be used for data acquisition in timed-selected Reaction Monitoring (t-SRM) mode. Raw data files will be processed using TraceFinder Clinical Research 4.1 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Calibration curves and the stable isotope-labelled internal standards (IS) will be used to determine the response factor for absolute quantification. The linearity of calibration curves will be evaluated for each species using a 12-point range; peak area integration will be manually curated and corrected when necessary. Reported sphingolipid species will be named according to the LIPID MAPS classification and nomenclature systems [8386].

Sample size calculation

The sample size calculation is based on the four primary endpoints, which are also the species entering the ceramide score (i.e., ceramide 16:0, ceramide 18:0, ceramide 24:0, and ceramide 24:1) [24, 25]. It was hypothesised that 1) log2-transformed pre-intervention sphingolipid levels are similar in both the intervention and the control groups and 2) the standard deviation of log2-transformed sphingolipid levels correspond to 0.475 (which is the average standard deviation obtained for the four sphingolipids mentioned above in participants of the COmPLETE Health study aged 40–60 years [87]). As the results of the SphingoHIIT study are not available yet, the effect size was estimated based on the unique intervention study available in the literature [35]. The authors of this study reported an average effect size (expressed as a geometric mean ratio) of 1.17. This means that the geometric mean of the sphingolipid levels was 1.17 times higher in the control than in the intervention group following the exercise intervention. Assuming a realistic correlation coefficient ρ of 0.6 between pre-and post-intervention values for sphingolipid levels, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to calculate the sample size. A result of 49 participants per group for a power of 80% was obtained (Fig 5). Notably, a drop-out rate of 10% was considered in the sample size calculation [80]. The sample size calculation code can be found here: https://github.com/JustinCarrard/SphingoFIT.

Statistical analyses

An ANCOVA will be run for each sphingolipid species to estimate the effect of the intervention [88]. The post-intervention sphingolipid value will be the dependent variable. In contrast, the pre-intervention sphingolipid value, a group variable (i.e., intervention or control group) and all control variables will be the independent variables. To identify control variables to be included in the models, we drew a causal-directed acyclic graph (DAG) using DAGitty [89]. Age, sex, body fat mass and CRF were identified as variables to be included in the models to reduce the outcome variation and improve the precision of the average causal effect of the intervention (Fig 6) [90]. The design will control food intake (each participant will receive individualised, pre-packaged meals for preceding blood sampling) and PA. Graphical methods will be used to assess the normal distribution of data. If the data are not normally distributed, sphingolipid concentrations will be log-transformed. A complete case analysis will be done if the proportion of missing data is below 5%. Otherwise, we will consider multiple imputations. The Benjamini-Hochberg method will adjust P-values for multiple testing [91]. The significance level is set at α = 0.05; all tests will be two-sided. All analyses will be done according to the intention-to-treat principle. Statistical analyses will be conducted using R (version 4.0.2 or later). The study will report its results in compliance with the CONSORT statement [92].

thumbnail
Fig 6. Directed acyclic graph representing the effect of HIIT on sphingolipid levels and other influencing variables.

Abbreviations: HIIT = high-intensity interval training, CRF = cardiorespiratory fitness, PA = physical activity, SL = sphingolipid levels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302477.g006

Data management

Data will be pseudonymised, stored on the protected server of the University of Basel, and accessible only to authorised personnel to fulfil the research objectives described in the present protocol. Biological material collected during the SphingoFIT study will be stored at the Department of Sport, Exercise and Health for ten years after study termination. The data management plan is available in the supplementary files (S2 File).

Safety considerations

Any adverse event will be classified, and its severity assessed by the investigator according to the guidelines of the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use [93]. The Ethics Committee will be informed in due time as required by Swiss law.

Exercise is considered a safe approach to optimise cardiometabolic health. The risk for cardiovascular events through exercise is reduced by performing a resting and an exercise ECG before starting the intervention to screen for pathological changes in the heart. The training load is divided between walking- and cycling-based sessions to alternate load and minimise the risk of musculoskeletal injury. Thus, the potential benefits of gaining fitness and thus improving different health parameters outweigh these risks. All subjects also benefit from receiving personal health information and expensive and complex examinations that can give them detailed information about their fitness status.

Study status

The recruitment started on November 1, 2023, and is still ongoing. Recruitment is estimated to be finished by the end of October 2024.

Amendments

As required by Swiss law, substantial changes to the study setup and organisation, the protocol and relevant study documents will be submitted to the Ethics Committee of Northwest and Central Switzerland for approval before implementation. Under emergency circumstances, deviations from the protocol to protect the rights, safety, and well-being of human subjects may proceed without prior approval of the Ethics Committee of Northwest and Central Switzerland. Such deviations shall be documented and reported to the Ethics Committee as soon as possible. A list of all non-substantial amendments will be submitted once a year to the Ethics Committee of Northwest and Central Switzerland.

On January 19, 2024, an amendment was submitted to the Ethics Committee of Northwest and Central Switzerland to include an echocardiographic assessment of the participants, which will be included in the study after February 26, 2024. This will enable strain analysis of heart cavities in an explorative manner. This amendment was approved by the Ethics Committee of Northwest and Central Switzerland on January 23, 2024 (EKNZ 2023–01345).

Discussion

Sphingolipids, in general, and ceramides, in particular, are now recognised as robust and clinically useful predictors of cardiometabolic risk [15, 16, 94]. A score based on the circulating level of four ceramide species has been developed and validated. It is now used in clinical in Finland and at the Cleveland and Mayo Clinic [24, 25]. However, little is known about the possibilities of lowering sphingolipid levels. If circulating sphingolipids are to be measured in daily clinical routines, it is key to provide patients with evidence-based interventions that can reduce sphingolipid levels. While exercise interventions seem ideal candidates for mitigating sphingolipid levels [26], only one unpowered preliminary study examined the effectiveness of a 12-week moderate-intensity continuous training to lower the circulating level of sphingolipids [35]. Yet it has been demonstrated that HIIT is a safe [36, 37] and a more effective way to improve cardiometabolic health in healthy individuals and patients with cardiometabolic diseases [3840]. Therefore, there is a real need to conduct this powered randomised control trial to inform clinicians whether and to what extent a fitness-enhancing HIIT-based training programme can lower circulating sphingolipid levels. Findings from the study could also contribute to reducing the gap in healthcare between low-income and high-income countries, as HIIT training is feasible in low-income countries due to its practicality and low cost. Finally, this study will also deepen the molecular understanding of exercise medicine and contribute to establishing this novel medical discipline as a cornerstone in the prevention and treatment of cardiometabolic disorders.

Data dissemination

Findings and data will be disseminated in scientific journals and meetings. Authorship will respect the recommendation of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (https://icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html).

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. SPIRIT checklist of the SphingoFIT study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302477.s001

(DOC)

S2 File. Data management plan of the SphingoFIT study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302477.s003

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank all the Bachelor and Master students (Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Switzerland) who contributed to data collection. We acknowledge using the Mind the Graph platform (www.mindthegraph.com (accessed on 15 January 2023)) to create Fig 1.

References

  1. 1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128. pmid:23245604
  2. 2. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990 to 2019: quantifying the epidemiological transition. [Internet]. Seattle, WA: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington. [cited 13.07.2021]. Available from: http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare.
  3. 3. Hunter DJ, Reddy KS. Noncommunicable Diseases. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(14):1336–43. pmid:24088093
  4. 4. Benziger CP, Roth GA, Moran AE. The Global Burden of Disease Study and the Preventable Burden of NCD. Glob Heart. 2016;11(4):393–7. pmid:27938824
  5. 5. Verma KP, Inouye M, Meikle PJ, Nicholls SJ, Carrington MJ, Marwick TH. New Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Techniques for Primary Prevention: JACC Review Topic of the Week. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022;80(4):373–87. pmid:35863853
  6. 6. Sachdeva A, Cannon CP, Deedwania PC, Labresh KA, Smith SC Jr, Dai D, et al. Lipid levels in patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease: an analysis of 136,905 hospitalizations in Get With The Guidelines. Am Heart J. 2009;157(1):111–7.e2. pmid:19081406
  7. 7. Martins AMA, Paiva MUB, Paiva DVN, de Oliveira RM, Machado HL, Alves LJSR, et al. Innovative Approaches to Assess Intermediate Cardiovascular Risk Subjects: A Review From Clinical to Metabolomics Strategies. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021;8. pmid:35004898
  8. 8. Poss AM, Maschek JA, Cox JE, Hauner BJ, Hopkins PN, Hunt SC, et al. Machine learning reveals serum sphingolipids as cholesterol-independent biomarkers of coronary artery disease. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2020;130(3):1363–76. pmid:31743112
  9. 9. Berkowitz L, Cabrera-Reyes F, Salazar C, Ryff CD, Coe C, Rigotti A. Sphingolipid Profiling: A Promising Tool for Stratifying the Metabolic Syndrome-Associated Risk. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022;8. pmid:35097004
  10. 10. Hannun YA, Obeid LM. Sphingolipids and their metabolism in physiology and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(3):175–91. pmid:29165427
  11. 11. Poss AM, Summers SA. Too Much of a Good Thing? An Evolutionary Theory to Explain the Role of Ceramides in NAFLD. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020;11.
  12. 12. Nicholson RJ, Norris MK, Poss AM, Holland WL, Summers SA. The Lard Works in Mysterious Ways: Ceramides in Nutrition-Linked Chronic Disease. Annual Review of Nutrition. 2022;42(1):115–44. pmid:35584813
  13. 13. Chaurasia B, Summers SA. Ceramides–Lipotoxic Inducers of Metabolic Disorders. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2015;26(10):538–50. pmid:26412155
  14. 14. Öörni K, Jauhiainen M, Kovanen PT. Why and how increased plasma ceramides predict future cardiovascular events? Atherosclerosis. 2020;314:71–3. pmid:33121744
  15. 15. Choi RH, Tatum SM, Symons JD, Summers SA, Holland WL. Ceramides and other sphingolipids as drivers of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(10):701–11. pmid:33772258
  16. 16. Tippetts TS, Holland WL, Summers SA. Cholesterol—the devil you know; ceramide—the devil you don’t. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2021;42(12):1082–95. pmid:34750017
  17. 17. Summers SA. Editorial: The Role of Ceramides in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021;12. pmid:33776946
  18. 18. Laaksonen R, Ekroos K, Sysi-Aho M, Hilvo M, Vihervaara T, Kauhanen D, et al. Plasma ceramides predict cardiovascular death in patients with stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes beyond LDL-cholesterol. European heart journal. 2016;37(25):1967–76. pmid:27125947
  19. 19. Hilvo M, Salonurmi T, Havulinna AS, Kauhanen D, Pedersen ER, Tell GS, et al. Ceramide stearic to palmitic acid ratio predicts incident diabetes. Diabetologia. 2018;61(6):1424–34. pmid:29546476
  20. 20. Leiherer A, Mündlein A, Laaksonen R, Lääperi M, Jylhä A, Fraunberger P, et al. Comparison of recent ceramide-based coronary risk prediction scores in cardiovascular disease patients. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2021;29(6):947–56.
  21. 21. Hilvo M, Jylhä A, Lääperi M, Jousilahti P, Laaksonen R. Absolute and relative risk prediction in cardiovascular primary prevention with a modified SCORE chart incorporating ceramide-phospholipid risk score and diabetes mellitus. European Heart Journal Open. 2021;1(3). pmid:35919880
  22. 22. Hilvo M, Vasile VC, Donato LJ, Hurme R, Laaksonen R. Ceramides and Ceramide Scores: Clinical Applications for Cardiometabolic Risk Stratification. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:570628. pmid:33133018
  23. 23. Katajamäki TT, Koivula M-K, Hilvo M, Lääperi MTA, Salminen MJ, Viljanen AM, et al. Ceramides and Phosphatidylcholines Associate with Cardiovascular Diseases in the Elderly. Clinical Chemistry. 2022;68(12):1502–8. pmid:36308332
  24. 24. Nicholls M. Plasma ceramides and cardiac risk. European Heart Journal. 2017;38(18):1359–60.
  25. 25. Vasile VC, Jaffe AS. An enhanced ceramide-based approach for primary prevention of atherosclerotic events. European Heart Journal Open. 2021;1(3). pmid:35923805
  26. 26. Fiuza-Luces C, Garatachea N, Berger NA, Lucia A. Exercise is the Real Polypill. Physiology. 2013;28(5):330–58. pmid:23997192
  27. 27. Katzmarzyk PT. Cost-effectiveness of exercise is medicine. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011;10(4):217–23. pmid:23531897
  28. 28. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451–62. pmid:33239350
  29. 29. Sarzynski MA, Rice TK, Després JP, Pérusse L, Tremblay A, Stanforth PR, et al. The HERITAGE Family Study: A Review of the Effects of Exercise Training on Cardiometabolic Health, with Insights into Molecular Transducers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54(5s):S1–s43. pmid:35611651
  30. 30. Fiuza-Luces C, Santos-Lozano A, Joyner M, Carrera-Bastos P, Picazo O, Zugaza JL, et al. Exercise benefits in cardiovascular disease: beyond attenuation of traditional risk factors. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(12):731–43. pmid:30115967
  31. 31. Newsom SA, Schenk S, Li M, Everett AC, Horowitz JF. High fatty acid availability after exercise alters the regulation of muscle lipid metabolism. Metabolism. 2011;60(6):852–9. pmid:20870251
  32. 32. Tan-Chen S, Guitton J, Bourron O, Le Stunff H, Hajduch E. Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling in Skeletal Muscle: From Physiology to Physiopathology. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020;11(491). pmid:32849282
  33. 33. Carrard J, Guerini C, Appenzeller-Herzog C, Infanger D, Königstein K, Streese L, et al. The metabolic signature of cardiorespiratory fitness: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021;7(1):e001008. pmid:33680500
  34. 34. Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Després JP, Franklin BA, et al. Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(24):e653–e99. pmid:27881567
  35. 35. Kasumov T, Solomon TPJ, Hwang C, Huang H, Haus JM, Zhang R, et al. Improved insulin sensitivity after exercise training is linked to reduced plasma C14:0 ceramide in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Obesity. 2015;23(7):1414–21. pmid:25966363
  36. 36. Dun Y, Smith JR, Liu S, Olson TP. High-Intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 2019;35(4):469–87. pmid:31543179
  37. 37. Wewege MA, Ahn D, Yu J, Liou K, Keech A. High-Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease-Is It Safe? A Systematic Review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(21):e009305.
  38. 38. Villelabeitia-Jaureguizar K, Vicente-Campos D, Senen AB, Jiménez VH, Garrido-Lestache MEB, Chicharro JL. Effects of high-intensity interval versus continuous exercise training on post-exercise heart rate recovery in coronary heart-disease patients. Int J Cardiol. 2017;244:17–23. pmid:28648356
  39. 39. Taylor JL, Holland DJ, Spathis JG, Beetham KS, Wisløff U, Keating SE, et al. Guidelines for the delivery and monitoring of high intensity interval training in clinical populations. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;62(2):140–6. pmid:30685470
  40. 40. Weston KS, Wisløff U, Coombes JS. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(16):1227–34. pmid:24144531
  41. 41. Bird SR, Hawley JA. Update on the effects of physical activity on insulin sensitivity in humans. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2017;2(1):e000143. pmid:28879026
  42. 42. Campbell WW, Kraus WE, Powell KE, Haskell WL, Janz KF, Jakicic JM, et al. High-Intensity Interval Training for Cardiometabolic Disease Prevention. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1220–6. pmid:31095079
  43. 43. Mendes R, Sousa N, Themudo-Barata JL, Reis VM. High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Middle-Aged and Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial of the Acute Effects of Treadmill Walking on Glycemic Control. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(21). pmid:31661946
  44. 44. Eddolls WTB, McNarry MA, Stratton G, Winn CON, Mackintosh KA. High-Intensity Interval Training Interventions in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2017;47(11):2363–74. pmid:28643209
  45. 45. Wang M, Wang C, Han RH, Han X. Novel advances in shotgun lipidomics for biology and medicine. Prog Lipid Res. 2016;61:83–108. pmid:26703190
  46. 46. Yang K, Han X. Lipidomics: Techniques, Applications, and Outcomes Related to Biomedical Sciences. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2016;41(11):954–69. pmid:27663237
  47. 47. Medina J, Borreggine R, Teav T, Gao L, Ji S, Carrard J, et al. Omic-Scale High-Throughput Quantitative LC-MS/MS Approach for Circulatory Lipid Phenotyping in Clinical Research. Anal Chem. 2023;95(6):3168–79. pmid:36716250
  48. 48. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2013;346:e7586. pmid:23303884
  49. 49. Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(1):15–20. pmid:21318011
  50. 50. Armstrong T, Bull F. Development of the World Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). Journal of Public Health. 2006;14(2):66–70.
  51. 51. Wanner M, Hartmann C, Pestoni G, Martin BW, Siegrist M, Martin-Diener E. Validation of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire for self-administration in a European context. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2017;3(1):e000206.
  52. 52. Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, Scott BJ, Daugherty SA, Koh YO. A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51(2):241–7. pmid:2305711
  53. 53. Hall KD, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, Chow CC, Wang YC, Gortmaker SL, et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):826–37. pmid:21872751
  54. 54. Hall KD, Chow CC. Estimating changes in free-living energy intake and its confidence interval. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(1):66–74. pmid:21562087
  55. 55. Gayoso-Diz P, Otero-Gonzalez A, Rodriguez-Alvarez MX, Gude F, Cadarso-Suarez C, García F, et al. Insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) levels in a general adult population: Curves percentile by gender and age. The EPIRCE study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2011;94(1):146–55. pmid:21824674
  56. 56. Marra M, Sammarco R, De Lorenzo A, Iellamo F, Siervo M, Pietrobelli A, et al. Assessment of Body Composition in Health and Disease Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): A Critical Overview. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2019;2019:3548284. pmid:31275083
  57. 57. Shepherd JA, Ng BK, Sommer MJ, Heymsfield SB. Body composition by DXA. Bone. 2017;104:101–5. pmid:28625918
  58. 58. Hanssen H, Streese L, Vilser W. Retinal vessel diameters and function in cardiovascular risk and disease. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2022:101095. pmid:35760749
  59. 59. Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, King WN, Clegg LX, Klein R, Cooper LS, et al. Methods for evaluation of retinal microvascular abnormalities associated with hypertension/sclerosis in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(12):2269–80. pmid:10599656
  60. 60. Wong TY, Knudtson MD, Klein R, Klein BE, Meuer SM, Hubbard LD. Computer-assisted measurement of retinal vessel diameters in the Beaver Dam Eye Study: methodology, correlation between eyes, and effect of refractive errors. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(6):1183–90. pmid:15177969
  61. 61. Vlachopoulos C, Xaplanteris P, Aboyans V, Brodmann M, Cifkova R, Cosentino F, et al. The role of vascular biomarkers for primary and secondary prevention. A position paper from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripheral circulation: Endorsed by the Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology (ARTERY) Society. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(2):507–32. pmid:26117398
  62. 62. Thijssen DHJ, Bruno RM, van Mil A, Holder SM, Faita F, Greyling A, et al. Expert consensus and evidence-based recommendations for the assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans. European heart journal. 2019;40(30):2534–47. pmid:31211361
  63. 63. Holder SM, Bruno RM, Shkredova DA, Dawson EA, Jones H, Hopkins ND, et al. Reference Intervals for Brachial Artery Flow-Mediated Dilation and the Relation With Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Hypertension. 2021;77(5):1469–80. pmid:33745297
  64. 64. Yubero-Serrano EM, Fernandez-Gandara C, Garcia-Rios A, Rangel-Zuniga OA, Gutierrez-Mariscal FM, Torres-Pena JD, et al. Mediterranean diet and endothelial function in patients with coronary heart disease: An analysis of the CORDIOPREV randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020;17(9):e1003282. pmid:32903262
  65. 65. Xue YT, Tan QW, Li P, Mou SF, Liu SJ, Bao Y, et al. Investigating the role of acute mental stress on endothelial dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015;104(4):310–9. pmid:25391292
  66. 66. Dawson EA, Sheikhsaraf B, Boidin M, Erskine RM, Thijssen DHJ. Intra-individual differences in the effect of endurance versus resistance training on vascular function: A cross-over study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(8):1683–92. pmid:33899971
  67. 67. Charakida M, de Groot E, Loukogeorgakis SP, Khan T, Luscher T, Kastelein JJ, et al. Variability and reproducibility of flow-mediated dilatation in a multicentre clinical trial. European heart journal. 2013;34(45):3501–7. pmid:23821401
  68. 68. Tomiyama H, Kohro T, Higashi Y, Takase B, Suzuki T, Ishizu T, et al. Reliability of measurement of endothelial function across multiple institutions and establishment of reference values in Japanese. Atherosclerosis. 2015;242(2):433–42. pmid:26291496
  69. 69. Hauser R, Nielsen AB, Skaarup KG, Lassen MCH, Duus LS, Johansen ND, et al. Left atrial strain predicts incident atrial fibrillation in the general population: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;23(1):52–60. pmid:34632488
  70. 70. Lavie CJ, Pandey A, Lau DH, Alpert MA, Sanders P. Obesity and Atrial Fibrillation Prevalence, Pathogenesis, and Prognosis: Effects of Weight Loss and Exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(16):2022–35. pmid:29025560
  71. 71. Li CY, Zhang JR, Hu WN, Li SN. Atrial fibrosis underlying atrial fibrillation (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2021;47(3). pmid:33448312
  72. 72. Elliott AD, Ariyaratnam J, Howden EJ, La Gerche A, Sanders P. Influence of exercise training on the left atrium: implications for atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023;325(4):H822–h36. pmid:37505470
  73. 73. Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, Finstuen JA, Foster MC, et al. Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Transthoracic Echocardiographic Examination in Adults: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(1):1–64. pmid:30282592
  74. 74. Badano LP, Kolias TJ, Muraru D, Abraham TP, Aurigemma G, Edvardsen T, et al. Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(6):591–600. pmid:29596561
  75. 75. Wisløff U, Støylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo Ø, Haram PM, et al. Superior Cardiovascular Effect of Aerobic Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Failure Patients. Circulation. 2007;115(24):3086–94.
  76. 76. Williams CJ, Gurd BJ, Bonafiglia JT, Voisin S, Li Z, Harvey N, et al. A Multi-Center Comparison of O2peak Trainability Between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training. Frontiers in Physiology. 2019;10.
  77. 77. Karlsen T, Aamot IL, Haykowsky M, Rognmo Ø. High Intensity Interval Training for Maximizing Health Outcomes. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;60(1):67–77. pmid:28385556
  78. 78. Streese L, Khan AW, Deiseroth A, Hussain S, Suades R, Tiaden A, et al. High-intensity interval training modulates retinal microvascular phenotype and DNA methylation of p66Shc gene: a randomized controlled trial (EXAMIN AGE). European Heart Journal. 2019;41(15):1514–9.
  79. 79. Streese L, Gander J, Carrard J, Hauser C, Hinrichs T, Schmidt-Trucksäss A, et al. Hypertension and retinal microvascular dysfunction (HyperVasc): protocol of a randomised controlled exercise trial in patients with hypertension. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e058997. pmid:35667713
  80. 80. Hecksteden A, Faude O, Meyer T, Donath L. How to Construct, Conduct and Analyze an Exercise Training Study? Front Physiol. 2018;9:1007. pmid:30140237
  81. 81. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). European Heart Journal. 2016;37(29):2315–81. pmid:27222591
  82. 82. Checa A, Khademi M, Sar DG, Haeggström JZ, Lundberg JO, Piehl F, et al. Hexosylceramides as intrathecal markers of worsening disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(10):1271–9. pmid:25480867
  83. 83. Fahy E, Subramaniam S, Brown HA, Glass CK, Merrill AH Jr, Murphy RC, et al. A comprehensive classification system for lipids. J Lipid Res. 2005;46(5):839–61. pmid:15722563
  84. 84. Fahy E, Subramaniam S, Murphy RC, Nishijima M, Raetz CR, Shimizu T, et al. Update of the LIPID MAPS comprehensive classification system for lipids. J Lipid Res. 2009;50 Suppl(Suppl):S9–14. pmid:19098281
  85. 85. Liebisch G, Fahy E, Aoki J, Dennis EA, Durand T, Ejsing CS, et al. Update on LIPID MAPS classification, nomenclature, and shorthand notation for MS-derived lipid structures. J Lipid Res. 2020;61(12):1539–55. pmid:33037133
  86. 86. Liebisch G, Vizcaíno JA, Köfeler H, Trötzmüller M, Griffiths WJ, Schmitz G, et al. Shorthand notation for lipid structures derived from mass spectrometry. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(6):1523–30. pmid:23549332
  87. 87. Carrard J, Gallart-Ayala H, Infanger D, Teav T, Wagner J, Knaier R, et al. Metabolic View on Human Healthspan: A Lipidome-Wide Association Study. Metabolites. 2021;11(5):287. pmid:33946321
  88. 88. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ. 2001;323(7321):1123–4.
  89. 89. Textor J, van der Zander B, Gilthorpe MS, Liśkiewicz M, Ellison GT. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ‘dagitty’. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2017;45(6):1887–94.
  90. 90. Cinelli C, Forney A, Pearl J. A crash course in good and bad controls. Available at SSRN 3689437. 2020.
  91. 91. Hochsmann C, Rossmeissl A, Baumann S, Infanger D, Schmidt-Trucksass A. Oxygen uptake during mini trampoline exercise in normal-weight, endurance-trained adults and in overweight-obese, inactive adults: A proof-of-concept study. European journal of sport science. 2018;18(5):753–61. pmid:29544075
  92. 92. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332. pmid:20332509
  93. 93. Guideline IHT, editor Clinical safety data management: definitions and standards for expedited reporting E2A. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use; 1994.
  94. 94. Papazoglou AS, Stalikas N, Moysidis DV, Otountzidis N, Kartas A, Karagiannidis E, et al. CERT2 ceramide- and phospholipid-based risk score and major adverse cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Lipidology. 2022;16(3):272–6. pmid:35219648